Series 28 — Introducing Broker-Dealer FINOP Exam Blueprint
Practical Series 28 exam blueprint for FINRA candidates reviewing introducing broker-dealer FINOP duties, net capital, records, reporting, and operations.
How to Use This Exam Blueprint
Use this checklist as a practical study map for the FINRA Series 28 — Introducing Broker-Dealer Financial and Operations Principal Qualification Examination. It is designed for candidates preparing for the real Series 28 exam who need to connect public topic areas to applied readiness.
Do not treat this as a promise of exact exam weighting or scoring. Instead, use it to ask:
- Can I classify the item correctly?
- Can I calculate the financial effect?
- Can I identify the required report, record, notice, or supervision issue?
- Can I distinguish an introducing broker-dealer issue from a carrying broker-dealer issue?
- Can I apply the rule logic in a short fact pattern without over-reading?
For any numeric thresholds, time frames, filing mechanics, or current rule text, verify against current FINRA and SEC materials used in your course of study.
High-level Series 28 readiness areas
| Readiness area | What to review | What “ready” looks like |
|---|---|---|
| FINOP role and responsibility | Financial and operations principal duties, supervision, books and records oversight, regulatory reporting, escalation | You can identify when an issue belongs to the FINOP function and when it also requires legal, compliance, supervisory, clearing firm, auditor, or regulator involvement. |
| Introducing broker-dealer model | Fully disclosed introducing arrangements, relationship with clearing firm, customer fund/security handling, allocation of operational duties | You can explain which obligations remain with the introducing firm even when a clearing firm performs custody, clearance, or account processing functions. |
| Net capital framework | Net worth adjustments, non-allowable assets, haircuts, aggregate indebtedness, minimum capital logic, excess capital | You can move from a trial balance to a regulatory capital answer and explain why each adjustment increases, decreases, or does not affect net capital. |
| Aggregate indebtedness | Liabilities included or excluded, operational liabilities, customer-related balances, accruals, subordinated borrowings | You can classify liabilities for aggregate indebtedness purposes and understand the effect on the firm’s capital position. |
| Broker-dealer accounting | Trial balance, general ledger, accruals, receivables, payables, revenue recognition, clearing statements, error accounts | You can spot incomplete entries, misclassified balances, and items that require further support before being used in a regulatory computation. |
| Financial reporting | FOCUS-style reporting concepts, supporting schedules, reconciliations, financial statements, amendments, notices | You can identify which financial information must agree across reports and what events may trigger prompt escalation or notice. |
| Books and records | Blotters, ledgers, account records, order and trade records, bank records, confirmations, statements, retention logic | You can match a business event to the records needed to support it and identify when records are incomplete or inconsistent. |
| Customer protection concepts | Customer versus firm assets, possession or control concepts, reserve logic at a conceptual level, carrying versus introducing responsibilities | You can avoid assuming that introducing status eliminates all customer-related financial responsibility. |
| Clearing, settlement, and operations | Trade date versus settlement date, fails, DKs, suspense items, stock record concepts, clearing deposits, commissions | You can follow how an operational item becomes an accounting item and then a regulatory capital item. |
| Receivables and allowability | Customer receivables, broker-dealer receivables, clearing firm receivables, employee/affiliate receivables, aged or unsecured items | You can determine whether a receivable is collectible, secured, aged, supported, and potentially allowable or non-allowable. |
| Payables and accrued liabilities | Commissions payable, clearing charges, taxes, rent, professional fees, bonuses, litigation accruals, expense-sharing arrangements | You can identify liabilities that must not be omitted simply because they are unpaid, disputed, or shared with an affiliate. |
| Subordination and capital contributions | Approved subordinated borrowings, owner contributions, withdrawals, capital changes, repayment restrictions | You can distinguish regulatory capital from ordinary debt and identify when a capital transaction may create a reporting or approval issue. |
| Supervision and controls | Written procedures, reconciliations, exception review, segregation of duties, evidence of review, escalation | You can evaluate whether controls would detect a misstatement, capital deficiency, missing record, or operational break. |
| Ethics and regulatory judgment | Accuracy of filings, cooperation with regulators, books-and-records integrity, misleading entries, backdating, concealment | You can choose the answer that preserves accurate records, timely escalation, and regulatory transparency. |
Core “can you do this?” checklist
FINOP responsibility and regulatory judgment
Check yourself:
- I can explain the role of the financial and operations principal at an introducing broker-dealer.
- I can identify when a financial issue should be escalated before the firm continues business as usual.
- I can distinguish an accounting correction from a regulatory capital problem.
- I can recognize when inaccurate books and records may make a financial report unreliable.
- I can identify when a change in business activity may affect net capital, reporting, supervision, or clearing arrangements.
- I can determine when a proposed distribution, withdrawal, repayment, bonus, or transfer could weaken capital.
- I can identify when an outside accountant, clearing firm, supervisor, compliance officer, or regulator may need to be involved.
- I can choose the answer that documents, reconciles, and reports rather than hides, delays, or nets away a problem.
Introducing broker-dealer model
Be ready to answer questions like:
- What does the introducing firm still control or supervise?
- What is handled by the clearing firm?
- What happens if the introducing firm receives customer funds or securities?
- How do clearing statements affect the introducing firm’s books?
- How do customer complaints, trade errors, commissions, and fees flow through the introducing firm’s accounting records?
- Which records must be maintained by the introducing firm even if another party processes transactions?
- How can an operational exception at the clearing firm still create a financial or supervisory issue for the introducing firm?
| Scenario cue | Exam-ready response |
|---|---|
| The clearing firm carries the customer account | Do not assume the introducing firm has no obligations. Identify the introducing firm’s records, supervision, disclosures, commissions, receivables, and capital effects. |
| The introducing firm receives a customer check | Focus on proper handling, forwarding, documentation, and whether the firm’s activity creates additional regulatory concerns. |
| The firm changes from limited introducing activity to a broader business model | Reassess capital, operations, supervision, records, and regulatory reporting before assuming existing controls are sufficient. |
| A clearing deposit appears on the balance sheet | Determine whether it is properly supported, collectible, restricted, or subject to capital treatment. |
| A clearing statement does not agree with the general ledger | Reconcile before relying on the financial report or net capital computation. |
Net capital computation logic
You should be able to work from financial accounting to regulatory capital logic.
At a readiness level, understand the structure:
[ \text{Tentative net capital} = \text{net worth}
- \text{allowable credits}
- \text{non-allowable assets}
- \text{required deductions} ]
[ \text{Net capital} = \text{tentative net capital}
- \text{securities haircuts}
- \text{operational charges}
- \text{other regulatory deductions} ]
[ \text{Excess net capital} = \text{net capital}
- \text{required minimum net capital} ]
You should be able to:
- Start with the correct net worth figure.
- Identify assets that may be non-allowable for regulatory capital purposes.
- Identify assets that require support before being treated as allowable.
- Apply the concept of haircuts to proprietary securities positions.
- Recognize that market movements can change net capital through securities valuation and haircuts.
- Identify operational charges, deficits, suspense items, aged items, and unsecured items that may reduce capital.
- Distinguish book capital from regulatory capital.
- Determine whether a firm has excess net capital, is close to a deficiency, or needs escalation.
- Understand why a profitable firm can still have a net capital issue if assets are illiquid, unsupported, or non-allowable.
- Understand why a cash contribution, subordinated borrowing, or receivable collection can improve capital only if properly documented and eligible.
Aggregate indebtedness logic
Know the conceptual relationship:
\[ \text{Aggregate indebtedness ratio} = \frac{\text{aggregate indebtedness}}{\text{net capital}} \]Be ready to:
- Identify liabilities that generally increase aggregate indebtedness.
- Identify liabilities that may receive different treatment because of approved subordination, secured status, or regulatory classification.
- Avoid excluding liabilities merely because they are unpaid, estimated, disputed, or owed to an affiliate.
- Understand that increasing liabilities can affect both net worth and aggregate indebtedness analysis.
- Recognize that an omitted payable can overstate capital and understate indebtedness.
- Determine whether a new liability, lease, settlement, tax accrual, or bonus accrual changes the firm’s regulatory position.
- Explain why capital adequacy is not evaluated only by looking at the cash balance.
Accounting entries and classification
| Item | Can you classify it? | Readiness check |
|---|---|---|
| Cash in bank | Asset, but must be reconciled and supported | Can you identify outstanding checks, deposits in transit, and restricted cash issues? |
| Commission receivable | Asset, possibly subject to collectability and aging review | Can you determine whether it is supported by clearing records or customer activity? |
| Receivable from employee | Asset, often a regulatory capital concern | Can you recognize unsecured or unsupported advances? |
| Receivable from affiliate | Asset, often scrutinized | Can you avoid treating it as automatically allowable? |
| Prepaid expense | Asset for accounting, often different for capital purposes | Can you explain why accounting value may not equal regulatory capital value? |
| Clearing deposit | Asset, but treatment depends on facts | Can you identify restrictions, offsets, documentation, and collectability? |
| Proprietary securities | Asset subject to valuation and haircut logic | Can you apply market value and regulatory deduction thinking? |
| Commissions payable | Liability | Can you accrue it even if not yet paid? |
| Taxes payable | Liability | Can you recognize that unpaid tax obligations affect capital? |
| Accrued expenses | Liability | Can you identify omitted accruals that overstate net worth? |
| Subordinated borrowing | Debt or regulatory capital support depending on eligibility | Can you distinguish approved subordination from ordinary borrowing? |
| Owner withdrawal | Equity reduction | Can you test capital after the withdrawal before assuming it is permissible? |
Financial reporting and records readiness
Reports and schedules you should be able to interpret
| Artifact | What to look for | Exam-style task |
|---|---|---|
| Trial balance | Account classification, unusual balances, missing accruals, suspense accounts | Identify which accounts affect net capital and which need reclassification. |
| General ledger | Detail supporting account balances | Trace a commission, payable, receivable, or adjustment to the financial statements. |
| Bank reconciliation | Outstanding checks, deposits in transit, stale items, restrictions | Determine whether cash is overstated or unsupported. |
| Clearing firm statement | Commissions, fees, receivables, payables, deposits, fails, trade errors | Reconcile to the introducing firm’s books. |
| Net capital computation | Net worth, deductions, haircuts, minimum requirement, excess | Find the item that changes the firm from adequate to deficient or vice versa. |
| Aggregate indebtedness schedule | Included liabilities, excluded items, subordinated liabilities | Determine whether a liability was omitted or misclassified. |
| Aged receivables report | Collectability, aging, customer or noncustomer status | Identify receivables that may require deduction or follow-up. |
| Payables listing | Accrued expenses, clearing charges, commissions, taxes, professional fees | Find omitted liabilities or improper netting. |
| Securities position report | Market values, proprietary positions, concentration, unresolved breaks | Determine valuation and capital impact. |
| Trade blotter | Trade date activity, corrections, cancels, errors | Link trading activity to books, records, and supervision. |
| Customer account records | Ownership, authorization, suitability-related records, contact information | Identify missing or inconsistent account documentation. |
| Written supervisory procedures | Assigned responsibility, review steps, exception handling | Decide whether controls address the risk in the fact pattern. |
| Regulatory financial filing support | Reconciliations, workpapers, sign-offs, amendments | Determine whether a filing is supportable and accurate. |
Books-and-records checks
You should be able to answer:
- What record should exist for this transaction?
- Who is responsible for creating, reviewing, or retaining it?
- Does the record agree with the general ledger?
- Does the record agree with the clearing firm statement?
- Does the record support the regulatory financial report?
- Is the record complete, timely, accurate, and accessible?
- Does a correction require documentation rather than silent overwriting?
- Does the item reveal a supervisory or control deficiency?
Customer protection and operational concepts
For Series 28, focus on the applied distinction between an introducing firm’s business model and the customer protection concepts that still matter.
| Topic | What to know | Common exam angle |
|---|---|---|
| Customer funds | How the firm handles, forwards, records, and supervises customer checks or cash equivalents | A customer sends money to the introducing firm instead of the clearing firm. |
| Customer securities | Handling, forwarding, logging, and escalation | A certificate or security is received at the branch or home office. |
| Possession or control concepts | Which firm has custody or control and how exceptions are handled | The question tests whether introducing status eliminates all concern. |
| Customer versus noncustomer | Classification affects capital, reserve, records, and reporting logic | A receivable or payable is mislabeled. |
| Clearing relationship | Allocation of functions does not remove all introducing firm responsibilities | The introducing firm ignores an exception because the clearing firm processes accounts. |
| Trade errors | Error account treatment, customer impact, loss recognition, supervision | A trade correction creates a loss or unresolved suspense item. |
| Fails and DKs | Operational breaks that may create financial charges, capital deductions, or control issues | A fail remains unresolved and is not reflected correctly. |
Decision-point scenarios
Use these as final-review prompts. For each scenario, decide: classification, financial effect, record required, supervisory issue, and whether escalation is needed.
Scenario 1: Receivable from an affiliated company
| Question | Readiness answer |
|---|---|
| Is it an asset for accounting? | It may be recorded as an asset if owed to the firm. |
| Is it automatically allowable for net capital? | No. Analyze collectability, support, security, age, and regulatory treatment. |
| What records matter? | Agreement, invoice, payment history, aging, board or management approval, ledger detail. |
| What is the trap? | Treating affiliate balances as safe because they are “related party” items. |
Scenario 2: Customer check received by the introducing firm
| Question | Readiness answer |
|---|---|
| What is the first concern? | Proper handling, forwarding, logging, and compliance with the firm’s permitted business model. |
| What records matter? | Receipt log, transmittal evidence, customer account record, clearing firm confirmation if applicable. |
| What is the capital issue? | Customer fund handling may signal operational or regulatory issues beyond a simple clerical event. |
| What is the trap? | Assuming the clearing firm’s existence excuses poor handling by the introducing firm. |
Scenario 3: Proposed owner withdrawal
| Question | Readiness answer |
|---|---|
| What must be tested? | Net capital and excess capital after the withdrawal. |
| What else should be reviewed? | Aggregate indebtedness, pending liabilities, receivables, required notices, and business projections. |
| What records matter? | Capital schedule, authorization, computation before and after the transaction. |
| What is the trap? | Looking only at cash available rather than regulatory capital after the withdrawal. |
Scenario 4: Unrecorded legal settlement
| Question | Readiness answer |
|---|---|
| What type of item is this? | A liability or contingent liability issue depending on facts. |
| What is the financial effect? | It may reduce net worth and affect capital. |
| What records matter? | Settlement agreement, legal correspondence, accounting entry, management review. |
| What is the trap? | Ignoring it because payment has not yet been made. |
Scenario 5: Proprietary securities decline in value
| Question | Readiness answer |
|---|---|
| What changes? | Asset value, net worth, and possibly haircut amount. |
| What records matter? | Position report, market price support, valuation policy, haircut schedule. |
| What is the capital concern? | Net capital can decline from both market loss and regulatory deductions. |
| What is the trap? | Applying only the market loss and forgetting regulatory capital deductions. |
Scenario 6: Clearing firm receivable does not reconcile
| Question | Readiness answer |
|---|---|
| What should happen before reporting? | Reconciliation and investigation. |
| What records matter? | Clearing statement, ledger, commission schedule, trade detail, bank activity. |
| What is the capital concern? | Unsupported receivables may not support capital as booked. |
| What is the trap? | Filing based on the firm’s internal ledger without reconciling to external support. |
Scenario 7: Expense paid by parent company
| Question | Readiness answer |
|---|---|
| What is the accounting concern? | Whether the broker-dealer has an expense, payable, contribution, or expense-sharing arrangement. |
| What records matter? | Written agreement, invoices, allocation method, management approval. |
| What is the capital concern? | Unrecorded expenses or liabilities can overstate capital. |
| What is the trap? | Assuming parent-paid expenses never belong on the broker-dealer’s books. |
Calculation and interpretation checks
Net capital workflow
Use this workflow when practicing calculations:
- Start with the balance sheet.
- Confirm all liabilities are recorded.
- Adjust net worth for regulatory capital treatment.
- Deduct non-allowable assets.
- Apply securities haircuts and other required deductions.
- Compare net capital to the applicable requirement.
- Determine excess or deficiency.
- Identify any required escalation, restriction, correction, or reporting action.
flowchart TD
A[Start with trial balance] --> B[Confirm assets and liabilities]
B --> C[Adjust net worth]
C --> D[Deduct non-allowable assets]
D --> E[Apply haircuts and other charges]
E --> F[Compute net capital]
F --> G[Compare to required minimum]
G --> H{Adequate capital?}
H -->|Yes| I[Document and monitor]
H -->|No or close| J[Escalate, correct, and evaluate reporting]
Common calculation tasks
| Task | What to practice | How to check your answer |
|---|---|---|
| Compute adjusted net worth | Start with book net worth and identify regulatory adjustments | Every adjustment should have a reason, not just a number. |
| Identify non-allowable assets | Review receivables, prepaid expenses, deposits, unsecured balances, aged items | Ask whether the asset is liquid, collectible, supported, and permitted for capital. |
| Apply haircut logic | Review proprietary securities and market exposure | Confirm you used current market value and did not ignore concentration or risk-based deductions where applicable. |
| Compute aggregate indebtedness | Classify liabilities and compare to net capital | Check that accrued and unpaid items are not omitted. |
| Calculate excess net capital | Net capital less required minimum | Interpret the result: adequate, close, deficient, or requiring action. |
| Assess effect of a transaction | Capital contribution, withdrawal, loan, loss, receivable collection, payable accrual | Recompute after the event, not before it. |
| Reconcile report to books | Compare trial balance, schedules, and filing support | Any unexplained difference is an exam red flag. |
Interpretation prompts
After every calculation, ask:
- Did the answer improve or weaken capital?
- Did aggregate indebtedness change?
- Did the item affect both the balance sheet and a regulatory deduction?
- Did I treat a receivable as allowable without checking support?
- Did I record the liability before testing capital?
- Did I consider whether a notice, filing amendment, or escalation is required?
- Did I assume an accounting asset is automatically a regulatory capital asset?
- Did I identify the business activity driving the capital requirement?
Topic-by-topic detailed checklist
1. Regulatory framework and FINOP function
Review:
- FINRA’s role as the exam provider and regulator for member firm activities.
- SEC broker-dealer financial responsibility concepts.
- Responsibilities of a financial and operations principal.
- Relationship among financial reporting, net capital, books and records, and supervision.
- When the FINOP should challenge incomplete information.
- When a firm should escalate a capital, reporting, or books-and-records issue.
- Why accurate records matter even when the dollar amount seems small.
- The difference between routine accounting entries and regulatory financial responsibility issues.
Can you do this?
- Identify the principal most directly responsible for financial operations.
- Choose the response that preserves accurate books and records.
- Recognize when a firm should not wait until month-end to address a capital issue.
- Explain why regulatory filings must be supported by reconciled books.
2. Broker-dealer business activities and capital impact
Review the capital effect of:
- Introducing customer accounts.
- Receiving commissions or concessions.
- Charging advisory, service, platform, or account fees.
- Maintaining proprietary securities positions.
- Holding deposits with a clearing firm.
- Using affiliates or shared services.
- Entering expense-sharing arrangements.
- Paying branch, representative, or employee compensation.
- Correcting trade errors.
- Expanding into a new line of business.
Exam cue: if the business activity changes, the financial responsibility analysis may also change.
3. Net capital assets
Be able to classify:
- Cash.
- Bank deposits.
- Restricted cash.
- Clearing deposits.
- Receivables from clearing firms.
- Receivables from customers.
- Receivables from broker-dealers.
- Receivables from employees.
- Receivables from owners or affiliates.
- Prepaid expenses.
- Fixed assets.
- Exchange memberships or deposits.
- Proprietary securities.
- Fails to deliver.
- Suspense items.
- Error account balances.
For each asset, ask:
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Is it real and supported? | Unsupported assets may overstate net worth. |
| Is it liquid? | Liquidity affects regulatory capital treatment. |
| Is it collectible? | Uncollectible receivables do not support capital. |
| Is it aged? | Aging may change regulatory treatment. |
| Is it secured? | Secured status may affect allowability. |
| Is it restricted? | Restricted assets may not be freely available. |
| Is it from an affiliate or insider? | Related-party balances require scrutiny. |
| Is it already offset elsewhere? | Double counting can distort capital. |
4. Liabilities, accruals, and aggregate indebtedness
Review:
- Accounts payable.
- Commissions payable.
- Clearing charges payable.
- Accrued payroll and bonuses.
- Rent and occupancy expenses.
- Technology and vendor expenses.
- Professional fees.
- Taxes payable.
- Litigation and settlement accruals.
- Customer-related payables.
- Payables to affiliates.
- Ordinary bank debt.
- Approved subordinated borrowings.
- Unapproved or informal loans.
- Contingent liabilities and guarantees.
Can you do this?
- Identify omitted liabilities from a fact pattern.
- Explain how recording a liability can reduce net worth.
- Determine whether a payable should be included in aggregate indebtedness.
- Distinguish approved subordinated capital from ordinary debt.
- Recognize that disputed liabilities may still require evaluation.
- Identify when netting assets and liabilities is improper without support.
5. Subordination, capital contributions, and withdrawals
Review:
- Purpose of subordinated borrowings in regulatory capital.
- Difference between equity, ordinary debt, and approved subordination.
- Documentation and approval concepts for subordinated capital.
- Capital contribution accounting.
- Owner withdrawals and distributions.
- Repayment or prepayment concerns.
- Impact on excess net capital.
- Notices or approvals that may be implicated by capital changes.
Decision prompt:
| If the firm wants to… | Ask first |
|---|---|
| Repay subordinated debt | Is repayment permitted and what is the capital position after repayment? |
| Pay an owner distribution | What is excess net capital after the distribution? |
| Record an informal owner loan as capital | Is there proper documentation and regulatory treatment? |
| Use an affiliate receivable as capital support | Is it allowable, collectible, and supported? |
| Increase business activity | Does the firm still meet financial responsibility requirements? |
6. Financial statements and reporting consistency
Review how these connect:
- Balance sheet.
- Income statement.
- Statement of changes in ownership equity.
- Statement of cash flows, where relevant.
- Trial balance.
- Net capital computation.
- Aggregate indebtedness schedule.
- Supporting schedules.
- Regulatory financial filings.
- Auditor or accountant workpapers.
- Management certifications or sign-offs.
Can you do this?
- Trace a balance sheet item to a ledger and support schedule.
- Explain why an unreconciled schedule undermines a filing.
- Identify when an amended or corrected report may be needed.
- Determine whether a loss, liability, or capital withdrawal affects a filed report.
- Recognize inconsistent treatment of the same item across schedules.
7. Revenue, commissions, and expenses
Review:
- Commission revenue recognition.
- Commission receivables from clearing firms or product sponsors.
- Representative payout accruals.
- Chargebacks and reversals.
- Fees billed to customers.
- Clearing charges.
- Referral or service fees.
- Expense-sharing agreements.
- Branch expenses.
- Unrecorded or prepaid expenses.
- Revenue cut-off around reporting dates.
Exam traps:
- Recording gross revenue but omitting payout liability.
- Treating unpaid expenses as irrelevant.
- Failing to accrue known clearing charges.
- Treating a parent-company payment as automatically outside the broker-dealer.
- Ignoring chargebacks or reversals that affect receivables.
- Recognizing revenue without support from clearing or product sponsor records.
8. Operations, settlement, and clearing activity
Review:
- Trade date versus settlement date accounting.
- Clearing firm statements.
- Fails to deliver and fails to receive.
- DKs and uncompared trades.
- Suspense accounts.
- Error accounts.
- Stock record concepts.
- Customer confirmations and statements.
- Trade corrections and cancels.
- Operational breaks and aged items.
- Cash and securities movements.
Can you do this?
- Follow a trade from order to clearing statement to ledger.
- Identify when a fail or break creates a capital or supervisory issue.
- Distinguish customer activity from firm proprietary activity.
- Recognize unresolved suspense items as red flags.
- Determine whether an error loss should be recognized.
- Identify when a customer has been affected by an operational error.
9. Books, records, and retention concepts
Review the purpose of:
- General ledger.
- Cash receipts and disbursements blotters.
- Securities blotters.
- Customer account records.
- Order tickets or order records.
- Trade confirmations.
- Customer statements.
- Bank statements and reconciliations.
- Trial balances.
- Financial statements.
- Net capital workpapers.
- Written agreements.
- Supervisory review evidence.
- Complaint and error records.
- Correspondence and communications records, where relevant.
Readiness questions:
- What record proves the transaction happened?
- What record proves it was authorized?
- What record proves the amount is correct?
- What record proves the item was reviewed?
- What record supports the regulatory filing?
- What record would an examiner ask for?
- What breaks if the record is missing?
10. Internal controls and supervision
Review controls over:
- Bank reconciliations.
- Clearing statement reconciliations.
- Receivable aging.
- Payable accruals.
- Capital computations.
- Owner withdrawals.
- Subordinated borrowing records.
- Expense allocations.
- Trade errors.
- Suspense accounts.
- Regulatory filings.
- Financial report review.
- Books-and-records retention.
- Access to accounting systems.
- Segregation of duties.
A control is exam-ready when you can identify:
| Control element | Readiness question |
|---|---|
| Owner | Who is responsible? |
| Frequency | How often is it performed? |
| Evidence | What proves it was done? |
| Exception handling | What happens when something does not reconcile? |
| Escalation | Who is notified if the issue affects capital or records? |
| Correction | How is the correction documented? |
| Follow-up | How does the firm confirm the issue is resolved? |
Common weak areas and traps
| Weak area | Why candidates miss it | Better exam approach |
|---|---|---|
| Confusing accounting profit with regulatory capital | Profit does not guarantee liquid, allowable assets | Recompute net capital after regulatory adjustments. |
| Treating all receivables as good assets | Receivables differ by source, support, age, and collectability | Ask who owes it, why, how old it is, and whether it is secured. |
| Ignoring accrued liabilities | Unpaid does not mean unrecorded | Record known or estimable obligations before testing capital. |
| Over-relying on the clearing firm | Clearing support does not remove introducing firm duties | Identify the introducing firm’s own records, supervision, and capital effects. |
| Forgetting haircuts | Proprietary positions create market and regulatory capital impact | Apply valuation and deduction logic. |
| Improper netting | Netting can hide assets, liabilities, and exposure | Net only when facts support it. |
| Misclassifying subordinated debt | Not every loan supports capital | Look for proper documentation and regulatory treatment. |
| Ignoring related-party balances | Affiliate items may be unsupported or non-allowable | Scrutinize agreements, collectability, and capital treatment. |
| Filing from unreconciled books | Reports must be supported by records | Reconcile before reporting. |
| Missing the supervisory issue | Many questions test process, not just math | Ask what control failed and who should escalate. |
| Choosing the “business-friendly” answer | Exams often reward regulatory protection and documentation | Choose accuracy, support, escalation, and compliance. |
| Memorizing isolated terms | Fact patterns require applied classification | Practice with short scenarios and explain the why. |
Scenario judgment checklist
When you see a Series 28 fact pattern, quickly label the issue.
| If the question mentions… | Think first about… |
|---|---|
| “Aged receivable” | Allowability, collectability, support, deduction |
| “Affiliate” | Related-party scrutiny, documentation, improper capital support |
| “Owner withdrawal” | Excess net capital after the transaction |
| “Unrecorded invoice” | Accrued liability, overstated net worth |
| “Customer check” | Handling, logging, forwarding, introducing firm limitations |
| “Clearing statement difference” | Reconciliation, support, filing accuracy |
| “Subordinated loan” | Approval, documentation, treatment as capital or debt |
| “Trade error” | Customer impact, loss recognition, supervision |
| “Suspense account” | Unsupported item, aging, capital deduction, control failure |
| “Firm expands business” | Capital requirement, operations, supervision, reporting |
| “Market value change” | Proprietary position valuation and haircuts |
| “Late or inaccurate report” | Books-and-records integrity and escalation |
| “Expense paid by affiliate” | Expense-sharing, liability, capital contribution, documentation |
| “Fail to deliver” | Operational break, aging, capital treatment |
| “Regulator inquiry” | Accurate records, cooperation, supportable response |
Final-week checklist
Knowledge cleanup
- I know the major Series 28 readiness areas without looking at notes.
- I can explain the difference between book capital and regulatory net capital.
- I can classify common assets as allowable, non-allowable, or requiring further analysis.
- I can identify liabilities that affect aggregate indebtedness.
- I can explain how introducing and clearing firm responsibilities interact.
- I can describe why accurate books and records support financial filings.
- I can identify the likely control failure in an operational scenario.
- I have reviewed current study materials for any specific thresholds, time frames, forms, or notices.
Calculation practice
- I can complete a net capital computation from a simplified balance sheet.
- I can adjust for non-allowable assets.
- I can identify haircut-related issues for proprietary securities.
- I can compute excess net capital conceptually and interpret the result.
- I can evaluate the effect of a proposed withdrawal, contribution, loan, or loss.
- I can identify how an omitted liability changes both financial statements and regulatory capital.
- I can spot when a calculation answer is directionally wrong.
Scenario practice
- I can answer short fact patterns without assuming facts not given.
- I can identify whether the issue is accounting, capital, operations, records, supervision, or reporting.
- I can choose the most conservative supportable regulatory answer when records are incomplete.
- I can explain why the wrong answers are wrong.
- I can separate customer protection concepts from general customer service issues.
- I can spot related-party, aged, unsupported, or restricted items quickly.
Exam execution
- I read the final sentence of each question first when the fact pattern is long.
- I identify whether the question asks for the best action, correct classification, calculation result, or regulatory consequence.
- I avoid choosing an answer based only on ordinary accounting treatment.
- I do not ignore words such as “unsecured,” “aged,” “affiliate,” “unreconciled,” “proposed,” or “after the transaction.”
- I mark calculation questions where one assumption controls the answer.
- I review missed practice questions by topic, not just by score.
Practical next step
After reviewing this Exam Blueprint, build a short error log with five columns: topic, missed fact, rule concept, correct reasoning, retest date. Then practice mixed Series 28 questions that force you to classify items, compute capital effects, and choose the proper supervisory or reporting response.