CPH — CSI Conduct and Practices Handbook Study Plan
A practical 7-, 14-, 30-, and 60/90-day Study Plan for Canadian Securities Institute CSI Conduct and Practices Handbook (CPH) candidates.
This Study Plan is for candidates preparing for the Canadian Securities Institute CSI Conduct and Practices Handbook (CPH), exam code CPH. It is built for a conduct, compliance, and applied-scenario exam: expect to spend more time on judgment, terminology, documentation, supervision, client facts, disclosure, and prohibited practices than on calculations.
Use this plan alongside the current Canadian Securities Institute materials and the current CPH syllabus. Treat the schedule below as a practical preparation framework, not as an official outline or guarantee of exam coverage.
Which plan should you use?
| Time until exam | Best fit | Study time target | Main objective | Practice priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | You have already read most of the material | 12-18 focused hours | Final review and exam readiness | Mixed timed sets, missed-question repair, final mock |
| 14 days | You know some topics but need structure | 20-30 focused hours | Close gaps quickly and build applied judgment | Topic drills first, then mixed timed practice |
| 30 days | You are starting with reasonable study time | 35-55 focused hours | Balanced learning, review, and mock practice | Topic-by-topic mastery plus weekly mixed review |
| 60/90 days | You are starting early or studying around work | 50-90 focused hours | Full preparation with spaced repetition | Read, drill, review, and retest on a cycle |
If you are not sure
| Your situation | Choose |
|---|---|
| You have not opened the materials and exam is within 7 days | Use the 7-day plan, but focus on high-yield conduct concepts and do not expect to master everything |
| You read the material once but remember little | Use the 14-day plan |
| You can study 5-8 hours per week | Use the 30-day plan if possible |
| You are working full time, have family obligations, or want lower stress | Use the 60/90-day path |
| You have failed a prior attempt | Use the 30-day or 60/90-day path and make the missed-question log the center of your plan |
CPH study priorities
The CPH is best approached as an applied conduct and practices exam. Your goal is not only to recognize definitions, but to choose the proper conduct, documentation, disclosure, or supervisory response in a client or firm scenario.
Use the current CSI materials as the source of truth. For scheduling, organize your review around these practical buckets:
| Study bucket | What to master | How to practice |
|---|---|---|
| Client facts and account information | KYC-style facts, client objectives, risk, time horizon, constraints, documentation | Scenario drills: identify missing facts before recommending action |
| Product and recommendation judgment | Product knowledge, risk, suitability-style reasoning, client/product fit | Compare “reasonable,” “incomplete,” and “clearly unsuitable” choices |
| Disclosure and documentation | Relationship disclosure, conflicts, fees, communications, records | Drill questions that ask what must be disclosed, recorded, or escalated |
| Conduct standards | Ethical duties, prohibited practices, conflicts, fair dealing | Practice “best next step” and “what should the representative do” questions |
| Trading and account activity | Order handling, authorization, complaints, suspicious or improper activity | Work through sequence questions: receive fact, document, escalate, supervise |
| Supervision and compliance | Branch/firm supervision, compliance review, escalation, internal controls | Distinguish representative duties from supervisor or firm duties |
| Regulatory vocabulary | Terms, roles, complaint language, enforcement concepts | Daily recall cards and short explanation review |
| Applied exam judgment | Selecting the best answer under time pressure | Mixed timed sets and full mock exams |
Daily practice rhythm
Use the same study rhythm most days. CPH preparation improves when you repeatedly connect rules to scenarios.
60-90 minute weekday session
| Time | Task | Output |
|---|---|---|
| 5-10 min | Quick recall | Write or recite key rules from yesterday without notes |
| 20-30 min | Focused reading or review | One narrow topic, not an entire chapter |
| 20-30 min | Topic drill | Answer questions immediately after review |
| 10-15 min | Missed-question review | Log the rule, scenario cue, and reason for the miss |
| 5 min | Closeout | Choose tomorrow’s topic and mark weak items |
2-3 hour weekend session
| Time | Task | Output |
|---|---|---|
| 15 min | Warm-up recall | Review flashcards or error log |
| 45-60 min | New or weak topic review | Summarize rules in your own words |
| 45-60 min | Practice set | Topic or mixed set, depending on phase |
| 30-45 min | Explanation review | Review every missed and guessed question |
| 15 min | Retest planning | Schedule the weak topic for retest in 2-4 days |
Minimum effective day
If you only have 20-30 minutes, do not skip entirely.
- Review 5-10 missed-question log entries.
- Answer 10-15 targeted questions.
- Write one sentence explaining why each missed answer was wrong.
- Mark one topic for the next full session.
Missed-question review method
Do not only record the correct answer. The value is in identifying why your judgment failed.
Use an error log with these columns:
| Column | What to write |
|---|---|
| Date | When you missed it |
| Topic | Example: conflicts, supervision, account documentation, client facts |
| Scenario cue | The phrase or fact you should have noticed |
| My wrong reason | Why the wrong answer looked attractive |
| Correct rule or principle | The rule, obligation, or decision standard |
| Better trigger | “If I see this fact, I should think…” |
| Retest date | 24-72 hours later, then again in final week |
Common CPH error types
| Error type | What it looks like | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Rule unknown | You never learned the requirement | Return to the source material, then do a small topic drill |
| Distinction confused | You mix up representative, supervisor, and firm responsibilities | Create a comparison table |
| Scenario cue missed | You knew the rule but ignored a key fact | Underline client facts and action verbs while practicing |
| Best-answer error | More than one option seemed plausible | Ask: which answer is most compliant, complete, and documented? |
| Over-reading | You added facts that were not in the question | Choose only from the facts provided |
| Memory lapse | You recognized the topic but could not recall the detail | Use spaced flashcards and retest within 48 hours |
When to use timed mock exams
Timed mock exams are most useful after you have enough content coverage to learn from the result. Use the current Canadian Securities Institute exam information to match timing and format as closely as possible.
| Stage | Mock use | What to do after |
|---|---|---|
| Early diagnostic | Optional short mixed set | Identify weak topics; do not overreact to the score |
| Mid-plan | One timed mixed set or partial mock | Test recall under pressure and expose timing issues |
| Final third | Full timed mock | Review every miss, guess, and slow question |
| Last 48 hours | Avoid heavy full mocks unless already planned | Use light review, error log, and confidence checks |
Mock review rules
After every timed mock:
- Review missed questions first.
- Review guessed correct answers second.
- Review questions that took too long third.
- Assign each miss to a topic bucket.
- Re-study only the rules connected to your misses.
- Retest weak buckets within 48 hours.
A mock exam without explanation review is mostly a stamina exercise. The learning happens after the timer stops.
7-day final review plan
Use this plan if your exam is one week away. This is not the time to read everything slowly from the beginning. Prioritize the topics most likely to affect scenario judgment: client facts, suitability-style reasoning, disclosure, conflicts, documentation, supervision, and improper conduct.
| Day | Focus | Study actions |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Diagnostic and triage | Take a mixed timed set. Build a ranked weak-topic list. Review explanations carefully. |
| 2 | Client/account facts and documentation | Drill scenarios involving client information, account opening, updates, records, and missing facts. |
| 3 | Conduct, conflicts, and disclosure | Review prohibited conduct, conflict handling, disclosure duties, and ethical decision points. |
| 4 | Supervision and compliance | Drill questions on escalation, supervisory responsibility, complaint handling, and firm controls. |
| 5 | Timed mock or long mixed set | Simulate exam conditions using the vendor-confirmed timing. Review all misses and guesses. |
| 6 | Error-log repair | Redo missed topics. Create one-page rule summaries for recurring mistakes. Stop adding nonessential new material. |
| 7 | Light final review | Review summaries, key distinctions, and exam logistics. Do not overload with new practice late in the day. |
7-day rules
- Stop broad new reading after Day 4 unless a topic is completely unknown.
- Do not take multiple full mocks back-to-back if review quality drops.
- Spend at least as much time reviewing explanations as answering questions.
- Keep a short “must not forget” sheet for rules you repeatedly miss.
- Sleep and timing discipline matter in the final 24 hours.
14-day focused plan
Use this plan if you have two weeks and need a concentrated path. The goal is to finish core content quickly, then shift to mixed application.
| Day | Focus | Study actions |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baseline | Take a short diagnostic set. List weak and unknown topics. Set a daily schedule. |
| 2 | Client facts and account documentation | Review client information, account records, updates, and documentation logic. Drill topic questions. |
| 3 | Product knowledge and recommendation judgment | Practice matching client facts to risk, objectives, and product-related concerns. |
| 4 | Disclosure and conflicts | Review disclosure, conflict identification, and client communication scenarios. |
| 5 | Conduct standards | Drill prohibited practices, ethical duties, improper actions, and best-response questions. |
| 6 | Trading activity and account handling | Practice order, authorization, client instruction, and suspicious activity scenarios. |
| 7 | Supervision and compliance | Review escalation, supervision, complaint handling, and compliance vocabulary. |
| 8 | Mixed review 1 | Take a timed mixed set. Build an updated error log. |
| 9 | Weak-topic repair | Re-study the two weakest areas and drill them separately. |
| 10 | Mixed review 2 | Take another timed mixed set. Focus on pacing and decision quality. |
| 11 | Full mock or long timed set | Simulate exam conditions. Review misses, guesses, and slow questions. |
| 12 | Error-log retest | Redo weak topics from Days 8-11. Write rule summaries. |
| 13 | Final mixed practice | Use a moderate timed set, not an exhausting cram session. |
| 14 | Final review | Light review, logistics, key distinctions, rest. |
14-day study allocation
| Activity | Approximate share |
|---|---|
| Focused topic review | 35% |
| Topic drills | 25% |
| Mixed timed practice | 20% |
| Missed-question review | 15% |
| Final logistics and light recall | 5% |
Stop adding major new material after Day 11. From Day 12 onward, your main job is to stabilize performance and avoid repeating known errors.
30-day balanced plan
Use this plan if you want a practical balance between learning and testing. The first half builds coverage. The second half converts knowledge into exam judgment.
Week 1: Build the foundation
| Day | Focus | Study actions |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Setup and diagnostic | Review the current syllabus. Take a short diagnostic. Create topic list and error log. |
| 2 | Client facts | Study client information, objectives, risk, constraints, and documentation. |
| 3 | Account documentation | Drill account-opening and records scenarios. |
| 4 | Product/recommendation judgment | Practice identifying whether more information, disclosure, or a different action is required. |
| 5 | Review and drill | Redo missed questions from Days 2-4. |
| 6 | Longer study block | Topic set plus explanation review. |
| 7 | Weekly mixed set | Timed mixed set and error-log update. |
Week 2: Conduct, disclosure, and trading scenarios
| Day | Focus | Study actions |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Disclosure | Review disclosure requirements and client communication issues. |
| 9 | Conflicts | Drill conflict identification and response scenarios. |
| 10 | Conduct standards | Review ethical duties and prohibited practices. |
| 11 | Trading/account activity | Practice orders, authorization, account activity, and escalation questions. |
| 12 | Complaints and communication | Review complaint handling and communication standards. |
| 13 | Mixed topic drill | Combine Days 8-12 topics in one timed set. |
| 14 | Weekly review | Re-study weak areas and update summaries. |
Week 3: Supervision, compliance, and applied judgment
| Day | Focus | Study actions |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Midpoint timed set | Take a longer timed mixed set. Review deeply. |
| 16 | Supervision | Review supervisory responsibilities and escalation. |
| 17 | Compliance controls | Practice firm/branch compliance scenarios and regulatory vocabulary. |
| 18 | Weak-topic repair | Re-study your two weakest buckets. |
| 19 | Scenario judgment | Drill “best next step” and “most appropriate action” questions. |
| 20 | Mixed timed set | Focus on pacing and answer discipline. |
| 21 | Rest/light review | Flashcards, error log, no heavy new material. |
Week 4: Mock exams and final readiness
| Day | Focus | Study actions |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Full mock or long timed set | Simulate exam timing. Mark guesses and slow questions. |
| 23 | Mock review | Review every missed and guessed question. Create a final weak-topic list. |
| 24 | Weak area 1 | Targeted review and drill. |
| 25 | Weak area 2 | Targeted review and drill. |
| 26 | Mixed timed set | Confirm improvement under time pressure. |
| 27 | Final content repair | Review only recurring errors and high-value distinctions. |
| 28 | Final mock or moderate timed set | Use if it will help confidence; otherwise do a shorter mixed set. |
| 29 | Final review | Error log, summaries, key conduct rules, logistics. |
| 30 | Light day | Brief recall, rest, exam-day plan. |
30-day rules
- Begin mixed practice by the end of Week 1.
- Use at least one full timed mock or long timed set in Week 4.
- Stop broad new learning around Day 24.
- From Day 25 onward, focus on known weaknesses, pacing, and decision rules.
60/90-day full preparation path
Use this path if you are starting early, studying around work, or want more spaced repetition. The 60-day version compresses each phase. The 90-day version gives more review and retest time.
Phase overview
| Phase | 60-day timing | 90-day timing | Goal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Orientation and first pass | Days 1-20 | Days 1-30 | Build basic understanding of all major topics |
| Phase 2: Topic mastery | Days 21-38 | Days 31-60 | Drill each topic and build the error log |
| Phase 3: Mixed application | Days 39-52 | Days 61-78 | Convert topic knowledge into scenario judgment |
| Phase 4: Final review | Days 53-60 | Days 79-90 | Timed mocks, repair, and exam readiness |
Phase 1: Orientation and first pass
| Weekly task | Actions |
|---|---|
| Set up materials | Confirm current CSI materials, exam appointment timing, and study calendar |
| Read actively | For each section, write a short “what conduct problem is this solving?” summary |
| Build vocabulary | Create flashcards for regulatory terms, roles, duties, and documentation concepts |
| Start light drills | Use small topic sets after each reading session |
| Keep an error log | Begin logging misses immediately, even if you are early in the plan |
Do not try to memorize everything on the first pass. Your goal is to understand the structure of the conduct rules and where each topic fits.
Phase 2: Topic mastery
| Topic cycle | Study sequence |
|---|---|
| Client facts and account information | Review rules, drill scenarios, log missing-fact errors, retest |
| Product and recommendation judgment | Compare client objectives, risk, and product concerns in scenario questions |
| Disclosure and conflicts | Practice identifying what must be disclosed, documented, or escalated |
| Conduct standards | Drill prohibited practices and ethical response questions |
| Trading and account activity | Work through order, authorization, and account-handling scenarios |
| Supervision and compliance | Separate representative, supervisor, and firm responsibilities |
| Complaints and communication | Review complaint processes, client communication, and documentation logic |
For each topic, complete this loop:
- Read or review the topic.
- Write a one-page summary in plain language.
- Complete a targeted question set.
- Review explanations.
- Add errors to your log.
- Retest the topic 2-4 days later.
Phase 3: Mixed application
This is where many candidates improve the most. Once topics are mixed together, you must recognize the issue without being told the chapter name.
| Practice type | Frequency | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Mixed timed sets | 2-3 times per week | Build recognition and pacing |
| Error-log review | 3-5 times per week | Prevent repeat mistakes |
| Topic repair | As needed | Fix weak areas exposed by mixed sets |
| Short recall sessions | Daily if possible | Keep vocabulary and distinctions fresh |
| Full mock or long timed set | 1-2 during this phase | Test endurance and exam strategy |
Phase 4: Final review
| Day range | Focus | Actions |
|---|---|---|
| Final 10-14 days | Timed practice and repair | Use full mocks or long timed sets, then review deeply |
| Final 7 days | Stabilize | Use the 7-day final review structure above |
| Final 3 days | No broad new material | Review summaries, error log, and high-value distinctions |
| Final 24 hours | Light review only | Confirm logistics, sleep, and timing plan |
How to review explanations
Explanation review is not passive reading. Use it to sharpen decision rules.
For every missed or guessed question, ask:
- What topic was actually being tested?
- Which fact in the scenario controlled the answer?
- Did I choose an answer that was incomplete, too aggressive, too passive, or not documented?
- Was the correct answer a representative action, supervisor action, firm action, or client communication step?
- What phrase should trigger the correct rule next time?
Create comparison notes
CPH questions often reward distinctions. Build short comparison tables like these:
| Distinction | Ask yourself |
|---|---|
| Disclosure vs approval | Does the client only need information, or must the firm/supervisor approve something? |
| Representative vs supervisor | Who has the duty to act in this scenario? |
| Missing information vs unsuitable action | Is the problem lack of facts, or is the action clearly inappropriate? |
| Documentation vs escalation | Is recording enough, or does the issue require review or escalation? |
| Conflict identified vs conflict managed | Has the conflict merely appeared, or has it been properly addressed? |
Practice schedule by study time available
If you have 3-5 hours per week
| Day | Task |
|---|---|
| Session 1 | Focused topic review plus 10-20 questions |
| Session 2 | Continue topic review plus missed-question log |
| Session 3 | Mixed set or retest weak topic |
| Weekend optional | Longer explanation review |
Use the 60/90-day path if possible.
If you have 6-10 hours per week
| Day | Task |
|---|---|
| 2 weekdays | Topic review and drills |
| 1 weekday | Error-log review and retest |
| Weekend day 1 | Longer topic block |
| Weekend day 2 | Mixed timed practice |
The 30-day plan is realistic for many candidates at this pace.
If you have 12+ hours per week
| Day type | Task |
|---|---|
| Heavy days | New topic review and large question sets |
| Medium days | Mixed timed practice and explanation review |
| Light days | Flashcards, error log, and rule summaries |
This pace can support a 14-day focused plan if you already have some familiarity.
Final-week rules
Use these rules during the last week regardless of plan length.
| Rule | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Stop broad new content 48-72 hours before the exam | New material can crowd out stable recall |
| Review explanations more than notes | Explanations show how rules are tested |
| Redo missed questions after a delay | Immediate review can create false confidence |
| Practice mixed scenarios | The exam will not label questions by your study chapter |
| Mark guesses during practice | A guessed correct answer is still a weakness |
| Simulate timing at least once | You need a pacing plan before exam day |
| Protect sleep | Conduct scenarios require careful reading and judgment |
Exam-readiness checks
You are not ready just because you have finished reading. Use these checks before exam day.
| Readiness check | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| I can explain the main conduct duties in plain language without notes | |
| I can identify missing client facts in a scenario | |
| I can distinguish disclosure, documentation, approval, and escalation | |
| I can separate representative, supervisor, and firm responsibilities | |
| I can explain why my wrong answers are wrong | |
| My recent mixed timed practice is stable, not wildly inconsistent | |
| I have reviewed all recurring error-log themes | |
| I know my timing plan for the exam | |
| I have stopped trying to learn every minor detail at the last minute | |
| I have confirmed exam logistics and required identification/instructions |
What to do next
Pick the plan that matches your exam date, schedule your first three study sessions, and start with a diagnostic practice set. After that, let your missed-question log drive the rest of your CPH review: study the rule, drill the scenario, review the explanation, and retest until the mistake stops repeating.