Exam Identity and Use
This Quick Reference is independent review support for the Canadian Securities Institute CSI Investment Management Techniques (IMT®) Exam 1, exam code IMT Exam 1. Use it to consolidate formulas, portfolio-management logic, and applied decision rules. Always align final study with the current CSI materials and learning objectives.
High-Yield Exam 1 Map
| Area | What to know cold | Typical exam decision point |
|---|
| Portfolio process | Objectives, constraints, policy, implementation, monitoring | Identify the correct next step in the investment management process |
| Client profile / IPS | Return, risk, liquidity, time horizon, tax, legal/regulatory, unique constraints | Distinguish a true constraint from an objective |
| Risk and return | Arithmetic/geometric return, standard deviation, beta, covariance, correlation | Select the right risk measure for the situation |
| Diversification | Correlation, systematic vs unsystematic risk, efficient frontier | Explain why adding a security may reduce portfolio risk |
| Asset allocation | Strategic, tactical, rebalancing, core-satellite | Choose policy mix versus short-term deviation |
| CAPM / market models | Beta, expected return, alpha, SML | Decide if a security is underpriced or overpriced |
| Performance measurement | TWR, MWR, Sharpe, Treynor, Jensen alpha, information ratio | Match the measure to the manager/client situation |
| Security analysis | Top-down, bottom-up, fundamental, technical, passive/active | Identify which analysis method is being used |
| Fixed-income basics | Price-yield relationship, duration, convexity, credit spread | Estimate bond price effect from rate changes |
| Equity valuation basics | P/E, dividend yield, DDM, ROE, DuPont | Interpret whether a stock looks cheap, expensive, or risky |
Investment Management Process
| Step | Purpose | Exam trap |
|---|
| 1. Define client situation | Gather facts, goals, constraints, risk tolerance, time horizon | Do not recommend products before the client profile is understood |
| 2. Set objectives | Translate goals into required return and acceptable risk | “Wants high return” is not enough; required return must be feasible |
| 3. Build IPS | Document objectives, constraints, asset mix, benchmarks, review rules | IPS is a control document, not just a sales summary |
| 4. Develop strategy | Strategic asset allocation, permitted securities, diversification | Asset allocation usually drives most portfolio risk/return |
| 5. Implement | Select securities/managers, trade, control costs and taxes | Implementation must remain consistent with the IPS |
| 6. Monitor and rebalance | Compare to benchmarks, client changes, drift, performance | Rebalancing is discipline, not market timing by default |
IPS Objectives and Constraints
| IPS component | Meaning | High-yield distinction |
|---|
| Return objective | Return needed to meet goals after costs, tax, inflation | Required return may exceed risk capacity; then goals must change |
| Risk tolerance | Willingness and ability to accept volatility/loss | Ability is financial; willingness is psychological |
| Liquidity | Need for cash or near-cash assets | High liquidity need reduces ability to hold volatile/illiquid assets |
| Time horizon | When funds are needed; may be multi-stage | Longer horizon usually increases risk capacity, but not always |
| Tax circumstances | Account type, tax sensitivity, income/capital gains preference | After-tax return matters in taxable accounts |
| Legal/regulatory | Trust, mandate, policy, contractual, regulatory constraints | A legal constraint can override return preferences |
| Unique circumstances | ESG preference, concentrated holdings, family needs, restrictions | Must be specific and investment-relevant |
Holding Period Return
\[
R = \frac{P_1 - P_0 + I}{P_0}
\]
Where \(P_0\) is beginning price, \(P_1\) is ending price, and \(I\) is income received.
Arithmetic Mean
\[
\bar{R} = \frac{R_1 + R_2 + \cdots + R_n}{n}
\]
Use for expected single-period return when each period is equally likely.
Geometric Mean
\[
R_G = \left[(1+R_1)(1+R_2)\cdots(1+R_n)\right]^{1/n} - 1
\]
Use for compound multi-period performance.
Annualized Return
\[
R_{\text{annual}} = (1+R_{\text{period}})^m - 1
\]
Where \(m\) is the number of periods per year.
Real Return Approximation
\[
R_{\text{real}} \approx R_{\text{nominal}} - \text{inflation}
\]
Exact Real Return
\[
R_{\text{real}} = \frac{1+R_{\text{nominal}}}{1+\text{inflation}} - 1
\]
Variance and Standard Deviation
\[
\sigma^2 = \frac{\sum (R_i - \bar{R})^2}{n}
\]\[
\sigma = \sqrt{\sigma^2}
\]
Standard deviation measures total volatility around the mean.
Annualized Standard Deviation
\[
\sigma_{\text{annual}} = \sigma_{\text{period}} \sqrt{m}
\]
Use only when periodic returns are assumed independent and similarly distributed.
Coefficient of Variation
\[
CV = \frac{\sigma}{E(R)}
\]
Lower CV means less risk per unit of expected return.
Covariance and Correlation
\[
\rho_{A,B} = \frac{\text{Cov}_{A,B}}{\sigma_A \sigma_B}
\]
Correlation ranges from \(-1\) to \(+1\).
| Correlation | Meaning | Portfolio effect |
|---|
| +1.00 | Perfect positive movement | No diversification benefit |
| 0 | No linear relationship | Diversification benefit |
| -1.00 | Perfect inverse movement | Maximum diversification benefit |
| Less than +1 | Not perfectly correlated | Some risk reduction possible |
Two-Asset Portfolio Return
\[
E(R_p) = w_A E(R_A) + w_B E(R_B)
\]
Two-Asset Portfolio Risk
\[
\sigma_p^2 = w_A^2\sigma_A^2 + w_B^2\sigma_B^2 + 2w_Aw_B\rho_{A,B}\sigma_A\sigma_B
\]
Beta
\[
\beta_i = \frac{\text{Cov}_{i,m}}{\sigma_m^2}
\]
Beta measures sensitivity to market movements, not total risk.
CAPM, Alpha, and Security Market Line
CAPM Expected Return
\[
E(R_i) = R_f + \beta_i [E(R_m)-R_f]
\]
| Input | Meaning | Trap |
|---|
| \(R_f\) | Risk-free rate | Base return for bearing no market risk |
| \(E(R_m)-R_f\) | Market risk premium | Compensation for market risk |
| \(\beta_i\) | Systematic risk | Beta does not measure unsystematic risk |
| \(E(R_i)\) | Required return | Compare with expected/forecast return |
Alpha
\[
\alpha_i = R_i - [R_f + \beta_i(R_m - R_f)]
\]
| Result | Interpretation |
|---|
| Positive alpha | Return exceeded CAPM-required return |
| Negative alpha | Return fell short of CAPM-required return |
| Zero alpha | Return matched required return for beta risk |
SML Decision Rule
| Forecast return vs CAPM required return | Security implication |
|---|
| Forecast return > required return | Undervalued / attractive, all else equal |
| Forecast return < required return | Overvalued / unattractive, all else equal |
| Forecast return = required return | Fairly valued under CAPM assumptions |
Risk Measures: Match the Measure to the Question
| Measure | Captures | Best used for | Common trap |
|---|
| Standard deviation | Total volatility | Stand-alone portfolio risk | Penalizes upside and downside volatility |
| Variance | Squared volatility | Formula work | Harder to interpret directly |
| Beta | Systematic market risk | Diversified portfolios / CAPM | Not useful for undiversified total risk alone |
| Correlation | Co-movement | Diversification decisions | Low correlation does not guarantee positive return |
| Tracking error | Volatility of active return vs benchmark | Active manager consistency | Low tracking error can still mean poor return |
| Downside risk | Negative-return volatility | Loss-sensitive investors | Not always the same as standard deviation |
| Duration | Bond price sensitivity to rates | Interest-rate risk | Longer duration means higher rate sensitivity |
| Credit spread | Extra yield over safer benchmark | Credit/default risk | Wider spread may signal higher risk, not just value |
| Liquidity risk | Difficulty selling near fair value | Thin markets, private assets | High quoted return may hide exit risk |
Time-Weighted vs Money-Weighted Return
| Measure | Also known as | Cash-flow treatment | Best for | Exam clue |
|---|
| Time-weighted return | TWR | Neutralizes external cash-flow timing | Evaluating portfolio manager skill | Manager does not control deposits/withdrawals |
| Money-weighted return | MWR / IRR | Sensitive to cash-flow size and timing | Client’s actual experience | Client controls contribution/withdrawal timing |
TWR Chain-Linking
\[
TWR = [(1+R_1)(1+R_2)\cdots(1+R_n)] - 1
\]
Money-Weighted Return Concept
MWR is the discount rate that equates the present value of cash inflows and outflows with ending value. In exam scenarios, choose MWR when the question emphasizes the investor’s actual dollar-weighted result.
Portfolio Theory Quick Reference
| Concept | Meaning | Exam use |
|---|
| Efficient frontier | Portfolios with highest expected return for each risk level | Identify efficient vs inefficient portfolios |
| Minimum-variance portfolio | Lowest-risk portfolio on the frontier | Not necessarily the highest return |
| Optimal risky portfolio | Best risk-return mix before adding risk-free asset | Depends on risk/return/correlation assumptions |
| Capital market line | Efficient combinations of risk-free asset and market portfolio | Uses total portfolio standard deviation |
| Security market line | CAPM required return for beta | Uses beta, not standard deviation |
| Systematic risk | Marketwide risk | Cannot be diversified away |
| Unsystematic risk | Company/industry-specific risk | Can be reduced through diversification |
| Market portfolio | Theoretical portfolio of all risky assets | CAPM benchmark concept |
CML vs SML
| Feature | Capital Market Line | Security Market Line |
|---|
| Risk measure | Standard deviation | Beta |
| Applies to | Efficient portfolios | Individual securities and portfolios |
| Based on | Total risk | Systematic risk |
| Slope | Sharpe ratio of market portfolio | Market risk premium |
| Main use | Choose efficient portfolio mix | Judge required return / alpha |
Asset Allocation Decision Matrix
| Approach | Description | When to choose | Trap |
|---|
| Strategic asset allocation | Long-term policy weights | Core portfolio design | Not a short-term forecast tool |
| Tactical asset allocation | Short-term deviations from policy | Manager has active market view | Must define limits and risk controls |
| Dynamic allocation | Adjusts exposure as conditions change | Rules-based risk or market response | Can increase trading and tax costs |
| Core-satellite | Passive/low-cost core plus active satellites | Control cost while seeking alpha | Satellites must not unintentionally dominate risk |
| Rebalancing | Restore target weights after drift | Maintain risk profile | Selling winners/buying laggards can feel counterintuitive |
| Liability-driven allocation | Assets matched to future obligations | Retirement, foundations, specific liabilities | Return target alone is insufficient |
Rebalancing Rules
| Method | How it works | Advantage | Weakness |
|---|
| Calendar | Rebalance at set intervals | Simple discipline | Ignores size of drift |
| Percentage-of-portfolio | Rebalance when weights breach bands | Responds to material drift | Requires monitoring |
| Constant-mix | Sell assets that rise, buy those that fall | Maintains stable risk exposure | Can underperform in strong trends |
| Buy-and-hold | Let weights drift | Low trading cost | Risk profile can change materially |
| CPPI-style | Increase risky asset exposure as cushion grows | Downside-risk control concept | Assumptions may fail in gaps/fast markets |
Asset Class Characteristics
| Asset class | Return source | Key risks | Portfolio role |
|---|
| Cash / money market | Interest income | Inflation, reinvestment risk | Liquidity and capital preservation |
| Government bonds | Coupon, price change | Interest-rate, inflation risk | Income, stability, duration management |
| Corporate bonds | Coupon plus credit spread | Credit, spread, liquidity risk | Higher income than government bonds |
| Preferred shares | Dividends, rate sensitivity | Credit, rate, call risk | Income, hybrid equity/fixed-income exposure |
| Common equity | Dividends, earnings growth, valuation change | Market, business, liquidity risk | Long-term growth |
| Real assets | Income, inflation linkage, appreciation | Liquidity, valuation, sector risk | Diversification and inflation sensitivity |
| Alternatives | Strategy-specific | Liquidity, leverage, complexity | Diversification/absolute-return potential if understood |
Fixed-Income Quick Rules
| Topic | Rule | Exam trap |
|---|
| Price and yield | Bond prices move inversely to yields | Price change is not linear for large rate moves |
| Coupon rate vs yield | Coupon is contractual; yield is market-required return | Premium/discount depends on coupon vs market yield |
| Premium bond | Coupon rate > market yield | Price above par, tends toward par at maturity |
| Discount bond | Coupon rate < market yield | Price below par, tends toward par at maturity |
| Longer maturity | Usually more interest-rate sensitivity | Coupon level also matters |
| Lower coupon | More duration, all else equal | Zero-coupon bonds have high duration sensitivity |
| Callable bond | Issuer may redeem early | Investor faces reinvestment risk when rates fall |
| Putable bond | Investor may sell back to issuer | Benefits investor; usually lower yield than comparable non-putable |
| Credit spread widening | Credit risk perception rises | Bond price generally falls |
| Yield curve steepening | Long yields rise vs short yields, or short yields fall vs long | Identify which segment changes |
Approximate Bond Price Change
\[
\%\Delta P \approx -D_{\text{mod}} \times \Delta y
\]
Modified Duration
\[
D_{\text{mod}} = \frac{D_{\text{Mac}}}{1 + y/m}
\]
Duration Plus Convexity Approximation
\[
\%\Delta P \approx -D_{\text{mod}}\Delta y + \frac{1}{2}C(\Delta y)^2
\]
Where \(C\) is convexity and \(\Delta y\) is the yield change in decimal form.
Equity Analysis and Valuation
| Metric | Plain formula | Interpretation | Trap |
|---|
| EPS | Net income available to common / weighted avg common shares | Profit per common share | EPS growth can be affected by buybacks |
| P/E ratio | Price / EPS | Price paid per unit of earnings | Low P/E can signal value or distress |
| Earnings yield | EPS / Price | Earnings relative to price | Inverse of P/E |
| Dividend yield | Annual dividend / price | Cash income yield | High yield may signal falling price or dividend risk |
| Payout ratio | Dividends / earnings | Share of earnings paid out | High payout may limit reinvestment |
| Retention ratio | 1 - payout ratio | Share of earnings retained | Supports growth if reinvested well |
| P/B ratio | Price / book value per share | Market value vs accounting equity | Less useful for asset-light firms |
| ROE | Net income / average equity | Return on shareholder capital | Can rise from leverage, not just better operations |
| ROA | Net income / average assets | Profitability of assets | Affected by business model and leverage |
| Debt-to-equity | Total debt / equity | Financial leverage | Higher leverage magnifies gains and losses |
Dividend Discount Model
\[
P_0 = \frac{D_1}{k - g}
\]
Use when dividends are meaningful and expected to grow at a stable rate. \(k\) must be greater than \(g\).
Sustainable Growth Rate
\[
g = ROE \times \text{retention ratio}
\]
DuPont Analysis
\[
ROE = \frac{\text{Net income}}{\text{Sales}} \times \frac{\text{Sales}}{\text{Assets}} \times \frac{\text{Assets}}{\text{Equity}}
\]
| Component | Meaning | Interpretation |
|---|
| Net profit margin | Net income / sales | Operating profitability |
| Asset turnover | Sales / assets | Efficiency of asset use |
| Equity multiplier | Assets / equity | Financial leverage |
High ROE is strongest when driven by margins and efficiency, not only leverage.
Active, Passive, and Style Distinctions
| Strategy | Core idea | Best fit | Trap |
|---|
| Passive indexing | Replicate benchmark exposure | Low cost, broad market exposure | Tracking error still exists |
| Enhanced indexing | Small active bets around index | Seek modest alpha with controlled risk | May underperform after costs |
| Active management | Security selection / market timing / factor tilts | Belief in manager skill or market inefficiency | Alpha must be evaluated net of fees and risk |
| Growth investing | Buy firms with high expected growth | Expanding earnings/revenues | Overpaying for growth is a risk |
| Value investing | Buy securities below estimated intrinsic value | Mispricing / mean reversion | Value traps exist |
| Momentum | Follow price/earnings trends | Persistent trends | Reversals can be sharp |
| Quality | Strong balance sheets, stable earnings | Defensive growth | Valuation can become expensive |
| Small-cap tilt | Smaller companies | Higher growth potential | Higher volatility and liquidity risk |
Top-Down vs Bottom-Up
| Method | Starts with | Then analyzes | Exam clue |
|---|
| Top-down | Economy and market cycle | Sectors, industries, securities | GDP, rates, inflation, sector rotation |
| Bottom-up | Individual companies | Industry and macro context later | Financial statements, management, valuation |
| Fundamental | Intrinsic value | Earnings, cash flow, balance sheet | “Undervalued relative to fundamentals” |
| Technical | Price/volume patterns | Trends, support/resistance | “Chart signal” or trading pattern |
Economic and Market Indicators
| Indicator | Generally positive for | Generally negative for | Key nuance |
|---|
| Falling interest rates | Existing bonds, rate-sensitive sectors | New income reinvestment | May signal weaker economy |
| Rising interest rates | New bond investors, lenders | Existing bond prices, leveraged firms | Rate reason matters: growth vs inflation |
| Higher inflation | Real assets, inflation-linked cash flows | Fixed coupons, cash purchasing power | Nominal returns can look high while real returns fall |
| Strong GDP growth | Cyclical equities, credit quality | Defensive relative performance | Too strong may trigger rate hikes |
| Widening credit spreads | Future credit opportunity if compensated | Existing risky bonds | Usually signals rising credit concern |
| Currency appreciation | Foreign purchasing power | Export competitiveness | Portfolio effect depends on hedge status |
| Yield curve inversion | Short yields above long yields | Bank margins, cyclical sentiment | Often read as slowdown/recession signal |
Sharpe Ratio
\[
\text{Sharpe} = \frac{R_p - R_f}{\sigma_p}
\]
Uses total risk. Best for portfolios that may not be fully diversified.
Treynor Ratio
\[
\text{Treynor} = \frac{R_p - R_f}{\beta_p}
\]
Uses systematic risk. Best when the portfolio is well diversified.
Jensen Alpha
\[
\alpha_p = R_p - [R_f + \beta_p(R_m - R_f)]
\]
Measures return above or below CAPM-required return.
\[
IR = \frac{R_p - R_b}{\text{tracking error}}
\]
Measures active return per unit of active risk.
| Ratio | Numerator | Risk denominator | Best comparison |
|---|
| Sharpe | Portfolio excess return over risk-free rate | Standard deviation | Total-risk efficiency |
| Treynor | Portfolio excess return over risk-free rate | Beta | Systematic-risk efficiency |
| Jensen alpha | Actual return minus CAPM required return | Built into CAPM beta adjustment | Value added vs required return |
| Information ratio | Active return over benchmark | Tracking error | Active manager skill vs benchmark |
| Attribution type | Question answered | Example |
|---|
| Asset allocation effect | Did the manager overweight/underweight the right asset classes or sectors? | Overweight equities when equities beat bonds |
| Security selection effect | Did the manager choose better securities within a category? | Selected banks that beat the bank sector |
| Interaction effect | Combined allocation and selection effect | Overweight a sector and selected winners there |
| Currency effect | Did exchange-rate movement help or hurt? | Unhedged foreign assets gained from weaker Canadian dollar |
| Fee/tax effect | How much return was lost to costs or taxes? | High turnover reduced after-tax return |
Tax-Aware Portfolio Logic
| Item | General Canadian exam-prep logic | Portfolio implication |
|---|
| Interest income | Generally fully taxable in non-registered accounts | Often less tax-efficient than capital gains/dividends |
| Dividends | Canadian eligible dividends may receive preferential tax treatment | Tax status of account and investor matters |
| Capital gains | Usually taxed when realized; only part is taxable under current rules | Deferral can have value |
| Registered accounts | Tax treatment differs from taxable accounts | Asset location matters |
| Turnover | More trading can accelerate taxable events and costs | High-turnover strategies need after-tax evaluation |
| Tax-loss selling | Realize losses to offset gains where permitted | Must respect applicable tax rules and timing constraints |
Do not memorize tax rates unless provided in current materials. Focus on after-tax return, account type, and suitability.
Portfolio Suitability Decision Table
| Client fact pattern | Likely implication | Avoid |
|---|
| Short time horizon and high liquidity need | Higher cash/short-term fixed income allocation | Illiquid or highly volatile strategy |
| Long horizon, stable income, high risk capacity | More growth assets may be suitable | Assuming willingness equals ability |
| Low willingness but high ability | Education and conservative implementation may be needed | Forcing high-risk allocation |
| High required return but low risk capacity | Goals, savings, or horizon must be adjusted | Chasing unsuitable return |
| Concentrated employer stock | Diversification and risk control priority | Adding correlated sector exposure |
| Taxable investor in high marginal bracket | After-tax return and asset location matter | Ranking investments only by pre-tax yield |
| Income need with inflation concern | Balance current income and real purchasing power | Overconcentration in nominal fixed income |
| Ethical/ESG restriction | Reflect in IPS and security universe | Treating preference as informal if material |
Common Exam Traps
| Trap | Correct approach |
|---|
| Confusing risk tolerance with risk capacity | Willingness is psychological; capacity is financial |
| Using arithmetic mean for compound long-term performance | Use geometric mean for multi-period compounded return |
| Treating beta as total risk | Beta is systematic risk only |
| Assuming diversification eliminates all risk | It reduces unsystematic risk, not systematic risk |
| Comparing Sharpe ratios when beta is requested | Sharpe uses standard deviation; Treynor uses beta |
| Ignoring cash-flow timing in returns | TWR for manager skill; MWR for investor experience |
| Calling a low P/E stock automatically cheap | Check earnings quality, growth, leverage, and sector context |
| Assuming higher yield means better bond | Higher yield may reflect credit, liquidity, call, or duration risk |
| Forgetting bond price-yield inverse relationship | Rates up, existing bond prices down |
| Ignoring IPS constraints during implementation | Product choice must fit objectives and constraints |
Calculation Checklist
Before solving, identify:
- Return type: holding period, arithmetic, geometric, annualized, real, after-tax.
- Risk type: standard deviation, beta, duration, tracking error, downside risk.
- Perspective: client actual experience or manager performance.
- Benchmark: market index, risk-free rate, policy benchmark, liability target.
- Time period: monthly, quarterly, annual; convert consistently.
- Weights: ensure portfolio weights sum to 100%.
- Signs: bond price change is negative when yields rise.
- Units: basis points vs percentages; 100 bps = 1.00%.
- Tax/costs: confirm whether returns are gross, net, pre-tax, or after-tax.
- Decision rule: know what result means, not just the calculation.
flowchart TD
A[Performance question] --> B{External cash flows?}
B -->|Yes, manager evaluation| C[Use time-weighted return]
B -->|Yes, client actual result| D[Use money-weighted return / IRR]
B -->|No or already return data| E{Risk-adjusted measure?}
E -->|Total risk| F[Sharpe ratio]
E -->|Systematic risk / beta| G[Treynor or Jensen alpha]
E -->|Benchmark active risk| H[Information ratio]
E -->|No| I[Compare raw or benchmark-relative return]
Last-Week Review Priorities
| Priority | Drill |
|---|
| Formulas | Recreate return, risk, CAPM, duration, and performance formulas from memory |
| Interpretation | For every formula, write what a high/low/positive/negative result means |
| IPS scenarios | Classify facts into objective, constraint, or irrelevant detail |
| Risk measure selection | Match standard deviation, beta, duration, and tracking error to scenarios |
| Bond questions | Practice yield-change price estimates and premium/discount logic |
| Equity questions | Interpret P/E, dividend yield, ROE, DuPont, and DDM assumptions |
| Performance questions | Decide TWR vs MWR; Sharpe vs Treynor vs information ratio |
| Suitability | Check time horizon, liquidity, tax, risk, and concentration before recommending |
Practical Next Step
Work a timed mixed set of IMT Exam 1-style questions, then review every miss by category: formula error, concept confusion, suitability error, or misread wording. Re-drill the category that caused the most lost marks before moving to full practice exams.