Browse Certification Practice Tests by Exam Family

FINRA Series 24 Practice Test & Mock Exam

Practice FINRA Series 24 with free sample questions, timed mock exams, topic drills, and detailed answer explanations in Securities Prep.

Series 24 rewards candidates who can supervise the broker-dealer holistically, connect retail and institutional activity to the right principal control, and spot where escalation or remediation is required. If you are searching for Series 24 sample questions, a practice test, mock exam, or simulator, this is the main Securities Prep page to start on web and continue on iOS or Android with the same account. This page includes 24 sample questions with detailed explanations so you can try the exam style before opening the full app question bank.

Interactive Practice Center

Start a practice session for Series 24 below, or open the full app in a new tab. For the best experience, open the full app in a new tab and navigate with swipes/gestures or the mouse wheel—just like on your phone or tablet.

Open Full App in a New Tab

A small set of questions is available for free preview. Subscribers can unlock full access by signing in with the same account they use on web and mobile.

Prefer to practice on your phone or tablet? Download the Securities Prep app:

Securities Prep iOS app QR code (United States)
Scan for iOS (United States)
Securities Prep Android app QR code (United States)
Scan for Android (United States)

If you already subscribed on web or mobile, sign in with the same account here to continue on desktop.

Free diagnostic: Try the 150-question Series 24 full-length practice exam before subscribing.

What this Series 24 practice page gives you

  • a direct route into the Securities Prep simulator for Series 24
  • 24 sample questions with detailed explanations across the main Series 24 supervisory buckets
  • targeted practice around principal supervision, customer activity, trading oversight, and investment-banking controls
  • detailed explanations that show why the strongest principal response is the most defensible
  • a clear free-preview path before you subscribe
  • the same subscription across web and mobile

Series 24 exam snapshot

  • Provider: FINRA
  • Exam: General Securities Principal
  • Practice reference: 150 practice questions in 225 minutes
  • Registration context: principal-level qualification for broad broker-dealer supervision

Topic coverage for Series 24 practice

  • General broker-dealer supervision: registration, firm activity, and control obligations
  • Customer-related activity: retail and institutional customer supervision, documentation, and remediation
  • Trading and investment banking: trading, market making, investment banking, and research oversight

What Series 24 is really testing

Series 24 is primarily a principal-reflex-and-control-framework exam:

  • identifying the business line before deciding what supervisory duty applies
  • recognizing when the strongest answer is to restrict, investigate, escalate, document, or remediate
  • distinguishing representative-level actions from principal-level oversight obligations
  • treating WSPs, surveillance, approvals, and records as core parts of the answer rather than administrative afterthoughts
  • choosing the response that protects customers, market integrity, and the firm’s defensibility

Common question styles

  • What should the principal do next?: approve, reject, restrict, escalate, investigate, or revise a control
  • What control is missing?: WSP, exception review, surveillance alert, communication approval, or supervisory note
  • What is the main failure mode?: customer harm, manipulation risk, AML red flag, books-and-records issue, or offering-disclosure gap
  • Which business line is this?: personnel, general broker-dealer activity, customer supervision, trading, or IB/research
  • What makes the answer defensible?: documented review, approval evidence, retention, follow-up testing, and escalation discipline

High-yield pitfalls

  • answering like a representative instead of a principal
  • fixing the customer-facing problem while skipping the supervisory record or approval step
  • overlooking books-and-records obligations after solving the immediate issue
  • treating communications issues as marketing problems instead of supervisory problems
  • failing to stop or restrict activity when the facts suggest real risk
  • choosing the commercially convenient answer instead of the safer control answer

How Series 24 differs from similar routes

If you are choosing between…Main distinction
Series 24 vs Series 23Series 24 is the broader general-securities-principal route; Series 23 is the narrower sales-supervisor top-off alternative.
Series 24 vs Series 10Series 24 is broad broker-dealer principal supervision; Series 10 is general-sales supervision.
Series 24 vs Series 14Series 24 is principal supervision across the broker-dealer; Series 14 is compliance-officer control and escalation work.
Series 24 vs Series 26Series 24 is broad principal coverage; Series 26 is packaged-products and variable-contract principal supervision.

How to use the Series 24 simulator efficiently

  1. Start with general broker-dealer and customer-activity drills so the principal workflow becomes automatic.
  2. Review every miss until you can explain what should be supervised, escalated, or remediated.
  3. Move into mixed sets once you can shift between customer, trading, and IB or research scenarios without hesitation.
  4. Finish with timed runs so the full-session pace feels steady.

Free preview vs premium

  • Free preview: 24 public sample questions on this page plus the web app entry so you can validate the question style and explanation depth.
  • Premium: the full Series 24 practice bank, focused drills, mixed sets, timed mock exams, detailed explanations, and progress tracking across web and mobile.

Free samples and full bank

  • Live now: this exact practice route is available in Securities Prep on web, iOS, and Android.
  • On-page sample set: this page includes 24 public sample questions from the current practice coverage.
  • Full app: open the Securities Prep web app or mobile app for broader timed coverage.

Good next pages after Series 24

  • Series 23 if you are comparing the broad principal route against the narrower sales-supervisor top-off path
  • Series 10 if you want the general-sales-supervision route beside the broad principal page
  • Series 14 if the real target is compliance-officer qualification
  • FINRA if you want the wider principal, FINOP, research, and specialist route map first

Free review resources

Use these free SecuritiesMastery.com resources for concept review, then return to this page when you are ready to practice in Securities Prep.

Focused sample questions

Use these focused Series 24 sample-question pages when you want to isolate one official topic area before returning to the mixed simulator.

24 Series 24 sample questions with detailed explanations

These sample questions cover multiple blueprint areas for Series 24. Use them to check your readiness here, then move into the full Securities Prep question bank for broader timed coverage.

Question 1

Topic: Function 2 — Supervision of General Broker-Dealer Activities

A FINRA member is moving all retail customer onboarding to a mobile app. To shorten disclosures and avoid sharing operational details, the CCO proposes removing the “Business Continuity/Disaster Recovery” page and offering no customer-facing summary of the firm’s business continuity plan.

As the General Securities Principal approving the updated WSPs and customer disclosures, which option best states the primary risk/tradeoff that matters most with this proposal?

  • A. Customers lose clear guidance on accessing accounts during disruptions
  • B. Publishing a BCP summary materially increases cybersecurity intrusion risk
  • C. Competitors could reverse-engineer the firm’s recovery strategy
  • D. The firm will have to file the full BCP with FINRA annually

Best answer: A

Explanation: The key supervisory tradeoff is not convenience versus proprietary details; it is meeting the customer-facing transparency purpose of business continuity planning. Firms must be able to provide customers a summary that tells them how to contact the firm and access their funds and securities during a significant business disruption. Removing the summary increases customer confusion and the likelihood of complaints and disputes during an outage.


Question 2

Topic: Function 2 — Supervision of General Broker-Dealer Activities

In a broker-dealer, what best describes the firm’s obligations regarding the “custodian of books and records,” including during personnel changes or reorganizations?

  • A. If the custodian resigns, recordkeeping responsibility automatically shifts to the clearing firm until a replacement is hired.
  • B. The firm must ensure continuous custody and accessibility of required records by promptly re-designating responsibility and maintaining retention; the obligation remains with the firm regardless of staffing changes.
  • C. During a reorganization, the firm may pause record retention until new WSPs and supervisory designations are approved.
  • D. Once a custodian is designated, the custodian—not the firm—assumes ongoing responsibility for retention and production of records.

Best answer: B

Explanation: Custodianship of required books and records is a broker-dealer obligation that must be maintained without interruption. When personnel change or a firm reorganizes, the firm must promptly reassign records responsibility and preserve required access and retention. The duty is not shifted away from the firm simply because a named custodian leaves or roles change.


Question 3

Topic: Function 5 — Supervision of Investment Banking and Research

A research analyst will appear on a live webcast on March 10, 2026 to discuss Issuer QRS, which is a subject company covered by the firm. The research principal must decide what disclosures are required and whether to approve the appearance.

Exhibit: Investment banking compensation from QRS

Date receivedAmount (USD)
March 5, 2025$120,000
April 2, 2025$80,000

Which supervisory action is most appropriate?

  • A. Approve without IB disclosure because both payments are outside 12 months
  • B. Approve; disclosure can be only a link to the firm’s website
  • C. Approve, with oral disclosure of IB compensation within 12 months
  • D. Deny; any IB compensation in the last 24 months prohibits appearances

Best answer: C

Explanation: For public appearances, the firm must ensure required conflict disclosures are made clearly and prominently, including whether the member received investment banking compensation from the subject company within the prior 12 months. The principal should calculate the 12-month lookback from the appearance date and require an oral disclosure when the lookback is triggered, with documentation of the approval and records per WSPs.


Question 4

Topic: Function 5 — Supervision of Investment Banking and Research

Which statement is most accurate regarding a general securities principal’s supervision of prospectus delivery in a registered public offering?

  • A. If the syndicate manager delivers the prospectus, other member firms do not need WSPs or testing for delivery.
  • B. Posting the prospectus on the firm’s public website alone satisfies delivery requirements.
  • C. A firm must deliver a paper prospectus to each customer before accepting any order.
  • D. A firm may satisfy final prospectus delivery by ensuring it is filed and providing required prospectus-availability notice on confirmations.

Best answer: D

Explanation: Firms can, for many registered offerings, rely on the SEC framework that allows “access equals delivery” for a final prospectus when it is properly filed and investors receive the required notice (typically on the confirmation) about availability. A principal’s role is to ensure the firm’s procedures, documentation, and testing support that reliance and that customers can obtain the prospectus as described.


Question 5

Topic: Function 2 — Supervision of General Broker-Dealer Activities

A FINRA member firm is adding a small operations team that will have authority to initiate customer journal entries and process third‑party wire requests. The firm’s CCO notes that most recent losses at peer firms involved employee fraud (forged documents and misdirected wires), and senior management wants a control that supports the firm’s overall operational risk management and financial responsibility program without changing customer agreements.

As the General Securities Principal, what is the single best supervisory action?

  • A. Review and obtain adequate fidelity bond coverage for employee dishonesty
  • B. Purchase or increase errors and omissions (E&O) insurance coverage
  • C. Satisfy the risk by increasing the firm’s net capital target
  • D. Purchase or increase SIPC/excess SIPC coverage for customer losses

Best answer: A

Explanation: A fidelity bond is an operational risk tool that helps protect the broker-dealer’s financial condition by covering losses caused by dishonest or fraudulent acts of employees. Expanding staff access to cash movement and account processing increases internal fraud exposure, so the appropriate principal action is to ensure the firm maintains adequate fidelity bond coverage as part of its broader supervisory controls.


Question 6

Topic: Function 4 — Supervision of Trading and Market Making Activities

A General Securities Principal is reviewing a new OMS/settlement interface after multiple delivery fails. Based on the exhibit, which interpretation is best supported?

Exhibit: WSP excerpt and settlement exception (same day)

WSP (Units of delivery):
- Equities: shares
- Corporate bonds: par amount (typically in $1,000 increments)
- UITs: units (do not deliver underlying shares)

Exception report:
TradeID  Product  Symbol/Desc        Qty Entered  Unit Size        Delivery Instruction Created
78421    UIT      ABC Income Trust    10          100 sh per unit  Deliver 1,000 shares ABC
  • A. The UIT delivery instruction is correct because a UIT unit represents shares.
  • B. The OMS is incorrectly converting UIT units into underlying shares for delivery.
  • C. The exception is expected because equity and UIT trades settle on different cycles.
  • D. The exception indicates the corporate bond unit of delivery is being treated as shares.

Best answer: B

Explanation: The exhibit shows a UIT trade entered as 10 units, but the delivery instruction created is for 1,000 underlying shares. UITs are delivered in units (not the underlying shares), so the only supported conclusion is that the system is using the wrong unit of delivery. This type of operational mismatch commonly causes delivery fails and requires supervisory remediation.


Question 7

Topic: Function 4 — Supervision of Trading and Market Making Activities

Which statement is most accurate about trader mandates and aggregation units and how a principal supervises compliance?

  • A. Aggregation units are always firmwide, so individual desk mandates are not a meaningful supervisory control.
  • B. Once a trader is properly registered, the firm may allow trading in any product as long as position limits are monitored.
  • C. A principal should define each trader’s mandate and aggregation unit, limit the trader’s system entitlements to that unit/product scope, and use exception surveillance to detect and remediate out-of-mandate activity.
  • D. Compliance with a trader’s mandate can be adequately supervised through the annual branch inspection process without trade-level surveillance.

Best answer: C

Explanation: Trader mandates and aggregation units set the permitted scope of trading activity and the boundary for monitoring. A principal’s role is to translate those definitions into preventive controls (e.g., entitlements) and detective controls (e.g., exception reports) and to document remediation when activity occurs outside the assigned unit.


Question 8

Topic: Function 3 — Supervision of Retail and Institutional Customer-Related Activities

During a branch inspection, the principal finds a static Instagram graphic posted by a registered rep promoting the firm’s advisory program. The post highlights “Up 18% last year—beat the market” and shows only the best-performing model, with no discussion of risks, fees, or that results were for a single strategy and time period. The post was published without required pre-use principal approval under the firm’s WSPs.

What is the best next supervisory step?

  • A. File the post with FINRA and wait for FINRA feedback before taking action
  • B. Allow the post to remain if the rep adds a risk disclaimer in the comments
  • C. Issue a verbal warning to the rep and close the matter if no customer complaints are found
  • D. Direct immediate removal, preserve the record, and require a revised fair-and-balanced version before any re-use

Best answer: D

Explanation: The communication is misleading because it cherry-picks performance and omits material qualifiers (risks, fees, and context). A principal’s first priority is to stop further distribution and ensure the firm retains the record of what was used. Remediation should require a revised, fair-and-balanced communication and supervisory pre-approval before any re-use.


Question 9

Topic: Function 5 — Supervision of Investment Banking and Research

For most Regulation D private placements that a member firm sells to customers, which statement best describes the firm’s general FINRA filing/notice expectation that should be addressed in its WSPs?

  • A. File a notice and the offering documents (or a notice of no documents) with FINRA shortly after the first sale
  • B. Ensure the issuer registers the offering with the SEC by filing a registration statement
  • C. File each customer’s accredited-investor questionnaire with FINRA before any solicitation
  • D. Obtain FINRA approval of the offering materials before any sale

Best answer: A

Explanation: Even when an offering is exempt from SEC registration under Regulation D, member firms typically have a FINRA private placement notice-filing obligation that is handled after the first sale. WSPs should capture this workflow so the firm consistently submits the required notice and offering documents (or a notice that no documents exist) and retains supporting records.


Question 10

Topic: Function 1 — Supervision of Registration of the Broker-Dealer and Personnel Management Activities

A firm hires an experienced registered representative who had two customer arbitrations within the past 18 months alleging unsuitable options recommendations. The rep will be permitted to trade options with retail customers.

Two heightened-supervision designs are proposed:

  • Design 1: Designate an options principal to (a) pre-approve opening options accounts and any options strategy beyond covered calls, (b) review a daily options exception report (concentration/turnover), and (c) conduct a documented weekly review of all options trades for the first 90 days.
  • Design 2: Require the branch manager to (a) hold a quarterly coaching meeting with the rep and (b) include the rep in the next annual branch inspection sampling.

Which design best fits the purpose of heightened supervision in this situation?

  • A. Either design, because disclosed arbitrations do not require extra controls
  • B. Design 1, because it adds targeted approval gates and frequent reviews
  • C. Design 2, because heightened supervision is mainly satisfied by branch inspections
  • D. Design 2, because quarterly meetings are sufficient enhanced supervision

Best answer: B

Explanation: Heightened supervision is designed to mitigate specific, known risks posed by an individual associated person through documented, enhanced controls. Because the rep’s recent history involves options suitability, the plan should add front-end approvals and a higher review cadence focused on options activity. A generic coaching/inspection approach does not directly address the identified risk.


Question 11

Topic: Function 4 — Supervision of Trading and Market Making Activities

A broker-dealer provides customers with electronic market access through an automated order router. Which market access risk control is designed to stop an order from reaching an exchange when it would cause the firm or the customer to exceed preset capital or credit exposure limits?

  • A. Post-trade surveillance exception reporting
  • B. Best execution review of routed orders
  • C. Pre-trade capital and credit limit checks
  • D. A trading “kill switch” for immediate shutdown

Best answer: C

Explanation: Market access rules require broker-dealers to have automated, pre-trade risk controls reasonably designed to limit financial exposure. Capital and credit limit checks validate orders before they are sent to a trading center, preventing the firm or customer from exceeding established exposure thresholds. This reduces the risk of erroneous or excessive trading creating losses the firm cannot absorb.


Question 12

Topic: Function 1 — Supervision of Registration of the Broker-Dealer and Personnel Management Activities

Which statement is most accurate about a broker-dealer’s recordkeeping for registration filings (e.g., Form BD/CRD submissions) and written communications with regulators, and how a principal should evidence compliance?

  • A. Responses to regulators may be handled verbally without written documentation if no rule is cited.
  • B. Only the firm’s current Form BD must be retained; prior versions are unnecessary.
  • C. Because CRD stores filings, the firm does not need to keep its own copies.
  • D. The firm should retain filings and regulator communications, with evidence of principal review, per record retention rules.

Best answer: D

Explanation: Broker-dealers are expected to maintain records supporting registration-related filings and communications with regulators. Principals evidence compliance by documenting review/approval and keeping an audit trail showing what was filed or communicated, when, and by whom, retained under applicable record retention requirements.


Question 13

Topic: Function 4 — Supervision of Trading and Market Making Activities

FINRA sends a market surveillance inquiry to a broker-dealer about possible manipulative trading in a thinly traded OTC equity, citing patterns observed in trade reporting data and requesting order/trade records (including any corrections), supervisory reviews, and related communications.

Which principal response is INCORRECT?

  • A. Direct involved traders to delete chats to avoid producing confusing messages
  • B. Seek clarification or an extension from FINRA if needed and document contacts
  • C. Preserve potentially responsive records and coordinate a complete, timely submission
  • D. Perform and document an internal review of the flagged activity and controls

Best answer: A

Explanation: Regulators use trade reporting data for surveillance to identify patterns and anomalies and then request supporting records to understand the activity and supervision behind the prints. A principal must respond by preserving records, conducting a good-faith review, and providing complete and accurate information. Instructing personnel to delete communications is prohibited and undermines the integrity of the inquiry response.


Question 14

Topic: Function 5 — Supervision of Investment Banking and Research

Your firm is lead underwriter for a follow-on equity offering. During the due diligence meeting, the investment banking deal captain states that a firm affiliate is the issuer’s senior secured lender and that the issuer expects to use a material portion of the offering proceeds to repay that affiliate loan. The deal team has not documented the conflict analysis, and the current draft offering document does not describe the affiliate relationship or the planned repayment.

As the supervising principal, what is the best next step?

  • A. Proceed with the offering since the affiliate is a separate legal entity
  • B. Escalate to Compliance/Legal, document the conflict, and require updated offering disclosure and approvals before proceeding
  • C. Wait until after pricing to review for conflicts as part of a post-deal supervisory check
  • D. Instruct bankers to make verbal conflict disclosures during the roadshow only

Best answer: B

Explanation: When underwriting proceeds will materially benefit an affiliate (such as repaying an affiliate loan), it creates a clear offering-related conflict of interest. A principal’s next step is to escalate and document the conflict analysis and ensure appropriate disclosure is added to the offering materials, with required internal approvals, before the transaction advances. This sequence prevents proceeding on incomplete or misleading disclosures.


Question 15

Topic: Function 1 — Supervision of Registration of the Broker-Dealer and Personnel Management Activities

A broker-dealer hires a registered representative with a recent disciplinary history and places the rep on a written heightened supervision plan. The plan requires pre-approval of all new accounts and a weekly review of correspondence and trading, but the assigned supervisor does not perform or document the pre-approvals and only sporadically looks at activity after customer complaints arise.

What is the most likely outcome of this control failure?

  • A. The firm will likely be viewed as having reasonably supervised because it created a written plan
  • B. The deficiency is likely cured if the firm conducts its next annual branch inspection on time
  • C. The firm is likely to face a failure-to-supervise finding for not implementing the heightened controls
  • D. Only the representative is likely to be held responsible because the plan was delegated

Best answer: C

Explanation: Heightened supervision is designed to reduce risk from a higher-risk person by adding specific control patterns such as approval gates, increased review cadence, and restrictions. If those controls are not actually performed and documented, regulators typically treat the plan as ineffective. The predictable consequence is supervisory liability for the firm for failing to supervise and maintain an effective supervisory system for that representative.


Question 16

Topic: Function 2 — Supervision of General Broker-Dealer Activities

A firm creates a monthly exception report that compares each registered representative’s product mix to peers and flags sharp increases in sales of higher-compensation products when the representative is close to reaching a production bonus or payout tier. Which supervisory control function does this report best describe?

  • A. Monitoring gifts and entertainment limit compliance
  • B. Identifying suspicious cash movement for AML escalation
  • C. Testing best execution quality across routing venues
  • D. Detecting compensation-driven conflicts affecting recommendations

Best answer: D

Explanation: The report is aimed at spotting changes in recommendations that correlate with heightened compensation incentives, such as bonus thresholds or payout tiers. Principals use this type of surveillance to detect whether incentives may be driving product selection in a way that creates conflicts of interest and potentially harms customers.


Question 17

Topic: Function 3 — Supervision of Retail and Institutional Customer-Related Activities

A broker-dealer is revising its written supervisory procedures for ongoing account maintenance. Which supervisory control best matches the purpose of ensuring required documentation is obtained and retained when a customer changes account ownership or adds/changes an authorized person (e.g., trustee, POA, or third-party trading authorization)?

  • A. Require signed change forms and principal approval before updating records
  • B. Re-perform CIP verification for existing customers at each profile change
  • C. Deliver an initial privacy notice before processing any address update
  • D. Escalate all maintenance requests to the AML officer for SAR decisions

Best answer: A

Explanation: Supervising account maintenance focuses on controlling changes to ownership, authority, and key profile information through documented customer instructions and updated account records. The most direct control is to require properly executed change documentation (and any required signatures) and to route the change for principal review/approval before the firm implements it.


Question 18

Topic: Function 5 — Supervision of Investment Banking and Research

Your firm is the lead underwriter for an IPO. The registration statement has been filed and the deal is in the waiting period. A desk manager proposes (1) a “tombstone” newspaper ad with basic offering facts and (2) a one-page emailed “deal highlight sheet” with bullet points, selected financial metrics, and management quotes that reps may forward to customers.

Which supervisory statement about these materials is INCORRECT?

  • A. A written highlight sheet may be a free writing prospectus with added requirements.
  • B. The emailed highlight sheet cannot trigger Securities Act filing or liability.
  • C. A statutory prospectus is the formal offering document tied to delivery obligations.
  • D. A tombstone ad is not a prospectus and is limited to basic facts.

Best answer: B

Explanation: Communications used in an offering must be properly classified because that classification drives what can be used when, what must be filed or accompanied by required legends, and what Securities Act liability can attach. A tombstone is a limited notice and does not substitute for a prospectus. A more substantive written “highlight sheet” can be treated as a free writing prospectus, with additional conditions and potential liability.


Question 19

Topic: Function 5 — Supervision of Investment Banking and Research

A firm is updating its WSPs to better control who can publish and distribute equity research and to prevent distribution of unapproved drafts. The firm is considering two supervisory control designs:

  • Design 1: Analysts draft reports in a research publishing system. Only designated Research supervisory principals can electronically approve for publication, and only a small “research distribution” group can release the report externally (email lists, website posting, and feeds). Analysts and sales have view-only access to approved, published reports.
  • Design 2: Analysts create PDFs locally and may email reports directly to customers and internal distribution lists after forwarding the PDF to a principal for approval.

Based on the decisive factor of controlling who can publish and distribute research, which design is most appropriate?

  • A. Design 2, because sales can more quickly deliver research to clients
  • B. Design 2, because principal approval occurs before analysts email reports
  • C. Design 1, because it gates publication and limits distribution access
  • D. Design 1, but only if investment banking approves each report first

Best answer: C

Explanation: Design 1 best fits the key supervisory goal: principals control publication and dissemination through system permissions and an approval “gate.” By limiting who can release research externally and keeping an audit trail, the firm reduces the risk of drafts or unapproved versions being distributed. Design 2 relies on manual steps and gives too many people the ability to disseminate research outside controlled channels.


Question 20

Topic: Function 2 — Supervision of General Broker-Dealer Activities

During routine electronic communications surveillance, an OSJ principal finds emails showing a registered representative is receiving an “advisory board stipend” and stock options from a public company. The rep also recently recommended that same company’s stock to several retail customers, but no conflict disclosure or outside activity approval is on file under the firm’s WSPs.

What is the best next supervisory step?

  • A. Immediately notify all affected customers before confirming the facts
  • B. Rely on the annual OBA attestation and continue normal supervision
  • C. Approve the activity as an OBA and document it retroactively
  • D. Escalate, investigate, and restrict further recommendations pending review

Best answer: D

Explanation: This is a conflict-of-interest red flag tied to compensation from an issuer being recommended to customers. The principal should open and document a supervisory investigation, escalate per WSPs, and implement interim restrictions to prevent further potentially conflicted recommendations while the facts and customer impact are assessed.


Question 21

Topic: Function 2 — Supervision of General Broker-Dealer Activities

Which statement best defines hypothecation and the key regulatory limit on a broker-dealer’s use of customer securities?

  • A. Pledging margin securities, limited to 140% of customer debit balance
  • B. Pledging any customer securities, limited to their market value
  • C. Pledging customer securities is unlimited if excess is segregated
  • D. Using fully paid securities as collateral with written customer consent

Best answer: A

Explanation: Hypothecation refers to a firm pledging customer margin securities to a lender to finance margin activity. The core protection is that the amount pledged is limited (commonly 140% of the customer’s margin debit balance), and fully paid/excess-margin customer securities are not meant to be used as firm collateral. Violations are serious because they can put customer assets at risk if the firm fails.


Question 22

Topic: Function 5 — Supervision of Investment Banking and Research

A General Securities Principal is asked to determine how a draft communication should be supervised before it is posted to the firm’s public website.

Exhibit: Draft PDF header and excerpt (submitted for approval)

Title: ABC Corp (ABC) — Initiating Coverage
Author: Jane Lee, Equity Research Analyst
Distribution: Public website (retail) and institutional email list
Rating: BUY
12-month price target: $52 (current price: $41)
Excerpt: We expect margin expansion driven by new contracts and believe ABC is
undervalued versus peers. We recommend investors accumulate shares at current
levels.

Based on the exhibit, which interpretation is best supported?

  • A. It is sales literature because it encourages customers to buy shares
  • B. It is a research report requiring research supervision and disclosures
  • C. It is correspondence because it will be emailed to institutions
  • D. It is educational content because it is posted on a public website

Best answer: B

Explanation: The exhibit contains issuer-specific analysis and a clear recommendation, including a rating and a 12-month price target. Communications with this level of security-specific analysis and recommendation are supervised as research reports, regardless of distribution channel. Posting it publicly does not convert it into “educational” material.


Question 23

Topic: Function 4 — Supervision of Trading and Market Making Activities

A firm’s clearing report shows a customer purchase of 15,000 shares has been a fail-to-receive since the T+1 settlement date. After four additional business days, the contra broker still has not delivered. The firm’s WSP (consistent with its clearing arrangement) requires that when a fail-to-receive ages beyond this point, the firm must send a buy-in notice through the clearing process giving the contra one business day to deliver; if not cured, the firm executes a market purchase to close out the fail and charges the contra for any price difference and fees.

As the trading supervisor, what is the best next step?

  • A. Wait for the contra broker to deliver without escalation
  • B. Close the exception because the trade already settled T+1
  • C. Approve and document issuing the buy-in notice
  • D. Execute a market purchase immediately to cover the fail

Best answer: C

Explanation: A buy-in/close-out process is triggered when a fail persists beyond the firm’s stated aging threshold. The supervisor should ensure the required buy-in notice is sent and documented before any forced purchase is executed. This preserves proper sequence, evidence, and charge-back support if the contra fails to cure.


Question 24

Topic: Function 1 — Supervision of Registration of the Broker-Dealer and Personnel Management Activities

A broker-dealer is revising its WSPs for keeping registered persons’ Forms U4 accurate and complete.

  • Proposal A: Collect a detailed disclosure questionnaire at hire and require an annual certification. Updates are handled during the annual cycle unless a regulator specifically requests information.
  • Proposal B: Collect the same hire and annual disclosures, but also require registered persons to report specified events as they occur (e.g., criminal charges, civil judgments/liens, bankruptcy, customer complaints/arbitrations, name/address changes, and outside business activities) through a documented escalation channel so Compliance can evaluate and file U4 amendments when needed.

Which proposal is the better supervisory design, based on the core information captured on Form U4?

  • A. Proposal B, because U4 updates are only needed for customer complaints and arbitration claims
  • B. Proposal A, because background checks are more reliable than representative self-reporting
  • C. Proposal A, because U4 is primarily an onboarding record and annual updates are sufficient
  • D. Proposal B, because U4 includes ongoing reportable events that require event-driven updates

Best answer: D

Explanation: Proposal B best fits what Form U4 captures because U4 is not just an onboarding snapshot—it contains disclosures that can change throughout a person’s registration. A principal should supervise for completeness and accuracy by requiring prompt reporting of key events and routing them to Compliance for review and, when appropriate, U4 amendments. This reduces the risk of stale or misleading CRD records.

Series 24 general principal map

Use this map after the sample questions to connect individual items to broker-dealer supervision, registration, underwriting, trading, market making, retail sales, and compliance decisions these Securities Prep samples test.

    flowchart LR
	  S1["Firm activity or supervisory event"] --> S2
	  S2["Identify business line and rule exposure"] --> S3
	  S3["Apply registration supervision and controls"] --> S4
	  S4["Review sales trading banking or market activity"] --> S5
	  S5["Escalate report or remediate issue"] --> S6
	  S6["Document principal approval and governance"]

Quick Cheat Sheet

CueWhat to remember
Principal scopeSeries 24 expects broad supervision across sales, trading, underwriting, market making, and operations interfaces.
RegistrationPerson, branch, activity, and product registration status often determines what is permitted.
UnderwritingDistribution, due diligence, compensation, selling concessions, and conflicts drive many scenarios.
Retail supervisionSuitability, communications, complaints, outside activity, and customer protection remain central.
RecordsPrincipal approvals and exception dispositions need a clear retained audit trail.

Mini Glossary

  • Supervision: Firm process for review, approval, escalation, and evidence of compliance.
  • Underwriting: Investment banking process for structuring, pricing, distributing, and settling offerings.
  • Communications: Retail and institutional content subject to approval, recordkeeping, and fair-balanced standards.
  • Order handling: Process for receiving, routing, executing, modifying, and documenting orders.
  • AML: Anti-money laundering controls for identifying, monitoring, and reporting suspicious activity.

In this section

Revised on Sunday, May 3, 2026