IMT Exam 1 — CSI Investment Management Techniques Cheat Sheet
Cheat sheet: formulas, decision rules, and exam traps for Canadian Securities Institute IMT Exam 1 preparation.
Use the tables for a quick pre-exam check. Expand a topic’s notes for explanations, examples, and additional distinctions.
Scope and study context
For CSI Investment Management Techniques (IMT®) Exam 1 preparation, do not only read explanations after wrong answers. Use original practice questions to diagnose why you missed the question.
| If You Missed Because Of… | Fix With… |
|---|---|
| Formula recall | Write the formula, define each input, redo similar calculations |
| Misread wording | Underline the command word and constraint |
| Concept confusion | Compare similar terms side by side |
| Poor elimination | Identify why each wrong option is wrong |
| Time pressure | Use timed topic drills |
| Weak integration | Use mixed mock exams |
| False confidence | Redo questions after several days |
High-Yield Exam 1 Map
| Area | What to know cold | Typical exam decision point |
|---|---|---|
| Portfolio process | Objectives, constraints, policy, implementation, monitoring | Identify the correct next step in the investment management process |
| Client profile / IPS | Return, risk, liquidity, time horizon, tax, legal/regulatory, unique constraints | Distinguish a true constraint from an objective |
| Risk and return | Arithmetic/geometric return, standard deviation, beta, covariance, correlation | Select the right risk measure for the situation |
| Diversification | Correlation, systematic vs unsystematic risk, efficient frontier | Explain why adding a security may reduce portfolio risk |
| Asset allocation | Strategic, tactical, rebalancing, core-satellite | Choose policy mix versus short-term deviation |
| CAPM / market models | Beta, expected return, alpha, SML | Decide if a security is underpriced or overpriced |
| Performance measurement | TWR, MWR, Sharpe, Treynor, Jensen alpha, information ratio | Match the measure to the manager/client situation |
| Security analysis | Top-down, bottom-up, fundamental, technical, passive/active | Identify which analysis method is being used |
| Fixed-income basics | Price-yield relationship, duration, convexity, credit spread | Estimate bond price effect from rate changes |
| Equity valuation basics | P/E, dividend yield, DDM, ROE, DuPont | Interpret whether a stock looks cheap, expensive, or risky |
Investment Management Process
| Step | Purpose | Exam trap |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Define client situation | Gather facts, goals, constraints, risk tolerance, time horizon | Do not recommend products before the client profile is understood |
| 2. Set objectives | Translate goals into required return and acceptable risk | “Wants high return” is not enough; required return must be feasible |
| 3. Build IPS | Document objectives, constraints, asset mix, benchmarks, review rules | IPS is a control document, not just a sales summary |
| 4. Develop strategy | Strategic asset allocation, permitted securities, diversification | Asset allocation usually drives most portfolio risk/return |
| 5. Implement | Select securities/managers, trade, control costs and taxes | Implementation must remain consistent with the IPS |
| 6. Monitor and rebalance | Compare to benchmarks, client changes, drift, performance | Rebalancing is discipline, not market timing by default |
Notes and examples
Core Investment Management Process
| Step | What It Means | Exam Trap |
|---|---|---|
| Define objectives | Return needs, risk tolerance, income, growth, preservation | Choosing high-return assets without matching risk capacity |
| Identify constraints | Time horizon, liquidity, taxes, legal/regulatory, unique circumstances | Treating all clients with the same IPS |
| Set policy | Strategic asset allocation, benchmarks, allowable ranges | Confusing policy with short-term market timing |
| Implement | Select securities, funds, managers, or strategies | Ignoring costs, taxes, liquidity, or mandate fit |
| Monitor and rebalance | Compare to IPS and benchmark; adjust when needed | Rebalancing because of emotion rather than policy |
| Evaluate performance | Risk-adjusted results and attribution | Looking only at total return |
Decision Rule: IPS First
If a question gives a client profile, start with the investment policy statement logic:
- What is the required return?
- What is the client’s willingness and ability to take risk?
- What is the time horizon?
- Are there liquidity, tax, legal, or unique constraints?
- What asset mix best fits the above?
Do not jump directly to the investment with the highest expected return.
IPS Objectives and Constraints
| IPS component | Meaning | High-yield distinction |
|---|---|---|
| Return objective | Return needed to meet goals after costs, tax, inflation | Required return may exceed risk capacity; then goals must change |
| Risk tolerance | Willingness and ability to accept volatility/loss | Ability is financial; willingness is psychological |
| Liquidity | Need for cash or near-cash assets | High liquidity need reduces ability to hold volatile/illiquid assets |
| Time horizon | When funds are needed; may be multi-stage | Longer horizon usually increases risk capacity, but not always |
| Tax circumstances | Account type, tax sensitivity, income/capital gains preference | After-tax return matters in taxable accounts |
| Legal/regulatory | Trust, mandate, policy, contractual, regulatory constraints | A legal constraint can override return preferences |
| Unique circumstances | ESG preference, concentrated holdings, family needs, restrictions | Must be specific and investment-relevant |
Notes and examples
Objectives and Constraints
| IPS Component | Key Review Point | Common Candidate Mistake |
|---|---|---|
| Return objective | Required return may be income, growth, or total return | Assuming every client wants maximum growth |
| Risk tolerance | Includes willingness and ability | Ignoring ability to take risk when willingness is high |
| Time horizon | Longer horizons generally support more risk capacity | Treating retirement as a single-date horizon only |
| Liquidity | Cash needs reduce ability to hold volatile/illiquid assets | Recommending illiquid assets for near-term cash needs |
| Taxes | After-tax return matters for taxable investors | Comparing investments only on pre-tax return |
| Legal/regulatory | Mandates may restrict eligible investments | Ignoring trust, plan, or policy restrictions |
| Unique circumstances | ESG preferences, concentrated holdings, currency exposure, legacy goals | Treating unique constraints as optional |
Return Formula Sheet
Holding Period Return
\[ R = \frac{P_1 - P_0 + I}{P_0} \]Where \(P_0\) is beginning price, \(P_1\) is ending price, and \(I\) is income received.
Arithmetic Mean
\[ \bar{R} = \frac{R_1 + R_2 + \cdots + R_n}{n} \]Use for expected single-period return when each period is equally likely.
Geometric Mean
\[ R_G = \left[(1+R_1)(1+R_2)\cdots(1+R_n)\right]^{1/n} - 1 \]Use for compound multi-period performance.
Annualized Return
\[ R_{\text{annual}} = (1+R_{\text{period}})^m - 1 \]Where \(m\) is the number of periods per year.
Real Return Approximation
\[ R_{\text{real}} \approx R_{\text{nominal}} - \text{inflation} \]Exact Real Return
\[ R_{\text{real}} = \frac{1+R_{\text{nominal}}}{1+\text{inflation}} - 1 \]Notes and examples
Real Return Approximation
\[ \text{Real Return} \approx \text{Nominal Return} - \text{Inflation Rate} \]More exact formula:
\[ 1 + R_{\text{real}} = \frac{1 + R_{\text{nominal}}}{1 + \text{Inflation}} \]Inflation Review
| Asset/Strategy | Inflation Consideration |
|---|---|
| Cash | Purchasing power erosion if yield is below inflation |
| Nominal bonds | Fixed payments lose real value when inflation rises |
| Real return bonds | Designed to provide inflation-linked payments |
| Equities | May hedge inflation over long periods, but not reliably short term |
| Real assets | May offer inflation sensitivity, but valuation and liquidity matter |
Formula Quick Sheet
| Concept | Formula in Plain Text |
|---|---|
| Holding period return | (Ending value - Beginning value + Income) / Beginning value |
| Expected portfolio return | Sum of weight × expected return |
| Two-asset portfolio variance | wA²σA² + wB²σB² + 2wAwBσAσBρAB |
| CAPM | Risk-free rate + beta × market risk premium |
| Sharpe ratio | (Portfolio return - risk-free rate) / standard deviation |
| Treynor ratio | (Portfolio return - risk-free rate) / beta |
| Information ratio | Active return / tracking error |
| Approximate bond price change | -Modified duration × change in yield |
| Constant-growth DDM | Next dividend / (required return - growth rate) |
| Approximate real return | Nominal return - inflation |
Risk Formula Sheet
Variance and Standard Deviation
\[ \sigma^2 = \frac{\sum (R_i - \bar{R})^2}{n} \]\[ \sigma = \sqrt{\sigma^2} \]Standard deviation measures total volatility around the mean.
Annualized Standard Deviation
\[ \sigma_{\text{annual}} = \sigma_{\text{period}} \sqrt{m} \]Use only when periodic returns are assumed independent and similarly distributed.
Coefficient of Variation
\[ CV = \frac{\sigma}{E(R)} \]Lower CV means less risk per unit of expected return.
Covariance and Correlation
\[ \rho_{A,B} = \frac{\text{Cov}_{A,B}}{\sigma_A \sigma_B} \]Correlation ranges from \(-1\) to \(+1\).
| Correlation | Meaning | Portfolio effect |
|---|---|---|
| +1.00 | Perfect positive movement | No diversification benefit |
| 0 | No linear relationship | Diversification benefit |
| -1.00 | Perfect inverse movement | Maximum diversification benefit |
| Less than +1 | Not perfectly correlated | Some risk reduction possible |
Two-Asset Portfolio Return
\[ E(R_p) = w_A E(R_A) + w_B E(R_B) \]Two-Asset Portfolio Risk
\[ \sigma_p^2 = w_A^2\sigma_A^2 + w_B^2\sigma_B^2 + 2w_Aw_B\rho_{A,B}\sigma_A\sigma_B \]Beta
\[ \beta_i = \frac{\text{Cov}_{i,m}}{\sigma_m^2} \]Beta measures sensitivity to market movements, not total risk.
Notes and examples
CAPM Formula
\[ E(R_i) = R_f + \beta_i[E(R_m) - R_f] \]Where:
- \(E(R_i)\) = required or expected return on security \(i\)
- \(R_f\) = risk-free rate
- \(\beta_i\) = beta of the security
- \(E(R_m) - R_f\) = market risk premium
Beta Interpretation
| Beta | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 1.0 | Moves with the market on average |
| Greater than 1.0 | More sensitive than market |
| Less than 1.0 but positive | Less sensitive than market |
| 0 | No market sensitivity in CAPM terms |
| Negative | Tends to move opposite the market |
CAPM Decision Rule
Compare the security’s expected return with its CAPM required return:
| Situation | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Expected return > CAPM required return | Potentially undervalued / positive alpha |
| Expected return = CAPM required return | Fairly priced under CAPM assumptions |
| Expected return < CAPM required return | Potentially overvalued / negative alpha |
CAPM, Alpha, and Security Market Line
CAPM Expected Return
\[ E(R_i) = R_f + \beta_i [E(R_m)-R_f] \]| Input | Meaning | Trap |
|---|---|---|
| \(R_f\) | Risk-free rate | Base return for bearing no market risk |
| \(E(R_m)-R_f\) | Market risk premium | Compensation for market risk |
| \(\beta_i\) | Systematic risk | Beta does not measure unsystematic risk |
| \(E(R_i)\) | Required return | Compare with expected/forecast return |
Alpha
\[ \alpha_i = R_i - [R_f + \beta_i(R_m - R_f)] \]| Result | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Positive alpha | Return exceeded CAPM-required return |
| Negative alpha | Return fell short of CAPM-required return |
| Zero alpha | Return matched required return for beta risk |
SML Decision Rule
| Forecast return vs CAPM required return | Security implication |
|---|---|
| Forecast return > required return | Undervalued / attractive, all else equal |
| Forecast return < required return | Overvalued / unattractive, all else equal |
| Forecast return = required return | Fairly valued under CAPM assumptions |
Risk Measures: Match the Measure to the Question
| Measure | Captures | Best used for | Common trap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | Total volatility | Stand-alone portfolio risk | Penalizes upside and downside volatility |
| Variance | Squared volatility | Formula work | Harder to interpret directly |
| Beta | Systematic market risk | Diversified portfolios / CAPM | Not useful for undiversified total risk alone |
| Correlation | Co-movement | Diversification decisions | Low correlation does not guarantee positive return |
| Tracking error | Volatility of active return vs benchmark | Active manager consistency | Low tracking error can still mean poor return |
| Downside risk | Negative-return volatility | Loss-sensitive investors | Not always the same as standard deviation |
| Duration | Bond price sensitivity to rates | Interest-rate risk | Longer duration means higher rate sensitivity |
| Credit spread | Extra yield over safer benchmark | Credit/default risk | Wider spread may signal higher risk, not just value |
| Liquidity risk | Difficulty selling near fair value | Thin markets, private assets | High quoted return may hide exit risk |
Notes and examples
Risk Measures
| Measure | What It Captures | Best Use | Trap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard deviation | Total volatility | Standalone total risk | Does not separate upside and downside volatility |
| Variance | Squared dispersion | Statistical foundation | Less intuitive than standard deviation |
| Beta | Sensitivity to market movements | Systematic risk | Only meaningful relative to a chosen market benchmark |
| Correlation | Direction and strength of co-movement | Diversification analysis | Low correlation is not the same as low risk |
| Covariance | Joint movement in return units | Portfolio risk calculations | Harder to interpret directly |
| Tracking error | Active return volatility vs benchmark | Active management risk | Not the same as underperformance |
| Downside risk | Loss-focused volatility | Risk-averse investor analysis | Requires a defined threshold |
| Value at Risk | Estimated potential loss over period/confidence | Risk control and reporting | Does not describe losses beyond the VaR threshold |
Time-Weighted vs Money-Weighted Return
| Measure | Also known as | Cash-flow treatment | Best for | Exam clue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time-weighted return | TWR | Neutralizes external cash-flow timing | Evaluating portfolio manager skill | Manager does not control deposits/withdrawals |
| Money-weighted return | MWR / IRR | Sensitive to cash-flow size and timing | Client’s actual experience | Client controls contribution/withdrawal timing |
TWR Chain-Linking
\[ TWR = [(1+R_1)(1+R_2)\cdots(1+R_n)] - 1 \]Money-Weighted Return Concept
MWR is the discount rate that equates the present value of cash inflows and outflows with ending value. In exam scenarios, choose MWR when the question emphasizes the investor’s actual dollar-weighted result.
Portfolio Theory Cheat Sheet
| Concept | Meaning | Exam use |
|---|---|---|
| Efficient frontier | Portfolios with highest expected return for each risk level | Identify efficient vs inefficient portfolios |
| Minimum-variance portfolio | Lowest-risk portfolio on the frontier | Not necessarily the highest return |
| Optimal risky portfolio | Best risk-return mix before adding risk-free asset | Depends on risk/return/correlation assumptions |
| Capital market line | Efficient combinations of risk-free asset and market portfolio | Uses total portfolio standard deviation |
| Security market line | CAPM required return for beta | Uses beta, not standard deviation |
| Systematic risk | Marketwide risk | Cannot be diversified away |
| Unsystematic risk | Company/industry-specific risk | Can be reduced through diversification |
| Market portfolio | Theoretical portfolio of all risky assets | CAPM benchmark concept |
Notes and examples
High-Yield Concepts
| Concept | Meaning | Exam Angle |
|---|---|---|
| Unsystematic risk | Company/industry-specific risk | Can be reduced through diversification |
| Systematic risk | Market-wide risk | Cannot be diversified away |
| Efficient frontier | Best expected return for a given risk level | Portfolios below frontier are inefficient |
| Minimum variance portfolio | Lowest-risk portfolio on the opportunity set | Not necessarily the best portfolio for every investor |
| Risk-free asset | Theoretical asset with no volatility/default risk in model | Used in capital allocation theory |
| Capital market line | Efficient portfolios combining risk-free asset and market portfolio | Uses total risk, standard deviation |
| Security market line | CAPM relationship between expected return and beta | Uses systematic risk, beta |
Exam Trap: CML vs SML
| Feature | Capital Market Line | Security Market Line |
|---|---|---|
| Risk measure | Standard deviation | Beta |
| Applies to | Efficient portfolios | Individual securities and portfolios |
| Key model | Capital allocation | CAPM |
| Main use | Risk-return trade-off for efficient portfolios | Fair expected return based on systematic risk |
CML vs SML
| Feature | Capital Market Line | Security Market Line |
|---|---|---|
| Risk measure | Standard deviation | Beta |
| Applies to | Efficient portfolios | Individual securities and portfolios |
| Based on | Total risk | Systematic risk |
| Slope | Sharpe ratio of market portfolio | Market risk premium |
| Main use | Choose efficient portfolio mix | Judge required return / alpha |
Asset Allocation Decision Matrix
| Approach | Description | When to choose | Trap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic asset allocation | Long-term policy weights | Core portfolio design | Not a short-term forecast tool |
| Tactical asset allocation | Short-term deviations from policy | Manager has active market view | Must define limits and risk controls |
| Dynamic allocation | Adjusts exposure as conditions change | Rules-based risk or market response | Can increase trading and tax costs |
| Core-satellite | Passive/low-cost core plus active satellites | Control cost while seeking alpha | Satellites must not unintentionally dominate risk |
| Rebalancing | Restore target weights after drift | Maintain risk profile | Selling winners/buying laggards can feel counterintuitive |
| Liability-driven allocation | Assets matched to future obligations | Retirement, foundations, specific liabilities | Return target alone is insufficient |
Notes and examples
Strategic vs Tactical
| Type | Meaning | Exam Signal |
|---|---|---|
| Strategic asset allocation | Long-term policy mix based on objectives and constraints | IPS, target weights, long-term plan |
| Tactical asset allocation | Short-term deviations from strategic weights | Market outlook, valuation views |
| Dynamic allocation | Systematic changes as conditions or client status changes | Rules-based adjustments |
| Rebalancing | Restoring weights to policy targets or ranges | Discipline, risk control |
Asset Allocation Decision Rules
| Client Situation | Likely Allocation Implication |
|---|---|
| Long time horizon, high risk capacity | Higher equity/growth allocation may be appropriate |
| Near-term liquidity need | Higher cash/short-term fixed income allocation |
| Low risk tolerance and low risk capacity | More conservative allocation |
| Inflation concern | Consider real assets, inflation-sensitive assets, equities, inflation-linked bonds where suitable |
| Taxable investor | After-tax return and asset location matter |
| Concentrated employer stock | Diversification may be a priority |
| Income need | Consider yield, sustainability, credit risk, and interest-rate risk |
Rebalancing Rules
| Method | How it works | Advantage | Weakness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calendar | Rebalance at set intervals | Simple discipline | Ignores size of drift |
| Percentage-of-portfolio | Rebalance when weights breach bands | Responds to material drift | Requires monitoring |
| Constant-mix | Sell assets that rise, buy those that fall | Maintains stable risk exposure | Can underperform in strong trends |
| Buy-and-hold | Let weights drift | Low trading cost | Risk profile can change materially |
| CPPI-style | Increase risky asset exposure as cushion grows | Downside-risk control concept | Assumptions may fail in gaps/fast markets |
Notes and examples
Why Rebalance?
- Maintains the risk profile in the IPS.
- Forces discipline after market movements.
- Prevents winners from dominating the portfolio.
- Can control drift from the strategic asset allocation.
Rebalancing Methods
| Method | Description | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calendar-based | Rebalance at fixed intervals | Simple, disciplined | May trade unnecessarily |
| Threshold-based | Rebalance when weights move outside bands | Responsive to market movements | Requires monitoring |
| Cash-flow rebalancing | Use deposits/withdrawals to adjust weights | Tax- and cost-efficient | May not be enough for large drift |
| Tactical overlay | Adjust based on market views | Flexible | Can become market timing |
Exam Trap
Rebalancing is not automatically about maximizing return. Its primary purpose is usually risk control and policy alignment.
Asset Class Characteristics
| Asset class | Return source | Key risks | Portfolio role |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash / money market | Interest income | Inflation, reinvestment risk | Liquidity and capital preservation |
| Government bonds | Coupon, price change | Interest-rate, inflation risk | Income, stability, duration management |
| Corporate bonds | Coupon plus credit spread | Credit, spread, liquidity risk | Higher income than government bonds |
| Preferred shares | Dividends, rate sensitivity | Credit, rate, call risk | Income, hybrid equity/fixed-income exposure |
| Common equity | Dividends, earnings growth, valuation change | Market, business, liquidity risk | Long-term growth |
| Real assets | Income, inflation linkage, appreciation | Liquidity, valuation, sector risk | Diversification and inflation sensitivity |
| Alternatives | Strategy-specific | Liquidity, leverage, complexity | Diversification/absolute-return potential if understood |
Fixed-Income Quick Rules
| Topic | Rule | Exam trap |
|---|---|---|
| Price and yield | Bond prices move inversely to yields | Price change is not linear for large rate moves |
| Coupon rate vs yield | Coupon is contractual; yield is market-required return | Premium/discount depends on coupon vs market yield |
| Premium bond | Coupon rate > market yield | Price above par, tends toward par at maturity |
| Discount bond | Coupon rate < market yield | Price below par, tends toward par at maturity |
| Longer maturity | Usually more interest-rate sensitivity | Coupon level also matters |
| Lower coupon | More duration, all else equal | Zero-coupon bonds have high duration sensitivity |
| Callable bond | Issuer may redeem early | Investor faces reinvestment risk when rates fall |
| Putable bond | Investor may sell back to issuer | Benefits investor; usually lower yield than comparable non-putable |
| Credit spread widening | Credit risk perception rises | Bond price generally falls |
| Yield curve steepening | Long yields rise vs short yields, or short yields fall vs long | Identify which segment changes |
Notes and examples
Approximate Bond Price Change
\[ \%\Delta P \approx -D_{\text{mod}} \times \Delta y \]Modified Duration
\[ D_{\text{mod}} = \frac{D_{\text{Mac}}}{1 + y/m} \]Duration Plus Convexity Approximation
\[ \%\Delta P \approx -D_{\text{mod}}\Delta y + \frac{1}{2}C(\Delta y)^2 \]Where \(C\) is convexity and \(\Delta y\) is the yield change in decimal form.
Bond Price and Yield Relationship
| Change | Bond Price Effect |
|---|---|
| Market yields rise | Bond prices fall |
| Market yields fall | Bond prices rise |
| Longer maturity | Generally more interest-rate sensitivity |
| Lower coupon | Generally more interest-rate sensitivity |
| Higher duration | Greater price sensitivity to yield changes |
Duration
Duration measures a bond’s sensitivity to interest-rate changes.
Approximate price change:
Where \(D_{\text{mod}}\) is modified duration and \(\Delta y\) is the change in yield.
Example interpretation: if modified duration is 5 and yield rises by 1%, approximate price change is about -5%.
Convexity
Convexity adjusts for the curvature in the bond price-yield relationship.
| Concept | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Positive convexity | Price gains from falling yields are larger than price losses from equal yield increases |
| Higher convexity | More useful when yield changes are large |
| Duration alone | Linear approximation; less accurate for large yield changes |
Duration and Convexity Trap
Duration is a first approximation. Convexity matters more when:
- Yield changes are large.
- Bonds have embedded options.
- Comparing bonds with similar duration but different curvature.
Fixed Income Risks
| Risk | What It Means | Common Trap |
|---|---|---|
| Interest-rate risk | Bond price changes when yields change | Highest for long-duration bonds |
| Reinvestment risk | Coupon/cash flows reinvest at lower rates | More important for high-coupon bonds |
| Credit/default risk | Issuer may fail to pay | Yield alone does not equal attractiveness |
| Spread risk | Credit spreads widen | Can hurt even if government yields are stable |
| Liquidity risk | Hard to sell at fair price | Often rises in stressed markets |
| Call risk | Issuer redeems bond early | Investor may lose upside when rates fall |
| Inflation risk | Real purchasing power falls | Fixed coupons are vulnerable |
Interest-Rate Risk vs Reinvestment Risk
| If Rates Rise | If Rates Fall |
|---|---|
| Bond prices fall | Bond prices rise |
| Reinvestment income may improve | Reinvestment income may decline |
| Long-duration bonds usually hurt more | Callable bonds may be called |
Equity Analysis and Valuation
| Metric | Plain formula | Interpretation | Trap |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPS | Net income available to common / weighted avg common shares | Profit per common share | EPS growth can be affected by buybacks |
| P/E ratio | Price / EPS | Price paid per unit of earnings | Low P/E can signal value or distress |
| Earnings yield | EPS / Price | Earnings relative to price | Inverse of P/E |
| Dividend yield | Annual dividend / price | Cash income yield | High yield may signal falling price or dividend risk |
| Payout ratio | Dividends / earnings | Share of earnings paid out | High payout may limit reinvestment |
| Retention ratio | 1 - payout ratio | Share of earnings retained | Supports growth if reinvested well |
| P/B ratio | Price / book value per share | Market value vs accounting equity | Less useful for asset-light firms |
| ROE | Net income / average equity | Return on shareholder capital | Can rise from leverage, not just better operations |
| ROA | Net income / average assets | Profitability of assets | Affected by business model and leverage |
| Debt-to-equity | Total debt / equity | Financial leverage | Higher leverage magnifies gains and losses |
Notes and examples
Dividend Discount Model
\[ P_0 = \frac{D_1}{k - g} \]Use when dividends are meaningful and expected to grow at a stable rate. \(k\) must be greater than \(g\).
Sustainable Growth Rate
\[ g = ROE \times \text{retention ratio} \]Common Equity Valuation Approaches
| Approach | Main Idea | Best Use | Trap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend discount model | Value equals present value of expected dividends | Dividend-paying firms | Weak for firms with unstable/no dividends |
| Price/earnings ratio | Price relative to earnings | Comparing similar firms | Low P/E is not automatically cheap |
| Price/book ratio | Price relative to accounting book value | Financials, asset-heavy firms | Book value may not reflect intangible assets |
| Price/sales ratio | Price relative to revenue | Early-stage or low-margin firms | Ignores profitability |
| EV/EBITDA | Enterprise value relative to operating earnings proxy | Capital-structure comparisons | EBITDA is not cash flow |
| Free cash flow models | Value based on cash available to capital providers | Fundamental valuation | Sensitive to assumptions |
Dividend Discount Model
For a constant-growth dividend model:
- \(P_0\) = current intrinsic value
- \(D_1\) = expected dividend next period
- \(k\) = required return
- \(g\) = constant dividend growth rate
Key condition: \(k\) must be greater than \(g\).
Equity Valuation Traps
- A stock with a low P/E may be cheap, distressed, cyclical, or facing declining earnings.
- A high dividend yield may indicate value — or market concern about dividend sustainability.
- Growth increases value only if returns on invested capital exceed the cost of capital.
- Comparing valuation ratios across unrelated industries can mislead.
- Accounting earnings are not the same as cash flow.
- Historical growth does not guarantee future growth.
DuPont Analysis
\[ ROE = \frac{\text{Net income}}{\text{Sales}} \times \frac{\text{Sales}}{\text{Assets}} \times \frac{\text{Assets}}{\text{Equity}} \]| Component | Meaning | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Net profit margin | Net income / sales | Operating profitability |
| Asset turnover | Sales / assets | Efficiency of asset use |
| Equity multiplier | Assets / equity | Financial leverage |
High ROE is strongest when driven by margins and efficiency, not only leverage.
Active, Passive, and Style Distinctions
| Strategy | Core idea | Best fit | Trap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Passive indexing | Replicate benchmark exposure | Low cost, broad market exposure | Tracking error still exists |
| Enhanced indexing | Small active bets around index | Seek modest alpha with controlled risk | May underperform after costs |
| Active management | Security selection / market timing / factor tilts | Belief in manager skill or market inefficiency | Alpha must be evaluated net of fees and risk |
| Growth investing | Buy firms with high expected growth | Expanding earnings/revenues | Overpaying for growth is a risk |
| Value investing | Buy securities below estimated intrinsic value | Mispricing / mean reversion | Value traps exist |
| Momentum | Follow price/earnings trends | Persistent trends | Reversals can be sharp |
| Quality | Strong balance sheets, stable earnings | Defensive growth | Valuation can become expensive |
| Small-cap tilt | Smaller companies | Higher growth potential | Higher volatility and liquidity risk |
Top-Down vs Bottom-Up
| Method | Starts with | Then analyzes | Exam clue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top-down | Economy and market cycle | Sectors, industries, securities | GDP, rates, inflation, sector rotation |
| Bottom-up | Individual companies | Industry and macro context later | Financial statements, management, valuation |
| Fundamental | Intrinsic value | Earnings, cash flow, balance sheet | “Undervalued relative to fundamentals” |
| Technical | Price/volume patterns | Trends, support/resistance | “Chart signal” or trading pattern |
Economic and Market Indicators
| Indicator | Generally positive for | Generally negative for | Key nuance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Falling interest rates | Existing bonds, rate-sensitive sectors | New income reinvestment | May signal weaker economy |
| Rising interest rates | New bond investors, lenders | Existing bond prices, leveraged firms | Rate reason matters: growth vs inflation |
| Higher inflation | Real assets, inflation-linked cash flows | Fixed coupons, cash purchasing power | Nominal returns can look high while real returns fall |
| Strong GDP growth | Cyclical equities, credit quality | Defensive relative performance | Too strong may trigger rate hikes |
| Widening credit spreads | Future credit opportunity if compensated | Existing risky bonds | Usually signals rising credit concern |
| Currency appreciation | Foreign purchasing power | Export competitiveness | Portfolio effect depends on hedge status |
| Yield curve inversion | Short yields above long yields | Bank margins, cyclical sentiment | Often read as slowdown/recession signal |
Performance Measurement Ratios
Sharpe Ratio
\[ \text{Sharpe} = \frac{R_p - R_f}{\sigma_p} \]Uses total risk. Best for portfolios that may not be fully diversified.
Treynor Ratio
\[ \text{Treynor} = \frac{R_p - R_f}{\beta_p} \]Uses systematic risk. Best when the portfolio is well diversified.
Jensen Alpha
\[ \alpha_p = R_p - [R_f + \beta_p(R_m - R_f)] \]Measures return above or below CAPM-required return.
Information Ratio
\[ IR = \frac{R_p - R_b}{\text{tracking error}} \]Measures active return per unit of active risk.
| Ratio | Numerator | Risk denominator | Best comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe | Portfolio excess return over risk-free rate | Standard deviation | Total-risk efficiency |
| Treynor | Portfolio excess return over risk-free rate | Beta | Systematic-risk efficiency |
| Jensen alpha | Actual return minus CAPM required return | Built into CAPM beta adjustment | Value added vs required return |
| Information ratio | Active return over benchmark | Tracking error | Active manager skill vs benchmark |
Performance Attribution
| Attribution type | Question answered | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Asset allocation effect | Did the manager overweight/underweight the right asset classes or sectors? | Overweight equities when equities beat bonds |
| Security selection effect | Did the manager choose better securities within a category? | Selected banks that beat the bank sector |
| Interaction effect | Combined allocation and selection effect | Overweight a sector and selected winners there |
| Currency effect | Did exchange-rate movement help or hurt? | Unhedged foreign assets gained from weaker Canadian dollar |
| Fee/tax effect | How much return was lost to costs or taxes? | High turnover reduced after-tax return |
Tax-Aware Portfolio Logic
| Item | General Canadian exam-prep logic | Portfolio implication |
|---|---|---|
| Interest income | Generally fully taxable in non-registered accounts | Often less tax-efficient than capital gains/dividends |
| Dividends | Canadian eligible dividends may receive preferential tax treatment | Tax status of account and investor matters |
| Capital gains | Usually taxed when realized; only part is taxable under current rules | Deferral can have value |
| Registered accounts | Tax treatment differs from taxable accounts | Asset location matters |
| Turnover | More trading can accelerate taxable events and costs | High-turnover strategies need after-tax evaluation |
| Tax-loss selling | Realize losses to offset gains where permitted | Must respect applicable tax rules and timing constraints |
Do not memorize tax rates unless provided in current materials. Focus on after-tax return, account type, and suitability.
Portfolio Suitability Decision Table
| Client fact pattern | Likely implication | Avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Short time horizon and high liquidity need | Higher cash/short-term fixed income allocation | Illiquid or highly volatile strategy |
| Long horizon, stable income, high risk capacity | More growth assets may be suitable | Assuming willingness equals ability |
| Low willingness but high ability | Education and conservative implementation may be needed | Forcing high-risk allocation |
| High required return but low risk capacity | Goals, savings, or horizon must be adjusted | Chasing unsuitable return |
| Concentrated employer stock | Diversification and risk control priority | Adding correlated sector exposure |
| Taxable investor in high marginal bracket | After-tax return and asset location matter | Ranking investments only by pre-tax yield |
| Income need with inflation concern | Balance current income and real purchasing power | Overconcentration in nominal fixed income |
| Ethical/ESG restriction | Reflect in IPS and security universe | Treating preference as informal if material |
Common Exam Traps
| Trap | Correct approach |
|---|---|
| Confusing risk tolerance with risk capacity | Willingness is psychological; capacity is financial |
| Using arithmetic mean for compound long-term performance | Use geometric mean for multi-period compounded return |
| Treating beta as total risk | Beta is systematic risk only |
| Assuming diversification eliminates all risk | It reduces unsystematic risk, not systematic risk |
| Comparing Sharpe ratios when beta is requested | Sharpe uses standard deviation; Treynor uses beta |
| Ignoring cash-flow timing in returns | TWR for manager skill; MWR for investor experience |
| Calling a low P/E stock automatically cheap | Check earnings quality, growth, leverage, and sector context |
| Assuming higher yield means better bond | Higher yield may reflect credit, liquidity, call, or duration risk |
| Forgetting bond price-yield inverse relationship | Rates up, existing bond prices down |
| Ignoring IPS constraints during implementation | Product choice must fit objectives and constraints |
Notes and examples
“Higher Return” Is Not Always Better
Higher return may come from:
- More market risk.
- More credit risk.
- More liquidity risk.
- Leverage.
- Concentration.
- Currency exposure.
- Longer duration.
- Style exposure.
Always evaluate return relative to risk, constraints, and benchmark.
“Diversified” Does Not Mean “Risk-Free”
Diversification can reduce unsystematic risk, but it cannot eliminate systematic market risk.
“Low Volatility” Does Not Mean “Suitable”
A low-volatility asset may still be unsuitable if it creates liquidity, tax, inflation, concentration, or currency issues.
“High Yield” Does Not Mean “Attractive”
High yield may compensate for credit risk, illiquidity, call risk, duration risk, or distress.
“Past Performance” Does Not Prove Skill
Look for consistency with process, benchmark, risk exposure, and repeatability.
Calculation Checklist
Before solving, identify:
- Return type: holding period, arithmetic, geometric, annualized, real, after-tax.
- Risk type: standard deviation, beta, duration, tracking error, downside risk.
- Perspective: client actual experience or manager performance.
- Benchmark: market index, risk-free rate, policy benchmark, liability target.
- Time period: monthly, quarterly, annual; convert consistently.
- Weights: ensure portfolio weights sum to 100%.
- Signs: bond price change is negative when yields rise.
- Units: basis points vs percentages; 100 bps = 1.00%.
- Tax/costs: confirm whether returns are gross, net, pre-tax, or after-tax.
- Decision rule: know what result means, not just the calculation.
Notes and examples
Final Cheat Sheet Checklist
Before your next practice set, confirm you can:
- Explain the difference between total risk and systematic risk.
- Identify when Sharpe, Treynor, Jensen’s alpha, and information ratio are appropriate.
- Calculate and interpret CAPM required return.
- Explain why correlation matters for diversification.
- Distinguish strategic asset allocation from tactical allocation.
- Match client objectives and constraints to suitable portfolio choices.
- Interpret bond duration and convexity.
- Explain how yield changes affect bond prices.
- Identify major fixed income risks.
- Interpret valuation ratios cautiously.
- Recognize benchmark mismatch.
- Explain why time-weighted return is useful for manager evaluation.
- Identify behavioural biases in client scenarios.
- Avoid choosing an answer based only on highest return.
Mini Decision Flow: Performance Question
flowchart TD
A[Performance question] --> B{External cash flows?}
B -->|Yes, manager evaluation| C[Use time-weighted return]
B -->|Yes, client actual result| D[Use money-weighted return / IRR]
B -->|No or already return data| E{Risk-adjusted measure?}
E -->|Total risk| F[Sharpe ratio]
E -->|Systematic risk / beta| G[Treynor or Jensen alpha]
E -->|Benchmark active risk| H[Information ratio]
E -->|No| I[Compare raw or benchmark-relative return]
Last-Week Review Priorities
| Priority | Drill |
|---|---|
| Formulas | Recreate return, risk, CAPM, duration, and performance formulas from memory |
| Interpretation | For every formula, write what a high/low/positive/negative result means |
| IPS scenarios | Classify facts into objective, constraint, or irrelevant detail |
| Risk measure selection | Match standard deviation, beta, duration, and tracking error to scenarios |
| Bond questions | Practice yield-change price estimates and premium/discount logic |
| Equity questions | Interpret P/E, dividend yield, ROE, DuPont, and DDM assumptions |
| Performance questions | Decide TWR vs MWR; Sharpe vs Treynor vs information ratio |
| Suitability | Check time horizon, liquidity, tax, risk, and concentration before recommending |
Notes and examples
Day 1: Portfolio Theory and Risk
- Expected return
- Standard deviation, correlation, covariance
- Diversification
- Efficient frontier
- CAPM, beta, CML vs SML
Practice focus: topic drills on risk/return calculations and conceptual interpretation.
Day 2: Asset Allocation and IPS
- Objectives and constraints
- Strategic vs tactical allocation
- Rebalancing
- Suitability decision rules
Practice focus: client-profile questions and IPS scenario drills.
Day 3: Fixed Income
- Price/yield relationship
- Duration and convexity
- Yield curve
- Credit spreads
- Fixed income risks
Practice focus: duration calculations, yield curve interpretation, and bond risk questions.
Day 4: Equity and Valuation
- Dividend discount model
- Valuation ratios
- Growth vs value
- Fundamental analysis traps
Practice focus: valuation interpretation and ratio comparison drills.
Day 5: Performance Evaluation
- Sharpe, Treynor, Jensen’s alpha
- Tracking error and information ratio
- Benchmark selection
- Manager due diligence
Practice focus: risk-adjusted performance questions with detailed explanations.
Day 6: Mixed Mock Exam
- Complete a timed set.
- Review every missed question.
- Tag errors by category: formula, concept, reading, or judgment.
Day 7: Weak-Area Repair
- Redo missed topic drills.
- Rework formulas without looking.
- Review traps and decision rules.
- Keep the final session focused and calm.
CSI IMT Exam 1 Cheat Sheet Focus
This quick review is for candidates preparing for the Canadian Securities Institute CSI Investment Management Techniques (IMT®) Exam 1, official exam code IMT Exam 1. Use it as a fast review before moving into independent companion practice, original practice questions, topic drills, mock exams, and detailed explanations.
The goal is not to replace the CSI materials. The goal is to help you rapidly connect the major ideas: portfolio construction, risk and return, asset allocation, fixed income, equity analysis, performance measurement, and exam-style decision points.
High-Yield Exam Mindset
For IMT Exam 1, expect many questions to test whether you can:
- Choose the right portfolio concept for a client objective or constraint.
- Distinguish risk measures from performance measures.
- Apply formulas correctly without confusing inputs.
- Interpret duration, convexity, beta, correlation, standard deviation, alpha, tracking error, and information ratio.
- Recognize when diversification reduces risk — and when it does not.
- Separate strategic asset allocation from tactical shifts and security selection.
- Understand the effect of interest-rate changes on bond prices.
- Interpret valuation ratios without treating them as absolute answers.
- Avoid “sounds right” answers that ignore assumptions, risk, time horizon, or benchmark relevance.
Return Measures
Holding Period Return
\[ \text{Holding Period Return} = \frac{\text{Ending Value} - \text{Beginning Value} + \text{Income}}{\text{Beginning Value}} \]Use when measuring the total return over one period.
Arithmetic vs Geometric Return
| Return Type | Best Use | Key Point |
|---|---|---|
| Arithmetic average | Expected single-period return | Usually higher than geometric return when returns vary |
| Geometric average | Multi-period compounded performance | Better measure of realized long-term growth |
| Money-weighted return | Investor experience with cash flows | Affected by size and timing of contributions/withdrawals |
| Time-weighted return | Manager performance | Removes effect of client-controlled cash flows |
Time-Weighted vs Money-Weighted Trap
If the question asks about manager skill, prefer time-weighted return.
If the question asks about the client’s actual experienced return, money-weighted return may be more relevant.
Expected Return and Portfolio Risk
Expected Return
\[ E(R_p) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} w_i E(R_i) \]Where \(w_i\) is the portfolio weight and \(E(R_i)\) is the expected return of asset \(i\).
Two-Asset Portfolio Variance
\[ \sigma_p^2 = w_A^2\sigma_A^2 + w_B^2\sigma_B^2 + 2w_Aw_B\sigma_A\sigma_B\rho_{AB} \]Key interpretation:
- Lower correlation reduces portfolio risk.
- Negative correlation provides stronger diversification.
- Perfect positive correlation reduces diversification benefit.
- Portfolio expected return is weighted average, but portfolio risk is not simply a weighted average unless correlation is perfect positive.
Correlation Quick Table
| Correlation | Meaning | Diversification Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| +1.0 | Assets move perfectly together | No meaningful risk reduction |
| 0 | No linear relationship | Moderate diversification |
| -1.0 | Assets move exactly opposite | Maximum theoretical diversification |
| Positive but less than 1 | Move together imperfectly | Some diversification |
| Negative | Tend to move opposite | Stronger diversification |
Alpha, Active Risk, and Benchmarking
| Term | Meaning | Candidate Trap |
|---|---|---|
| Alpha | Return above/below required or benchmark-adjusted return | Positive return is not necessarily positive alpha |
| Active return | Portfolio return minus benchmark return | Needs an appropriate benchmark |
| Tracking error | Volatility of active return | High tracking error can be good or bad depending on alpha |
| Information ratio | Active return per unit of active risk | Requires benchmark relevance |
| Benchmark | Standard for comparison | A poor benchmark makes evaluation misleading |
Information Ratio
\[ \text{Information Ratio} = \frac{\text{Portfolio Return} - \text{Benchmark Return}}{\text{Tracking Error}} \]Use when evaluating active management relative to a benchmark.
Risk-Adjusted Performance Measures
| Measure | Formula in Words | Best For | Key Distinction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratio | Excess return over risk-free rate / standard deviation | Total portfolio efficiency | Uses total risk |
| Treynor ratio | Excess return over risk-free rate / beta | Well-diversified portfolios | Uses systematic risk |
| Jensen’s alpha | Actual return minus CAPM required return | Manager value added | Based on CAPM |
| Information ratio | Active return / tracking error | Active manager skill | Benchmark-relative |
| Sortino ratio | Excess return / downside deviation | Downside-risk focus | Penalizes downside volatility |
Sharpe vs Treynor Trap
- Use Sharpe when total risk matters or the portfolio is not fully diversified.
- Use Treynor when the portfolio is well diversified and systematic risk is the focus.
- If two portfolios have different diversification levels, Sharpe is often more informative.
Yield Curve and Spread Review
| Term | Meaning | Exam Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Normal yield curve | Longer yields above shorter yields | Often associated with growth/inflation expectations |
| Flat yield curve | Similar short and long yields | Transition or uncertainty signal |
| Inverted yield curve | Short yields above long yields | May signal economic slowdown expectations |
| Credit spread | Extra yield for credit risk | Widens when credit risk concerns rise |
| Liquidity spread | Extra yield for lower liquidity | Wider for less liquid securities |
| Term premium | Extra yield for longer maturity | Compensation for interest-rate uncertainty |
Yield Curve Strategies
| Strategy | View or Objective |
|---|---|
| Bullet | Concentrate maturities around one point |
| Barbell | Hold short and long maturities, less in middle |
| Ladder | Spread maturities over time |
| Roll-down | Benefit as a bond moves down a normally shaped yield curve |
| Immunization | Match duration to a liability horizon |
Efficient Markets and Active Management
| Concept | Meaning | Exam Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Weak-form efficiency | Prices reflect historical price/volume data | Technical analysis should not reliably outperform |
| Semi-strong efficiency | Prices reflect all public information | Fundamental analysis should not reliably outperform after costs |
| Strong-form efficiency | Prices reflect public and private information | Even insider information would not help in theory |
| Active management | Attempts to outperform benchmark | Requires skill, risk control, and cost awareness |
| Passive management | Tracks an index or benchmark | Lower cost, lower active risk |
| Enhanced indexing | Small active deviations from index | Limited tracking error |
Notes and examples
Active vs Passive Decision Points
| Choose More Active When | Choose More Passive When |
|---|---|
| Market inefficiencies may exist | Market is highly efficient |
| Skilled manager has repeatable edge | Low cost and benchmark exposure are priorities |
| Client accepts tracking error | Client wants tight benchmark alignment |
| Mandate permits active risk | IPS emphasizes simplicity and cost control |
Portfolio Construction
Top-Down vs Bottom-Up
| Approach | Starts With | Then Focuses On |
|---|---|---|
| Top-down | Economy, asset classes, sectors | Securities within favored areas |
| Bottom-up | Individual securities | Portfolio built from security selection |
Core-Satellite
| Component | Role |
|---|---|
| Core | Broad, diversified, often lower-cost market exposure |
| Satellite | Active, specialized, or tactical positions |
| Goal | Balance cost control, diversification, and potential alpha |
Factor and Style Exposures
| Style/Factor | Description | Key Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Lower valuation securities | Value traps |
| Growth | Higher expected growth | Overpaying for growth |
| Momentum | Recent winners | Reversal risk |
| Quality | Strong profitability/balance sheets | Crowded trade risk |
| Size | Smaller companies | Liquidity and volatility |
| Low volatility | Lower historical volatility | Underperformance in strong bull markets |
Derivatives and Hedging Concepts
If tested in your assigned IMT Exam 1 materials, focus on what the instrument is used for rather than complex pricing.
| Instrument | Basic Use | Key Risk/Trap |
|---|---|---|
| Forward | Customized agreement to buy/sell later | Counterparty risk |
| Future | Exchange-traded standardized contract | Margin and mark-to-market |
| Option | Right, not obligation, to buy/sell | Premium cost and time decay |
| Swap | Exchange cash flows | Counterparty and valuation risk |
| Currency hedge | Reduce FX exposure | Hedge may reduce gains if currency moves favorably |
Notes and examples
Option Basics
| Position | Right/Obligation | Market View |
|---|---|---|
| Long call | Right to buy | Bullish |
| Long put | Right to sell | Bearish/protection |
| Short call | Obligation to sell if exercised | Neutral to bearish; limited upside |
| Short put | Obligation to buy if exercised | Neutral to bullish; downside risk |
Hedging Trap
A hedge is designed to reduce or transfer risk. It may also reduce upside. Do not assume hedging improves expected return.
Currency Risk
| Situation | Currency Impact |
|---|---|
| Canadian investor owns foreign asset | Return depends on asset return and currency movement |
| Foreign currency appreciates vs CAD | Boosts CAD return, all else equal |
| Foreign currency depreciates vs CAD | Reduces CAD return, all else equal |
| Hedged exposure | Reduces currency volatility but may reduce gains |
Approximate domestic return:
\[ R_{\text{domestic}} \approx R_{\text{foreign asset}} + R_{\text{foreign currency}} \]This approximation is useful for quick reasoning, though exact compounding may differ.
Taxes and After-Tax Return
| Investment Return Type | Tax Sensitivity Review Point |
|---|---|
| Interest income | Often less tax-efficient for taxable investors |
| Dividends | Tax treatment depends on type and jurisdictional rules |
| Capital gains | Timing and realization matter |
| Deferred gains | Can improve after-tax compounding |
| Registered accounts | Tax characteristics differ from taxable accounts |
Exam Decision Rule
For taxable investors, compare investments on an after-tax, after-cost, risk-adjusted basis, not just stated yield.
Manager Selection and Due Diligence
| Area | What to Review |
|---|---|
| Philosophy | Is there a clear belief about how value is added? |
| Process | Is the process repeatable and disciplined? |
| People | Are key decision-makers experienced and stable? |
| Performance | Is performance consistent with stated style and risk? |
| Risk controls | Are exposures, leverage, liquidity, and drawdowns monitored? |
| Fees | Are costs reasonable relative to expected value added? |
| Capacity | Can the strategy still work at current asset size? |
Performance Trap
Strong historical returns may result from:
- Higher risk.
- Style tailwinds.
- Benchmark mismatch.
- Concentrated positions.
- Luck.
- Leverage.
- Illiquidity.
- Survivorship or selection bias.
Always ask: Was the return earned in a way consistent with the mandate?
Behavioural Finance Traps
| Bias | Description | Exam Clue |
|---|---|---|
| Loss aversion | Losses hurt more than gains help | Client refuses rational risk after downturn |
| Overconfidence | Overestimates skill/forecast ability | Excessive trading or concentrated bets |
| Anchoring | Fixates on a reference price | “I’ll sell once it gets back to my purchase price” |
| Confirmation bias | Seeks supporting evidence only | Ignores contrary data |
| Recency bias | Overweights recent events | Chasing recent winners |
| Herding | Follows the crowd | Buys because everyone else is buying |
| Mental accounting | Treats money differently by bucket | Irrational separation of equivalent wealth |
| Status quo bias | Avoids change | Fails to rebalance or diversify |
Ethics and Professional Judgment
Even when questions are technical, professional judgment matters. In investment management questions, prefer answers that:
- Put client objectives and constraints first.
- Use suitable benchmarks.
- Explain risks honestly.
- Avoid unsupported performance claims.
- Consider costs, taxes, and liquidity.
- Maintain discipline with the IPS.
- Avoid unnecessary complexity.
- Document assumptions and rationale.
Do not choose an answer simply because it appears to offer a higher return.
Fast Decision Tree for Exam Questions
flowchart TD
A[Read the question stem] --> B{Client profile or portfolio objective?}
B -->|Yes| C[Start with IPS: return, risk, time, liquidity, tax, constraints]
B -->|No| D{Formula or concept question?}
C --> E[Choose suitable asset mix or strategy]
D -->|Formula| F[Identify inputs and units before calculating]
D -->|Concept| G[Match term to risk, return, valuation, or performance category]
E --> H{Benchmark or performance comparison?}
F --> I[Check sign, percentage, and annualization]
G --> J[Eliminate answers that ignore assumptions]
H -->|Yes| K[Use risk-adjusted and benchmark-relative measures]
H -->|No| L[Check suitability and constraints]
I --> M[Select best answer]
J --> M
K --> M
L --> M
Common Calculation Mistakes
| Mistake | How to Avoid It |
|---|---|
| Using percentage instead of decimal incorrectly | Convert consistently before calculating |
| Confusing beta with standard deviation | Beta = market sensitivity; standard deviation = total volatility |
| Treating covariance as correlation | Correlation is standardized between -1 and +1 |
| Forgetting income in holding period return | Include dividends or interest |
| Using arithmetic average for compounded performance | Use geometric return for multi-period realized growth |
| Reversing bond price/yield direction | Yields up, prices down |
| Ignoring the negative sign in duration | Price moves opposite yield |
| Treating tracking error as return | Tracking error is volatility of active return |
| Calling high return “alpha” automatically | Alpha must be relative to risk/benchmark expectation |
| Comparing funds to wrong benchmarks | Benchmark must match mandate and style |