Cheat sheet: independent review for Canadian Securities Institute CSI Advanced Investment Strategies (AIS): portfolio risk, derivatives, hedging, alternatives, tax-aware suitability, and strategy selection.
This independent Cheat Sheet is for candidates preparing for the Canadian Securities Institute CSI Advanced Investment Strategies (AIS) exam, code AIS. Use it to review strategy selection, risk controls, derivatives payoffs, portfolio calculations, alternative investments, and applied suitability traps.
Use the tables for a quick pre-exam check. Expand a topic’s notes for explanations, examples, and additional distinctions.
Scope and study context
This independent Cheat Sheet is for candidates preparing for the Canadian Securities Institute CSI Advanced Investment Strategies (AIS) exam, code AIS. Use it as a last-pass review before topic drills, mock exams, and detailed explanations.
The exam rewards more than product memorization. For each strategy, ask:
What problem is the strategy solving?
What risk is being reduced, transferred, leveraged, or introduced?
What is the payoff pattern?
What client constraint could make it unsuitable?
What are the liquidity, tax, fee, leverage, and disclosure implications?
Fast rule: advanced strategies are tested through suitability, risk trade-offs, payoff logic, and implementation details—not just definitions.
flowchart TD
A[Client objective] --> B[Constraints]
B --> C[Risk tolerance and capacity]
C --> D[Strategy selection]
D --> E[Payoff and scenario testing]
E --> F[Costs, tax, liquidity, leverage]
F --> G[Suitability and documentation]
G --> H[Monitoring and rebalancing]
Use this order in scenario questions. If you jump directly to a sophisticated product, you may miss the constraint that makes it inappropriate.
Core Portfolio and Risk Formulas
Use formulas as decision tools, not memorized decoration. Know what each input means and what assumption is being made.
Reported volatility may be understated because assets are infrequently valued.
Low correlation in normal markets may rise during stress.
Lockups, gates, and redemption limits matter.
High fees require strong gross performance just to deliver acceptable net returns.
Manager selection risk is often larger than asset-class label risk.
Illiquidity can be acceptable for long-horizon capital but unsuitable for near-term needs.
“Absolute return” does not mean guaranteed positive return.
Structured Products and Packaged Strategies
Product or structure
Basic construction
Suitable when
Unsuitable when
Principal-protected note
Debt-like component plus derivative exposure
Client wants downside protection and accepts capped/limited upside
Client needs liquidity, transparent pricing, or issuer-risk avoidance
Market-linked note
Return tied to index, basket, commodity, rate, or formula
Client wants defined exposure without direct ownership
Client does not understand payoff formula
Reverse convertible
Enhanced coupon with downside linked to reference asset
Client accepts equity-like downside for income
Client believes it is bond-like safe income
Split share structure
Separates income-priority and capital-growth claims
Client understands priority and leverage
Client cannot tolerate structural complexity
Covered-call fund
Portfolio plus systematic call writing
Income-focused client with moderate upside expectations
Client expects full participation in strong bull markets
Leveraged ETF or inverse ETF
Daily reset leveraged or inverse exposure
Short-term tactical use by knowledgeable investor
Long-term buy-and-hold without understanding compounding
Fund-of-funds
Allocates across underlying managers/funds
Diversification and manager access
Fee layering or lack of transparency is unacceptable
Notes and examples
Structured Product Traps
Trap
Correct exam logic
“Principal protected means no risk.”
Protection depends on product terms and issuer/guarantor strength.
“Higher participation is always better.”
Look for caps, averaging, barriers, fees, and dividend exclusion.
“Enhanced coupon equals low risk.”
Extra income often compensates for embedded option risk.
“Back-tested payoff proves suitability.”
Back-tests may not reflect real liquidity, costs, taxes, or stress periods.
“Daily leveraged ETF matches long-term multiple.”
Daily reset and compounding can cause long-term divergence.
Tax-Aware Strategy Selection
Do not rely on tax rules alone for suitability. For exam scenarios, focus on relative tax character, account type, timing, and after-tax objective rather than memorizing changing rates.
Return type
General tax-aware consideration
Strategy implication
Interest income
Often less tax-efficient in non-registered accounts than capital gains or eligible dividends
Consider registered account placement where suitable
Dividends
Tax treatment depends on dividend type and investor situation
Compare after-tax yield, not headline yield
Capital gains
Often more tax-efficient than fully taxable income and tax is generally realization-based
Deferral and turnover matter
Capital losses
May be useful for offsetting taxable capital gains subject to applicable rules
Tax-loss selling must avoid rule violations and portfolio distortion
Return of capital
May defer tax but reduces adjusted cost base
Not the same as earned income
Foreign income
May face withholding and currency effects
Evaluate account type and after-tax net return
High-turnover strategies
Can accelerate taxable income or gains
Consider tax drag in non-registered accounts
Derivative strategies
Tax character can depend on intent, structure, and account
Do not assume every option result is a capital gain
Notes and examples
Asset Location Logic
Asset or strategy
Often preferred account logic
Caveat
Interest-bearing investments
Registered or tax-sheltered/deferred accounts may reduce annual tax drag
Liquidity and withdrawal needs still matter
Broad equity exposure
Non-registered may allow capital gains deferral
Concentration and risk must be suitable
High-turnover active strategies
Registered accounts can reduce annual tax reporting drag
Costs and suitability remain central
Foreign dividend exposure
Account type can affect withholding and net return
Product structure matters
Illiquid alternatives
Long horizon accounts may fit liquidity profile
Valuation and eligibility must be reviewed
Options for hedging
Account must permit the strategy and match risk profile
Margin, approval, and liquidity constraints matter
Currency and Global Investing
Issue
Meaning
Strategy response
Translation risk
Foreign asset value changes when converted to Canadian dollars
Hedge foreign currency exposure
Transaction risk
Known future foreign cash flow changes in CAD terms
Use forward or money-market hedge
Economic exposure
Business value affected by currency competitiveness
Diversify or choose firms with natural hedges
Interest-rate differential
Forward rates reflect relative interest rates
Hedging cost/benefit is embedded in forward pricing
Partial hedge
Hedge less than full exposure
Reduces but does not eliminate currency impact
Natural hedge
Liability or expense in same currency as asset/income
Aligns cash flows without derivative overlay
Notes and examples
Currency Hedge Direction
Canadian investor exposure
Concern
Typical hedge
Owns USD asset
USD weakens versus CAD
Sell USD forward/future
Will buy USD asset later
USD strengthens versus CAD before purchase
Buy USD forward/future
Will receive foreign currency
Foreign currency weakens before receipt
Sell foreign currency forward
Must pay foreign currency later
Foreign currency strengthens before payment
Buy foreign currency forward
Rebalancing, Allocation, and Manager Review
Allocation Approaches
Approach
Description
Best use
Risk
Strategic asset allocation
Long-term policy mix based on objectives and constraints
Core portfolio design
May lag in unusual market regimes
Tactical asset allocation
Shorter-term deviations from policy weights
Express valuation or macro views
Market timing error
Dynamic allocation
Rules-based adjustment to market conditions
Risk control or trend response
Whipsaw and model risk
Core-satellite
Passive or low-cost core plus active satellites
Balance cost and alpha pursuit
Satellite concentration
Liability-driven investing
Assets selected to meet liabilities
Pension or specific future obligation
Model and rate assumptions
Risk parity
Allocate by risk contribution, not capital
Diversify risk drivers
Often uses leverage; correlation instability
Notes and examples
Rebalancing Rules
Method
How it works
Advantage
Disadvantage
Calendar rebalancing
Rebalance on fixed dates
Simple and disciplined
Ignores size of drift
Tolerance bands
Rebalance when allocation breaches range
Responds to material drift
Requires monitoring
Cash-flow rebalancing
Direct contributions/withdrawals to under/overweight assets
Good for intrinsic value and long-term assumptions
Technical
Price, volume, trends, momentum, patterns
More focused on market behaviour and timing
Quantitative
Rules-based models, factors, data signals
Model risk and data-mining risk
Top-down
Economy, rates, sectors, asset classes
Macro forecast can dominate security selection
Bottom-up
Company-level analysis
May ignore macro or sector headwinds
Active Management Traps
Comparing active return to the wrong benchmark.
Ignoring fees and taxes when evaluating skill.
Mistaking factor exposure for manager skill.
Using short track records to infer persistent alpha.
Ignoring capacity limits: some strategies stop working when too much money follows them.
Treating concentrated portfolios as “high conviction” without acknowledging higher idiosyncratic risk.
Margin, Short Selling, and Leverage
Leverage Basics
Leverage increases exposure relative to invested capital. It can improve return on equity when the investment performs well, but it also magnifies losses and can force liquidation.
Strategy
Potential Benefit
Key Risk
Margin purchase
Larger market exposure
Margin calls and magnified losses
Short sale
Profit from price decline
Unlimited theoretical loss
Leveraged ETF/fund
Amplified daily exposure
Compounding and path dependency
Derivatives
Efficient exposure or hedging
Leverage, complexity, counterparty risk
Securities lending/borrowing
Income or short-sale facilitation
Operational and counterparty risk
Notes and examples
Short Sale Exam Points
Short seller borrows and sells securities, hoping to repurchase lower.
Maximum gain is limited because the security cannot fall below zero.
Maximum loss is theoretically unlimited because price can rise without limit.
Short sellers may owe dividends or distributions to the lender.
Buy-ins, recalls, liquidity stress, and borrowing costs can affect outcomes.
Leverage Traps
A “small” market move can create a large capital loss.
Volatility drag can hurt leveraged products over time.
Margin calls can force selling at poor prices.
Leverage can make a diversified portfolio unsuitable if liquidity is weak.
Hedging with derivatives can still create cash-flow risk through margin.
Use real estate/infrastructure for income and potential inflation linkage, not guaranteed stability.
Use commodities carefully; they can diversify but may be volatile and cash-flow poor.
Assess leverage at the asset and fund level.
Check liquidity terms, valuation frequency, and redemption mechanics.
Match asset life and liquidity to the client’s time horizon.
Structured Products and Complex Funds
Structured products combine debt, derivatives, and reference assets. Always decompose the payoff.
Structured Product Review
Product Feature
Meaning
Candidate Trap
Principal protection
Some or all principal protected at maturity, subject to terms
Issuer credit risk and opportunity cost remain
Participation rate
Percentage of reference asset gain credited
Less than full upside if below 100%
Cap
Maximum return
Upside may be limited even in strong markets
Buffer
First layer of losses absorbed before investor loss
Losses beyond buffer may be large
Barrier
Payoff changes if level is breached
Path matters, not just final price
Autocall
Product may redeem early if conditions met
Reinvestment risk and capped upside
Averaging
Uses average reference level
Can reduce timing risk but may reduce upside
Leveraged/inverse exposure
Magnified or opposite daily exposure
Path dependency and compounding effects
Notes and examples
Structured Product Analysis Steps
Identify the issuer and credit exposure.
Identify the reference asset or index.
Determine whether returns are based on price return, total return, average level, or point-to-point change.
Check participation, caps, floors, buffers, barriers, and call features.
Identify the maturity date and liquidity before maturity.
Compare payoff to simpler alternatives.
Assess fees, tax treatment, and client understanding.
Product Traps
Principal protection may apply only at maturity.
Protection depends on issuer ability to pay.
Early redemption may occur when the product is most favourable to the issuer.
Complex payoff formulas can hide low expected return.
Secondary market liquidity may be limited.
A product can be unsuitable even if the payoff seems attractive.
Tax, Fees, and Liquidity
Tax treatment is client-specific and can change. For exam purposes, focus on the relative planning logic and after-tax return.
Tax-Aware Strategy Review
Issue
Planning Logic
Exam Trap
Interest income
Often less tax-efficient in non-registered accounts
Ignoring after-tax yield
Dividends
May receive preferential treatment depending on type and account
Treating all distributions the same
Capital gains
Tax timing may be controlled by realization
Ignoring turnover and embedded gains
Foreign income
May involve withholding tax and currency effects
Looking only at pre-tax foreign yield
Registered accounts
Tax sheltering/deferral can affect asset location
Assuming the same asset belongs in every account
Loss harvesting
Realized losses may offset gains, subject to rules
Creating tax trades that harm investment policy
Fund turnover
Higher turnover can reduce tax efficiency
Comparing only gross performance
Return of capital
May defer tax but reduce adjusted cost base
Mistaking ROC for earned income
Notes and examples
Fee Review
Fee Type
Where It Appears
Why It Matters
Management fee
Funds, private investments, managed accounts
Reduces net return
Performance fee
Hedge funds, private funds
Incentives and hurdle/high-water-mark terms matter
Trading costs
Active strategies, derivatives, turnover
Can erode performance
Embedded structuring cost
Structured notes/products
May be difficult to see
Borrowing cost
Margin, shorts, leveraged strategies
Reduces net return and adds cash-flow pressure
Bid-ask spread
Less liquid securities/products
Immediate implementation cost
Liquidity Review
Liquidity Feature
Meaning
Daily liquidity
Investor can usually transact daily, subject to market conditions
Notice period
Investor must provide advance notice to redeem
Lockup
Investor cannot redeem for a set period
Gate
Fund may limit redemptions
Side pocket
Illiquid assets may be segregated
Secondary market
Sale before maturity may depend on available buyers
Exam point: illiquidity can be acceptable if compensated and suitable, but it is dangerous when the client needs flexibility.
Common Candidate Mistakes
Product and Payoff Mistakes
Forgetting that option buyers have rights and option writers have obligations.
Calculating option breakeven without net premiums.
Calling a covered call “downside protection” without noting protection is limited to the premium.
Treating collars as free protection without recognizing capped upside.
Ignoring assignment risk for written options.
Assuming futures require full purchase price instead of margin.
Ignoring daily settlement on futures.
Forgetting that forwards have counterparty risk.
Treating swaps as risk-free because no principal is exchanged.
Assuming structured products are simple because the payoff has a headline guarantee.
Notes and examples
Portfolio and Risk Mistakes
Choosing the highest expected return without considering risk capacity.
Using standard deviation for illiquid assets without questioning valuation smoothing.
Assuming historical correlation will hold during crises.
Ignoring benchmark selection when evaluating alpha.
Comparing pre-fee or pre-tax performance to after-fee alternatives.
Treating low beta as low risk in all scenarios.
Ignoring concentration risk from employer stock, real estate, business ownership, or sector tilts.
Forgetting that currency can add or reduce portfolio risk.
Suitability Mistakes
Recommending illiquid strategies to clients with near-term cash needs.
Recommending leverage to clients who cannot meet margin calls.
Recommending complex products without client understanding.
Overweighting alternatives because of past performance.
Ignoring the client’s investment policy or stated constraints.
Confusing willingness to take risk with ability to take risk.
Mini Self-Test
Use these prompts to test whether you are ready for topic drills.
Prompt
Quick Answer
A client owns a stock, wants income, and is willing to sell above a target price.
Covered call
A client owns a stock and wants downside protection while keeping upside.
Protective put
A client wants protection but is willing to cap upside to reduce cost.
Collar
A long call has a strike of 50 and premium of 4. Breakeven?
54
A long put has a strike of 50 and premium of 3. Breakeven?
47
Investor will buy an asset in three months and fears price increase.
Long futures/forward hedge
Investor will sell an asset in three months and fears price decrease.
Short futures/forward hedge
Rates rise; what happens to a plain bond price?
Price falls
Which bond has more duration, all else equal: low coupon or high coupon?
Low coupon
What does tracking error measure?
Volatility of active return versus benchmark
Why can VaR be misleading?
It does not show losses beyond the VaR threshold
Why are private assets risky despite low reported volatility?
Illiquidity and infrequent valuation can smooth returns
What is the main risk of a principal-protected note?
Issuer risk, opportunity cost, terms, liquidity
What is the main danger of a short call?
Unlimited theoretical loss
What is basis risk?
Hedge and exposure do not move perfectly together
Final Review Priorities
If time is short, prioritize:
Suitability framework
Options payoffs and breakevens
Futures/forwards hedge direction
Duration, convexity, and yield curve logic
Risk-adjusted performance metrics
Alternative investment risks
Structured product payoff features
Tax, fees, and liquidity constraints
Leverage and margin risks
Client communication and product understanding
The best next step is to turn this review into active recall: complete AIS topic drills, then use detailed explanations to close gaps before attempting full mock exams.