Practical exam blueprint for the Canadian Securities Institute CSI Applied Financial Planning (AFP®) Exam 2, with readiness areas, scenario cues, and final-review checks.
How to Use This Exam Blueprint
This independent checklist is for candidates preparing for the Canadian Securities Institute CSI Applied Financial Planning (AFP®) Exam 2, exam code AFP Exam 2. It is a practical study map, not an official syllabus or scoring guide.
Use it to confirm that you can move from client facts to professional recommendations. For each area, ask:
Can I identify the relevant facts?
Can I separate financial planning issues from distractions?
Can I recommend an appropriate next step?
Can I explain why an option is suitable or unsuitable?
Can I recognize compliance, documentation, disclosure, and ethics issues?
Because official weights can change, the areas below are organized as readiness areas, not as weighted exam sections.
Topic-Area Readiness Table
Readiness area
What to review
You are ready when you can…
Common evidence in a case
Client discovery and fact-finding
Goals, constraints, family status, income, assets, liabilities, risk profile, time horizon, tax status, estate wishes
Extract missing facts and decide what must be clarified before giving advice
Survivor benefits, indexing, commuted value concepts, guarantees
You can identify factors, not just choose the largest payment
Spousal planning
Age difference, income split, survivor needs, pension options
You can evaluate household retirement income, not just individual accounts
Longevity and inflation
Risk of outliving assets and loss of purchasing power
You can balance growth need with risk capacity
Retirement risk management
Health costs, long-term care, insurance, estate liquidity
You can connect retirement planning with insurance and estate planning
Retirement Calculation Checks
You do not need to overcomplicate projections unless the case requires it. Be ready to interpret:
\[
\text{Annual Retirement Gap} = \text{Desired Annual Spending} - \text{Reliable Annual Income}
\]\[
\text{Required Annual Savings} \approx \frac{\text{Future Funding Need}}{\text{Number of Years to Save}}
\]
This simplified annual savings estimate ignores investment growth and inflation. If a case gives growth and inflation assumptions, apply them consistently and state assumptions.
Family transfer, third-party sale, management buyout
Owner wants to retire but has no buyer
Estate liquidity
Tax at death, equalization among heirs
One child in business, others not
Retirement funding
Diversify away from business value
Business sale is the only retirement plan
Professional coordination
Accountant, lawyer, insurance specialist
Complex corporate or shareholder planning
Business Owner Decision Prompts
Is the business a source of income, retirement capital, risk, or all three?
Is the client overconcentrated in business value?
What happens if the owner dies, becomes disabled, or exits suddenly?
Are family members involved in ownership or employment?
Is there a funded buy-sell or succession arrangement?
Does the recommendation require tax or legal structuring advice?
Compliance, Ethics, and Professional Conduct Checklist
For the Canadian Securities Institute AFP Exam 2 context, be ready to apply professional judgment to client-facing situations. Focus on suitability, documentation, disclosure, and client-first reasoning.
Area
What to know
Exam-style red flag
Know your client
Facts must support advice
Recommendation made with missing income, risk, or objective information
Know your product
Understand features, risks, costs, liquidity
Advisor recommends a complex product they cannot explain
Suitability
Match recommendation to client circumstances
High-risk product for short-term conservative goal
Conflicts of interest
Identify, disclose, manage, or avoid
Compensation or referral arrangement not discussed
Confidentiality
Protect client information
Sharing details with family member without authority
Documentation
Record rationale, instructions, disclosures, updates
No file note explaining why strategy was chosen
Misrepresentation
Avoid guarantees or exaggerated claims
“This investment cannot lose money”
Client capacity and vulnerability
Recognize diminished capacity or undue influence
Family member pressures elderly client
Referral boundaries
Use specialists when needed
Planner gives detailed legal drafting advice
Ongoing review
Monitor life changes and recommendation fit
Old plan not updated after divorce or retirement
Ethics “Can You Do This?” Prompts
Identify when a client request should be declined or escalated.
Explain why disclosure alone may not cure an unsuitable recommendation.
Recognize when a conflict must be avoided, not merely documented.
Identify when a third party lacks authority to receive information.
Distinguish client education from personalized advice.
Recognize vulnerable-client concerns and appropriate caution.
Document assumptions, limitations, and client decisions.
Applied Scenario Decision Path
Use this workflow when reading a long case.
flowchart TD
A[Read client facts] --> B[Identify goals and constraints]
B --> C[Find missing or conflicting facts]
C --> D{Can advice be given now?}
D -- No --> E[Request information or refer to specialist]
D -- Yes --> F[Prioritize issues]
F --> G[Evaluate suitable strategies]
G --> H[Check tax, risk, liquidity, estate, and compliance effects]
H --> I[Recommend action with rationale]
I --> J[Document assumptions and review triggers]
Scenario and Decision-Point Checks
Suitability Decisions
Client fact pattern
Better exam instinct
Avoid
Conservative client, short-term house down payment
Liquidity and capital preservation
Equity-heavy growth strategy
Young family, single income, no insurance
Protect income and dependants
Focusing only on retirement investments
High-income client with no emergency fund
Build liquidity before locking funds away
Maximizing registered contributions without cash reserve analysis
Retiree dependent on portfolio withdrawals
Income stability, withdrawal sustainability, tax management
AFP Exam 2 preparation should include practical interpretation of financial planning math. Review the formulas conceptually and be able to explain what changes the result.
Calculation
Plain-text formula
What the result tells you
Net worth
Assets minus liabilities
Overall financial position
Monthly surplus
Income minus expenses, debt payments, and savings
Whether recommendations are affordable
Savings rate
Annual savings divided by income
Progress toward accumulation goals
Debt service ratio
Debt payments divided by income measure used in the case
Debt pressure and affordability
Emergency fund target
Essential monthly expenses times target months
Liquidity buffer needed
Insurance gap
Required capital minus available assets and coverage
Additional coverage need
Retirement income gap
Desired spending minus reliable income
Amount portfolio or savings must fund
Real return approximation
Nominal return minus inflation
Purchasing-power growth estimate
Capital gain
Proceeds minus adjusted cost base conceptually
Taxable gain exposure before applying tax rules
Portfolio weight
Asset class value divided by total portfolio value
Allocation and concentration
Calculation Traps
Mixing monthly and annual amounts.
Using gross income when the case requires after-tax cash flow.
Ignoring inflation in long-term goals.
Treating expected investment return as guaranteed.
Forgetting taxes when selling non-registered assets.
Counting illiquid assets as available emergency funds.
Double-counting an asset for two goals.
Ignoring survivor needs in retirement or insurance calculations.
Using old values after a life event changes the balance sheet.
Documentation and Implementation Checklist
Recommendations should not stop at “what.” Be ready for “how” and “what must be documented.”
Review formulas, traps, decision tables, and personal error log; avoid cramming new material
Final Readiness Self-Test
I can read a case and identify the top three planning issues.
I can explain what facts are missing before making a recommendation.
I can choose between debt repayment, saving, investing, and insurance priorities.
I can evaluate suitability using objective, risk, time horizon, liquidity, tax, and cost.
I can connect retirement planning with tax, estate, insurance, and cash flow.
I can identify beneficiary and ownership problems.
I can spot conflicts of interest and documentation failures.
I can perform basic calculations without mixing time periods.
I can explain why an answer is suitable, not just identify it.
I can slow down when a question includes a vulnerable client, business owner, blended family, or complex tax fact pattern.
Practical Next Step
Use this checklist as a scoring guide for your final practice. After each practice case or question set, tag every miss by topic: discovery, tax, retirement, investment, insurance, estate, business owner, ethics, calculation, or prioritization. Then spend your remaining study time on the topics where your reasoning is least consistent, not just the topics that feel familiar.