Series 28 — Introducing Broker-Dealer Financial and Operations Principal Qualification Examination Quick Review
Independent Quick Review for the FINRA Series 28 exam, focused on introducing broker-dealer financial responsibility, net capital, reporting, books and records, and operations.
Quick Review Overview
This Quick Review is for candidates preparing for FINRA’s Series 28 — Introducing Broker-Dealer Financial and Operations Principal Qualification Examination. The goal is fast, exam-focused review before moving into topic drills, mock exams, and detailed explanations.
The Series 28 candidate should think like a financial and operations principal at an introducing broker-dealer: protect the firm’s minimum capital, maintain accurate books and records, file required reports, understand customer protection boundaries, and recognize when a transaction or balance sheet item creates a regulatory capital issue.
Use this page as an independent companion practice aid. It is not affiliated with FINRA or any regulator. Always use current FINRA and SEC materials as the controlling source for rule language and current requirements.
High-Yield Series 28 Mindset
| If the question says… | Think first about… | Common trap |
|---|---|---|
| “Introducing broker-dealer” | Does the firm carry accounts, hold funds, or hold securities? | Treating the firm like a clearing broker |
| “Net capital” | Start with net worth, remove nonallowable assets, apply haircuts and charges | Counting illiquid assets as capital |
| “Aggregate indebtedness” | Money liabilities compared with net capital | Forgetting accrued expenses, payables, or customer credits |
| “Customer funds or securities” | Prompt transmission, fully disclosed clearing arrangement, possession/control | Holding customer checks or securities too long |
| “FOCUS report” | Financial reporting, net capital computation, supporting books | Confusing annual audit with periodic FOCUS filing |
| “Clearing deposit” | Is it allowable, restricted, or subject to a deduction? | Assuming all deposits are fully liquid |
| “Fail, aged receivable, or unresolved difference” | Potential capital deduction or nonallowable asset | Ignoring age and collectability |
| “Proprietary position” | Haircut, market risk, concentration, open commitment | Using market value without haircut |
| “Early warning” | Notice requirement before or at financial deterioration | Waiting until actual deficiency |
| “Exam asks for best action” | Maintain capital, file notice, stop business if deficient, document support | Choosing a sales or revenue answer over regulatory protection |
Core Financial Responsibility Framework
The Series 28 heavily tests whether you can classify items correctly and follow the calculation sequence.
Net Capital Core Formula
[ \text{Net Capital}
\text{Net Worth} + \text{Qualified Subordinated Liabilities}
\text{Nonallowable Assets}
\text{Haircuts and Other Charges} ]
Aggregate Indebtedness Ratio
[ \text{AI Ratio}
\frac{\text{Aggregate Indebtedness}}{\text{Net Capital}} ]
Required Net Capital Under the Aggregate Indebtedness Standard
[ \text{Required Net Capital}
\max(\text{Fixed Dollar Minimum},\ \text{Percentage Requirement Based on Aggregate Indebtedness}) ]
For exam purposes, remember the concept: the firm must maintain the greater of the applicable fixed-dollar minimum and the required amount based on indebtedness. If the firm is near a limit, the conservative answer is usually to reduce liabilities, increase allowable capital, restrict withdrawals, or notify as required.
Net Capital Calculation Sequence
Do not jump straight from balance sheet equity to net capital. The exam often tests the order.
Start with ownership equity / net worth
- Assets minus liabilities under appropriate accounting principles.
- Confirm liabilities are complete, including accruals.
Add qualified subordinated borrowings if allowable
- Only properly documented and approved subordinated liabilities count.
- Ordinary loans payable are generally liabilities, not capital.
Deduct nonallowable assets
- Assets that are not readily convertible to cash or are not collectible in time.
- Common examples: furniture, fixtures, prepaid expenses, unsecured receivables, aged receivables, certain deposits, and unresolved differences.
Apply securities haircuts
- Proprietary securities positions are reduced by required deductions.
- More volatile or less liquid positions usually create larger capital charges.
Apply operational and concentration charges
- Fails, deficits, undue concentration, open commitments, and other specific charges may reduce net capital.
Compare net capital to the required minimum
- Required capital is the greater of the applicable fixed minimum or formula-based requirement.
Determine excess net capital
- Excess net capital is the cushion above the requirement.
[ \text{Excess Net Capital}
\text{Net Capital}
\text{Required Net Capital} ]
Allowable vs. Nonallowable Assets
| Asset or item | Likely treatment | Exam reason |
|---|---|---|
| Cash in bank | Usually allowable | Liquid asset, subject to verification and restrictions |
| Proprietary securities with ready market | Allowable after haircut | Marketable, but subject to market-risk deduction |
| Government securities | Allowable after applicable haircut | Lower risk does not mean no haircut |
| Listed equity securities | Allowable after haircut | Market value must be reduced |
| Furniture, fixtures, equipment | Nonallowable | Not readily convertible into cash for customer/regulatory protection |
| Leasehold improvements | Nonallowable | Illiquid operating asset |
| Prepaid expenses | Nonallowable | Already paid; not available to meet liabilities |
| Unsecured receivable | Often nonallowable | Collection risk |
| Aged receivable | Often nonallowable or deducted | Age indicates collectability risk |
| Clearing deposit | Depends on terms | Restricted deposits may not be fully allowable |
| Insurance claim receivable | Question-specific | Allowability depends on collectability and documentation |
| Deferred tax asset | Often nonallowable or limited | Not immediately liquid |
| Goodwill or intangible assets | Nonallowable | No reliable immediate liquidation value |
| Deficits in customer or broker accounts | Potential charge | Unsecured exposure or collectability issue |
Quick Classification Rule
Ask:
- Is the asset cash or readily convertible to cash?
- Is it free of restriction?
- Is it collectible promptly?
- Is there a ready market?
- Does a rule require a haircut or deduction?
If the answer is no, restricted, aged, uncertain, or unsupported, expect a deduction or nonallowable treatment.
Aggregate Indebtedness Quick Review
Aggregate indebtedness generally focuses on the firm’s money liabilities. The Series 28 often tests whether a balance sheet item belongs in aggregate indebtedness, net capital, both, or neither.
| Item | Usually included in aggregate indebtedness? | Review point |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts payable | Yes | Money liability |
| Accrued expenses | Yes | Must accrue known expenses |
| Rent payable | Yes | Ordinary liability |
| Salaries and bonuses payable | Yes | Accrued compensation counts when owed |
| Taxes payable | Yes | Liability even if not yet paid |
| Bank loan payable | Usually yes | Unless properly subordinated and approved |
| Customer credit balances | Often yes | Liability to customers |
| Broker-dealer payable | Often yes | Liability unless specifically excluded or offset by rule |
| Qualified subordinated loan | No, if properly treated as capital | Must meet regulatory conditions |
| Fully secured liability | May be excluded or limited | Depends on collateral and rule treatment |
| Equity capital | No | Ownership interest, not indebtedness |
AI Ratio Decision Point
If the question gives aggregate indebtedness and net capital, calculate the ratio and compare it with the applicable limit or warning threshold described in the question.
Plain-English version:
- Higher aggregate indebtedness means more required capital.
- Lower net capital makes the ratio worse.
- Accruing an expense can reduce net worth and increase indebtedness at the same time.
- Reclassifying a receivable as nonallowable reduces capital even though total assets may not change.
Introducing Broker-Dealer vs. Carrying Broker-Dealer
This distinction is central to the Series 28.
| Function | Introducing broker-dealer | Carrying / clearing broker-dealer |
|---|---|---|
| Customer accounts | Introduces on a fully disclosed basis | Carries customer accounts |
| Customer funds/securities | Generally should not hold; promptly transmits if received | May receive, hold, and safeguard |
| Customer statements | Often generated by carrying firm | Usually responsible for custody-related statements |
| Customer Protection Rule reserve | Often relies on exemption or noncarrying status | Typically must calculate reserve and maintain possession/control |
| Net capital burden | Lower than a carrying firm, but still critical | Higher and more complex |
| Operations focus | Books, records, commissions, clearing relationship, capital | Custody, margin, settlement, reserve formula, possession/control |
| Exam trap | Assuming “introducing” means no financial responsibility | Assuming every introducing firm has carrying-firm obligations |
Customer Protection Rule Decision Path
flowchart TD
A[Does the firm carry customer accounts?] -->|Yes| B[Expect carrying-firm customer protection obligations]
A -->|No| C[Does the firm receive or hold customer funds or securities?]
C -->|No| D[Noncarrying / introducing analysis]
C -->|Receives only for prompt transmission| E[Check payable to correct party and promptly forward]
C -->|Holds or controls| F[Potential custody issue and higher regulatory concern]
D --> G[Verify fully disclosed clearing arrangement]
E --> G
G --> H[Maintain books, records, notices, and exemption support]
F --> I[May lose expected treatment; review net capital and customer protection consequences]
Customer Funds and Securities Traps
| Situation | Exam concern |
|---|---|
| Customer check made payable to the introducing firm | May indicate receipt of customer funds; treatment depends on prompt handling and firm permissions |
| Check made payable to clearing firm or issuer and promptly forwarded | More consistent with introducing-firm role |
| Customer securities left at the introducing firm | Possession/control issue; may violate procedures |
| Employee delays forwarding customer funds | Operational and supervisory failure |
| Firm uses customer funds for operating expenses | Serious violation; customer funds cannot finance the firm |
| Fully disclosed agreement exists but firm’s conduct differs | Actual conduct can override labels |
FOCUS Reports and Financial Reporting
FOCUS reporting is a high-yield Series 28 topic because it connects books, records, capital, and regulatory supervision.
| Report / filing area | What to know for exam review | Common mistake |
|---|---|---|
| FOCUS report | Periodic financial and operational report filed through required regulatory channels | Treating it as only an accounting report |
| Balance sheet | Shows assets, liabilities, and equity at a date | Forgetting nonallowable asset impact |
| Income statement | Shows revenue and expense over a period | Ignoring accruals |
| Net capital computation | Supports capital compliance | Not tying it to general ledger |
| Aggregate indebtedness schedule | Supports AI ratio | Omitting accrued liabilities |
| Annual audited financial statements | Independent audit support for financial condition | Confusing audit with daily capital monitoring |
| Supplemental schedules | Provide regulatory detail | Assuming summary statements are enough |
| Amendments | Correct material errors | Ignoring inaccurate prior filing |
Reporting Review Rules of Thumb
- The books must support the report.
- The report must support the net capital computation.
- The net capital computation must be current enough to detect deterioration.
- Material errors require correction, not silence.
- A firm cannot solve a capital deficiency by delaying the filing.
Books and Records: What to Recognize Quickly
FINRA and SEC recordkeeping expectations are a major part of the financial operations function.
| Record type | Why it matters | Exam angle |
|---|---|---|
| General ledger | Master accounting record | Must reconcile to trial balance and financial reports |
| Cash receipts and disbursements blotter | Tracks money movement | Detects misuse, errors, and unrecorded liabilities |
| Securities blotter | Tracks securities transactions | Supports trade and position records |
| Customer account records | Shows customer identity and account details | Introducing firms still maintain required records |
| Proprietary position records | Supports haircut calculations | Missing positions understate capital charges |
| Trial balance | Checks ledger equality | Unbalanced trial balance signals record problem |
| Bank reconciliations | Verifies cash | Old reconciling items may become charges |
| Clearing broker statements | Supports commissions, deposits, fails, and receivables | Must reconcile to internal books |
| Expense accrual support | Ensures liabilities are complete | Underaccruing inflates capital |
| Written supervisory procedures | Shows how compliance is performed | Procedures must match actual operations |
Accrual Accounting Traps
Series 28 questions often hide capital issues inside accounting treatment.
| Fact pattern | Correct thinking |
|---|---|
| Expense incurred but not paid | Accrue the liability; net worth decreases |
| Commission earned but not received | Record receivable only if collectible and supported |
| Receivable is old or disputed | Deduct or treat as nonallowable if required |
| Prepaid rent or insurance | Asset for accounting, but usually nonallowable for net capital |
| Bonus declared but unpaid | Liability if earned/obligated |
| Legal settlement probable and estimable | Accrual may be required |
| Bank account unreconciled | Cash may be overstated; investigate before relying on it |
| Clearing broker charges not booked | Capital may be overstated |
Haircuts and Market Risk
A haircut is a regulatory deduction from the value of proprietary positions. It recognizes that securities may decline in value before they can be liquidated.
| Position type | Exam concept |
|---|---|
| U.S. government securities | Usually lower haircut than equities, but still subject to deduction |
| Municipal securities | Haircut depends on features such as maturity and marketability |
| Corporate debt | Haircut depends on quality, maturity, and market risk |
| Listed equity securities | Standard equity haircut concepts frequently tested |
| Options | Strategy and position relationships matter |
| Illiquid or nonmarketable securities | May be heavily deducted or nonallowable |
| Concentrated positions | Additional charge may apply |
| Open contractual commitments | Can create capital charges before settlement |
Haircut Mistakes
- Using market value as net capital without deduction.
- Netting long and short positions when the rules do not allow it.
- Ignoring concentration.
- Treating restricted stock as freely marketable.
- Forgetting proprietary accounts held at the clearing firm.
- Ignoring unsettled trades that create position exposure.
Fails, Receivables, and Operational Charges
Fails and aged balances are common exam topics because they connect operations to capital.
| Item | Meaning | Capital concern |
|---|---|---|
| Fail to deliver | Firm sold securities but did not deliver | May require charge if unresolved |
| Fail to receive | Firm bought securities but has not received them | Exposure to counterparty or market movement |
| DK / don’t know notice | Counterparty does not recognize trade | Must resolve promptly |
| Aged receivable | Amount due but not collected timely | May become nonallowable |
| Unsecured debit | Amount owed without adequate collateral | Capital deduction risk |
| Stock record difference | Internal records do not match actual positions | Potential capital and books/records issue |
| Suspense account | Temporary unresolved item | Must be investigated; cannot hide losses |
Exam Rule of Thumb
If an item is old, unresolved, unsecured, disputed, or unsupported, expect the exam to push you toward a deduction, charge, notice, or corrective action.
Early Warning, Deficiency, and Corrective Action
The financial and operations principal must identify capital problems before they become firm-threatening.
| Condition | Best exam response |
|---|---|
| Net capital below required minimum | Immediate regulatory concern; firm cannot continue business as usual |
| Net capital approaching warning level | Notify as required, restrict withdrawals, raise capital, reduce business |
| AI ratio too high | Reduce liabilities, increase capital, or both |
| Books and records not current | Fix immediately; cannot rely on unsupported capital computation |
| Unrecorded liability discovered | Record it; recompute net capital |
| Large capital withdrawal proposed | Test pro forma capital before approving |
| Material FOCUS error found | Correct and amend as required |
| Clearing deposit becomes restricted | Reassess allowability and net capital impact |
Conservative Exam Answer Pattern
When capital is threatened, the best answer usually prioritizes:
- Recompute net capital accurately.
- Stop or limit business if required.
- Notify regulators when required.
- Correct books and records.
- Add capital or reduce liabilities.
- Document the action.
Capital Withdrawals and Subordinated Loans
Capital withdrawals are risky because they reduce the cushion protecting customers and creditors.
| Item | Exam focus |
|---|---|
| Owner withdrawal | Must be tested against net capital after the withdrawal |
| Dividend or distribution | Same capital effect as withdrawal |
| Repayment of subordinated loan | Only if permitted under agreement and capital rules |
| Unapproved loan from owner | May be liability, not capital |
| Properly subordinated borrowing | May be added to net worth if it meets requirements |
| Temporary capital injection | Must be genuine and documented |
| Capital used to cover operating losses | Capital falls as losses accrue |
Subordination Trap
A loan from an owner is not automatically capital. It must meet the requirements for qualified subordinated debt. Otherwise, it is a payable that may worsen aggregate indebtedness.
Securities Settlement and Operations
Even an introducing broker-dealer must understand trade flow, settlement exposure, and clearing relationships.
| Stage | What happens | Series 28 focus |
|---|---|---|
| Order entry | Customer order accepted | Correct account, capacity, and suitability/supervision context |
| Execution | Trade occurs | Trade details must be captured accurately |
| Comparison / affirmation | Parties agree on trade terms | DKs and breaks must be resolved |
| Clearance | Clearing broker processes obligations | Introducing firm reconciles clearing records |
| Settlement | Money and securities exchanged | Fails create exposure and possible charges |
| Confirmation | Customer receives transaction details | Accuracy and required disclosures |
| Statement cycle | Customer positions and balances reported | Carrying broker often responsible, but introducing firm must supervise its role |
Current Settlement Awareness
For many U.S. securities, regular-way settlement is commonly tested as a short settlement cycle. Always confirm the current settlement standard in current exam materials, because settlement cycles can change.
Margin, Credit, and Customer Balances
An introducing firm may not carry margin balances itself, but questions can still test margin concepts because the firm introduces accounts and supervises customer activity.
| Concept | Review point |
|---|---|
| Reg T | Federal credit rule for initial margin in securities transactions |
| Maintenance margin | Ongoing equity requirement after purchase |
| Margin agreement | Customer authorization and disclosures matter |
| Day trading | Higher-risk activity with special requirements |
| Debit balance | Customer owes money; carrying firm usually carries the balance |
| Credit balance | Firm or carrying broker owes customer |
| Introducing firm role | Understand, disclose, supervise, and coordinate with clearing firm |
| Trap | Assuming the introducing firm can ignore margin because it does not carry accounts |
Underwriting and Contingent Offerings
Series 28 candidates should recognize when underwriting activity affects capital or customer funds.
| Offering type | Financial operations issue |
|---|---|
| Firm commitment underwriting | Underwriter takes inventory risk; capital charge possible |
| Best efforts | No firm inventory commitment, but funds-handling rules matter |
| All-or-none | Investor funds must be handled according to contingency terms |
| Minimum-maximum | Funds handling depends on minimum being met |
| Escrow arrangement | Used to protect investor funds in contingent offerings |
| Open contractual commitment | May require capital charge |
| Unsold allotment | May create proprietary exposure |
Offering Trap
A “best efforts” label does not eliminate financial responsibility. Customer funds in a contingent offering must be handled exactly as required by the offering terms and applicable rules.
SIPC and Customer Protection Concepts
SIPC concepts may appear in financial operations questions.
| Concept | Know this |
|---|---|
| SIPC | Protects customers if a member broker-dealer fails financially, subject to limits and conditions |
| Not insurance against market loss | SIPC does not make customers whole for bad investments |
| Assessments and reports | Member firms may have filing and assessment obligations |
| Customer property | Distinct from firm property |
| Exam trap | Saying SIPC protects against investment performance, fraud losses generally, or unsuitable recommendations |
Supervisory and Principal Responsibilities
A Series 28 principal is expected to understand both calculation and control.
| Responsibility | What it means |
|---|---|
| Maintain accurate books | Financial records must be current and supported |
| Monitor net capital | Not only at month-end or filing time |
| Approve financial reports | Reports must reconcile to books |
| Supervise operations staff | Delegation does not remove responsibility |
| Coordinate with clearing firm | Reconcile statements, deposits, commissions, fails |
| Escalate deficiencies | Notify and correct when required |
| Maintain written procedures | Procedures should match actual workflow |
| Preserve records | Records must be retained and accessible |
| Support audits | Provide schedules, reconciliations, and evidence |
Delegation Trap
A FinOp may delegate tasks, but not accountability. If a clerk prepares a capital computation incorrectly, the principal is still expected to supervise, review, and correct it.
AML, Privacy, and Operational Controls
The Series 28 is financial-operations focused, but operational control questions may include related compliance themes.
| Area | Fast review |
|---|---|
| AML program | Written program, customer identification, monitoring, suspicious activity escalation |
| Customer identification | Verify and document according to firm procedures |
| OFAC / sanctions screening | Escalate potential matches |
| Suspicious activity | Escalate; do not ignore unusual money movement |
| Privacy | Protect nonpublic customer information |
| Cybersecurity | Safeguard systems and records |
| Business continuity | Ensure critical operations can continue |
| Vendor oversight | Clearing and technology vendors still require supervision |
Trial Balance and Reconciliation Review
A common exam pattern gives a list of balances and asks what adjustment is needed.
| Problem | Likely effect |
|---|---|
| Bank statement lower than ledger cash | Cash may be overstated; net capital may be overstated |
| Outstanding checks not recorded | Liabilities or cash reductions may be missing |
| Deposit in transit unsupported | Potential cash overstatement |
| Clearing receivable disputed | May be nonallowable |
| Commission payable omitted | Liabilities understated; net worth overstated |
| Proprietary trade not recorded | Haircuts may be missing |
| Fail not aged properly | Capital charge may be missed |
| Suspense account unresolved | Must investigate; may require deduction |
Reconciliation Decision Rule
If a reconciliation difference cannot be explained and supported, do not give the firm capital credit for the favorable side of the difference.
Common Series 28 Candidate Mistakes
Confusing net worth with net capital
Net worth is only the starting point. Net capital requires regulatory deductions.Ignoring nonallowable assets
Accounting assets are not always regulatory capital assets.Forgetting accruals
Unpaid expenses can reduce net worth and increase aggregate indebtedness.Treating owner loans as capital automatically
Only properly qualified subordinated borrowings receive capital treatment.Assuming introducing firms have no customer protection obligations
Introducing firms still need proper handling, prompt transmission, records, and exemption support.Missing the clearing broker relationship
Clearing deposits, commissions receivable, fails, and trade breaks often come from the clearing statement.Overlooking haircuts on proprietary positions
Marketable securities are not counted at full market value for net capital.Failing to age receivables and fails
Old items become capital problems.Choosing a business-growth answer over a capital-protection answer
The exam usually rewards financial responsibility, not revenue maximization.Relying on labels instead of facts
“Introduced,” “escrowed,” “subordinated,” or “fully disclosed” must be supported by actual documentation and conduct.
Fast Calculation Practice Table
| Question asks for… | Use… | Watch for… |
|---|---|---|
| Net capital | Net worth plus qualified subordinated debt minus deductions | Nonallowable assets and haircuts |
| Required net capital | Greater of fixed minimum or formula-based requirement | Aggregate indebtedness |
| Excess net capital | Net capital minus required net capital | Early warning cushion |
| AI ratio | Aggregate indebtedness divided by net capital | Liabilities omitted from AI |
| Effect of expense accrual | Net worth down; AI up | Double impact |
| Effect of prepaid expense | Asset may be nonallowable | Accounting asset, regulatory deduction |
| Effect of proprietary stock position | Haircut reduces capital | Concentration or restricted stock |
| Effect of receivable aging | Deduction or nonallowable treatment | Collectability |
| Effect of owner withdrawal | Capital decreases | Pro forma deficiency |
Mini Drill Examples
Example 1: Nonallowable Asset
A firm has net worth of 300,000, including 40,000 of furniture and 20,000 of prepaid insurance. Before haircuts, what is the impact?
- Furniture is nonallowable.
- Prepaid insurance is generally nonallowable.
- Tentative capital is reduced by 60,000 before other deductions.
Example 2: Accrued Expense
A firm forgot to accrue 25,000 in legal expenses.
- Liabilities increase by 25,000.
- Net worth decreases by 25,000.
- Aggregate indebtedness may increase by 25,000.
- Net capital and AI ratio both worsen.
Example 3: Proprietary Security Position
A firm owns marketable securities.
- The position may be an allowable asset.
- But it must be reduced by the applicable haircut.
- If concentrated or illiquid, additional deductions may apply.
Example 4: Clearing Receivable
A clearing broker owes the introducing firm a commission receivable.
- If current, supported, and collectible, it may receive favorable treatment.
- If aged, disputed, or unsupported, expect nonallowable treatment or a charge.
Topic Drill Priorities
Use original practice questions to drill the highest-yield Series 28 areas in this order:
Net capital computation
- Nonallowable assets
- Haircuts
- Subordinated loans
- Capital charges
Aggregate indebtedness
- Included vs excluded liabilities
- AI ratio
- Required capital
- Excess capital
Introducing broker-dealer operations
- Fully disclosed clearing
- Customer funds and securities
- Clearing deposits
- Commission receivables
Books and records
- Ledgers
- Blotters
- Trial balance
- Reconciliations
- Record preservation
Regulatory reporting
- FOCUS concepts
- Annual audit support
- Amendments and notices
- SIPC-related concepts
Operational risk
- Fails
- DKs
- Aged receivables
- Suspense items
- Trade breaks
Supervision and controls
- Written procedures
- Delegation
- Escalation
- Capital withdrawal review
Final Quick Review Checklist
Before you move into a mock exam, make sure you can answer these without notes:
- What is the difference between net worth and net capital?
- Which assets are usually nonallowable?
- How do haircuts affect proprietary positions?
- What liabilities are usually included in aggregate indebtedness?
- How do you calculate excess net capital?
- What happens when a firm discovers an unrecorded liability?
- Why can a prepaid expense reduce regulatory capital?
- What makes a receivable nonallowable?
- How does an introducing firm handle customer checks and securities?
- What is the purpose of a fully disclosed clearing agreement?
- Why are fails and DKs financial responsibility issues?
- What records support a FOCUS report?
- What should a FinOp do when capital is near a warning level?
- Why is an owner loan not automatically capital?
- What is the difference between SIPC protection and market-loss protection?
Practical Next Step
Use this Quick Review to identify weak areas, then move directly into Series 28 topic drills with original practice questions and detailed explanations. Focus especially on net capital, aggregate indebtedness, nonallowable assets, customer funds handling, and FOCUS-report support before attempting full-length mock exams.