CSI Portfolio Management Techniques (PMT) Quick Review
Quick review for Canadian Securities Institute CSI Portfolio Management Techniques (PMT): IPS, risk, allocation, fixed income, derivatives, performance, and traps.
PMT Quick Review
This independent quick review is for candidates preparing for the Canadian Securities Institute CSI Portfolio Management Techniques (PMT®) exam, code PMT. Use it as a fast final review before moving into topic drills, mock exams, original practice questions, and detailed explanations.
The exam rewards candidates who can connect portfolio theory to practical portfolio decisions: client objectives, constraints, risk measurement, asset allocation, portfolio construction, implementation, monitoring, and performance evaluation.
High-Yield Exam Mindset
For most PMT-style questions, ask:
- Who is the client? Individual, pension, foundation, corporation, trust, or other institutional investor.
- What is the objective? Return requirement, risk tolerance, income need, capital preservation, growth, liability matching, tax efficiency.
- What are the constraints? Time horizon, liquidity, tax, legal/regulatory, unique circumstances, ethical restrictions, currency, concentration, ESG or mandate limits.
- What is the portfolio decision? Strategic asset allocation, tactical shift, security selection, hedging, rebalancing, manager selection, benchmark choice.
- What metric answers the question? Standard deviation, beta, duration, Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio, tracking error, information ratio, attribution, after-tax return.
- What is the trap? Confusing risk measures, ignoring constraints, using the wrong benchmark, mixing nominal and real returns, or choosing a technically correct answer that violates the IPS.
Portfolio Management Workflow
flowchart TD
A[Define client situation] --> B[Create or update IPS]
B --> C[Set objectives and constraints]
C --> D[Choose strategic asset allocation]
D --> E[Select implementation approach]
E --> F[Monitor portfolio, client, markets]
F --> G[Measure performance and risk]
G --> H[Rebalance or revise strategy]
H --> B
Core PMT Topic Map
| Topic | What to Know Cold | Common Exam Trap |
|---|---|---|
| Investment Policy Statement | Objectives, constraints, risk tolerance, return need, time horizon, liquidity, taxes, legal, unique factors | Treating the IPS as static when client facts change |
| Risk and return | Expected return, variance, standard deviation, correlation, beta, downside risk | Confusing total risk with systematic risk |
| Asset allocation | Strategic vs tactical allocation, diversification, rebalancing, efficient frontier | Overweighting security selection versus allocation |
| Modern portfolio theory | Efficient portfolios, correlation benefits, market portfolio, CAPM | Assuming diversification removes all risk |
| Client constraints | Liquidity, time horizon, tax, legal/regulatory, unique circumstances | Ignoring a constraint because the return looks attractive |
| Fixed income | Duration, convexity, yield curve, credit risk, immunization, ladder/barbell/bullet | Reversing the rate-duration relationship |
| Equities | Growth/value, active/passive, factors, sector and style exposure | Choosing a style inconsistent with the mandate |
| Alternatives | Liquidity, valuation, leverage, correlation, fees, transparency | Assuming low reported volatility means low risk |
| Derivatives | Hedging, options payoff logic, futures exposure, covered calls, protective puts | Treating derivatives as speculative only |
| Performance evaluation | TWRR vs MWRR, benchmarks, Sharpe, Treynor, Jensen’s alpha, information ratio | Using the wrong performance measure for the decision |
| Attribution | Allocation effect, selection effect, interaction effect | Calling all outperformance “security selection” |
| Behavioural finance | Biases, framing, loss aversion, overconfidence, anchoring | Recommending education only when process controls are needed |
Investment Policy Statement Essentials
The IPS is the bridge between client facts and portfolio decisions. In exam questions, the best answer usually aligns with the IPS even if another answer has a higher expected return.
Objectives vs Constraints
| IPS Element | Review Point | Exam Clue |
|---|---|---|
| Return objective | Required return to meet goals; can be absolute or relative | Retirement income, spending policy, liability funding, inflation protection |
| Risk objective | Ability and willingness to take risk | Job stability, wealth level, liabilities, emotional tolerance, shortfall risk |
| Time horizon | Single-stage or multi-stage | Working years, retirement, education funding, endowment perpetuity |
| Liquidity | Cash needs, spending, emergencies, distributions | Upcoming purchase, annual withdrawals, debt payments |
| Tax situation | Taxable status, account type, after-tax return focus | High marginal tax rate, tax-exempt entity, realized gains, income preference |
| Legal/regulatory | Governing documents, mandate rules, fiduciary duties | Trust deed, pension rules, investment restrictions |
| Unique circumstances | Special restrictions or preferences | Concentrated employer stock, ethical screens, legacy holdings, currency needs |
Ability vs Willingness to Take Risk
| Situation | Likely Interpretation |
|---|---|
| High wealth, stable income, long horizon | High ability to take risk |
| Short horizon, low wealth, high liquidity need | Low ability to take risk |
| Client panics during volatility | Low willingness to take risk |
| Client wants aggressive returns but cannot afford losses | Ability usually constrains the portfolio |
| Client can afford risk but is very conservative | Willingness may constrain the portfolio unless education changes it |
Decision rule: When ability and willingness conflict, the prudent portfolio normally reflects the lower effective risk tolerance unless the question gives a reason to educate the client and adjust expectations.
Client Type Quick Review
| Client Type | Typical Objective | Key Constraints | High-Yield Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Young individual | Growth, wealth accumulation | Long horizon, human capital risk, limited liquidity | Can often tolerate more volatility, but job risk matters |
| Retiree | Income, preservation, inflation protection | Liquidity, shorter horizon, tax, longevity risk | Avoid excessive volatility and sequence-of-returns risk |
| High-net-worth client | After-tax total return, estate goals | Tax, unique preferences, concentration risk | Asset location and tax efficiency may matter |
| Defined benefit pension | Fund liabilities | Legal, actuarial assumptions, funded status | Liability-driven investing and duration matching are key |
| Foundation/endowment | Perpetual support of spending | Spending policy, inflation, legal/mandate rules | Balance current spending and real capital preservation |
| Insurance company | Match liabilities and reserves | Regulatory, liquidity, duration, credit quality | Asset-liability matching is central |
| Corporation | Liquidity, capital preservation, return on surplus cash | Operating cash needs, short horizon | Cash flow timing often dominates return |
Risk and Return Formula Review
Know what each measure captures and when it is appropriate.
Core Portfolio Relationships
\[ E(R_p)=\sum_{i=1}^{n} w_iE(R_i) \]\[ \sigma_p^2=w_A^2\sigma_A^2+w_B^2\sigma_B^2+2w_Aw_B\sigma_A\sigma_B\rho_{A,B} \]\[ \beta_p=\sum_{i=1}^{n} w_i\beta_i \]\[ \text{CAPM expected return}=R_f+\beta_i\left(E(R_m)-R_f\right) \]Metric Selection Table
| Metric | Measures | Best Used When | Trap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | Total volatility | Total portfolio risk matters | Penalizes upside and downside volatility equally |
| Variance | Squared dispersion | Calculation step for volatility | Harder to interpret directly |
| Correlation | Co-movement between assets | Diversification benefit | Low correlation can change during stress |
| Covariance | Direction and strength of joint movement | Portfolio variance calculations | Scale is less intuitive than correlation |
| Beta | Sensitivity to market/systematic risk | Diversified equity portfolio or CAPM | Not a complete risk measure for undiversified portfolios |
| Tracking error | Active risk versus benchmark | Active manager evaluation | Low tracking error does not mean low absolute risk |
| VaR | Estimated loss threshold over period/confidence | Tail risk summary | Does not show how bad losses can be beyond the threshold |
| Downside deviation | Harmful volatility below target | Asymmetric risk preferences | Requires correct target threshold |
| Duration | Bond price sensitivity to interest rates | Fixed-income risk | Higher duration means greater rate sensitivity |
| Convexity | Curvature of bond price-yield relationship | Large yield changes | Duration alone is only an approximation |
Required Return: Practical Exam Approach
A required return question often has hidden cash flow and inflation assumptions. Read carefully.
Common Required Return Steps
- Identify current portfolio value.
- Identify cash inflows or outflows.
- Determine whether return is nominal or real.
- Adjust for inflation if required.
- Use after-tax amounts if the question asks for after-tax return.
- Compare required return to risk tolerance.
Trap: A client may require a high return mathematically, but if risk tolerance is low, the correct recommendation may be to adjust goals, spending, retirement date, savings, or constraints rather than simply build a high-risk portfolio.
Modern Portfolio Theory and Efficient Frontier
Concepts to Review
| Concept | Meaning | Exam Application |
|---|---|---|
| Efficient frontier | Portfolios with highest expected return for each risk level | Choose efficient portfolios, not dominated portfolios |
| Diversification | Combining assets to reduce unsystematic risk | Works best when correlations are low or imperfect |
| Systematic risk | Market-wide risk | Cannot be diversified away |
| Unsystematic risk | Security-specific risk | Can be reduced through diversification |
| Capital market line | Efficient portfolios combining risk-free asset and market portfolio | Uses total risk/standard deviation |
| Security market line | CAPM relationship between expected return and beta | Uses systematic risk/beta |
| Market portfolio | Portfolio of risky assets in CAPM theory | Benchmark for systematic risk pricing |
CML vs SML
| Feature | Capital Market Line | Security Market Line |
|---|---|---|
| Risk measure | Standard deviation | Beta |
| Applies to | Efficient portfolios | Individual securities and portfolios |
| Slope | Market price of total risk | Market risk premium |
| Key use | Portfolio efficiency | Expected return under CAPM |
Trap: If the question involves a well-diversified portfolio and market sensitivity, beta may be appropriate. If the question evaluates total portfolio volatility or Sharpe ratio, use standard deviation.
Asset Allocation
Asset allocation is often the most important determinant of portfolio risk and return. Exam questions may test whether you distinguish policy-level allocation from short-term tilts.
| Allocation Type | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Strategic asset allocation | Long-term target mix based on IPS | 60% equity, 35% fixed income, 5% cash |
| Tactical asset allocation | Short-term deviation from policy weights | Temporarily overweighting equities |
| Dynamic allocation | Adjusting exposure based on changing conditions or rules | Reducing equity risk as funded status improves |
| Core-satellite | Passive or low-cost core plus active satellites | Index core with specialist managers |
| Liability-driven allocation | Assets selected to match liability timing and sensitivity | Pension duration matching |
Rebalancing
| Rebalancing Method | Strength | Weakness |
|---|---|---|
| Calendar-based | Simple and disciplined | May rebalance when not needed |
| Percentage-of-portfolio | Responds to drift | Requires monitoring and thresholds |
| Constant mix | Buys after declines and sells after gains | Can underperform in strong trends |
| CPPI-style approach | Protects floor while allowing upside | Requires assumptions and monitoring |
Decision rule: Rebalancing is not just mechanical. Consider transaction costs, taxes, liquidity, client constraints, and whether the IPS has changed.
Fixed-Income Portfolio Techniques
Fixed income questions frequently combine return, risk, income, liquidity, and liability matching.
Bond Price and Yield Relationship
| If Market Yields… | Bond Prices… | Longer Duration Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Rise | Fall | Larger price decline |
| Fall | Rise | Larger price increase |
Duration and Convexity
| Concept | What It Tells You | Exam Trap |
|---|---|---|
| Macaulay duration | Weighted average time to receive cash flows | Not the same as modified duration |
| Modified duration | Approximate price sensitivity to yield changes | Approximation is less accurate for large rate moves |
| Effective duration | Sensitivity when cash flows may change | Useful for callable or option-embedded bonds |
| Convexity | How duration changes as yields change | Positive convexity is generally beneficial |
| Negative convexity | Price gains limited when rates fall | Common with callable bonds or mortgage-like structures |
Fixed-Income Strategies
| Strategy | Best Fit | Key Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Ladder | Diversified maturity schedule and liquidity | May not maximize return for a rate view |
| Barbell | Short and long maturities | Reinvestment and long-duration risk |
| Bullet | Maturities clustered around target date | Concentration around one maturity point |
| Immunization | Matching asset duration to liability horizon | Requires rebalancing as rates and durations change |
| Cash-flow matching | Bond cash flows meet liabilities | Can be costly or hard to construct |
| Credit strategy | Earn spread through credit exposure | Default, downgrade, liquidity risk |
| Yield curve strategy | Position for curve shifts | Forecast risk |
Trap: A bond with a higher yield may have more credit risk, liquidity risk, call risk, or duration risk. Do not choose it solely because yield is higher.
Equity Portfolio Techniques
Equity Style Review
| Style | Typical Characteristics | Risks |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Lower valuation multiples, often out-of-favour companies | Value traps, slower growth |
| Growth | Higher expected earnings growth | Valuation risk, sensitivity to expectations |
| Quality | Strong balance sheets, stable profitability | May become expensive |
| Momentum | Recent winners | Reversal risk |
| Dividend/income | Dividend-paying stocks | Sector concentration, dividend cuts |
| Small-cap | Smaller companies | Liquidity, business risk, volatility |
Active vs Passive
| Approach | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Passive | Low cost, transparent, benchmark exposure | No attempt to outperform, benchmark concentration |
| Active | Potential alpha, flexibility, risk control | Fees, manager risk, style drift |
| Enhanced indexing | Small active bets around benchmark | Tracking error still matters |
| Factor investing | Systematic exposure to rewarded factors | Factor cycles and crowding risk |
Exam trap: A manager can outperform because of market beta, sector exposure, style exposure, currency, or luck — not necessarily skill. Performance evaluation must isolate risk-adjusted value added.
Alternative Investments
Alternatives are often tested through risk, liquidity, valuation, diversification, and suitability.
| Alternative | Potential Role | Key Risks and Traps |
|---|---|---|
| Real estate / REITs | Income, inflation sensitivity, diversification | Leverage, liquidity, property cycle risk |
| Infrastructure | Long-term cash flows, inflation linkage | Regulatory, political, valuation, liquidity risk |
| Private equity | Growth and illiquidity premium | Long lockups, valuation lag, high dispersion |
| Private debt | Income and spread | Credit, liquidity, covenant risk |
| Hedge funds | Absolute return or lower correlation strategies | Fees, leverage, transparency, manager risk |
| Commodities | Inflation hedge, crisis diversification | No cash flow, volatility, roll yield |
| Structured products | Customized payoff | Complexity, issuer risk, liquidity |
Decision rule: Alternatives may improve diversification, but suitability depends on liquidity needs, time horizon, complexity tolerance, valuation transparency, fees, and IPS constraints.
Derivatives and Hedging
Derivatives may be used to hedge, equitize cash, adjust duration, manage currency exposure, or create option-based payoff profiles. The exam may test whether the derivative use is consistent with the client mandate.
Derivative Use Cases
| Instrument | Common Use | Key Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Futures | Hedge market exposure, adjust beta, equitize cash | Basis risk, margin, contract mismatch |
| Forwards | Currency or customized exposure hedge | Counterparty risk, liquidity |
| Options | Downside protection, income generation, asymmetric exposure | Premium cost, complexity |
| Swaps | Exchange cash flow exposures | Counterparty and valuation risk |
Option Strategy Review
| Strategy | Position | Objective | Trade-Off |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protective put | Long asset + long put | Downside protection | Pay option premium |
| Covered call | Long asset + short call | Generate income | Cap upside |
| Collar | Long asset + long put + short call | Reduce downside with lower net cost | Limit upside |
| Long call | Right to buy | Upside exposure with limited loss | Premium can expire worthless |
| Long put | Right to sell | Hedge or profit from decline | Premium cost |
| Short option | Obligation if exercised | Earn premium | Potentially large risk |
Hedge Ratio Reminder
A simple equity futures hedge often depends on portfolio value, beta, futures price, and contract multiplier.
Number of contracts is commonly estimated as:
\[ N \approx \frac{\text{Portfolio value} \times \beta}{\text{Futures price} \times \text{Contract multiplier}} \]Adjust the direction based on the objective:
- Reduce equity exposure: short futures.
- Increase or equitize exposure: long futures.
- Hedge currency receivable: sell the foreign currency forward.
- Hedge currency payable: buy the foreign currency forward.
Trap: A perfect hedge is rare. Basis risk, beta mismatch, timing mismatch, currency mismatch, liquidity, and transaction costs can cause hedge results to differ from expectations.
Currency Management
Currency exposure matters when assets, liabilities, spending, or reporting currency differ.
| Choice | When It May Fit | Main Trade-Off |
|---|---|---|
| Fully hedge currency | Liability or spending is in home currency; low tolerance for FX volatility | May give up currency diversification or upside |
| Partially hedge | Balance volatility control and diversification | Requires policy and monitoring |
| Unhedged | Long horizon, desire for diversification, acceptable FX volatility | Currency can dominate short-term returns |
| Dynamic hedge | Adjust hedge ratio based on conditions | Forecast and implementation risk |
Trap: The correct currency policy depends on the client’s base currency, liabilities, time horizon, and risk tolerance — not simply on a forecast that a currency may rise or fall.
Tax-Aware Portfolio Management
PMT questions may test whether you think in after-tax terms when the client is taxable.
| Concept | Review Point |
|---|---|
| After-tax return | What the client keeps matters more than pre-tax return |
| Asset location | Place tax-inefficient assets where they are most appropriate, subject to client facts |
| Turnover | High turnover can increase realized taxable gains and costs |
| Tax-loss harvesting | Realize losses where appropriate to offset gains, subject to applicable rules |
| Income type | Interest, dividends, and capital gains may be taxed differently depending on jurisdiction and account type |
| Unrealized gains | Selling legacy holdings may trigger tax costs |
| Registered/tax-advantaged accounts | Consider account rules and suitability without assuming facts not provided |
Decision rule: If the question says “taxable investor,” “after-tax return,” “large embedded gain,” or “high turnover,” taxes are probably central to the answer.
Performance Measurement
TWRR vs MWRR
| Measure | Best For | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Time-weighted rate of return | Evaluating manager skill | Removes impact of external cash flows |
| Money-weighted rate of return | Evaluating investor experience | Reflects timing and size of client cash flows |
Trap: If cash flows are controlled by the client, use time-weighted return to evaluate the manager. If the question asks what the investor actually earned on invested money, money-weighted return may be relevant.
Risk-Adjusted Performance Metrics
| Metric | Plain Formula | Best Use | Trap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratio | (Portfolio return - risk-free rate) / standard deviation | Total risk-adjusted performance | Best for diversified total portfolios |
| Treynor ratio | (Portfolio return - risk-free rate) / beta | Systematic risk-adjusted performance | Requires meaningful beta |
| Jensen’s alpha | Actual return - CAPM required return | Value added versus CAPM expectation | Depends on beta and benchmark assumptions |
| Information ratio | Active return / tracking error | Active manager skill versus benchmark | Requires appropriate benchmark |
| Sortino ratio | Excess return / downside deviation | Downside-risk focus | Target return must be defined |
Benchmark Quality
A good benchmark should generally be:
- Specified in advance
- Investable or replicable
- Measurable
- Appropriate to the mandate
- Unambiguous
- Reflective of manager style and opportunity set
Trap: Comparing a Canadian balanced manager to a pure equity index, or a value manager to a broad growth-heavy index, can produce misleading conclusions.
Performance Attribution
Attribution explains why performance differed from the benchmark.
| Effect | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Allocation effect | Value added by overweighting or underweighting asset classes/sectors | Overweighting technology when technology outperforms |
| Selection effect | Value added by choosing better securities within a category | Picking stocks that outperform their sector |
| Interaction effect | Combined effect of allocation and selection | Overweighting a sector and also selecting strong securities within it |
Decision rule: First identify whether the manager’s active decision was about where to allocate or what to select. Then match the attribution effect.
Manager Selection and Monitoring
| Area | What to Review |
|---|---|
| Investment philosophy | Is the process coherent, repeatable, and aligned with mandate? |
| People | Stability, experience, decision rights, succession risk |
| Process | Security selection, portfolio construction, risk controls |
| Performance | Risk-adjusted, benchmark-relative, peer-relative, cycle-aware |
| Portfolio characteristics | Style, concentration, turnover, liquidity, factor exposure |
| Fees and costs | Impact on net return |
| Operational risk | Compliance, valuation, reporting, controls |
| Style drift | Whether the manager remains consistent with stated mandate |
Trap: Do not hire or retain a manager based only on recent performance. Look for process, risk, consistency, and mandate fit.
Behavioural Finance Quick Review
| Bias | Description | Portfolio Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Loss aversion | Losses feel worse than equivalent gains | Selling risky assets after declines |
| Overconfidence | Overestimating skill or information | Excessive trading, concentration |
| Anchoring | Relying too heavily on initial value | Refusing to sell below purchase price |
| Confirmation bias | Seeking confirming evidence only | Ignoring contrary data |
| Recency bias | Overweighting recent events | Chasing performance |
| Herding | Following the crowd | Buying bubbles, selling panics |
| Mental accounting | Treating money differently by bucket | Inefficient total portfolio |
| Framing | Decisions change based on presentation | Inconsistent risk choices |
| Status quo bias | Preference for current holdings | Failure to rebalance or diversify |
| Endowment effect | Overvaluing what one owns | Holding unsuitable legacy assets |
Exam trap: The remedy may be education, reframing, IPS discipline, automatic rebalancing, diversification rules, or decision checklists — not simply “tell the client the bias is wrong.”
Ethics, Suitability, and Professional Judgment
For the Canadian Securities Institute CSI Portfolio Management Techniques (PMT®) exam, professional judgment questions often come down to putting the client’s objectives, constraints, disclosure, and suitability ahead of return chasing.
Practical Rules
- Recommend only strategies consistent with client facts and the IPS.
- Identify and manage conflicts of interest.
- Use reasonable assumptions and explain limitations.
- Do not ignore liquidity, tax, or legal constraints.
- Do not present forecasts as guarantees.
- Consider costs, risks, and implementation practicality.
- Document major decisions and rationale.
- Revisit the IPS when client circumstances materially change.
Calculation and Decision Checklist
| If the Question Asks About… | Use This Concept | Watch For |
|---|---|---|
| Portfolio expected return | Weighted average return | Weights must sum correctly |
| Portfolio risk with two assets | Variance using weights, volatilities, correlation | Correlation drives diversification benefit |
| Market sensitivity | Beta | Total risk may still be high |
| CAPM required return | Risk-free rate + beta × market risk premium | Use market premium, not market return alone |
| Active manager skill | Alpha or information ratio | Benchmark must be appropriate |
| Total risk-adjusted return | Sharpe ratio | Uses standard deviation |
| Systematic risk-adjusted return | Treynor ratio | Uses beta |
| Bond price sensitivity | Duration and convexity | Price falls when yields rise |
| Liability matching | Duration matching or cash-flow matching | Rebalancing may be required |
| Client return need | Required return calculation | Nominal vs real; pre-tax vs after-tax |
| Cash flow timing impact | MWRR versus TWRR | Manager control vs client control |
| Benchmark-relative risk | Tracking error | Low tracking error is not necessarily low absolute risk |
| Hedging equity exposure | Futures hedge logic | Contract size, beta, and hedge direction |
Common Candidate Mistakes
- Choosing the highest-return answer without checking suitability.
- Confusing willingness to take risk with ability to take risk.
- Using standard deviation when the question points to beta, or beta when total risk matters.
- Ignoring liquidity needs in retirement, foundation spending, or liability-driven cases.
- Forgetting that duration is a price sensitivity measure, not just “time to maturity.”
- Assuming alternatives are automatically low risk because they have low correlation.
- Using the wrong benchmark for performance evaluation.
- Treating tax as irrelevant for a taxable client.
- Assuming a hedge eliminates all risk.
- Calling recent outperformance skill without considering style, factor exposure, or benchmark mismatch.
- Failing to distinguish strategic asset allocation from tactical tilts.
- Overlooking embedded gains, concentrated positions, or unique constraints.
- Ignoring inflation when the question asks for real purchasing power.
- Assuming the IPS never changes.
- Answering from market opinion rather than the facts given in the case.
Fast Review: “Best Answer” Decision Rules
IPS and Suitability
- If a strategy violates a stated constraint, it is usually wrong.
- If required return is unrealistic, adjust goals rather than automatically increasing risk.
- If a client has low liquidity tolerance, avoid illiquid alternatives even if expected return is attractive.
- If the client has short horizon and high cash need, capital preservation usually dominates.
Risk Metrics
- Use standard deviation for total volatility.
- Use beta for market/systematic risk.
- Use tracking error for benchmark-relative active risk.
- Use duration for bond interest rate sensitivity.
- Use downside deviation when the concern is losses below a threshold.
Performance
- Use TWRR to evaluate the manager.
- Use MWRR to evaluate the investor’s actual experience.
- Use Sharpe for total portfolio risk-adjusted return.
- Use information ratio for active return per unit of active risk.
- Use attribution to separate allocation decisions from selection decisions.
Fixed Income
- Rates up, bond prices down.
- Longer duration means greater sensitivity.
- Callable bonds may have negative convexity.
- Immunization requires monitoring and rebalancing.
- Higher yield usually comes with higher or different risk.
Derivatives
- Protective put = downside protection with premium cost.
- Covered call = income now, upside capped.
- Short futures = reduce exposure.
- Long futures = increase exposure.
- Currency hedge direction depends on whether the client will receive or pay the foreign currency.
Mini Self-Check Before Practice
Can you answer these without notes?
- What are the two parts of risk tolerance?
- Which IPS constraints are most likely to override a high-return recommendation?
- When should a manager be evaluated using TWRR instead of MWRR?
- What is the difference between Sharpe ratio and Treynor ratio?
- Why can a low-correlation alternative still be unsuitable?
- How does a rise in interest rates affect a long-duration bond portfolio?
- What does convexity add beyond duration?
- What makes a benchmark appropriate?
- What is the difference between allocation effect and selection effect?
- When is a protective put preferable to a stop-loss-style approach?
- Why might a client with high wealth still have low risk tolerance?
- How can tax considerations change the preferred portfolio strategy?
- What is style drift, and why does it matter?
- Why does diversification reduce unsystematic but not systematic risk?
- What changes would require updating the IPS?
How to Use This With a Question Bank
After reviewing this page, move into independent companion practice:
- Start with topic drills for IPS, risk/return, asset allocation, fixed income, derivatives, and performance measurement.
- Review every missed question using detailed explanations, not just the correct option.
- Track mistakes by category: calculation error, concept confusion, missed constraint, wrong metric, or poor reading of the case.
- Re-drill weak areas with original practice questions until you can explain why each wrong answer is wrong.
- Finish with mixed timed sets or mock exams to practice switching topics under exam conditions.
Practical next step: choose one weak PMT topic, complete a focused question bank drill, and review the detailed explanations until the decision rule behind each answer is clear.