Try 10 focused CFP® MCQ questions on Insurance and Risk Management, with answers and explanations, then continue with Securities Prep.
Try 10 focused CFP® MCQ questions on Insurance and Risk Management, with answers and explanations, then continue with Securities Prep.
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Exam route | CFP® MCQ |
| Issuer | FP Canada |
| Topic area | Insurance and Risk Management |
| Blueprint weight | 14% |
| Page purpose | Focused sample questions before returning to mixed practice |
These questions are original Securities Prep practice items aligned to this topic area. They are designed for self-assessment and are not official exam questions.
Topic: Insurance and Risk Management
Mei, 39, is a self-employed IT consultant in Ontario. Your analysis shows her family would have a major income gap if illness or injury prevented her from working; she has three months of expenses in cash and no group disability plan. When you present individual disability insurance at $185 per month, Mei says, “That is too expensive. Let’s just ignore it.” What is the most appropriate next step?
Best answer: A
What this tests: Insurance and Risk Management
Explanation: Premium resistance is not a reason to abandon or force the recommendation. The planner should communicate the risk clearly, explore affordability, and present reasonable design trade-offs before the client decides.
The core concept is client-centred insurance implementation. When analysis shows a material coverage gap, the planner should help the client understand the consequence of remaining uninsured and explore practical ways to align coverage with cash flow. This may include adjusting the benefit amount, waiting period, benefit period, or implementation timing. If Mei still declines after understanding the trade-offs, the planner should document the discussion and set a review point. The key is informed decision-making, not product pressure.
This helps Mei make an informed decision by addressing affordability while preserving focus on the uncovered disability risk.
Topic: Insurance and Risk Management
Priya, 49, is the sole shareholder of a physiotherapy clinic and depends on her ability to treat clients for most of her household income. She plans to work 10 more years to fund retirement savings and to help support her widowed father. Her cash reserve covers about two months of expenses, and her spouse’s income would not cover the mortgage and clinic lease. She has provincial coverage and a spouse’s group health plan for drugs and dental, but no disability, critical illness, or long-term care coverage. With limited premium dollars, which recommendation best addresses Priya’s priority risk?
Best answer: D
What this tests: Insurance and Risk Management
Explanation: Priya’s main uncovered risk is loss of earned income if illness or injury prevents her from working. Disability insurance is designed to replace income during a period of disability, making it the best fit for her cash-flow, retirement, and family-support constraints.
The core distinction is the risk each policy type addresses. Disability insurance protects earning capacity by replacing income when the insured cannot work, which directly matches Priya’s dependence on active practice income, short cash reserve, mortgage exposure, and retirement savings timeline. Critical illness insurance can provide a lump sum after diagnosis of a covered condition, but it is not primarily an income-replacement contract. Extended health coverage reimburses eligible medical, drug, dental, or paramedical costs. Long-term care coverage addresses the cost of custodial care or assistance with activities of daily living, usually a different later-life risk. The closest alternative is critical illness coverage, but Priya’s decisive risk is sustained inability to earn.
Disability coverage best addresses the risk that Priya cannot work and her earned income stops before retirement.
Topic: Insurance and Risk Management
Priya, 49, is the sole shareholder of an incorporated electrical contracting business. Her retirement plan depends on preserving a growing corporate investment portfolio. Since the last review, the corporation hired employees, bought two vans, and started taking condo renovation jobs in occupied units. Priya has not reviewed commercial general liability, commercial auto, or property/business interruption insurance since she worked alone. She asks you to invest $180,000 of corporate cash immediately. What is the best next step?
Best answer: A
What this tests: Insurance and Risk Management
Explanation: The business has changed materially, creating property, casualty, and liability exposures that could undermine the broader retirement plan. Before deploying surplus corporate cash, the planner should collect the relevant insurance documents and coordinate a review with a qualified commercial P&C broker.
A CFP professional should not treat the $180,000 as simple investment surplus until major risk exposures have been assessed. New employees, vehicles, and work in occupied condo units increase the chance of commercial auto claims, third-party liability, property loss, and business interruption. These risks could impair the corporation’s retained earnings and Priya’s retirement funding. The appropriate sequence is to collect current policies, identify apparent gaps or changes in exposure, document the issue, and collaborate with or refer to a licensed commercial P&C broker for coverage analysis before finalizing the investment recommendation. The key planning point is that risk-transfer gaps can be more urgent than portfolio implementation.
The expanded operations create liability and property exposures that could threaten Priya’s retirement capital, so coverage adequacy should be assessed first.
Topic: Insurance and Risk Management
Leon, age 42, asks whether he needs more life insurance to protect his spouse if he dies this year. He confirms the non-registered savings can be used for survivor needs, and he wants any recommendation documented before an application is started. All amounts are in CAD.
Survivor capital needs: mortgage repayment $280,000; education fund $90,000; survivor income capital $650,000; final expenses $30,000.
Available resources: personal term insurance $400,000; group life after tax $120,000; non-registered savings $75,000.
Which planner action best aligns with FP Canada expectations for competent and objective insurance advice?
Best answer: A
What this tests: Insurance and Risk Management
Explanation: Competence and objectivity require a needs-based recommendation rather than product-led advice. The stated survivor needs total $1,050,000 and available resources total $595,000, leaving a $455,000 funding gap to document and address. Coverage discussions should be tied to that analysis.
A survivor needs analysis compares the capital required at death with resources available for that purpose. Leon’s stated needs are $280,000 + $90,000 + $650,000 + $30,000 = $1,050,000. Available resources are $400,000 + $120,000 + $75,000 = $595,000. The resulting funding gap is $455,000. Under FP Canada expectations, the planner should document the assumptions and calculation, then discuss appropriate coverage options in light of affordability, underwriting, and Leon’s objectives. The key is to recommend from the analysis, not from a product or incomplete subtotal.
This nets total survivor needs of $1,050,000 against available resources of $595,000 and supports objective, documented advice.
Topic: Insurance and Risk Management
Nadia, 41, is a self-employed single parent with two children and a 480,000 mortgage. She asks her CFP professional to reduce her 1,000,000 term life policy to 300,000 to lower premiums and rely on 150,000 of group coverage from a part-time employer. A current needs analysis shows her family would require about 850,000 of immediate capital if she died. Which action best aligns with FP Canada expectations?
Best answer: A
What this tests: Insurance and Risk Management
Explanation: The key issue is whether the proposed reduction would leave Nadia’s dependants underprotected. Because the needs analysis shows a large capital need that would not be met by the reduced and group coverage, the planner should explain the gap, document the advice, and consider lower-cost alternatives before any change.
FP Canada expectations require objective, competent advice that prioritizes the client’s interests, not simply the client’s first requested transaction. Here, reducing the policy to 300,000 and relying on 150,000 of group coverage would leave total stated coverage far below the 850,000 capital need. The planner should communicate the consequence clearly, document the analysis and recommendation, and consider alternatives such as adjusting policy features, reviewing budget trade-offs, or seeking suitable replacement coverage before cancelling or reducing existing protection. The practical takeaway is to avoid creating an uninsured period or permanent shortfall while trying to solve a premium problem.
The planner must put Nadia’s interests first by identifying the material protection gap before supporting any reduction or replacement.
Topic: Insurance and Risk Management
Nadia, 52, owns a professional corporation with surplus investments. She needs permanent life insurance to create estate liquidity for anticipated tax on death, but her personal cash flow is tight and she also relies on the corporation to fund retirement. When comparing personal ownership, corporate ownership, or blended funding, which planning lens applies best?
Best answer: D
What this tests: Insurance and Risk Management
Explanation: The best lens is an integrated after-tax funding and estate-liquidity analysis. Nadia’s decision is not just about paying premiums; it must weigh corporate asset use, personal affordability, retirement capital, tax at death, and how insurance proceeds reach the estate or beneficiaries.
When insurance funding competes with cash flow, corporate assets, and estate needs, the planner should compare alternatives on an integrated, after-tax basis. Corporate ownership may reduce personal cash-flow strain, but it can tie up corporate capital needed for retirement and changes how proceeds flow, including potential capital dividend account planning. Personal ownership may preserve corporate assets but require personal after-tax premium funding. The right framework tests whether the funding source, ownership, beneficiary structure, and estate liquidity outcome work together.
The key takeaway is to compare the full planning trade-off, not isolate one cost or tax feature.
This lens compares the competing effects on personal cash flow, corporate capital, tax-efficient estate liquidity, and retirement funding.
Topic: Insurance and Risk Management
Jaspreet, age 46, has been advised to replace an older term life policy with a larger 20-year term policy to match his updated family income-protection need. He wants to stop the current policy immediately to avoid overlapping premiums.
Exhibit: Insurance implementation file
| Item | Current policy | Proposed policy |
|---|---|---|
| Status | In force; premium due June 30 | Application not yet submitted |
| Coverage | CAD 750,000 | CAD 1,200,000 |
| Key condition | 31-day grace period after missed premium | In force only after underwriting approval, delivery, and first premium |
Best answer: D
What this tests: Insurance and Risk Management
Explanation: The best implementation step is to maintain existing coverage until the replacement policy is actually in force. A submitted application or quote does not remove underwriting, delivery, payment, or timing risk.
When replacing insurance, the planner should manage the implementation sequence so the client is not unintentionally uninsured. The exhibit shows the current policy is already in force, while the proposed policy has not even been submitted and will only become effective after underwriting approval, delivery, and first premium payment. Keeping the current policy active until the replacement is confirmed in force avoids the key risks: the new insurer could decline, rate, postpone, or delay the application. The grace period may prevent immediate lapse, but relying on it is weaker than deliberately maintaining coverage through implementation.
This preserves existing coverage while the new policy is still subject to underwriting, delivery, payment, and timing conditions.
Topic: Insurance and Risk Management
Nadia, 38, earns $125,000 and is the main income earner for her spouse and two young children. She wants to cancel her personally owned disability policy because her employer portal shows “LTD: 66.7% of salary” and “life insurance: 2x salary,” but she has not provided the plan booklet or certificate. What is the most appropriate next step?
Best answer: A
What this tests: Insurance and Risk Management
Explanation: Employee benefits can reduce, but do not automatically eliminate, personal-insurance needs. The planner should verify coverage amounts, definitions, taxability, offsets, waiting periods, and portability before deciding whether a meaningful gap remains.
The core process is to move from client-reported benefits to verified analysis. Group disability and life coverage may be capped, taxable, non-portable, offset by other benefits, or limited by restrictive disability definitions. A CFP professional should obtain the benefit booklet or certificate, confirm who pays the premiums, then compare the expected net benefits with Nadia’s income-replacement, debt, childcare, and survivor-income needs. Only after that analysis should the planner recommend keeping, modifying, replacing, or adding personal coverage. The key safeguard is not assuming that a headline percentage or multiple of salary equals adequate protection.
A meaningful insurance gap can be assessed only after verifying the group-benefit details and comparing them with Nadia’s actual needs.
Topic: Insurance and Risk Management
Priya and Aaron, both age 39, have two children and a large mortgage. Their needs analysis identifies a technically adequate insurance package, but they have said they cannot increase monthly insurance costs beyond the amount shown.
Exhibit: Case file excerpt
Which interpretation or planning action is best supported?
Best answer: C
What this tests: Insurance and Risk Management
Explanation: A technically adequate insurance recommendation still must be affordable and implementable. The quoted premium is more than the clients’ stated limit and available cash flow, while their emergency reserve is already below target. The planner should revise, prioritize, and possibly stage the recommendation rather than present it as immediately realistic.
Insurance recommendations must balance technical need with implementation feasibility. Here, the full package may address the calculated life and disability shortfalls, but the quoted CAD 690 monthly premium exceeds the clients’ CAD 300 limit and their CAD 280 available cash flow. Funding it from the emergency reserve would weaken an already underfunded safety net. A supportable planning action is to revise the recommendation: prioritize the highest-impact risks, consider lower initial amounts or terms where appropriate, and document the trade-offs until the clients can afford fuller coverage.
The key takeaway is that affordability can make an otherwise adequate insurance plan unrealistic.
The technically adequate package is not implementable because its premium exceeds both stated affordability and available cash flow.
Topic: Insurance and Risk Management
Priya, age 60, will retire from her hospital job on September 30 and lose $400,000 of group life coverage 31 days later unless she exercises a one-time conversion privilege that requires no medical evidence. Her spouse will receive only a small survivor pension, they have a $220,000 secured line of credit, and she wants estate liquidity for taxes on a cottage she plans to leave to children from a first marriage. Priya has an individual term quote that appears cheaper, but she is awaiting follow-up after an abnormal cardiac screening and the insurer says underwriting may take 6-8 weeks. She is reluctant to pay overlapping premiums from her cash reserve. Which implementation step best addresses the insurance need while minimizing underwriting, cancellation, and timing risk?
Best answer: B
What this tests: Insurance and Risk Management
Explanation: The safest implementation step is to secure coverage that does not depend on new medical underwriting before the conversion deadline expires. The converted policy may be more expensive, but it avoids a coverage gap while the individual application is assessed.
The core concept is safe insurance replacement sequencing. When existing coverage is ending and new coverage may be delayed, rated, or declined, the planner should preserve the client’s current insurability first. Priya has a hard 31-day conversion window, known underwriting uncertainty, estate liquidity needs, debt exposure, and survivor-income concerns. She can still pursue cheaper individual term coverage, but she should not allow the converted coverage to lapse until the new policy is issued, accepted, paid for, and in force. The temporary premium overlap is a risk-control cost, not a reason to create uninsured exposure.
The conversion preserves no-evidence coverage before the deadline while any cheaper replacement is still subject to underwriting.
Use the CFP® MCQ Practice Test page for the full Securities Prep route, mixed-topic practice, timed mock exams, explanations, and web/mobile app access.
Use the full Securities Prep practice page above for the latest review links and practice route.