Series 82 Cheat Sheet
Compact FINRA Series 82 Cheat sheet covering private placements, exemptions, investor status, due diligence, suitability, communications, and core calculations.
Use the tables for a quick pre-exam check. Expand a topic’s notes for explanations, examples, and additional distinctions.
Scope and study context
The FINRA Series 82 — Private Securities Offerings Representative Qualification Examination is designed around the activities of a representative involved in private securities offerings. For review purposes, think in three layers:
- Product and offering structure — equity, debt, convertible securities, private funds, valuation, capitalization, contingencies, use of proceeds.
- Exempt offering rules — Securities Act registration vs. exemptions, Regulation D, private placement documentation, resale limits, general solicitation, accredited investor concepts, and restricted securities.
- Broker-dealer conduct — communications, suitability/Reg BI, due diligence, supervision, AML, conflicts, books and records, customer protection, and anti-fraud rules.
This page is an independent Cheat Sheet. Use it to refresh decision rules before moving into topic drills, original practice questions, mock exams, and detailed explanations.
Series 82 Mental Model
| Exam area | What to recognize quickly | Common trap |
|---|---|---|
| Private offering exemption | Why the securities are not registered and what conditions apply | “Exempt” does not mean exempt from antifraud rules |
| Investor qualification | Accredited investor, QIB, qualified purchaser, institutional account | These categories are not interchangeable |
| Solicitation limits | Whether general solicitation is allowed | Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c) are often confused |
| Suitability / Reg BI | Whether the recommendation fits the customer and product risk | Accredited status alone does not make an investment suitable |
| Due diligence | Whether the firm had a reasonable basis to recommend the placement | Reliance on issuer statements alone may be inadequate |
| Communications | Whether materials are fair, balanced, approved, and consistent with the exemption | Advertising can destroy a private placement exemption |
| Offering documents | PPM, subscription agreement, investor questionnaire, term sheet | A term sheet is not a substitute for complete disclosure |
| FINRA conduct rules | Supervision, outside activities, compensation, AML, books and records | Private placement sales still occur inside a regulated BD framework |
Core Securities Law Map
| Law / rule set | Main purpose | Series 82 relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Securities Act of 1933 | Registration of new issues; disclosure; offering exemptions | Private placements are usually primary offerings relying on an exemption |
| Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | Broker-dealer regulation, secondary trading, antifraud, FINRA oversight | Broker-dealer and associated person conduct; Rule 10b-5 |
| SEC Rule 10b-5 | Antifraud rule for securities transactions | No material misstatements, omissions, manipulative schemes, or deceptive conduct |
| Regulation D | Safe harbor exemptions for private offerings | High-yield exam area: Rules 504, 506(b), 506(c), bad actor rules, Form D |
| Rule 144A | Resales to qualified institutional buyers | Institutional resale market; not the same as a Regulation D sale |
| Regulation S | Offshore offers and sales | Avoid directed selling efforts into the United States |
| State blue sky laws | State registration, notice filings, antifraud | Federal covered securities may avoid state registration but not state antifraud |
| Investment Company Act of 1940 | Regulates investment companies; provides private fund exclusions | Private funds often rely on 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) exclusions |
| Investment Advisers Act of 1940 | Regulates compensated investment advice | Private fund managers and advisory conflicts may appear in scenarios |
| Trust Indenture Act | Indenture protections for certain debt offerings | Public debt focus; many private debt placements are exempt |
| FINRA rules | Member firm and registered representative conduct | Suitability, communications, supervision, private placements, compensation, AML |
Private Offering Exemption Selection
| Exemption / structure | Typical use | Investor limits / conditions to know | Solicitation posture | Exam focus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Section 4(a)(2) | Statutory private placement by issuer | Transactions not involving a public offering; purchasers can evaluate and bear risk | No public offering | Broad principle; often supported by Reg D safe harbor |
| Regulation D Rule 504 | Smaller exempt offerings | Aggregate offering cap and state-law conditions apply under current rules | Limited; depends on conditions | Less common than Rule 506 but testable |
| Regulation D Rule 506(b) | Traditional private placement | Unlimited accredited investors; limited number of sophisticated non-accredited investors | No general solicitation | Most tested private placement structure |
| Regulation D Rule 506(c) | Publicly solicited accredited-investor-only offering | All purchasers must be accredited investors; issuer must take reasonable verification steps | General solicitation allowed | Verification is the key distinction from 506(b) |
| Rule 144A | Institutional resale of restricted securities | Sales to QIBs | Institutional resale process | QIB status; resale, not issuer private placement safe harbor |
| Regulation S | Offshore offering | Offshore transaction; no directed selling efforts into U.S. market | Outside U.S. | Keeps foreign distribution separate from U.S. offering |
| Intrastate offering | Local issuer raising capital in one state | Issuer and purchasers tied to one state; resale restrictions apply | Local only | Out-of-state sales can break exemption |
| Regulation A | Exempt public offering alternative | SEC qualification and offering circular process | Public solicitation permitted | Not a classic private placement |
| Regulation Crowdfunding | Online exempt capital raising | Must use required intermediary framework | Public portal-based process | Do not treat as ordinary Reg D private placement |
Regulation D High-Yield Distinctions
| Feature | Rule 506(b) | Rule 506(c) |
|---|---|---|
| General solicitation | Not allowed | Allowed |
| Purchasers | Accredited investors plus limited sophisticated non-accredited investors | Accredited investors only |
| Accredited investor verification | Reasonable belief generally may rely on investor representations unless red flags | Issuer must take reasonable steps to verify |
| Disclosure to non-accredited investors | Required when non-accredited investors participate | Not applicable because all purchasers must be accredited |
| Offering amount | No SEC aggregate cap under the rule | No SEC aggregate cap under the rule |
| Bad actor disqualification | Applies | Applies |
| Common exam phrase | “Pre-existing substantive relationship” | “Public website/social media ads plus verification” |
Notes and examples
Regulation D Process Points
| Item | Practical rule |
|---|---|
| Form D | Notice filing with the SEC after first sale; not a registration statement |
| Bad actor disqualification | Covered disqualifying events can make Rule 506 unavailable |
| Integration | Multiple offerings may be analyzed together if they are really one plan of financing |
| Resale restrictions | Securities sold in Regulation D offerings are generally restricted securities |
| Non-accredited investors | Permitted only in some structures; sophistication and disclosure become critical |
| State law | Rule 506 securities are federal covered securities, but states retain antifraud authority and may require notices/fees |
Regulation D Cheat Sheet
Regulation D provides common safe harbors for private offerings. The most tested distinction is usually between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c).
| Feature | Rule 506(b) | Rule 506(c) |
|---|---|---|
| General solicitation | Not permitted | Permitted |
| Purchasers | Unlimited accredited investors; limited non-accredited sophisticated investors | All purchasers must be accredited investors |
| Verification | Investor self-certification may be used when reasonable | Issuer must take reasonable steps to verify accredited status |
| Offering size | No federal dollar cap under the rule | No federal dollar cap under the rule |
| Key trap | Public marketing can destroy 506(b) availability | Mere checkbox self-certification may be insufficient |
Regulation D Decision Rules
Use this quick filter:
Was there public advertising, a public website, mass email, social media promotion, or open seminar?\
- If yes, think general solicitation.
- General solicitation is generally inconsistent with Rule 506(b).
- For Rule 506(c), all purchasers must be accredited and verification must be reasonable.
Were any non-accredited investors allowed?\
- Under Rule 506(b), a limited number may participate if sophistication and information standards are satisfied.
- Under Rule 506(c), non-accredited purchasers are not allowed.
Were resale restrictions disclosed?\
- Private placement securities are usually restricted.
- Investors should not be told they can freely resell unless an exemption or registration applies.
Did the firm perform diligence?\
- A broker-dealer recommending a private placement must have a reasonable basis.
- Accreditation alone does not prove suitability.
Other Exempt Offering Concepts
| Concept | High-yield point |
|---|---|
| Section 4(a)(2) | Statutory exemption for transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering |
| Rule 504 | Smaller Regulation D offering exemption; know generally that it differs from Rule 506 |
| Form D | Notice filing associated with Regulation D offerings |
| State blue sky laws | Federal preemption may apply to some offerings, but notice filings, fees, and anti-fraud rules can still matter |
| Integration | Separate offerings may be treated as one if facts show a single plan of financing |
| Bad actor disqualification | Certain disciplinary or criminal events can disqualify participation in certain exempt offerings |
Investor Status Reference
| Category | What it means | Used for | Trap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accredited investor | Investor meeting wealth, income, professional credential, entity, or institutional criteria under SEC rules | Regulation D offerings | Accredited does not equal suitable |
| Sophisticated investor | Investor has enough knowledge and experience to evaluate risks | 506(b) non-accredited investor analysis | Sophisticated is not the same as accredited |
| Institutional account | Bank, savings and loan, insurance company, registered investment company/adviser, or other qualifying institutional customer under FINRA rules | Communications and institutional suitability | Institutional communication rules differ from retail rules |
| QIB | Qualified institutional buyer for Rule 144A | Institutional resale market | QIB is narrower and more institutional than accredited investor |
| Qualified purchaser | Higher-threshold investor category under Investment Company Act | 3(c)(7) private funds | Not the same as accredited investor |
| Retail customer | Natural person or legal representative using a recommendation for personal, family, or household purposes | Regulation Best Interest | A wealthy individual can still be a retail customer |
Private Fund Exclusions
| Structure | Investor eligibility | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| 3(c)(1) fund | Limited beneficial owner count; usually accredited investors in practice | Excluded from investment company registration if conditions are met |
| 3(c)(7) fund | Qualified purchasers only | Allows a private fund with more sophisticated, higher-threshold investors |
| Hedge fund | Pooled investment vehicle using flexible strategies | Test suitability, liquidity, leverage, valuation, fees, conflicts |
| Private equity / venture fund | Long-term investments in private companies | Test capital calls, illiquidity, J-curve, exit risk, valuation uncertainty |
| Real estate private fund | Pooled real estate ownership or lending strategy | Test leverage, appraisal risk, tax allocations, income assumptions |
Offering Document Reference
| Document | Purpose | Exam points |
|---|---|---|
| Private placement memorandum / PPM | Main disclosure document | Business, risks, management, financials, use of proceeds, conflicts, fees, compensation, tax summary |
| Term sheet | Condensed summary of key terms | Must be consistent with full offering documents; not complete disclosure |
| Subscription agreement | Investor’s offer to purchase | Includes representations, investment intent, transfer restrictions, acknowledgments |
| Investor questionnaire | Collects investor status and suitability information | Accredited investor, QIB, qualified purchaser, risk tolerance, liquidity needs |
| Operating agreement / partnership agreement | Governs LLC or limited partnership | Voting, management, allocations, capital calls, transfer limits |
| Indenture / note purchase agreement | Debt investor rights | Covenants, collateral, maturity, default, trustee or agent provisions |
| Escrow agreement | Holds investor funds until conditions are met | Critical for contingency offerings |
| Side letter | Special rights for a particular investor | Creates conflicts and disclosure concerns |
| Engagement letter | Issuer and placement agent relationship | Compensation, role, indemnification, conflicts, scope of services |
Private Placement Workflow
flowchart TD
A[Issuer seeks capital] --> B[Select exemption and target investors]
B --> C[Due diligence on issuer and offering]
C --> D[Prepare PPM, term sheet, subscription docs]
D --> E[Principal approval and communication review]
E --> F{Solicitation allowed?}
F -->|506(b / private only| G[Contact qualified prospects through permitted channels]
F -->|506(c / public allowed| H[Use solicitation with accredited investor verification]
G --> I[Collect investor questionnaire and subscription agreement]
H --> I
I --> J[Suitability / Reg BI review]
J --> K[Issuer accepts subscriptions and closes]
K --> L[Form D, blue sky, FINRA filings if required]
L --> M[Post-closing records, confirmations, investor servicing]
Notes and examples
Private Placement Basics
A private placement is an offering not registered with the SEC, typically sold to a limited group of eligible or sophisticated investors under an exemption.
Parties and Roles
| Party | Role | Exam focus |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Company or fund raising capital | Business plan, capitalization, financials, risks, use of proceeds |
| Placement agent | Broker-dealer helping sell securities | Due diligence, suitability, disclosures, communications, compensation |
| Investor | Purchaser of private securities | Qualification, risk tolerance, liquidity needs, concentration |
| Counsel | Drafts offering documents and exemption analysis | Legal structure, disclosures, transfer restrictions |
| Escrow agent | Holds funds in contingent offerings | Release only when stated conditions are met |
| Transfer agent / custodian | Records ownership or holds assets | Restrictions, recordkeeping, settlement support |
Private Placement Documents
| Document | Purpose | Trap |
|---|---|---|
| Private placement memorandum, or PPM | Main disclosure document for offering terms, risks, issuer, use of proceeds | It is not a registered prospectus and does not eliminate anti-fraud liability |
| Subscription agreement | Investor’s purchase agreement and representations | Investor representations do not replace suitability or due diligence |
| Investor questionnaire | Helps determine accredited/sophisticated status | Incomplete answers require follow-up |
| Term sheet | Summary of economics and structure | Must be consistent with full offering documents |
| Operating agreement / limited partnership agreement | Governs entity rights and obligations | Economic rights may differ from headline returns |
| Escrow agreement | Controls handling of investor funds in contingent offerings | Funds cannot be released before contingency is satisfied |
| Financial statements | Support issuer analysis | Unaudited or stale financials require caution and disclosure |
Due Diligence Checklist
| Area | Questions to ask | Red flags |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer business | What does the issuer do? How does it make money? | Vague business model, no operating history explanation |
| Management | Who controls the issuer? Relevant background? | Undisclosed disciplinary history, related-party dominance |
| Financials | Are statements current, reliable, and consistent? | Unexplained revenue jumps, going-concern issues, missing liabilities |
| Use of proceeds | How will investor funds be used? | Excessive offering expenses, insider payments, vague “working capital” use |
| Capitalization | Existing debt/equity, senior rights, dilution | Hidden preferred rights, convertible overhang, unpaid obligations |
| Valuation | How was price determined? | Unsupported projections, unrealistic comparables |
| Conflicts | Related-party transactions, compensation, side letters | Undisclosed fees, sponsor loans, preferential liquidity |
| Legal structure | Entity type, governing documents, investor rights | Transfer restrictions not explained, missing authority |
| Exemption | Why is registration not required? | General solicitation in a 506(b) offering |
| Investor funds | Escrow, contingency, closing mechanics | Funds released before minimum offering conditions are met |
| Ongoing reporting | What will investors receive after closing? | No reporting commitment or unclear valuation policy |
Notes and examples
Due Diligence for Private Placements
FINRA expects broker-dealers to conduct a reasonable investigation when recommending private placements. The depth depends on facts and circumstances, but the representative should understand the investment before recommending it.
Due Diligence Checklist
| Area | Questions to ask |
|---|---|
| Issuer business | What does the issuer do? Is the business model understandable and viable? |
| Management | Background, experience, disciplinary history, conflicts, compensation |
| Financial condition | Revenue, cash flow, debt, burn rate, going-concern risks |
| Use of proceeds | How will investor funds be used? Are fees and related-party payments disclosed? |
| Capitalization | Existing debt/equity, senior claims, dilution, convertible instruments |
| Valuation | Is the valuation supportable? What assumptions drive it? |
| Offering terms | Security type, rights, preferences, covenants, maturity, conversion, redemption |
| Risks | Liquidity, leverage, competition, regulatory, operational, market, execution |
| Legal structure | Entity type, governing documents, tax treatment, transfer limits |
| Conflicts | Issuer affiliates, related-party transactions, compensation, side arrangements |
| Contingencies | Minimum raise, escrow, investor cancellation rights if applicable |
| Exit strategy | IPO, sale, refinancing, redemption, secondary sale — realistic or speculative? |
Diligence Traps
- Issuer reputation is not diligence. A known sponsor can still offer a weak deal.
- Third-party reports are not a substitute for review. The firm must assess reliability and relevance.
- Financial projections require assumptions. Unsupported forecasts should not be repeated as likely outcomes.
- Risk disclosure cannot be buried. Risks must be meaningful and understandable.
- Diligence is ongoing. New material information before closing must be evaluated and, if necessary, disclosed.
Suitability and Regulation Best Interest
| Obligation | Applies when | Core requirement | Private placement application |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasonable-basis suitability | Firm or rep recommends a security | Understand product enough to believe it could be suitable for at least some investors | Requires product due diligence |
| Customer-specific suitability | Recommendation to a customer | Match recommendation to customer profile | Illiquidity, risk, concentration, time horizon, tax status |
| Quantitative suitability | Series of recommendations | Avoid excessive trading or strategy frequency | Less central for one-off placements but still relevant |
| Regulation Best Interest | Recommendation to retail customer | Act in retail customer’s best interest and not place firm/rep interest ahead of customer | Disclosure, care, conflicts, compliance obligations |
| Institutional suitability | Institutional customer scenario | Customer can independently evaluate risk and affirmatively exercises independent judgment | Do not assume all institutions waive suitability duties |
Notes and examples
Suitability Factors for Private Placements
| Factor | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Net worth and liquidity | Private placements may be illiquid for years |
| Investment objective | Growth, income, speculation, preservation of capital differ sharply |
| Risk tolerance | Startups, private funds, subordinated debt, and real estate projects can lose principal |
| Time horizon | Exit may depend on sale, IPO, refinancing, fund wind-down, or maturity |
| Tax status | Pass-through income, K-1s, unrelated business taxable income, and state taxes may matter |
| Concentration | Private placements should be assessed against total portfolio exposure |
| Experience | Sophistication helps risk understanding but does not eliminate care obligations |
| Need for income | Distributions are not guaranteed unless legally fixed and funded |
| Leverage exposure | Borrowed money increases volatility and default risk |
| Transfer restrictions | Investor may be unable to sell when cash is needed |
Communications and Solicitation
| Communication issue | Rule of thumb | Exam trap |
|---|---|---|
| Retail communication | Written/electronic communication to more than 25 retail investors in a 30-calendar-day period | Usually requires principal approval before use |
| Correspondence | Written/electronic communication to 25 or fewer retail investors in a 30-calendar-day period | Still subject to supervision and content standards |
| Institutional communication | Communication only to institutional investors | Cannot be forwarded to retail investors without consequence |
| Fair and balanced standard | Risks must be presented along with benefits | Highlighting yield while burying illiquidity is problematic |
| Projections | Need reasonable basis, assumptions, and risk disclosure | Projections are not guarantees |
| Testimonials / endorsements | Must not be misleading and must disclose material conflicts where required | Paid promoter conflicts are high risk |
| Social media | Treated as communication | Public posts can be general solicitation |
| 506(b) offering | Avoid public advertising and broad untargeted outreach | A website blast may defeat the exemption |
| 506(c) offering | Public solicitation allowed if accredited investor verification is performed | Self-certification alone may be insufficient depending on facts |
FINRA Private Placement Rules to Recognize
| Rule / concept | Practical meaning |
|---|---|
| FINRA Rule 2010 | High standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade |
| FINRA Rule 2020 | No manipulative, deceptive, or fraudulent devices |
| FINRA Rule 2090 | Know your customer |
| FINRA Rule 2111 | Suitability |
| FINRA Rule 2210 | Communications with the public |
| FINRA Rule 3110 | Supervision and written supervisory procedures |
| FINRA Rule 3270 | Outside business activities require notice to the firm |
| FINRA Rule 3280 | Private securities transactions require prior written notice; compensation generally requires firm approval and supervision |
| FINRA Rule 3310 | AML compliance program |
| FINRA Rule 4512 | Customer account information |
| FINRA Rule 5122 | Member private offerings; heightened disclosure and use-of-proceeds requirements |
| FINRA Rule 5123 | Filing requirement for certain private placements sold by members |
| FINRA Rule 2040 | Restrictions on paying transaction-based compensation to unregistered persons |
| SEC Rule 15c2-4 | Customer funds in contingency offerings must be handled according to the contingency terms |
Rule 5122 vs Rule 5123
| Feature | Rule 5122 | Rule 5123 |
|---|---|---|
| Applies to | Private offering of a member firm’s or control entity’s own securities | Private placements sold by a FINRA member |
| Main concern | Conflicts when the firm or affiliate is issuer | FINRA visibility into private placement documents |
| Disclosure focus | Use of proceeds, offering expenses, selling compensation | PPM, term sheet, or other offering document filing |
| Filing concept | Filing with FINRA generally at or before first use of offering document | Filing generally within required period after first sale |
| Trap | Member cannot hide compensation or insider use of proceeds | Many exemptions exist, but do not assume every private placement is exempt |
Customer Funds and Contingency Offerings
| Offering type | Meaning | Handling concern |
|---|---|---|
| Best efforts | Placement agent tries to sell but does not guarantee amount raised | Investors need to know no firm commitment exists |
| Firm commitment | Underwriter purchases securities from issuer for resale | More common in public underwriting than private placement |
| All-or-none | Offering must raise full amount or fail | Funds should not be released unless condition met |
| Minimum-maximum | Offering can close after minimum is reached, up to maximum | Funds before minimum require careful escrow handling |
| Escrow | Third party holds investor funds | Protects investors until closing conditions are satisfied |
| Break escrow | Release funds to issuer | Only when disclosed conditions are met |
Product and Security Type Reference
| Security / product | Investor position | Key risks | Suitability focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Common stock | Residual ownership | Highest loss priority; dilution; no guaranteed dividends | Growth/speculation; long horizon |
| Preferred stock | Senior to common; junior to debt | Deferral of dividends, call risk, limited upside | Income with equity risk |
| Convertible preferred | Preferred plus conversion feature | Dilution, conversion price, valuation uncertainty | Upside participation with complexity |
| Corporate note / bond | Creditor claim | Default, interest rate, subordination, liquidity | Income, credit risk tolerance |
| Secured debt | Debt backed by collateral | Collateral valuation and perfection risk | Downside protection analysis |
| Subordinated debt | Paid after senior creditors | Higher default severity | Higher yield vs higher risk |
| Limited partnership interest | Passive ownership with GP control | Illiquidity, capital calls, tax complexity | Suitable only if investor can bear illiquidity |
| LLC membership interest | Ownership under operating agreement | Governance, transfer limits, manager conflicts | Review operating agreement |
| Private REIT / real estate program | Real estate exposure | Valuation, leverage, distribution sustainability | Income assumptions and liquidity |
| Hedge fund interest | Pooled alternative strategy | Leverage, derivatives, shorting, lockups | Sophistication and concentration |
| Private equity / VC fund | Long-term private company portfolio | J-curve, capital calls, no near-term liquidity | Long time horizon and high risk capacity |
| DPP | Direct participation in business/tax results | K-1s, passive losses, sponsor conflicts | Tax and illiquidity fit |
Debt Terms and Bond Math
Key Debt Terms
| Term | Meaning | Exam angle |
|---|---|---|
| Par / face value | Amount due at maturity | Used for coupon and conversion calculations |
| Coupon rate | Stated annual interest rate on par | Coupon dollars = par x coupon rate |
| Current yield | Annual income divided by market price | Ignores maturity gain/loss |
| Yield to maturity | Approximate total return if held to maturity | Reflects coupon plus discount/premium amortization |
| Call provision | Issuer can redeem early | Creates reinvestment risk; caps upside |
| Put provision | Investor can require issuer to repurchase | Investor protection if issuer remains solvent |
| Covenant | Promise in debt agreement | Can restrict leverage, asset sales, dividends |
| Seniority | Payment priority | Senior secured debt has stronger claim than subordinated debt |
| Default | Failure to meet obligations | May accelerate debt or trigger remedies |
| Collateral | Assets pledged to secure debt | Value and legal perfection matter |
Notes and examples
Core Formulas
\[ \text{Annual interest} = \text{Par value} \times \text{Coupon rate} \]\[ \text{Current yield} = \frac{\text{Annual interest}}{\text{Market price}} \]\[ \text{Approximate YTM} = \frac{\text{Annual interest} + \frac{\text{Par value} - \text{Price}}{\text{Years to maturity}}} {\frac{\text{Par value} + \text{Price}}{2}} \]\[ \text{Conversion ratio} = \frac{\text{Par value}}{\text{Conversion price}} \]\[ \text{Conversion value} = \text{Conversion ratio} \times \text{Common stock price} \]Private Equity and Capitalization Math
| Concept | Formula / rule | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Post-money valuation | Pre-money valuation + new investment | Value immediately after financing |
| Investor ownership | New investment / post-money valuation | Approximate new investor percentage |
| Price per share | Pre-money valuation / pre-money fully diluted shares | Financing share price |
| Enterprise value | Equity value + debt - cash | Values operating business regardless of capital structure |
| Equity value | Enterprise value - debt + cash | Value available to equity holders |
| EBITDA multiple | Enterprise value / EBITDA | Comparable-company valuation |
| Dilution | Reduction in ownership percentage after new issuance | Key risk in private equity financings |
| Liquidation preference | Preferred claim before common | Determines payout order on sale or liquidation |
Example: Pre-Money / Post-Money
If a company has a pre-money valuation of 20 million and raises 5 million:
\[ \text{Post-money valuation} = 20{,}000{,}000 + 5{,}000{,}000 = 25{,}000{,}000 \]\[ \text{New investor ownership} = \frac{5{,}000{,}000}{25{,}000{,}000} = 20\% \]Financial Statement and Ratio Review
| Ratio / measure | Formula | What it tests |
|---|---|---|
| Working capital | Current assets - current liabilities | Short-term liquidity cushion |
| Current ratio | Current assets / current liabilities | Ability to meet short-term obligations |
| Quick ratio | Cash + marketable securities + receivables, divided by current liabilities | More conservative liquidity |
| Debt-to-equity | Total debt / total equity | Leverage |
| Interest coverage | EBIT / interest expense | Ability to service debt |
| Gross margin | Gross profit / revenue | Product profitability |
| Operating margin | Operating income / revenue | Operating efficiency |
| Net margin | Net income / revenue | Overall profitability |
| Return on assets | Net income / total assets | Asset productivity |
| Return on equity | Net income / shareholders’ equity | Equity profitability |
| Free cash flow | Operating cash flow - capital expenditures | Cash available after reinvestment |
| Burn rate | Cash spent per period | Startup runway analysis |
| Runway | Cash balance / burn rate | How long issuer can operate before needing more capital |
Tax and Account-Type Concepts
| Concept | Practical point | Exam trap |
|---|---|---|
| Interest income | Generally taxed as ordinary income unless a specific exemption applies | Private corporate debt is not tax-exempt municipal debt |
| Dividends | May be ordinary or qualified depending on facts | Distribution is not the same as guaranteed income |
| Capital gain / loss | Sale price minus tax basis | Illiquid securities may not have easy valuation or exit |
| Pass-through taxation | Partnership/LLC items flow to investor via K-1 | Taxable income may occur without cash distribution |
| Passive activity rules | Loss deductibility may be limited | Tax benefits should not be the sole suitability basis |
| Depreciation / depletion | Noncash deductions in some DPPs | Tax assumptions must be supportable |
| UBTI | Tax-exempt accounts may owe tax on certain business income | Retirement account suitability issue |
| ERISA plans | Fiduciary and prohibited transaction concerns | Extra care with retirement plan investors |
Resales, Restricted Securities, and Control Securities
| Concept | Meaning | Exam angle |
|---|---|---|
| Restricted securities | Securities acquired in unregistered private offerings | Cannot be freely resold without registration or exemption |
| Control securities | Securities held by affiliates/control persons | Resale restrictions can apply even if securities were not restricted when acquired |
| Rule 144 | Safe harbor for public resale of restricted/control securities if conditions are met | Holding period, current information, volume, manner-of-sale, notice concepts |
| Rule 144A | Resale to QIBs | Institutional resale market, not retail liquidity |
| Legend | Restrictive notation on certificate/book-entry | Signals transfer restrictions |
| Investment intent | Purchaser represents not buying with view to distribution | Important in private placements |
| Liquidity discount | Reduced value due to lack of marketability | Private securities may be hard to sell |
AML, KYC, and Red Flags
| Area | What to do | Red flags |
|---|---|---|
| Customer identification | Obtain and verify required identifying information | Refusal to provide ID; inconsistent information |
| Beneficial ownership | Understand legal entity ownership/control where required | Shell entities with opaque owners |
| Source of funds | Understand how investment is funded | Third-party wires; funds from high-risk jurisdictions |
| OFAC / sanctions | Screen against applicable sanctions lists | Name matches or geographic concerns |
| Suspicious activity | Escalate according to firm AML procedures | Rapid investment and redemption request; no business purpose |
| Private placement funding | Match investor, account, and subscription documents | Funds sent from unrelated party |
| Senior investors | Watch for exploitation or diminished capacity | Unusual urgency, new “helper,” inconsistent instructions |
| Cyber / email changes | Verify payment instruction changes | Last-minute wire changes by email |
Representative Conduct Traps
| Scenario | Correct analysis |
|---|---|
| Rep sells a friend’s startup shares away from the firm for compensation | Private securities transaction issue; prior written notice and firm approval/supervision generally required |
| Rep sits on issuer advisory board | Outside business activity and conflict disclosure issue |
| Issuer pays transaction-based compensation to an unregistered finder | Broker-dealer registration and compensation concern |
| Rep guarantees investor will receive distributions | Misleading communication and antifraud issue |
| Rep says “accredited means you can buy anything” | Wrong; suitability and Reg BI still apply |
| Rep forwards institutional deck to retail prospects | Communication classification and supervision issue |
| Rep changes PPM risk language to make sale easier | Material misstatement/omission and supervision issue |
| Rep receives undisclosed side compensation from issuer | Conflict, compensation, and potential fraud issue |
| Rep uses personal email for offering documents | Books and records / supervision issue |
| Rep ignores negative due diligence because issuer is a major client | Conflict and reasonable-basis suitability issue |
High-Yield Distinction Table
| Do not confuse | Correct distinction |
|---|---|
| Private offering vs private securities transaction | Series 82 covers private securities offerings; Rule 3280 governs associated-person securities activity outside regular employment |
| Accredited investor vs qualified purchaser | Qualified purchaser is generally a higher Investment Company Act category |
| Accredited investor vs QIB | QIB is used for Rule 144A institutional resales |
| Sophisticated investor vs accredited investor | Sophistication is knowledge/experience; accreditation is rule-based status |
| 506(b) vs 506(c) | 506(b): no general solicitation. 506(c): general solicitation allowed but accredited investor verification required |
| Exempt offering vs exempt security | Offering exemption avoids registration for that transaction; security may still be subject to resale limits |
| Disclosure vs suitability | Good disclosure does not make an unsuitable recommendation suitable |
| PPM vs subscription agreement | PPM discloses offering; subscription agreement is investor’s purchase contract |
| Best efforts vs firm commitment | Best efforts does not guarantee capital raise; firm commitment involves purchase by underwriter |
| Yield vs distribution rate | Yield is return measure; distribution may include return of capital and may not be sustainable |
| Senior debt vs preferred stock | Debt has creditor claim; preferred is equity and junior to debt |
| Liquidity event vs maturity | Equity exit depends on transaction; debt maturity is contractual but still subject to credit risk |
Scenario Decision Guide
| If the question says… | Think… |
|---|---|
| “Website advertisement for a private placement” | Is this 506(c)? If 506(b), general solicitation problem |
| “Investor is accredited but needs funds in six months” | Liquidity mismatch; likely unsuitable |
| “Issuer will release funds before minimum is reached” | Contingency offering / escrow problem |
| “No PPM, only oral statements” | Due diligence, disclosure, antifraud, supervision concerns |
| “Member firm is issuer” | Rule 5122 conflict and disclosure focus |
| “Private placement sold by member” | Rule 5123 filing analysis unless exempt |
| “Institutional-only resale” | Rule 144A / QIB analysis |
| “Foreign buyers outside U.S.” | Regulation S and no directed selling efforts |
| “Investor receives K-1” | Partnership/LLC/DPP pass-through tax issue |
| “Rep receives finder’s fee away from firm” | Outside activity / private securities transaction / compensation issue |
| “Guaranteed high return with no risk” | Misleading, promissory, antifraud violation |
| “Promoter has disciplinary history” | Bad actor, disclosure, due diligence issue |
Final Review Checklist
- Know the difference between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c) cold.
- Treat accredited investor, QIB, qualified purchaser, and institutional account as separate categories.
- Remember: private placements remain subject to antifraud, suitability, supervision, AML, and communications rules.
- For every recommendation, ask: product risk, customer profile, liquidity, concentration, time horizon, and conflicts.
- For every offering, ask: exemption, solicitation method, investor eligibility, disclosure, due diligence, funds handling, and required filings.
- For every calculation, practice bond yield basics, conversion math, pre-money/post-money ownership, dilution, and core financial ratios.
Notes and examples
Final 24-Hour Review Checklist
Before a mock exam or final review session, make sure you can answer these quickly:
- What makes an offering private rather than public?
- What is the difference between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c)?
- Why does general solicitation matter?
- What is an accredited investor, and why is that not enough?
- What due diligence should a placement agent perform?
- What makes a private placement communication misleading?
- What are restricted securities?
- How do Rule 144 and Rule 144A differ?
- What conflicts must be disclosed?
- When does Reg BI apply?
- What are the main signs of unsuitable concentration?
- What should a representative do with suspicious customer funds?
- Why can escrow not be released early in a contingent offering?
- What is the difference between issuer exemption and broker-dealer registration?
- What records support a defensible recommendation?
High-Yield Exam Map
| Area | What to know cold | Common exam trap |
|---|---|---|
| Securities Act of 1933 | Registration of new issues; exemptions; prospectus concepts; anti-fraud liability | Assuming an exemption from registration removes anti-fraud duties |
| Private placements | Section 4(a)(2), Regulation D, investor qualification, information access, resale restrictions | Confusing “private offering” with “freely tradable” |
| Regulation D | Rules 504, 506(b), 506(c), Form D, accredited investors, solicitation limits | Treating 506(b) and 506(c) as interchangeable |
| Due diligence | Reasonable investigation of issuer, management, financials, use of proceeds, risks, conflicts | Believing a placement agent may rely blindly on issuer statements |
| Communications | Fair and balanced content; no misleading projections; approval/recordkeeping | Calling PPM language “safe” if oral statements contradict it |
| Suitability / Reg BI | Reasonable-basis, customer-specific, quantitative suitability; retail best interest obligations | Focusing only on investor accreditation and ignoring investment fit |
| Resales | Restricted securities, Rule 144, Rule 144A, transfer restrictions | Assuming accredited investors can immediately resell privately placed securities |
| Anti-fraud | Material misstatements, omissions, manipulation, insider trading, conflicts | Omitting a material risk is as dangerous as misstating a fact |
| Broker-dealer rules | Registration, supervision, outside business, private securities transactions, compensation | Treating issuer exemption as a broker-dealer exemption |
| AML / KYC | Customer identification, suspicious activity, OFAC/sanctions screening, red flags | Accepting funds without resolving identity/source-of-funds concerns |
Core Statutory Framework
Securities Act of 1933
The Securities Act of 1933 focuses on new issues and primary offerings. Its basic rule is simple: securities must be registered unless an exemption is available.
High-yield points:
- Registration is about disclosure, not SEC approval of investment merit.
- Exempt offerings are exempt from registration, not from anti-fraud rules.
- A materially misleading private placement memorandum, pitch deck, term sheet, or oral sales statement can create liability.
- Securities sold in private placements are often restricted securities.
Notes and examples
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
The Exchange Act focuses on secondary trading markets, broker-dealers, exchanges, reporting companies, manipulation, and anti-fraud rules.
Know the exam logic:
| Concept | Review point |
|---|---|
| Broker-dealer registration | Firms and associated persons generally must be properly registered for securities activities |
| Rule 10b-5 | Prohibits material misstatements, omissions, schemes to defraud, and deceptive practices |
| Manipulation | Includes improper trading, matched orders, wash sales, rumors, and artificial price activity |
| Insider trading | Trading or tipping while in possession of material nonpublic information can violate anti-fraud rules |
| Reporting issuers | Ongoing public reporting can affect resale rules, diligence, and available information |
FINRA Conduct Rules
FINRA rules are central to exam questions involving sales practice, supervision, communications, compensation, and customer interactions.
Expect scenarios asking: What should the representative or firm do next?
Usually correct actions include:
- Escalate to a supervisor or compliance.
- Correct or withdraw misleading materials.
- Obtain required approvals before use.
- Document diligence and suitability analysis.
- Disclose conflicts and compensation.
- Refuse or delay suspicious transactions pending review.
- Avoid guarantees, exaggerations, and unsupported predictions.
Accredited, Sophisticated, Qualified, and Institutional Investors
Private offering questions often test investor labels. Do not treat them as synonyms.
| Investor label | Basic meaning | Trap |
|---|---|---|
| Accredited investor | Meets SEC-defined financial, professional, or entity criteria | Accredited does not automatically mean suitable |
| Sophisticated investor | Has knowledge and experience to evaluate merits and risks, or has a capable purchaser representative | Sophistication is not the same as net worth |
| Qualified institutional buyer, or QIB | Large institutional investor category used in Rule 144A resales | QIB is not the same as accredited investor |
| Qualified purchaser | Investment Company Act concept often relevant to 3(c)(7) private funds | Higher/different standard than accredited investor |
| Institutional account | FINRA communications/suitability category | Institutional status does not eliminate all duties |
Notes and examples
Accredited Investor Review Points
Commonly tested accredited investor categories include:
- Certain individuals meeting income or net worth standards.
- Certain entities meeting asset or ownership standards.
- Certain regulated financial institutions.
- Certain knowledgeable employees of private funds.
- Individuals with specified professional certifications or credentials recognized under SEC rules.
- Certain family offices and family clients meeting required conditions.
Exam trap: if a question says an investor is accredited, ask the next question: Is the recommendation still suitable and in the customer’s best interest where applicable?
Private Offering Communication Rules
Private placement sales are communication-heavy: pitch books, PPMs, emails, calls, webinars, one-on-one meetings, term sheets, and data rooms.
FINRA Communication Categories
| Category | General concept | Review point |
|---|---|---|
| Retail communication | Communication distributed or made available to more than a limited number of retail investors within a defined period | Often requires principal approval and must be fair and balanced |
| Correspondence | Communication to a limited number of retail investors | Subject to supervision and review procedures |
| Institutional communication | Communication only to institutional investors | Still must be fair, balanced, and not misleading |
Notes and examples
Communication Musts
A compliant communication should:
- Be fair and balanced.
- Disclose material risks.
- Avoid exaggerated or unwarranted claims.
- Distinguish fact from opinion.
- Avoid promissory language such as “guaranteed,” unless actually guaranteed by a capable guarantor and fully explained.
- Present potential benefits with meaningful risks and limitations.
- Use current and supportable data.
- Disclose conflicts where material.
- Avoid selective disclosure that makes the overall message misleading.
Common Communication Traps
| Bad statement | Why it is a problem |
|---|---|
| “This private placement is SEC-approved.” | Registration or filing does not mean merit approval |
| “You can exit whenever you want.” | Private securities are often illiquid and transfer-restricted |
| “The issuer projects 20%; that is what investors should expect.” | Unsupported projections and promissory framing are misleading |
| “The PPM has all the risk disclosure, so the sales call can be more aggressive.” | Oral statements are also subject to anti-fraud standards |
| “Only accredited investors are receiving it, so advertising rules do not matter.” | Accredited status does not eliminate communication rules |
| “No commission is charged to the investor.” | Compensation may be paid by issuer and still create a conflict |
Suitability, Reg BI, and Investor Fit
A private placement can be technically exempt and still be an unsuitable recommendation.
Suitability Framework
| Type | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Reasonable-basis suitability | The firm must understand the product and have a basis to believe it is suitable for at least some investors | Diligence on issuer, risks, valuation, liquidity, and structure |
| Customer-specific suitability | The recommendation must fit the particular customer | Concentration, liquidity needs, age, objectives, risk tolerance |
| Quantitative suitability | Series of transactions must not be excessive | Repeated illiquid private placements may overconcentrate a customer |
Notes and examples
Reg BI Review
For retail customers, Regulation Best Interest requires broker-dealers and associated persons to act in the customer’s best interest when making a recommendation.
Remember the practical obligations:
| Obligation | Exam meaning |
|---|---|
| Disclosure | Provide material facts about scope, fees, costs, conflicts, and capacity |
| Care | Understand the investment and have a reasonable basis for the recommendation |
| Conflict of interest | Identify, disclose, mitigate, or eliminate conflicts as required |
| Compliance | Firm must have policies and procedures reasonably designed for compliance |
Private Placement Suitability Red Flags
A private placement is usually problematic for a customer who:
- Needs liquidity soon.
- Cannot tolerate loss of principal.
- Does not understand restrictions and risks.
- Is overconcentrated in speculative or illiquid investments.
- Is relying on projected income for essential expenses.
- Is purchasing primarily because of tax benefits without understanding economics.
- Is pressured by scarcity claims such as “last chance” or “exclusive access.”
- Has unresolved identity, funding source, or authorization issues.
Offering Structures and Contingencies
Best Efforts vs. Firm Commitment
| Structure | Meaning | Series 82 review point |
|---|---|---|
| Best efforts | Broker-dealer uses reasonable efforts to sell but does not guarantee amount raised | Common in private placements |
| Firm commitment | Underwriter purchases securities from issuer and resells them | More typical of underwritten public offerings |
| All-or-none | Offering must sell entire amount or investor funds are returned | Escrow and contingency compliance matter |
| Minimum-maximum | Minimum must be reached before closing; sales may continue up to maximum | Do not release funds before minimum is satisfied |
| Part-or-none | Specified portion must be sold | Follow stated terms exactly |
Escrow Trap
If an offering is contingent, investor funds generally must be handled according to the contingency and escrow terms. A representative should not suggest that a minimum has been met, or that funds can be released, unless the required condition is actually satisfied.
Securities Products in Private Offerings
Equity Securities
| Security | Core feature | Investor risk |
|---|---|---|
| Common stock | Residual ownership; voting rights may vary | Highest claim risk; dilution; no required dividends |
| Preferred stock | Priority over common for dividends/liquidation; may be cumulative, convertible, callable | Interest-rate sensitivity, subordination to debt, issuer call risk |
| LLC or partnership interests | Ownership in private entity or fund | Illiquidity, tax complexity, governance limits |
| Warrants | Right to buy securities at set price | May expire worthless |
| Convertible preferred | Preferred security convertible into common | Conversion/dilution and valuation risk |
Notes and examples
Debt Securities
| Feature | Review point |
|---|---|
| Secured vs. unsecured | Secured debt has collateral; unsecured relies on issuer credit |
| Senior vs. subordinated | Senior debt has higher payment priority |
| Fixed vs. floating rate | Fixed rate has more interest-rate price sensitivity |
| Maturity | Longer maturity usually means greater interest-rate risk |
| Covenants | Restrictions or requirements intended to protect creditors |
| Call provision | Issuer may redeem early, often when rates fall or credit improves |
| Default | Failure to pay or comply with covenants can trigger remedies |
Convertible Securities
Key concepts:
- Conversion ratio determines how many shares the investor may receive.
- Conversion price is the effective price at which conversion occurs.
- Convertibles combine debt/preferred features with equity upside.
- Investors face credit risk, equity risk, dilution risk, and complexity risk.
Useful formulas:
\[ \text{Conversion value} = \text{Conversion ratio} \times \text{Current common stock price} \]Valuation and Capitalization
Private offerings often include valuation, ownership, and dilution questions.
\[ \text{Post-money valuation} = \text{Pre-money valuation} + \text{New investment} \]\[ \text{Investor ownership percentage} = \frac{\text{New investment}}{\text{Post-money valuation}} \]High-yield trap: a headline ownership percentage may change after option pools, warrants, convertible notes, liquidation preferences, or future financing rounds.
Private Funds and Investment Company Concepts
Private offerings often involve pooled vehicles such as private equity funds, venture funds, real estate funds, hedge funds, or special purpose vehicles.
Common Private Fund Review Points
| Concept | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Investment Company Act | Regulates investment companies unless an exclusion or exemption applies |
| 3(c)(1) fund | Common private fund exclusion based on limited beneficial owners and non-public offering |
| 3(c)(7) fund | Common private fund exclusion based on qualified purchasers and non-public offering |
| Adviser conflicts | Management fees, carried interest, allocation policies, side letters, affiliated transactions |
| Liquidity | Redemptions may be limited, suspended, or unavailable |
| Valuation | Hard-to-value assets create conflict and disclosure issues |
Notes and examples
Fund Offering Traps
- A fund interest is still a security.
- A private fund exemption does not eliminate anti-fraud obligations.
- Side letters can create conflicts or preferential rights.
- Performance presentations must be accurate and not cherry-picked.
- Management fees and incentive compensation affect investor returns.
- Investor-level tax consequences may be complex and not suitable for all customers.
Resale Restrictions and Secondary Market Concepts
Private placement investors often want to know when they can sell. The safest exam answer is usually: do not promise liquidity unless a valid resale path exists.
Restricted Securities
Securities acquired in unregistered private offerings are often restricted. Resale may require:
- Registration;
- A resale exemption;
- Compliance with holding periods and conditions;
- Transfer agent approval or legal opinion;
- Issuer consent or compliance with governing documents.
Notes and examples
Rule 144
Rule 144 provides a safe harbor for public resale of restricted and control securities if conditions are met.
| Seller type | Review focus |
|---|---|
| Non-affiliate | Holding period and current public information concepts are key |
| Affiliate/control person | Additional limits may include volume, manner of sale, notice, and current information |
| Reporting issuer | Public information availability affects conditions |
| Non-reporting issuer | Longer and more restrictive resale analysis may apply |
Trap: Rule 144 is a resale safe harbor, not the original private placement exemption.
Rule 144A
Rule 144A permits certain resales to qualified institutional buyers. It supports institutional private resale markets.
Exam reminders:
- It is a resale rule, not the same as Regulation D.
- It is generally institutional, not retail.
- QIB status is not the same as accredited investor status.
- Securities may still be illiquid compared with exchange-traded securities.
Anti-Fraud Rules and Material Information
Materiality
Information is material if a reasonable investor would consider it important in making an investment decision, or if it would significantly alter the total mix of information available.
Examples of potentially material information:
- Misstated revenue, assets, liabilities, or cash flow.
- Undisclosed related-party transactions.
- Management disciplinary history.
- Loss of major customer or supplier.
- Use of proceeds inconsistent with disclosure.
- Pending litigation or regulatory investigation.
- Valuation assumptions with no reasonable basis.
- Conflicts of interest or compensation arrangements.
- Liquidity restrictions and lack of secondary market.
Notes and examples
Misstatement vs. Omission
| Problem | Example |
|---|---|
| Misstatement | “The company is profitable” when it is not |
| Omission | Failing to mention the company will use proceeds to repay insider loans |
| Half-truth | Saying “revenue doubled” while omitting that losses tripled |
| Unsupported projection | Presenting aggressive growth assumptions as expected results |
| Conflict concealment | Not disclosing that the firm receives significant placement compensation |
Insider Trading and MNPI
Material nonpublic information, or MNPI, must be handled carefully.
High-yield rules:
- Do not trade while in possession of MNPI.
- Do not tip others.
- Follow information barrier procedures.
- Escalate accidental receipt of MNPI.
- Do not use confidential issuer information to solicit customers improperly.
Compensation, Conflicts, and Disclosures
Private placements frequently involve fees paid by the issuer, which can create conflicts even if the investor does not write a separate commission check.
Compensation Types
| Compensation | Review issue |
|---|---|
| Placement fee | Must be disclosed where material; creates sales incentive |
| Selling concession | Compensation to selling broker-dealer or representative |
| Warrants or equity | Creates upside conflict and valuation concern |
| Expense reimbursement | Must be accurate and not disguise additional compensation |
| Management fee | Common in funds; reduces investor return |
| Carried interest / incentive allocation | Aligns with performance but can increase risk-taking incentives |
| Referral fee | May raise registration and disclosure issues |
Notes and examples
Conflict Decision Rule
If the fact could reasonably influence the investor’s decision, disclose it clearly and escalate if unsure.
Common conflicts:
- Firm has investment banking relationship with issuer.
- Representative personally invests in the offering.
- Firm or affiliate receives warrants.
- Issuer uses proceeds to pay affiliates.
- Fund manager values illiquid assets and receives performance fees.
- Preferential terms are granted to selected investors.
Broker-Dealer Registration and Associated Person Issues
Registration Logic
A person receiving transaction-based compensation for securities solicitation generally raises broker-dealer registration concerns.
Series 82 candidates should distinguish:
| Activity | Likely concern |
|---|---|
| Introducing investors for compensation | Broker-dealer registration issue |
| Soliciting purchases | Registration and supervision required |
| Giving investment recommendations | Suitability/Reg BI and registration implications |
| Marketing issuer securities while unregistered | Potential violation |
| Administrative support without solicitation | Less likely to be brokerage activity, but facts matter |
Trap: an issuer’s ability to rely on a securities registration exemption does not automatically permit unregistered persons to sell the securities for compensation.
Private Securities Transactions and Outside Business Activities
Representatives must follow firm procedures before participating in securities transactions away from the firm or engaging in outside business activities.
Key points:
- Provide required prior written notice.
- Obtain approval when required.
- Disclose compensation.
- Do not sell away.
- Do not route customers into off-platform deals without firm authorization.
- Personal investments can still create conflicts.
AML, KYC, and Customer Onboarding
AML Program Concepts
Broker-dealers must maintain an anti-money laundering program. For exam purposes, focus on practical red flags and escalation.
| Area | Review point |
|---|---|
| Customer Identification Program | Verify customer identity under firm procedures |
| Beneficial ownership | Understand ownership/control of legal entity customers as required by firm policy |
| Suspicious activity | Escalate unusual transactions, source-of-funds concerns, or inconsistent behavior |
| OFAC / sanctions | Screen against applicable sanctions lists under firm procedures |
| Recordkeeping | Maintain required identity and transaction records |
| No tipping off | Do not improperly alert a customer about suspicious activity reporting |
Notes and examples
AML Red Flags in Private Placements
- Investor refuses to provide identity documents.
- Funds come from unrelated third parties.
- Investor is unconcerned with risk or economics.
- Investment is inconsistent with known financial profile.
- Complex entity structure has no business purpose.
- Investor seeks rapid redemption or transfer.
- Customer is associated with high-risk jurisdictions or sanctioned parties.
- Source of funds cannot be explained.
Correct exam response: pause, investigate under firm procedures, and escalate to AML/compliance.
Supervision, Books, and Records
Supervisory Duties
Broker-dealers must supervise associated persons and securities activities.
High-yield controls:
- Written supervisory procedures.
- Principal review and approval where required.
- Communication review.
- Product due diligence.
- Training.
- Exception reports.
- Customer complaint handling.
- Escalation procedures.
- Record retention.
Records Often Relevant to Private Placements
| Record | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Offering documents | Evidence of disclosure and terms |
| Subscription agreements | Investor representations and purchase terms |
| Investor questionnaires | Qualification and suitability support |
| Communications | Emails, pitch decks, scripts, correspondence |
| Diligence files | Reasonable-basis support |
| Approval records | Supervisory review |
| Compensation records | Conflict and fee disclosure |
| Customer profile | Suitability and Reg BI analysis |
| Complaint files | Regulatory and supervisory review |
Trap: if it was not documented, it may be difficult to prove that it was done.
Customer Accounts, Orders, and Funds
Private placement processing can be less standardized than exchange-traded securities, so procedures matter.
Customer Account Review
Before recommending or processing a purchase, confirm:
- Customer identity.
- Authority for the account.
- Investment objectives.
- Risk tolerance.
- Time horizon.
- Liquidity needs.
- Financial condition.
- Tax status if relevant.
- Concentration in illiquid or speculative investments.
- Understanding of restrictions and risks.
Handling Funds
Be especially careful with:
- Checks made payable to the wrong party.
- Funds sent directly to a representative.
- Third-party wires.
- Early release from escrow.
- Customer requests inconsistent with offering documents.
- Use of personal accounts.
- Missing subscription documents.
Correct response: follow firm procedures and offering terms; escalate irregularities.
Common Series 82 Decision Points
506(b) or 506(c)?
| Fact pattern | Likely answer |
|---|---|
| No advertising; pre-existing substantive relationship; accredited investors | 506(b) may fit |
| Public website invites investors; social media promotion | General solicitation; think 506(c) if conditions met |
| Non-accredited but sophisticated investors included | 506(b) issue; not 506(c) |
| All purchasers accredited but no reasonable verification after public solicitation | 506(c) problem |
| Mass email to unknown investors | General solicitation concern |
Notes and examples
Suitable or Unsuitable?
| Fact pattern | Likely concern |
|---|---|
| Retired customer needs income and liquidity; product is speculative and locked up | Likely unsuitable |
| Accredited investor wants small allocation and understands illiquidity | May be suitable if diligence supports product |
| Customer wants 80% of net worth in one private fund | Concentration problem |
| Investor signs risk acknowledgment but cannot explain product | Documentation alone is not enough |
| Institutional investor has independent analysis capability | Duties still exist, but analysis differs from retail scenario |
Disclosure or No Disclosure?
Disclose if the information is material, including:
- Compensation.
- Conflicts.
- Illiquidity.
- Transfer restrictions.
- Use of proceeds.
- Related-party transactions.
- Financial weakness.
- Fees and expenses.
- Valuation methodology.
- Sponsor disciplinary history.
- Risks specific to the issuer or sector.
Escalate or Proceed?
Escalate when:
- Investor information is inconsistent.
- Offering documents appear misleading.
- Management refuses diligence requests.
- Funds come from unusual sources.
- Public solicitation may have occurred in a 506(b) deal.
- A representative wants to sell away.
- A customer complains.
- A material event occurs before closing.
- A communication contains exaggerated claims.
Calculation Review
Current Yield
Current yield compares annual income to current market price.
\[ \text{Current yield} = \frac{\text{Annual interest or dividend}}{\text{Current market price}} \]Exam trap: current yield does not include capital gain or loss at maturity.
Basic Bond Price Direction
| Market change | Existing fixed-rate bond price |
|---|---|
| Interest rates rise | Price falls |
| Interest rates fall | Price rises |
| Credit quality worsens | Price usually falls |
| Call becomes more likely | Upside may be limited |
| Longer maturity | More interest-rate sensitivity |
| Lower coupon | More interest-rate sensitivity |
Capitalization and Dilution
| Concept | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Pre-money valuation | Value before new investment |
| Post-money valuation | Value after new investment |
| Dilution | Reduction in ownership percentage due to new issuance |
| Liquidation preference | Preferred investor priority before common equity |
| Fully diluted shares | Shares including options, warrants, and convertibles if exercised/converted |
Quick trap: a 20% post-money ownership interest may not mean 20% of sale proceeds if preferred shares, debt, liquidation preferences, or participating rights exist.
Exam Traps to Memorize
“Accredited” Is Not the Final Answer
Accredited status helps with offering eligibility but does not answer:
- Is the product suitable?
- Is the recommendation in the customer’s best interest where applicable?
- Is the customer overconcentrated?
- Does the customer understand illiquidity?
- Were conflicts disclosed?
- Was due diligence performed?
Notes and examples
“Private” Does Not Mean “Unregulated”
Private offerings still involve:
- Anti-fraud rules.
- Broker-dealer registration.
- FINRA communications rules.
- Suitability and Reg BI.
- AML obligations.
- Books and records.
- Supervision.
- State anti-fraud rules.
“Filed” Does Not Mean “Approved”
A filing, notice, or disclosure document does not mean a regulator approved the investment’s merits.
“Risk Disclosure” Does Not Cure Everything
Risk factors help only if they are:
- Accurate.
- Complete.
- Specific.
- Prominent enough.
- Not contradicted by sales statements.
- Updated when material facts change.
“Issuer Says So” Is Not Enough
A placement agent should question:
- Unsupported valuations.
- Aggressive projections.
- Missing financials.
- Related-party transactions.
- Disciplinary history.
- Unclear use of proceeds.
- Pressure to close quickly.
- Refusal to provide diligence materials.
Fast Review Tables
Laws and Rules by Purpose
| Law/rule area | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Securities Act of 1933 | New issue registration, exemptions, disclosure, anti-fraud |
| Exchange Act of 1934 | Broker-dealers, trading markets, reporting companies, anti-fraud |
| FINRA rules | Member firm conduct, supervision, communications, suitability |
| Regulation D | Private offering safe harbors |
| Rule 144 | Public resale safe harbor for restricted/control securities |
| Rule 144A | Institutional resale safe harbor to QIBs |
| Regulation Best Interest | Best interest standard for retail recommendations |
| AML rules | Detect and prevent money laundering and suspicious activity |
Notes and examples
Correct Action Verbs
When unsure, Series 82 questions often reward conservative compliance actions:
| If you see… | Think… |
|---|---|
| Misleading pitch deck | Stop use, correct, escalate |
| Missing customer information | Obtain/update before recommendation |
| Suspicious funds | Escalate to AML/compliance |
| Undisclosed conflict | Disclose and supervise |
| Unapproved outside deal | Do not participate; notify firm |
| Material issuer change | Update disclosure; reassess recommendation |
| Customer complaint | Report under firm procedures |
| Public advertising in private deal | Analyze exemption impact |
| Non-accredited investor in 506(c) | Not permitted |
| Liquidity promise | Misleading unless valid and disclosed |
Topic Drill Priorities
Use topic drills to test whether you can apply rules to scenarios, not merely define terms. Prioritize practice in this order:
Regulation D scenarios
Especially 506(b) vs. 506(c), general solicitation, accredited investors, and verification.Suitability and Reg BI scenarios
Practice identifying when accreditation is insufficient.Private placement due diligence
Focus on what the firm must investigate and when to escalate.Communications and anti-fraud
Drill misleading statements, omissions, projections, and conflicts.Resale restrictions
Separate original issuance exemptions from resale exemptions.AML and supervision
Know when to stop, document, and escalate.Product economics
Review equity, debt, convertibles, valuation, dilution, yield, and risk.