Free LLQP Accident & Sickness Full-Length Practice Exam: 30 Questions

This free full-length LLQP Accident & Sickness practice exam includes 30 original Finance Prep questions across the official LLQP competency areas.

These questions are for self-assessment. They are not official exam questions and do not imply affiliation with any exam sponsor or regulator.

Count note: this page uses the full-length practice count maintained in the Mastery exam catalog. Some regulators and exam providers publish total questions, scored questions, duration, or pilot-item rules differently; always confirm exam-day rules with your licensing body or exam provider.

Need concept review first? Read the LLQP Accident & Sickness cheat sheet for disability, health, accident, critical illness, underwriting, claims, taxation, and client-need cues before starting another diagnostic.

Exam snapshot

Full-length exam mix

Practice questions

Questions 1-25

Question 1

Topic: Assess the Client’s Needs and Situation

Maya (34) lives in Vancouver and travels to the U.S. for short work trips about 6–8 times a year. She is planning a 21-day vacation to Portugal. Her employer group benefits booklet shows out-of-country emergency medical coverage up to $500,000 for a maximum of 15 days per trip. She has no other travel insurance.

Which advisor statement is INCORRECT?

• A. “Given your travel frequency and this longer trip, we should discuss whether a top-up for the extra days or an annual multi-trip travel medical plan fits your needs.”
• B. “Because your group plan already includes out-of-country emergency medical coverage, you don’t need any additional travel medical coverage for the 21-day Portugal trip.”
• C. “Let’s confirm the maximum number of covered days per trip and whether your 21-day trip exceeds that limit.”
• D. “We should also review your destinations and how you would access emergency assistance while abroad, since out-of-country emergencies can be costly and require coordination.”

Best answer: B

What this tests: Needs Analysis

Explanation: This question tests needs assessment for travel medical coverage (out-of-country emergency medical). A key part of assessing the need is identifying gaps created by common plan limits—especially the maximum number of days covered per trip and the maximum dollar limit.

Here, the group plan clearly limits coverage to 15 days per trip, but the client’s vacation is 21 days. That creates a potential uninsured period (the additional 6 days), which is a material risk because medical emergencies outside Canada can generate very high costs. An advisor should therefore verify the exact limits and discuss options to cover the gap (such as a top-up for additional days or an annual multi-trip plan given frequent travel), rather than assuming the group plan is sufficient.

This ignores a stated, material limit: the group coverage is capped at 15 days per trip, while the planned trip is 21 days. The client could be uninsured for the extra days.

Question 2

Topic: Assess the Client’s Needs and Situation

Priya bought an individual disability insurance policy when she was a salaried employee with 90 days of employer sick leave. She is now self-employed after a promotion into a managerial role and has only enough savings to cover 2 weeks of expenses if she cannot work.

Which single policy attribute should the agent compare to her new situation first to assess whether her existing coverage is still suitable?

• A. The definition of disability (own occupation vs any occupation)
• B. The renewability/guarantee provisions (non-cancellable vs guaranteed renewable vs cancellable)
• C. The benefit period (how long benefits can be paid)
• D. The elimination period (waiting period) before benefits start

Best answer: D

What this tests: Needs Analysis

Explanation: This question tests needs assessment when a client’s employment situation changes, specifically the impact on short-term cash flow during disability.

When Priya moved from employee to self-employed, she lost employer sick leave that previously helped her bridge the first 90 days of disability. Now she has only 2 weeks of savings, so the most urgent mismatch is when benefits would start under her current policy.

In disability insurance, the elimination period (waiting period) determines how long the client must wait after becoming disabled before benefits are payable. If the elimination period is longer than the client can self-fund, the policy may be unsuitable even if the monthly benefit and long-term duration are otherwise adequate.

With no employer sick leave and limited savings, the timing of when benefits begin is the key suitability issue. A 90-day elimination period could leave a major short-term cash-flow gap.

Question 3

Topic: Assess the Client’s Needs and Situation

When estimating how long a client can cover expenses from savings during an illness or injury, which disability insurance term refers to the time the client must wait after becoming disabled before benefits are payable?

• A. Coinsurance (copayment)
• B. Deductible
• C. Benefit period
• D. Elimination period

Best answer: D

What this tests: Needs Analysis

Explanation: In disability insurance, cash-flow planning often starts with the client’s monthly fixed and variable expenses and the resources available to cover them (savings, emergency fund, sick leave, etc.). A key term that links the budget to the plan design is the elimination period (also called the waiting period).

The elimination period is the length of time after the onset of disability during which no disability income benefits are payable. Choosing an elimination period is therefore a practical budgeting decision: the client needs enough cash flow (savings or other income sources) to cover essential expenses until benefits begin.

By contrast, other A&S terms relate to different parts of the coverage: how long benefits can last (benefit period) or how health expenses are shared (deductible/coinsurance).

This is the waiting period between the start of disability and when the insurer starts paying benefits, so it directly connects to how long the client can self-fund expenses.

Question 4

Topic: Assess the Client’s Needs and Situation

Nina earns a gross salary of $6,000 per month. Her employer group LTD benefit is 60% of gross salary with a 120-day waiting period. The employer pays the LTD premiums, and the benefits are taxable; assume a 30% tax rate on the LTD benefit.

Nina also has an individual disability policy that pays $1,500 per month, has a 90-day waiting period, and she pays the premiums herself (benefits are non-taxable).

Once both benefits are payable, what is Nina’s total monthly after-tax disability income from these coverages (ignore any offsets)?

• A. $4,650
• B. $3,600
• C. $5,100
• D. $4,020

Best answer: D

What this tests: Needs Analysis

Explanation: This question tests how to summarize existing disability coverage features (benefit amount, waiting period, and taxability) and translate them into a practical estimate of monthly income available during disability.

Step 1: Calculate the group LTD monthly benefit.

• 60% of $6,000 = $3,600 per month (gross).

Step 2: Apply tax because the employer pays the premiums (benefit is taxable in this question).

• Net group LTD = $3,600 × (1 − 0.30) = $2,520.

Step 3: Add the individual DI benefit.

• The individual benefit is $1,500 per month and is stated to be non-taxable, so it stays $1,500.

Total after-tax disability income once both are payable:

• $2,520 + $1,500 = $4,020 per month.

Waiting periods matter for when each benefit starts (90 days for the individual policy and 120 days for group LTD). The question asks for the amount once both are payable, not the timing.

Group LTD is $3,600 gross, taxable at 30%, so net $2,520. Add $1,500 non-taxable individual benefit: $2,520 + $1,500 = $4,020.

Question 5

Topic: Analyze the Available Products That Meet the Client’s Needs

Sonia is 42 and is considering an individual long-term care (LTC) policy to protect her retirement savings. She expects she may not claim for 30+ years and wants the benefit to keep pace with rising care costs.

Policy excerpt (benefit schedule snippet):

Based only on the excerpt, which inflation option best matches Sonia’s long planning horizon and desire for the strongest predictable increase in benefit value?

• A. 3% simple
• B. CPI-linked (0%–5%)
• C. No inflation protection
• D. 3% compound

Best answer: D

What this tests: Product Analysis

Explanation: This question tests why inflation protection is important in long-term care (LTC) planning and how to match an inflation option to a younger applicant with a long time horizon.

Over long time periods, inflation can significantly erode the buying power of a fixed LTC benefit. If care costs rise, a benefit that looks adequate today may be insufficient decades later, increasing the chance the client must draw more heavily on personal savings.

The excerpt contrasts how increases are calculated:

• With simple inflation, the increase is based on the original benefit amount each year.
• With compound inflation, the increase is based on the already-increased benefit, so growth accelerates over time.

Because Sonia expects a 30+ year horizon and wants the strongest predictable increase, the excerpt indicates the compound option provides the largest projected benefit after 30 years.

The excerpt shows this option applies increases to the current benefit each year and produces the highest stated projected daily benefit after 30 years ($485/day).

Question 6

Topic: Assess the Client’s Needs and Situation

Jordan, 35, is self-employed and has no employer group benefits. He asks if he can “just rely on government programs” instead of buying disability insurance because he already has provincial health coverage. As his insurance representative, which explanation best describes how public programs fit into his existing coverage layer—and why they may still leave gaps?

• A. Workers’ compensation provides disability income for any illness or injury, so the main public-program question is only whether Jordan has provincial health coverage.
• B. Provincial health plans mainly cover medically necessary hospital and physician services, but they generally do not replace employment income; EI sickness (if eligible and paying in) can provide short-term income support; CPP/QPP disability may help only in severe/prolonged disability; and workers’ compensation is typically limited to work-related injuries/illnesses—so relying only on public programs can leave income and expense gaps.
• C. CPP/QPP disability replaces income for short-term disabilities, while EI sickness is mainly for permanent disabilities, so Jordan should only confirm which one he qualifies for.
• D. Provincial health plans cover most medical and dental costs, EI sickness replaces long-term income, and CPP/QPP disability fills any remaining gap, so individual disability insurance is usually unnecessary.

Best answer: B

What this tests: Needs Analysis

Explanation: This question tests how public programs can be described as part of a client’s “coverage layer” in Canada and why they may not be sufficient on their own.

At a high level:

• Provincial/territorial health insurance plans typically pay for medically necessary hospital and physician services. They generally do not replace employment income and may not cover many out-of-pocket items (for example, some drugs, dental care, paramedical services, or private home care) depending on the situation.
• EI sickness benefits (when a person is eligible and has insurable employment) are generally a short-term income support layer.
• CPP/QPP disability is generally aimed at severe and prolonged disability situations, not brief absences.
• Workers’ compensation generally applies to work-related injury or illness and is not a universal disability plan for any cause.

Because each program has eligibility rules, time/definition limits, and scope limits, an advisor should treat them as partial building blocks—and then assess the client’s income needs, essential expenses, and coverage gaps before recommending private coverage.

This choice correctly positions public programs as a partial “base layer” with important limits: provincial plans focus on core medical services, EI sickness is generally short-term and eligibility-based, CPP/QPP disability is for more serious long-term situations, and workers’ compensation is tied to work-related events.

Question 7

Topic: Provide Customer Service During the Validity Period of the Coverage

In an individual disability income claim, how can a rehabilitation or gradual return-to-work plan typically affect benefit payments and the claimant’s obligations?

• A. Under rehabilitation programs, the claimant typically keeps the full disability benefit while also earning employment income, because benefits are not intended to change during recovery.
• B. The claimant can refuse rehabilitation or return-to-work activities without any impact on benefits because disability insurance has no expectation that the claimant will mitigate the loss.
• C. Any return to work automatically ends all disability benefits, even if the claimant still has a significant loss of income due to illness or injury.
• D. If the claimant can work part-time, the insurer may pay a partial (residual) disability benefit based on the remaining loss of income, and the claimant is generally expected to cooperate with reasonable rehabilitation/return-to-work efforts to help recovery.

Best answer: D

What this tests: In-force Service

Explanation: Rehabilitation and return-to-work programs are designed to help a disabled claimant recover function and re-enter the workforce safely. In disability income insurance, this often connects to partial (residual) disability concepts:

• If a claimant can return to work part-time or with reduced capacity, they may no longer qualify for a full disability benefit.
• Many contracts provide a partial/residual benefit when the claimant still meets the policy’s criteria for partial disability and continues to have a measurable loss of income.

From a service perspective, the claimant is typically expected to take reasonable steps to support recovery and reduce the duration/severity of the disability. Cooperation with reasonable rehabilitation or return-to-work efforts is commonly an expectation, and failure to cooperate may put ongoing benefit eligibility at risk (based on the contract terms and the facts).

This reflects the common purpose of rehabilitation/return-to-work programs: encourage recovery and reduce income loss, while allowing benefits to continue in a reduced form when the claimant is only partially disabled.

Question 8

Topic: Implement a Recommendation Adapted to the Client’s Needs and Situation

Sanjay, age 45, joined a mid-size employer 10 months ago and declined the group benefits plan at hire. He now wants to enroll because he was diagnosed with diabetes 2 months ago and expects the plan to pay for related medications and to replace income if he later can’t work.

The employee booklet states: “If you enroll more than 60 days after first becoming eligible, you are a late entrant. Late entrants must provide evidence of insurability for LTD. For late entrants, expenses or disabilities related to a condition that was diagnosed, treated, or had medication prescribed in the 3 months before coverage takes effect are not covered for the first 12 months.”

As the advisor helping with enrollment, what is the BEST recommendation to set appropriate expectations and implement the coverage appropriately?

• A. Tell Sanjay that once his premiums are deducted, diabetes medications and any diabetes-related disability will be covered immediately, because it is a group plan.
• B. Proceed with enrollment now, explain that LTD may require evidence of insurability, and clearly warn that diabetes-related claims may be limited by the 12-month pre-existing condition clause while still providing coverage for unrelated conditions.
• C. Recommend that Sanjay skip the group plan and buy an individual disability and health policy that will cover his diabetes immediately, and remind him that he does not need to disclose diabetes if it was only diagnosed recently.
• D. Advise Sanjay to delay joining the plan until he has gone at least 12 months without diabetes treatment so the pre-existing condition limitation won’t apply.

Best answer: B

What this tests: Recommendation Implementation

Explanation: This scenario tests how to apply (and explain) late entrant rules and pre-existing condition clauses when implementing group disability and health coverage.

Why these rules exist (at a high level):

• Pre-existing condition clauses help prevent adverse selection—people waiting until they are already ill or have predictable expenses, then enrolling only to claim right away. This supports affordability and fairness for the whole group.
• Late entrant rules reinforce timely enrollment. When someone joins outside the initial eligibility window, the plan may impose extra conditions such as evidence of insurability (EOI) for LTD and/or stronger or specified pre-existing condition limitations.

How they affect claim eligibility:

• Even if coverage becomes active and premiums are paid, a claim can still be excluded or limited if it relates to a condition captured by the plan’s pre-existing condition definition during the stated look-back period.
• For LTD, a late entrant may also need to be approved through underwriting (EOI) before LTD coverage is granted.

So the best implementation approach is to enroll the client (so they can gain coverage for unrelated conditions) while clearly disclosing and explaining that diabetes-related medication expenses and a diabetes-related disability claim may not be payable during the plan’s stated limitation period.

This matches the plan’s stated late entrant and pre-existing condition rules, sets realistic expectations about claim eligibility, and implements the coverage correctly (including the possible need for evidence of insurability).

Question 9

Topic: Implement a Recommendation Adapted to the Client’s Needs and Situation

Sonia is joining her employer’s group benefits plan and asks you whether the plan covers massage therapy and what the annual maximum is. She also asks who actually “owns” the policy. You want to give an accurate answer without guessing.

What is the most appropriate next step?

• A. Rely on the employer’s HR department’s verbal description of the benefits because the certificate is only a marketing summary.
• B. Review Sonia’s member certificate/benefit booklet for the massage therapy details, and explain that the master contract is between the insurer and the employer (plan sponsor).
• C. Submit a test claim for massage therapy to see what the insurer reimburses, then use that result to explain coverage and limits.
• D. Request a copy of the master contract from the insurer and tell Sonia she is the policyholder because the coverage is in her name.

Best answer: B

What this tests: Recommendation Implementation

Explanation: This question tests where to find group plan coverage details and who the contracting parties are.

A group benefits plan is governed by a master contract issued by the insurer to the plan sponsor (typically the employer). Employees are plan members/insured persons, and they usually receive a member certificate/benefit booklet that summarizes how the plan works: covered services, eligibility notes, deductibles/coinsurance (if any), maximums, and the claims process.

In day-to-day advising and service, the first and most practical document to consult for “Is massage therapy covered?” and “What is the annual maximum?” is the member certificate/benefit booklet. If a discrepancy arises, the master contract is the controlling agreement, but it is not the starting point for routine questions.

The certificate/booklet is the member-facing document that summarizes covered services, limits, and claims steps. In a group plan, the employer (plan sponsor) is typically the policyholder under the master contract, not the individual employee.

Question 10

Topic: Assess the Client’s Needs and Situation

In accident & sickness (A&S) planning for a small business, which description best identifies a key person for business continuity purposes?

• A. Any employee who is covered under the employer’s group LTD plan
• B. The person who owns the largest percentage of the business shares
• C. The individual whose illness or injury would materially disrupt operations or revenue, regardless of whether they are an owner, partner, or employee
• D. The person authorized to sign contracts and cheques for the business

Best answer: C

What this tests: Needs Analysis

Explanation: This question tests identifying the key role that drives A&S business continuity exposure. In practice, business continuity risk from illness or injury depends on whether the business can keep operating and generating revenue if a specific person becomes disabled.

A key person is the person whose absence would cause a major interruption—because they generate sales, manage critical relationships, perform specialized work, or make essential operational decisions. That person might be a sole proprietor, a partner, an incorporated owner, or a non-owner employee.

Ownership structure (sole proprietor, partnership, corporation) helps you understand who has legal control and financial stakes, but the continuity exposure is often tied to the operationally essential individual(s).

A key person is identified by operational importance (skills, relationships, decision-making), not by the legal ownership structure.

Question 11

Topic: Provide Customer Service During the Validity Period of the Coverage

An insured misses several disability insurance premium payments and the policy goes past the grace period. The client asks what the practical impact is and what “reinstatement” could involve. Which statement is most accurate at a general LLQP level?

• A. The coverage can lapse after the grace period, creating a gap in protection; to reinstate, the insurer may require back premiums and new evidence of insurability, so the client should act quickly to avoid an uncovered period.
• B. If the client becomes disabled during the missed-payment period, reinstatement will automatically make the claim payable retroactively once premiums are caught up.
• C. If the policy lapses, reinstatement simply restarts coverage with no further requirements because the insurer already accepted the client at issue.
• D. As long as the client intends to pay, the policy stays in force and claims will be paid even if premiums are overdue.

Best answer: A

What this tests: In-force Service

Explanation: This question tests customer service knowledge (C4) about what can happen when premiums are missed on an A&S policy.

If premiums are not paid, the policy usually provides a short grace period during which coverage may remain in force while the overdue premium is still payable. If payment is not made by the end of the grace period, the policy can lapse, meaning coverage may end and the client can face a coverage gap.

If the client later asks to put the policy back in force, reinstatement may be possible but is not automatic. Because the insurer is being asked to accept the risk again after a lapse, it may require:

• Payment of overdue premiums (and possibly interest, depending on the contract)
• Evidence of insurability (for example, updated health/occupation/income information) to confirm the risk has not materially changed

From a client-impact and prevention standpoint, the best service message is: act quickly, contact the insurer/advisor immediately, and use strategies like pre-authorized debit or calendar reminders to reduce the chance of a lapse and an uninsured period.

Missing premiums beyond the grace period can end coverage (lapse). Reinstatement is not automatic and may require proof of continued insurability plus payment of amounts owed, so early action helps prevent a gap.

Question 12

Topic: Implement a Recommendation Adapted to the Client’s Needs and Situation

Sana, age 38, is leaving her full-time job in 2 weeks to become self-employed. Her current employer plan includes LTD, but it will end when she leaves. She wants individual disability insurance that can replace about $4,000/month and can afford only a modest premium. She has a 3‑month emergency fund and takes a prescription for anxiety.

What is the best recommendation that fits her situation and anticipates underwriting requirements and timing?

• A. Apply immediately for individual disability insurance with a 90‑day elimination period and a long benefit period (e.g., to age 65), and advise her to be ready to provide income verification and possible medical evidence; if possible, avoid ending the group LTD until the individual policy is in force.
• B. Recommend an accident-only disability plan because it is more likely to be issued quickly and her main risk is injury when she starts working for herself.
• C. Recommend critical illness insurance instead of disability insurance to avoid delays from income verification and because it provides a lump sum that can cover bills while she recovers.
• D. Wait until she is self-employed for a few months so her new income is established, then apply for disability insurance once underwriting can confirm her earnings.

Best answer: A

What this tests: Recommendation Implementation

Explanation: This item tests implementation and underwriting planning for individual disability insurance.

In Sana’s situation, two constraints drive the recommendation:

• Timing risk: her group LTD ends in 2 weeks. Individual DI generally requires underwriting, and underwriting may request additional medical evidence (for example, details related to prescriptions/health history) and financial evidence (especially for self-employment or when income is changing). That can affect how quickly coverage can be placed.
• Affordability + cash flow: she has a 3-month emergency fund, which supports choosing a longer elimination period (such as 90 days) so the premium is more likely to fit a modest budget. At the same time, her need is long-term income replacement, which points to a long benefit period rather than a short-term benefit.

A practical implementation approach is therefore: apply right away, disclose accurately, prepare the likely evidence (income/occupation ensure the benefit amount is supportable; medical evidence supports insurability), and manage the transition so she does not voluntarily give up existing coverage before the new policy is in force (when possible).

This uses her emergency fund to support a longer elimination period (often lowering cost), targets long-term income risk with a long benefit period, and sets realistic expectations that underwriting may request financial and medical evidence and may not be completed before her group plan ends.

Question 13

Topic: Analyze the Available Products That Meet the Client’s Needs

Maya is covered under an individual dental plan and has not had any dental claims this calendar year. She is scheduled for two crowns (a major service) with total eligible charges of $3,000.

Exhibit (Dental plan summary):

Based on the exhibit, what is the maximum the plan would pay for the crowns this year?

• A. $1,475
• B. $1,450
• C. $0
• D. $1,500

Best answer: A

What this tests: Product Analysis

Explanation: This question tests how to interpret a dental benefits schedule using three common components:

• Deductible: the amount the insured pays before the plan starts paying (here, $50 per person for the year, and it applies to Basic and Major; Preventive is waived).
• Coinsurance: the percentage split of eligible costs between the plan and the insured (here, Major is reimbursed at 50%).
• Annual maximum: a yearly cap on what the plan will pay for certain categories (here, a $1,500 cap for Basic + Major combined).

Application to Maya’s crowns (Major service):

1. Apply the annual deductible: eligible $3,000 − $50 = $2,950.
2. Apply Major coinsurance: plan pays 50% of $2,950 = $1,475.
3. Check the annual maximum: $1,475 is below the $1,500 cap, so the plan pays $1,475.

The deductible applies to major services, then the plan pays 50% coinsurance, and the result is still below the $1,500 annual maximum for Basic + Major combined.

Question 14

Topic: Implement a Recommendation Adapted to the Client’s Needs and Situation

When documenting the suitability of a disability insurance (DI) recommendation, which statement about the general Canadian tax treatment of DI benefits is most accurate when the tax result depends on who paid the premiums?

• A. If premiums are shared between employer and employee, DI benefits are always 50% taxable.
• B. If the employer pays the DI premiums, DI benefits are generally not taxable to the employee.
• C. Who pays the DI premiums does not affect whether benefits are taxable; only the type of disability matters.
• D. If the employee pays the DI premiums personally (after-tax), DI benefits are generally not taxable to the employee.

Best answer: D

What this tests: Recommendation Implementation

Explanation: This question tests a high-level tax principle that also supports suitable implementation and documentation. For disability insurance, a key suitability note is who pays the premiums, because the tax treatment of benefits is commonly tied to that fact.

At an exam-appropriate level, the general direction is:

• Employee-paid premiums (typically with after-tax dollars) → benefits are generally not taxable to the employee.
• Employer-paid premiums → benefits are generally taxable to the employee.

Because this can affect the client’s net income replacement, an advisor should document the premium payor (employer vs employee) and explain the expected general tax direction, without promising a specific tax outcome.

This is the commonly taught principle: benefits are generally received tax-free when the employee paid the premiums personally.

Question 15

Topic: Implement a Recommendation Adapted to the Client’s Needs and Situation

You are delivering a disability insurance recommendation to Mira. Use the exhibit to choose the best follow-up that confirms understanding in plain language and supports proper documentation.

Exhibit (Recommendation summary you prepared)

• A. Avoid discussing the pre-existing condition limitation unless Mira asks, to prevent confusion during delivery.
• B. Ask Mira if she understands the recommendation and proceed if she says yes, because the written summary already lists the main terms.
• C. Ask Mira to explain back how the $3,000 benefit, 90-day waiting period, the change in disability definition after 24 months, and the pre-existing condition limitation would affect her, then document her questions and your answers in the file.
• D. Tell Mira to review the insurer’s policy wording on her own and contact the insurer directly with any questions; no additional notes are needed if she takes the documents.

Best answer: C

What this tests: Recommendation Implementation

Explanation: This item tests how an advisor should communicate and confirm understanding when implementing an A&S recommendation (delivery). The exhibit includes several terms that commonly cause confusion and can materially affect claim outcomes: the elimination period, the benefit amount, the change in definition of disability after 24 months, and a pre-existing condition limitation.

A best-practice delivery approach is to:

• Explain the key terms in plain language.
• Use a teach-back prompt (have the client summarize in their own words) to confirm understanding.
• Ensure limitations/exclusions that could reduce or deny benefits are clearly disclosed.
• Document the client’s questions and the advisor’s answers to create a clear file record.

This is part of implementing a recommendation in a way that is suitable and defensible—not just providing paperwork.

This uses teach-back to confirm understanding of the key terms shown in the summary, highlights the limitation in plain language, and creates a clear record of the client’s questions and your responses.

Question 16

Topic: Assess the Client’s Needs and Situation

Meera, age 34, is self-employed and wants disability insurance to protect her income. She mentions she has had intermittent migraines and takes prescription medication “once in a while.” She is price-sensitive and asks if she really needs to include this in the application.

Which action by the insurance agent is INCORRECT from a consumer-protection (suitability and disclosure) perspective?

• A. Suggest that Meera leave the migraines off the application since they are intermittent and might make the coverage more expensive.
• B. Explain that policies often contain limitations and exclusions (for example, pre-existing condition limitations) and that these should be reviewed at delivery so Meera understands what is and is not covered.
• C. Document Meera’s needs, budget constraints, and the discussion about disclosure, and confirm her understanding before proceeding.
• D. Explain that complete and accurate health information is required and that the insurer will decide how (or whether) the migraines affect coverage.

Best answer: A

What this tests: Needs Analysis

Explanation: This question tests consumer-protection best practices in A&S sales: suitability, accurate disclosure, and clear explanation of limitations/exclusions.

In disability insurance, the insurer’s underwriting decision depends on the information provided in the application. Advising a client to omit or minimize relevant health information (such as intermittent migraines treated with medication) is inappropriate. It can lead to problems later, including disputes about coverage, claim delays/denials, or other adverse outcomes if the omitted information is discovered.

Good practice is to (1) obtain full and accurate disclosure, (2) avoid promising outcomes, (3) document the needs analysis and key discussions, and (4) clearly explain that limitations/exclusions may apply and should be reviewed with the client when the policy is delivered.

Encouraging nondisclosure undermines the duty of accurate disclosure and can jeopardize the client’s coverage or claim.

Question 17

Topic: Analyze the Available Products That Meet the Client’s Needs

A client travelling to the U.S. says, “I’ll just use my provincial health card if something happens.” What is the most likely coverage outcome without private travel medical insurance if the client has an emergency hospitalization abroad?

• A. The provincial plan will pay the full hospital bill abroad as long as the care is medically necessary.
• B. The provincial plan will generally pay only limited eligible amounts, so the client may face significant out-of-pocket costs and have no travel assistance services to coordinate care and transportation.
• C. The provincial plan will not pay anything for emergency medical treatment outside Canada, so private coverage is always mandatory to receive care.
• D. The provincial plan will cover emergency treatment costs, and travel medical insurance is mainly for trip cancellation and lost baggage.

Best answer: B

What this tests: Product Analysis

Explanation: Travel medical insurance is used to protect clients from the potentially high cost of out-of-country emergency medical care and to provide assistance services that help manage an emergency away from home.

Relying only on a provincial health plan can be risky because provincial plans often reimburse only limited eligible amounts for medical services received outside Canada, while foreign hospitals (especially in the U.S.) may charge much more. The result can be a large coverage gap that becomes the client’s responsibility.

Private travel medical insurance commonly addresses two needs:

• Emergency coverage: pays eligible emergency medical expenses incurred while travelling.
• Assistance services: 24/7 support that can help coordinate care (finding appropriate facilities, arranging payment methods, coordinating medical transport/repatriation, and helping with logistics during an emergency).

The key product-analysis point is that travel medical insurance is not just “extra”—it can be essential asset protection because a single emergency abroad can create very large, immediate expenses and complex coordination needs.

Provincial plans typically reimburse only limited amounts for out-of-country emergency care, and they do not provide the full suite of travel assistance (24/7 support, arranging payment, repatriation coordination). Private travel medical insurance is designed to cover these gaps.

Question 18

Topic: Analyze the Available Products That Meet the Client’s Needs

Tara, age 29, is an employee with 5 paid sick days. Her employer’s group plan provides short-term disability (STD) for up to 15 weeks and long-term disability (LTD) starting after a 15-week elimination period. She asks how EI sickness benefits would fit if she became too ill to work for 6 months.

Which statement is INCORRECT?

• A. STD is designed for short-duration disabilities and commonly bridges the gap after sick leave and before LTD begins.
• B. Employer-paid sick leave typically applies first, because it is continued salary for a limited number of days.
• C. EI sickness benefits generally become the long-term payer and are expected to continue as long as the disability lasts, after LTD ends.
• D. EI sickness benefits are time-limited and may help provide temporary income replacement when a person is not being paid through employer sick leave or an employer STD plan.

Best answer: C

What this tests: Product Analysis

Explanation: This question tests how to distinguish common income-replacement “layers” and the typical order in which they may apply.

• Employer sick leave is usually the first source of income during a short absence because it is continued wages for a set number of days.
• Short-term disability (STD) is intended for temporary disabilities and often starts after sick leave ends, for a limited period.
• Long-term disability (LTD) is intended for longer-lasting disabilities and usually begins after a waiting/elimination period (often aligned with when STD ends).
• EI sickness benefits are a government program that can provide temporary, time-limited income replacement in some situations (for example, when the person is not being paid through employer sick leave/STD). It is not designed to act as an indefinite, long-term disability benefit.

In Tara’s case, the plan structure clearly indicates sick leave first, then STD up to 15 weeks, then LTD starting after the 15-week elimination period. The incorrect statement is the one that treats EI sickness benefits as the long-term payer that continues for as long as the disability lasts.

This misrepresents EI sickness benefits: they are intended as temporary support and are time-limited, not a long-term replacement that continues for the duration of a disability.

Question 19

Topic: Implement a Recommendation Adapted to the Client’s Needs and Situation

A landscaping company with 12 employees wants to replace its current group health and dental plan effective next month. The owner says some employees may waive coverage due to spouse plans, and two employees were not covered under the current plan but now want in. As the advisor, what is the most appropriate next step to support underwriting and implementation?

• A. Advise the owner to exclude employees who previously declined coverage so the group plan can be issued without evidence of insurability concerns.
• B. Collect full medical questionnaires from every employee immediately because group plans always require individual medical underwriting.
• C. Submit the group application now and let the insurer determine participation and eligibility after the effective date.
• D. Request an employee census and planned elections/waivers, and obtain details of the current plan and any available claims/experience information before finalizing the submission.

Best answer: D

What this tests: Recommendation Implementation

Explanation: This question tests group plan underwriting inputs and the advisor’s next step (small business A&S implementation). At a high level, group underwriting decisions are driven by factors such as:

• Participation and eligibility/classing: how many eligible employees will enroll, who is waiving, and whether classes (e.g., owners vs employees, full-time vs part-time) are set up consistently.
• Plan design: what benefits and limits are being requested and whether they align with insurer small-group guidelines.
• Replacement and experience: if the employer is replacing an existing plan, insurers may consider available claims/experience information (when provided) as part of the underwriting review.
• Late entrants and evidence rules: employees who did not enroll when first eligible (or who are newly requesting coverage outside normal enrollment windows) may be treated as late entrants, which often triggers evidence of insurability rules for some coverages.

The practical workflow step that supports all of these is to gather a complete employee census plus election/waiver intentions and current-plan details before finalizing the submission and setting expectations.

Underwriting for small-group plans commonly depends on participation, plan design/classing, and—when replacing coverage—available experience information. The census also helps identify potential late entrants and whether evidence of insurability may apply.

Question 20

Topic: Analyze the Available Products That Meet the Client’s Needs

Mina (34) is self-employed in Alberta and has no employer benefits. She is worried about having to use savings to pay for a new long-term prescription medication her doctor expects she will need for years. She asks what supplementary (extended) health insurance mainly does beyond provincial health coverage.

Which product attribute is the most relevant to her concern?

• A. Coverage for outpatient prescription drugs (for example, drugs purchased at a pharmacy)
• B. Coverage for medically necessary physician visits billed under the provincial plan
• C. Coverage for emergency hospital services provided in Canada
• D. Coverage for elective cosmetic procedures

Best answer: A

What this tests: Product Analysis

Explanation: This question tests the role of supplementary (extended) health insurance in Canada: it is designed to help cover common gaps beyond provincially/territorially funded health care.

Across Canada, provinces/territories generally cover medically necessary hospital and physician services. Many other costs that can create out-of-pocket exposure—such as outpatient prescription drugs, dental care, vision care, and some paramedical services—are often only partially covered or not covered at all by public plans. Extended health insurance helps reduce the risk that a client must use savings to pay those expenses.

Mina’s concern is specifically the long-term cost of a medication purchased at a pharmacy, which is a classic “gap” extended health insurance is intended to address.

Provincial/territorial plans generally cover medically necessary hospital and physician services, but outpatient prescription drugs are a common gap that extended health plans can help fill.

Question 21

Topic: Analyze the Available Products That Meet the Client’s Needs

In coordination of benefits for extended health/dental, an employee is covered under their own employer plan and is also covered as a dependent under their spouse’s plan. Which statement correctly describes how the claim is typically paid to avoid overpayment?

• A. The plan with the higher annual maximum always pays first, regardless of who is the plan member.
• B. Both plans automatically split the claim 50/50 so the employee receives the full benefit quickly.
• C. The employee’s own plan pays first, then the spouse’s plan may pay some or all of the remaining eligible amount, but total reimbursement cannot exceed the actual expense.
• D. The employee can choose which plan pays first, and then collect full reimbursement from the other plan as well.

Best answer: C

What this tests: Product Analysis

Explanation: Coordination of benefits (COB) is designed to prevent duplicate payment when a person is covered by more than one extended health/dental plan. The key idea is primary vs secondary payer:

• The primary plan pays first according to its contract (eligibility, deductibles, coinsurance, and limits).
• The secondary plan then considers the unpaid balance and may pay additional amounts only to the extent allowed under its contract.
• Across both plans, the claimant should not receive more than 100% of the actual expense.

In practice, this commonly means the person’s own plan is primary when they are the plan member, and a spouse’s plan is secondary when the person is covered as a dependent.

Coordination of benefits uses a primary/secondary payer order and caps total payment at the actual cost of the service.

Question 22

Topic: Analyze the Available Products That Meet the Client’s Needs

In an individual disability income (DI) policy, what does the term elimination period mean?

• A. The waiting time after the start of a covered disability before benefits become payable
• B. The period during which the policy is in force but the insurer can cancel it at any time
• C. The maximum length of time the policy will pay benefits for one disability
• D. The time window after policy issue during which pre-existing conditions are excluded from coverage

Best answer: A

What this tests: Product Analysis

Explanation: The elimination period is a core disability income policy feature that affects when benefits start. It is the time the insured must be continuously disabled (from illness or injury) before the policy begins paying the monthly benefit.

In practice, elimination periods are often coordinated with other income sources (such as employer sick leave or group short-term disability) so the client is not paying for overlapping coverage and can better manage premium costs. The elimination period is different from the benefit period, which determines how long benefits can continue once they start.

This is the standard DI meaning of elimination period (also called the waiting period): the insured must be continuously disabled for this time before the policy starts paying.

Question 23

Topic: Assess the Client’s Needs and Situation

Nora, age 36, works full-time as an administrative assistant and is applying for individual disability insurance. She earns $62,000 and has no hazardous hobbies. In the fact-find, she mentions she was off work for 6 weeks last year due to low back pain and is still receiving treatment every 2 weeks.

To support suitability and auditability, which underwriting-relevant detail is most important to clearly document because it is most likely to affect acceptability, rating, or exclusions?

• A. That she does not participate in hazardous hobbies
• B. The 6-week absence from work for low back pain last year and ongoing back treatment
• C. Her occupation as an administrative assistant (sedentary duties)
• D. Her annual employment income of $62,000

Best answer: B

What this tests: Needs Analysis

Explanation: This question tests identifying and documenting the underwriting-relevant facts that can materially affect the outcome of an individual disability insurance application.

For auditability and suitability, an advisor’s notes should clearly capture items that could change what can be issued (approved as applied for, rated, excluded, postponed, or declined). A recent condition that caused time off work and is still being treated is a strong indicator the insurer will ask follow-up questions and may impose limitations related to that condition.

In practice, documenting the timing, duration of the work absence, current symptoms/limitations (if any), ongoing treatment details, and whether the client is fully back at regular duties helps support a defensible recommendation and sets realistic expectations about possible underwriting outcomes.

A recent condition that caused time off work, plus ongoing treatment, is a key underwriting risk indicator and commonly leads to follow-up medical questions and potentially an exclusion or rating.

Question 24

Topic: Assess the Client’s Needs and Situation

Jordan, age 38, earns $6,500/month and is buying an individual disability income policy. Jordan’s employer provides 8 weeks of paid sick leave, and Jordan also has an emergency fund that could cover essential expenses for about 1 more month. Jordan wants to keep premiums as low as possible but still have coverage for longer disabilities.

Which elimination period is the most appropriate recommendation?

• A. 60-day elimination period
• B. 90-day elimination period
• C. 30-day elimination period
• D. 120-day elimination period

Best answer: B

What this tests: Needs Analysis

Explanation: This question tests selecting an elimination period that matches the client’s short-term resources and existing short-term coverage, while respecting a preference to reduce premiums.

An elimination period is how long the client must be disabled before disability benefits begin. If the client has paid sick leave and/or a solid emergency fund, they can usually choose a longer elimination period to reduce premiums—as long as it doesn’t create a realistic income gap.

Here, Jordan has 8 weeks of paid sick leave plus about 1 more month of emergency savings for essential expenses. That totals roughly 12 weeks (about 90 days). Recommending a 90-day elimination period aligns benefits to start around the time Jordan’s resources would be used up, while helping keep premiums lower for long-duration disabilities.

Jordan has resources to cover about 12 weeks (8 weeks paid sick leave + ~1 month emergency fund), so a 90-day elimination period aligns with cash flow while supporting lower premiums for long-term protection.

Question 25

Topic: Assess the Client’s Needs and Situation

A client receives employer-sponsored long-term disability (LTD) coverage. The LTD plan states it is integrated with other disability income sources such as CPP disability (CPPD) or workers’ compensation (WCB).

If the client becomes disabled and also qualifies for CPPD or WCB, what generally happens to the amount the LTD insurer pays?

• A. The LTD insurer increases its payment so the client reaches 100% of pre-disability income once CPPD or WCB is approved
• B. The LTD insurer typically reduces its payment by the amount of CPPD or WCB, so total disability income stays within the plan’s cap
• C. The LTD insurer pays the full LTD benefit, but CPPD or WCB only affects whether the LTD benefit is taxable
• D. The LTD insurer continues to pay the full LTD benefit, and CPPD or WCB is paid in addition with no impact

Best answer: B

What this tests: Needs Analysis

Explanation: This tests the coordination/offset concept that an advisor should recognize during needs analysis: multiple disability income sources can interact.

Many employer group LTD plans are integrated with other disability-related income (commonly CPPD or WCB). Integration means those other payments are treated as deductible income, so the LTD insurer reduces what it pays to help keep total disability income from exceeding the plan’s intended replacement level (a cap). This is one reason agents must ask about other potential sources of disability income when assessing a client’s situation and potential benefit gap.

The exact sources that are deductible, and how the calculation is done, varies by contract—so the safe, exam-level takeaway is the concept: integrated plans generally pay a net benefit after offsets.

Integrated/offset LTD plans treat CPPD/WCB as deductible income. The LTD insurer generally pays the difference (up to the LTD benefit) rather than stacking full payments on top of each other.

Questions 26-30

Question 26

Topic: Implement a Recommendation Adapted to the Client’s Needs and Situation

An applicant applies for individual disability insurance and signs the application on June 1. The insurer approves the application on June 10, but the policy has not been delivered and the first premium has not been paid. The applicant becomes disabled on June 15.

What is the most accurate outcome?

• A. Coverage is in force as of June 1 because the application was signed on that date.
• B. There is no disability coverage in force yet because required conditions (such as delivery/acceptance and the initial premium) have not been met.
• C. Coverage is in force as of June 10 because the insurer approved the application on that date.
• D. Coverage is in force as of June 15 because disability occurred after approval, even though the first premium is unpaid.

Best answer: B

What this tests: Recommendation Implementation

Explanation: This tests how an individual accident & sickness policy becomes effective during implementation.

In general, an insurance contract is not in force just because a client signs an application or because underwriting has approved it. The policy’s effective date is determined by the contract and the completion of required “put-into-force” conditions, which commonly include:

• Insurer acceptance/approval (issue)
• Policy delivery and the applicant’s acceptance of the issued contract
• Payment of the initial premium

Until those conditions are met, the client should not assume they are covered. (Temporary insurance rules vary by insurer and should not be assumed unless explicitly provided and confirmed.)

For an individual A&S policy, coverage generally does not begin simply because an application was signed or approved. The contract typically requires insurer acceptance/issue plus completion of delivery/acceptance requirements and payment of the first premium before coverage is in force.

Question 27

Topic: Provide Customer Service During the Validity Period of the Coverage

Which statement best describes how renewal and termination generally work for group versus individual accident & sickness (A&S) coverage?

• A. If an individual policy is guaranteed renewable, the insurer can cancel the policy at any time as long as it refunds unused premiums; group plans cannot be cancelled mid-year.
• B. Individual policies always terminate when the insured changes jobs, while group plans are portable as long as the employee keeps paying premiums personally.
• C. Group plans typically renew periodically and the employer/insurer can change plan terms or costs at renewal; individual policies renew based on their renewability provision (for example, non-cancellable, guaranteed renewable, or cancellable).
• D. Group plans are guaranteed renewable for each employee and cannot have premium or benefit changes, while individual policies are reviewed and re-priced each year like auto insurance.

Best answer: C

What this tests: In-force Service

Explanation: At a high level, group A&S plans (through an employer or association) commonly operate on a renewal cycle. At each renewal, the insurer and plan sponsor can typically review experience and costs, and the plan’s premium rates and/or benefits may change.

By contrast, individual A&S policies are personal contracts. Whether the insurer can change the premium and/or terms at renewal depends on the policy’s renewability provision:

• Non-cancellable (if offered): the insurer cannot cancel the policy or change premiums to a higher rate for the insured, as long as premiums are paid.
• Guaranteed renewable: the insurer must renew coverage, but may be able to change premiums by class (not singled out to one person), depending on the contract.
• Cancellable: the insurer has more ability to change terms or terminate, subject to the contract.

This distinction matters in ongoing service: clients should understand that group coverage is more likely to change at renewal or end with employment, while individual coverage is governed by the policy’s specific renewability wording.

Group coverage is usually re-priced and amended at renewal, while an individual contract’s renewal and change rights are determined by the specific renewability provision in the policy.

Question 28

Topic: Analyze the Available Products That Meet the Client’s Needs

Sanjay, age 62, is travelling to Arizona for 45 days. He wants to buy emergency travel medical insurance today for a trip that starts next week. He has diabetes and high blood pressure; his blood pressure medication dosage was changed 2 months ago.

The insurer’s brochure states: a pre-existing condition is covered only if it was stable for 90 days before departure. It defines an emergency as a sudden and unexpected illness or injury that requires immediate medical treatment.

Which statement by the insurance agent is INCORRECT?

• A. Explain that a medication dosage change within the 90-day stability period may cause claims related to that pre-existing condition to be excluded under this policy wording.
• B. Confirm the trip length and make sure the policy’s maximum trip duration matches the 45-day trip (or arrange additional days if needed).
• C. Review common exclusions and how the policy defines an emergency so Sanjay understands when coverage applies and what situations may not be covered.
• D. Tell Sanjay he does not need to disclose diabetes because it is controlled, and travel medical only pays for new accidents or illnesses.

Best answer: D

What this tests: Product Analysis

Explanation: This question tests key travel medical policy considerations when analyzing products for a client (trip length, pre-existing condition/stability wording, exclusions, and the definition of an emergency).

In the scenario, the insurer explicitly states a 90-day stability requirement for pre-existing conditions. Because Sanjay’s blood pressure medication dosage changed 2 months (about 60 days) before departure, the agent must treat that as relevant to coverage and discuss the potential impact on claims related to that condition.

The incorrect statement is the one that advises the client not to disclose a chronic condition because it is “controlled” and implies travel medical is only for “new” issues. Travel medical coverage commonly includes pre-existing condition limitations, and accurate disclosure and review of the stability wording are essential to suitability and to avoiding claim disputes.

The other statements reflect appropriate product analysis: confirming the trip length fits the policy’s duration rules, explaining how the stability clause may affect coverage, and reviewing exclusions and the emergency definition so the client understands when coverage applies.

This is incorrect and unsafe advice. Pre-existing conditions and related stability rules are central to travel medical, and non-disclosure can jeopardize coverage.

Question 29

Topic: Analyze the Available Products That Meet the Client’s Needs

Sam is having a planned hospital procedure. Sam understands the public health plan covers a standard ward room but may not cover extra charges for a semi-private/private room.

Review the health insurance benefit schedule and choose the best interpretation of how it could help with costs not paid by the public plan.

• A. It will reimburse the hospital’s actual charges for the upgraded room, as long as Sam submits receipts.
• B. It pays only if the public plan refuses to cover any part of the hospital stay, so it would not help with a room upgrade.
• C. It will pay $300/day for a private room upgrade because the $200 confinement benefit and $100 supplement are combined without limits.
• D. It can provide fixed cash that can be used toward the extra cost of upgrading to a semi-private/private room, even if the public plan covers a standard ward room.

Best answer: D

What this tests: Product Analysis

Explanation: Hospital insurance (often called hospital cash or hospital indemnity coverage) can help with hospital-related costs that a public health plan may not cover, such as semi-private/private room upgrades and other incidental/ancillary charges.

In the exhibit, the key planning features are:

• The coverage pays fixed cash amounts ($200/day for confinement and an additional $100/day when an upgraded room is used).
• Payment is not based on the hospital’s actual charges, so the money can help offset the client’s out-of-pocket expenses from non-covered hospital costs.
• The room upgrade supplement is specifically designed to address the incremental cost of choosing a higher room category, but it has its own day limit (up to 30 days per stay).

The schedule shows a room upgrade supplement payable on days an upgraded room is used, and notes that benefits are fixed cash amounts not based on actual charges.

Question 30

Topic: Assess the Client’s Needs and Situation

Kiran (age 40) is self-employed and has a $480,000 mortgage. She says she is interested in critical illness insurance mainly to (1) pay off the mortgage if diagnosed with a covered condition, (2) pay for extra help at home, and (3) take time off work without worrying about cash flow.

Which advisor statement is INCORRECT when assessing Kiran’s need for critical illness coverage?

• A. “Critical illness benefits can only be used to pay medical bills, so using the money for your mortgage or time off work wouldn’t be an appropriate goal.”
• B. “Let’s review your emergency fund and other assets, because that affects how much you could self-fund if you became critically ill.”
• C. “Let’s confirm any existing coverage, such as a spouse’s group benefits or any individual disability/critical illness coverage you already have.”
• D. “Let’s clarify how much lump sum you would want available for debt payoff and how long you’d want to take time away from work.”

Best answer: A

What this tests: Needs Analysis

Explanation: This question tests client needs assessment for critical illness (CI) coverage based on the client’s intended use of a lump-sum benefit. In a needs analysis, the advisor should clarify what financial problems the client is trying to solve (debt obligations, time away from work, extra support costs) and how much liquidity would be helpful.

A key principle is that CI benefits are generally paid as a lump sum on diagnosis of a covered condition (subject to policy terms). The client typically decides how to use the money. Therefore, debt payoff and funding time away from work are valid client goals to explore when assessing need.

Good needs assessment also includes confirming existing resources (savings) and existing insurance/benefits, so the recommendation can be sized to the gap rather than based on assumptions.

This is incorrect. Critical illness insurance is typically a lump-sum benefit the client can use for any purpose (for example, debt, time off, caregiving, or out-of-pocket costs).

Continue with full practice

Use the LLQP Accident & Sickness Practice Test page for the full Finance Prep practice bank, mixed-topic practice, timed mock exams, explanations, and web/mobile app access.

Focused topic pages

• LLQP Accident & Sickness: Needs Analysis
• LLQP Accident & Sickness: Product Analysis
• LLQP Accident & Sickness: Recommendation Implementation
• LLQP Accident & Sickness: In-Force Service

Free review resource

Read the LLQP Accident & Sickness Study Guide on SecuritiesMastery.com for concept review, then return here for Finance Prep practice.