Explain why Scrum is used for complex work and how it differs from plan-driven approaches.
Identify how Agile values and principles show up in day-to-day Scrum behaviors and decisions.
Distinguish between iterative and incremental delivery using Scrum examples.
Recognize signs that a problem is complex (vs complicated) and choose an appropriate Scrum response.
Explain the concept of "inspect and adapt" and identify when adaptation should occur in Scrum.
Describe how transparency enables empirical decision-making in Scrum.
Distinguish between uncertainty in requirements vs uncertainty in solutions and how Scrum handles learning.
Choose an appropriate way to slice work into small, valuable increments (vertical slicing).
Explain how short feedback loops reduce risk without relying on heavy upfront planning.
Given a product scenario, decide whether Scrum is a suitable approach and justify the choice using Scrum principles.
Empiricism and Scrum Values
Define empiricism and name its three pillars (transparency, inspection, adaptation).
Apply the pillar of transparency to decide what information must be visible to the Scrum Team and stakeholders.
Identify whether inspection is happening effectively in a Sprint event or whether key inspection points are being skipped.
Choose the best adaptation action when new learning invalidates part of a plan during a Sprint.
Explain the five Scrum values (commitment, focus, openness, respect, courage) and how they appear in team behavior.
Recognize behaviors that violate Scrum values and choose a corrective coaching or facilitation action.
Distinguish between the Scrum value of commitment and a fixed-scope commitment.
Explain how a strong Definition of Done supports transparency and reduces rework.
Identify how psychological safety supports openness and meaningful inspection.
Given a conflict scenario, choose actions that maintain respect while encouraging constructive collaboration.
Scrum Framework Overview and Terminology
Identify the three Scrum accountabilities and describe their primary focus.
Explain how Scrum events and artifacts form a coherent, minimal framework for empirical product development.
Distinguish between Scrum accountabilities and traditional project management roles (for example, project manager).
Explain how a Sprint creates a cadence and supports predictability through frequent inspection and adaptation.
Identify which decisions are made by the Scrum Team versus external managers or stakeholders.
Describe what "self-managing" and "cross-functional" mean in Scrum and their implications for how work is done.
Use correct Scrum terminology in context (Increment, Sprint Goal, Product Goal, Definition of Done).
Distinguish between Product Backlog refinement and Sprint Planning based on purpose and outcomes.
Recognize common Scrum anti-patterns (extra ceremonies, phase gates inside the Sprint) and why they reduce empiricism.
Interpret a scenario and decide which Scrum component (event, artifact, accountability) needs adjustment to restore Scrum.
Scrum in Practice: Complexity, Adaptation, and Delivery
Apply Scrum concepts to a non-software context while keeping Scrum principles and terminology intact.
Identify what it means to cancel a Sprint and who has authority to cancel it.
Decide how to handle emergent work or urgent requests while protecting the Sprint Goal and maintaining transparency.
Explain how refinement supports future Sprints without locking in premature detail.
Distinguish between outputs and outcomes and use that distinction to evaluate product progress.
Given a partially complete Increment, decide whether it can be released and what conditions must be met.
Choose practices that reduce work in progress and increase flow within a Sprint.
Identify the impact of Sprint length on feedback frequency, risk, and adaptation.
Decide how to integrate stakeholders effectively without derailing the Scrum Team's focus.
Recognize when Scrum is being used as "waterfall in Sprints" and choose corrections that restore inspection and adaptation.
Scrum Team & Accountabilities (18%)
Scrum Team Characteristics and Responsibility
Describe the Scrum Team's responsibility for creating a valuable, useful Increment every Sprint.
Explain why the Scrum Team is designed to be small, cross-functional, and focused on a single product goal.
Identify what "cross-functional" means and how it reduces handoffs and delays.
Explain why Scrum has no sub-teams or titles within the Scrum Team and how that supports accountability.
Given a scenario of external interruptions, choose how the Scrum Team should protect focus while remaining transparent.
Decide how to manage dependencies on people outside the Scrum Team while maintaining self-management.
Identify how managers can support Scrum without overriding Scrum Team decisions.
Recognize when utilization-focused thinking conflicts with Scrum goals and choose better signals of progress.
Apply Scrum accountability concepts to decide who owns quality and how quality is ensured.
Choose approaches for onboarding new team members while maintaining sustainable delivery.
Product Owner Accountability (Value and Backlog Ownership)
Describe the Product Owner's accountability for maximizing product value.
Determine who is responsible for ordering the Product Backlog and what "ordering" means in practice.
Decide how the Product Owner collaborates with stakeholders while maintaining a single ordered Product Backlog.
Distinguish between the Product Owner accountability and related roles such as business analyst or sponsor.
Choose effective ways for a Product Owner to express Product Backlog items (for example, user stories or outcomes).
Identify when and how the Product Owner can delegate work while retaining accountability for value and backlog ordering.
Decide how to handle competing stakeholder requests and negotiate tradeoffs based on value and learning.
Explain how the Product Goal guides Product Backlog ordering and release decisions.
Recognize Product Owner anti-patterns (committee prioritization, absent PO, PO as note-taker) and choose corrections.
Given a scenario where Developers propose enabling technical work, choose how the Product Owner should respond to maximize value.
Scrum Master Accountability (Servant Leadership)
Describe the Scrum Master as a servant-leader for the Scrum Team and the organization.
Choose facilitation techniques that keep Scrum events within timebox and aligned to purpose.
Identify how the Scrum Master supports the Product Owner in effective Product Backlog management.
Identify how the Scrum Master supports the Developers in self-management and continuous improvement.
Decide when to coach, teach, facilitate, or intervene to help the Scrum Team improve.
Recognize when the Scrum Master is acting like a project manager or team secretary and choose corrective actions.
Decide how the Scrum Master should respond when management demands commitments that undermine empiricism.
Identify ways the Scrum Master helps the organization adopt Scrum (policies, structures, collaboration).
Choose responses when Scrum events are misused (for example, Daily Scrum becomes a status meeting).
Explain what it means for the Scrum Master to ensure Scrum is understood and enacted.
Developers Accountability (Delivery and Quality)
Describe Developers' accountability for creating the Sprint Backlog and delivering a Done Increment.
Explain how Developers decide how to accomplish work without task assignment by external roles.
Distinguish between commitment to the Sprint Goal and flexibility of the Sprint Backlog plan.
Decide how Developers should adjust the plan during the Sprint based on new information.
Explain why a shared Definition of Done is essential for quality and transparency.
Choose practices that reduce technical debt and support sustainable delivery within Scrum.
Decide how Developers collaborate with the Product Owner to clarify work without turning refinement into sign-off.
Recognize anti-patterns such as separating "developers" and "testers" into sub-teams and choose improvements.
Decide how Developers handle defects discovered during the Sprint while protecting the Sprint Goal.
Choose estimation and forecasting approaches that support inspection and adaptation (not fixed commitments).
Events & Timeboxes (23%)
The Sprint (Cadence and Focus)
Define the purpose of the Sprint and how it supports predictability through frequent inspection and adaptation.
Explain that a Sprint is timeboxed to one month or less and how Sprint length impacts feedback frequency and risk.
Decide what can change during a Sprint and what must remain stable to preserve focus.
Identify who can cancel a Sprint and under what conditions cancellation is appropriate.
Given a scenario, choose how to handle a major change in priority during a Sprint while maintaining transparency.
Decide how to handle urgent unplanned work requests during a Sprint without undermining the Sprint Goal.
Explain why quality should not decrease over time in Scrum and how the Definition of Done supports this.
Identify consequences of skipping or weakening Scrum events during a Sprint.
Choose what to do with unfinished work at the end of a Sprint in a Scrum-aligned way.
Recognize mini-waterfall phases inside a Sprint and choose changes that restore incremental delivery.
Sprint Planning (Goal and Plan)
State the purpose of Sprint Planning (timeboxed to a maximum of 8 hours for a one-month Sprint) and the outcomes it should produce (Sprint Goal and plan).
Identify who participates in Sprint Planning and what each accountability contributes.
Decide how to select Product Backlog items for a Sprint based on capacity and past performance.
Explain the three Sprint Planning topics (why, what, how) and apply them to a scenario.
Craft or evaluate a Sprint Goal that provides focus while allowing flexibility in scope.
Decide how to handle poorly refined or high-uncertainty backlog items during Sprint Planning.
Recognize when Sprint Planning becomes stakeholder negotiation and choose how to keep it a Scrum Team event.
Choose an estimation or forecasting approach appropriate for Sprint Planning.
Identify what information is needed to plan effectively (DoD, acceptance criteria, dependencies).
Recognize Sprint Planning anti-patterns (task assignment, over-committing, splitting into multiple meetings) and choose corrections.
Daily Scrum (Daily Planning)
State the purpose of the Daily Scrum and who it is primarily for (Developers).
Decide how to structure the Daily Scrum to inspect progress toward the Sprint Goal.
Explain why the traditional three questions are optional and how the Daily Scrum can be adapted.
Recognize when the Daily Scrum becomes a status meeting and choose interventions that restore daily planning.
Decide when the Scrum Master should participate in the Daily Scrum and when not.
Given an impediment discovered in the Daily Scrum, choose the most appropriate immediate next step.
Decide how to keep the Daily Scrum effective for remote or distributed teams.
Explain why the Daily Scrum is timeboxed to 15 minutes and choose facilitation practices that respect the timebox.
Identify how the Sprint Backlog should be updated based on daily inspection.
State the purpose of the Sprint Review (timeboxed to a maximum of 4 hours for a one-month Sprint) and how it supports inspection and adaptation of the Product Backlog.
Identify who attends the Sprint Review and how collaboration with stakeholders should work.
Decide what should be demonstrated at a Sprint Review (Done Increment) and what should not.
Interpret stakeholder feedback from a Sprint Review and decide how it should influence backlog ordering.
Recognize Sprint Review anti-patterns (sign-off meeting, slide deck status report) and choose corrections.
Decide how to handle stakeholder requests that emerge during the Sprint Review.
Explain how the Sprint Review differs from the Sprint Retrospective in purpose and focus.
Choose how to incorporate market/usage data and stakeholder feedback into product planning.
Determine what evidence best indicates value delivered during the Sprint Review.
Decide how to update forecasts or release expectations based on Sprint Review outcomes.
Sprint Retrospective (Process Improvement)
State the purpose of the Sprint Retrospective (timeboxed to a maximum of 3 hours for a one-month Sprint) and how it improves quality and effectiveness.
Identify who participates in the Retrospective and what facilitation role the Scrum Master plays.
Choose techniques to surface issues safely and produce actionable insights.
Decide how to select a small number of high-impact improvement actions and track them.
Recognize Retrospective anti-patterns (blame, skipping, "nothing to improve") and choose fixes.
Decide how to handle recurring impediments that require organizational change beyond the Scrum Team.
Distinguish between continuous improvement during the Sprint and improvements planned in the Retrospective.
Choose how to incorporate improvement actions into the Sprint Backlog without derailing delivery.
Identify measures that indicate whether Retrospective improvement actions are working.
Decide how to run effective Retrospectives for distributed teams.
Artifacts & Commitments (18%)
Product Backlog and Product Goal
Define the Product Backlog and describe its characteristics (emergent, ordered, single source of work).
Explain the Product Goal and how it provides longer-term direction for the Scrum Team.
Decide how to order Product Backlog items considering value, risk, dependencies, and learning.
Distinguish between a product roadmap and the Product Backlog and explain how they relate.
Choose an appropriate level of detail for Product Backlog items at different time horizons.
Determine who can add items to the Product Backlog and who is accountable for ordering it.