Project+ — CompTIA Project+ (PK0-005) Exam Quick Review
Independent Quick Review for CompTIA Project+ (PK0-005), exam code Project+, covering high-yield concepts, traps, decision rules, and practice focus areas.
Quick Review purpose
This Quick Review is for candidates preparing for CompTIA Project+ (PK0-005), exam code Project+. It is designed to help you refresh the most testable project management ideas before moving into PM Mastery practice, topic drills, mock exams, and detailed explanations.
CompTIA Project+ questions often test whether you can choose the best project management action in a realistic scenario. The exam is not only about definitions. Expect questions that require you to recognize project constraints, stakeholder issues, documentation needs, change control, risk responses, communication problems, and project life cycle decisions.
Use this page to quickly review:
- What project documents are used for
- How scope, schedule, cost, quality, resources, and risk interact
- How to choose the right action when a project changes
- How to distinguish issues, risks, assumptions, constraints, and dependencies
- How to avoid common scenario-question traps
High-yield exam mindset
For CompTIA Project+ (PK0-005), many questions come down to disciplined project control.
| If the scenario says… | Think first about… | Common best action |
|---|---|---|
| A stakeholder requests new work | Scope/change control | Document and evaluate the change |
| A future uncertain event may affect the project | Risk management | Record in risk register and plan response |
| Something has already happened | Issue management | Log, assign owner, escalate if needed |
| Team members are confused about responsibilities | RACI/resource planning | Clarify roles and accountability |
| The project is behind schedule | Schedule analysis | Identify critical tasks and options |
| The customer is dissatisfied | Stakeholder/quality/communication | Clarify expectations and acceptance criteria |
| Requirements are unclear | Scope/requirements management | Elicit, document, validate, baseline |
| A vendor misses a deliverable | Procurement/vendor management | Review contract/SLA, escalate per plan |
| Executives want status | Communication management | Provide agreed status report/dashboard |
| The project is ending | Closure | Confirm acceptance and capture lessons learned |
A strong test-taking rule: do not jump straight to execution when the correct answer is to document, analyze, communicate, or follow the approved process first.
Project basics you should know cold
Project vs. operations
| Concept | Project | Operations |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Create a unique product, service, or result | Run ongoing business activities |
| Duration | Temporary | Continuous |
| Success focus | Deliver approved objectives | Maintain stable performance |
| Change level | Often higher | Usually controlled and repeatable |
| Example | Deploy a new ticketing system | Operate the help desk |
A common trap is treating a temporary initiative as routine operations. If the work has a defined beginning, end, scope, and deliverables, treat it as a project.
Core project constraints
Project decisions often involve tradeoffs among:
- Scope — what is included and excluded
- Schedule — when work and deliverables are due
- Cost — budget, funding, and financial limits
- Quality — degree to which deliverables meet requirements
- Resources — people, equipment, tools, and facilities
- Risk — uncertainty that may affect objectives
If one constraint changes, at least one other constraint usually changes too. For example, increasing scope without changing schedule may require more resources, higher cost, lower quality, or higher risk.
Project life cycle quick review
CompTIA Project+ scenarios frequently ask what should happen next in the project life cycle.
| Phase / activity area | Main purpose | High-yield outputs |
|---|---|---|
| Initiation | Confirm business need and authorize the project | Business case, project charter, initial stakeholder list |
| Planning | Define how work will be performed, controlled, and measured | Scope baseline, schedule, budget, risk plan, communication plan |
| Execution | Perform the work and produce deliverables | Work results, team coordination, vendor management |
| Monitoring and controlling | Compare actual performance to plan and manage changes | Status reports, change requests, issue/risk updates |
| Closure | Confirm completion and formally close project work | Final acceptance, lessons learned, archived documents |
Initiation
Initiation answers: Should this project exist, and who authorizes it?
Key concepts:
- Business case: explains why the project is valuable.
- Project charter: formally authorizes the project and gives the project manager authority.
- Stakeholder identification: determines who can affect or be affected by the project.
- High-level scope: describes major deliverables, boundaries, and objectives.
Common exam trap: Starting detailed planning or execution before authorization. If the project has not been formally approved, the better answer often involves business case approval or project charter creation.
Planning
Planning answers: How will the project be delivered and controlled?
Important plans and baselines:
| Planning item | What it controls |
|---|---|
| Scope statement | What is included and excluded |
| Work breakdown structure | Decomposition of deliverables into manageable work |
| Schedule | Task sequencing, duration, milestones, deadlines |
| Budget | Approved cost baseline |
| Quality plan | Standards, acceptance criteria, testing/review methods |
| Resource plan | People, skills, equipment, availability |
| Communication plan | Who receives what information, when, and how |
| Risk register | Identified risks, probability/impact, owners, responses |
| Change management plan | How changes are submitted, evaluated, approved, and tracked |
Common exam trap: Choosing a communication or execution action before confirming the plan, baseline, or approval process.
Execution
Execution answers: How is the work performed and coordinated?
High-yield execution activities:
- Assigning work according to roles and responsibilities
- Managing team performance
- Coordinating vendors and external resources
- Holding status meetings
- Producing deliverables
- Performing quality assurance activities
- Communicating with stakeholders
- Updating logs and reports
Common exam trap: Ignoring the project plan. Execution should align with approved scope, schedule, budget, quality, and communication expectations.
Monitoring and controlling
Monitoring and controlling answers: Are we on track, and what must be adjusted?
High-yield activities:
- Compare actual progress to the baseline
- Track issues, risks, changes, and defects
- Analyze schedule and budget variances
- Validate deliverables against acceptance criteria
- Escalate according to thresholds
- Report status to stakeholders
- Manage approved changes
Common exam trap: Making informal changes. If a change affects scope, schedule, cost, quality, or risk, it should go through change control.
Closure
Closure answers: Is the project formally complete?
Key closure steps:
- Verify deliverables against acceptance criteria.
- Obtain formal acceptance.
- Close contracts and vendor obligations.
- Release project resources.
- Archive project documents.
- Capture lessons learned.
- Communicate final status.
Common exam trap: Treating work completion as project closure. A deliverable being finished is not the same as formal acceptance and administrative closure.
Project documents and artifacts
High-yield document table
| Document | Purpose | Watch for this in scenarios |
|---|---|---|
| Business case | Justifies the project | “Why are we doing this?” |
| Project charter | Authorizes the project | “Who approved this project?” |
| Stakeholder register | Lists stakeholders and key details | “Who is affected?” |
| Requirements document | Captures stakeholder needs | “What must the solution do?” |
| Scope statement | Defines project boundaries | “Is this work included?” |
| WBS | Breaks deliverables into smaller components | “How is work decomposed?” |
| Schedule | Shows task timing and dependencies | “When will tasks occur?” |
| Budget | Defines approved funding | “How much can be spent?” |
| Risk register | Tracks uncertain future events | “What might happen?” |
| Issue log | Tracks current problems | “What has happened?” |
| Change log | Tracks submitted and approved/rejected changes | “What changed?” |
| Communication plan | Defines communication methods and frequency | “Who needs what update?” |
| RACI chart | Clarifies responsibility and accountability | “Who owns this task?” |
| Lessons learned | Captures improvement knowledge | “What should future projects know?” |
RACI review
RACI is commonly tested because it clarifies roles.
| RACI role | Meaning | Key exam clue |
|---|---|---|
| Responsible | Does the work | The person performing the task |
| Accountable | Owns the outcome | Final decision/approval authority |
| Consulted | Provides input | Two-way communication |
| Informed | Kept updated | One-way communication |
Common trap: More than one person may be responsible, but accountability should be clear. If everyone owns the result, no one owns the result.
Scope management
Scope management prevents uncontrolled expansion and unclear expectations.
Scope terms
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Product scope | Features and functions of the deliverable |
| Project scope | Work required to deliver the product/service/result |
| Scope statement | Detailed description of project boundaries and deliverables |
| Deliverable | Tangible or verifiable output |
| Acceptance criteria | Conditions that must be met for approval |
| Scope baseline | Approved scope statement, WBS, and related scope controls |
| Scope creep | Uncontrolled expansion of scope without approval |
Scope decision rule
If a stakeholder requests additional work:
- Determine whether the request is already in scope.
- If unclear, review the scope statement, WBS, and requirements.
- If it is new or changes approved work, create a change request.
- Analyze impact on schedule, cost, quality, resources, and risk.
- Submit for approval according to the change process.
- Update baselines and communicate only after approval.
Do not accept “the customer asked for it” as automatic authorization to change the project.
Requirements review
Requirements define what the solution must do or achieve.
| Requirement type | Example |
|---|---|
| Business requirement | Reduce manual ticket routing time |
| Stakeholder requirement | Support managers need weekly reporting |
| Functional requirement | Users can submit a ticket through a portal |
| Nonfunctional requirement | Portal must meet performance or availability expectations |
| Technical requirement | System must integrate with an identity provider |
| Compliance requirement | Solution must satisfy required policies or standards |
Common mistakes:
- Confusing requirements with design decisions
- Failing to validate requirements with stakeholders
- Missing nonfunctional requirements
- Accepting ambiguous terms such as “fast,” “easy,” or “secure” without measurable criteria
- Allowing requirements changes without change control
Schedule management
Schedule building blocks
| Concept | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Activity/task | Unit of work to be scheduled |
| Milestone | Significant event or checkpoint, often zero-duration |
| Dependency | Relationship between tasks |
| Duration | Time needed to complete a task |
| Lead | Acceleration where a successor starts before predecessor fully completes |
| Lag | Delay between tasks |
| Critical path | Longest path through the schedule; determines minimum project duration |
| Float/slack | Time a task can slip without delaying the project or dependent work |
Dependency types
| Dependency | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Finish-to-start | Task B starts after Task A finishes | Install software after server build |
| Start-to-start | Task B starts after Task A starts | Begin documentation after configuration starts |
| Finish-to-finish | Task B finishes after Task A finishes | Final review finishes after testing finishes |
| Start-to-finish | Task B finishes after Task A starts | Rare; old process ends after new process starts |
Most scenario questions use finish-to-start dependencies, but do not assume every dependency is the same.
Schedule compression
| Technique | What it does | Tradeoff |
|---|---|---|
| Crashing | Adds resources to shorten schedule | Often increases cost |
| Fast tracking | Performs tasks in parallel that were planned sequentially | Often increases risk and rework |
| Resource leveling | Adjusts schedule based on resource availability | May extend timeline |
| Resource smoothing | Adjusts activities within available float | Tries not to change critical path |
Common trap: If the question says the budget cannot increase, crashing may not be best. If the question says quality/rework risk is unacceptable, fast tracking may not be best.
Cost and budget review
Project+ candidates should understand budgeting concepts and cost-control thinking.
| Concept | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Budget | Approved funding for project work |
| Estimate | Forecast of expected cost |
| Baseline | Approved version used to measure performance |
| Fixed cost | Cost that does not vary directly with amount of work |
| Variable cost | Cost that changes with usage or quantity |
| Direct cost | Cost directly attributable to the project |
| Indirect cost | Shared overhead or support cost |
| Sunk cost | Money already spent; should not drive future decisions |
| Contingency reserve | Funds/time for known risks |
| Management reserve | Funds/time for unknown or higher-level uncertainty, usually controlled outside the project manager’s normal authority |
Common trap: Continuing a bad project because money has already been spent. Sunk cost should not justify poor future decisions.
Quality management
Quality is about meeting requirements and acceptance criteria, not simply adding premium features.
| Concept | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Quality planning | Define standards and how quality will be measured |
| Quality assurance | Ensure processes are being followed |
| Quality control | Inspect/test deliverables for defects |
| Acceptance criteria | Conditions required for stakeholder approval |
| Defect | Nonconformance with requirement or quality standard |
| Rework | Correcting defective or incomplete work |
Quality vs. grade
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Quality | Degree to which requirements are met |
| Grade | Category or level of features |
A low-grade product can still be high quality if it meets requirements. A high-grade product can be low quality if it fails to meet requirements.
Common exam trap: Choosing “add more features” when the problem is quality. Quality means conforming to requirements, not gold-plating.
Risk management
Risk is one of the most important Project+ areas because scenarios often test the difference between a possible future event and a current problem.
Risk vs. issue
| Term | Timing | Example | Tool |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk | May happen | A key vendor might miss a delivery date | Risk register |
| Issue | Has happened | The vendor missed the delivery date | Issue log |
If the event has already occurred, it is no longer a risk; it is an issue.
Risk register essentials
A useful risk entry usually includes:
- Risk description
- Cause
- Potential impact
- Probability
- Impact rating
- Risk owner
- Response strategy
- Trigger
- Status
- Contingency plan
Negative risk response strategies
| Strategy | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Avoid | Change the plan to eliminate the risk | Use a proven platform instead of an untested one |
| Mitigate | Reduce probability or impact | Add testing, training, or redundancy |
| Transfer | Shift financial/operational impact to another party | Insurance, warranty, outsourcing |
| Accept | Take no proactive action beyond monitoring or reserving contingency | Accept a low-impact risk |
Positive risk response strategies
| Strategy | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Exploit | Ensure the opportunity happens |
| Enhance | Increase probability or benefit |
| Share | Partner with another party to capture benefit |
| Accept | Take advantage if it occurs, without active pursuit |
Common trap: Transferring a risk does not make it disappear. It shifts responsibility for some consequences, often through a contract or insurance mechanism.
Issue management and escalation
An issue is a current condition affecting the project.
Good issue management process
- Log the issue.
- Categorize and assess impact.
- Assign an owner.
- Determine priority.
- Identify resolution options.
- Escalate if it exceeds authority or thresholds.
- Track to closure.
- Communicate status to affected stakeholders.
Escalation is appropriate when:
- The project manager lacks authority to resolve it
- The issue crosses defined thresholds
- A decision is needed from sponsor or governance group
- The issue affects major scope, schedule, cost, quality, or risk baselines
- A conflict cannot be resolved at the project level
Common trap: Escalation is not the first step for every problem. Use the issue process, but escalate when authority, impact, or urgency requires it.
Change control
Change control is a major exam decision point.
Change request workflow
flowchart TD
A[Change requested] --> B[Document the request]
B --> C[Analyze impact]
C --> D{Affects scope, schedule, cost, quality, resources, or risk?}
D -- No --> E[Handle within project authority]
D -- Yes --> F[Submit to change control process]
F --> G{Approved?}
G -- No --> H[Record decision and communicate]
G -- Yes --> I[Update baselines, plans, logs, and stakeholders]
I --> J[Implement approved change]
What to analyze before approval
| Impact area | Question to ask |
|---|---|
| Scope | Does this add, remove, or change deliverables? |
| Schedule | Does this affect milestones, dependencies, or critical path? |
| Cost | Does this require more budget or different funding? |
| Quality | Does this alter standards or acceptance criteria? |
| Resources | Does this require different people, tools, or vendors? |
| Risk | Does this create new threats or opportunities? |
| Stakeholders | Who needs to approve or be informed? |
| Contracts | Does this affect vendor obligations? |
Common trap: Implementing a change because it sounds small. Even small changes may affect baselines, dependencies, budget, or risk.
Stakeholder management
Stakeholders are people or groups that can affect, be affected by, or perceive themselves to be affected by the project.
Stakeholder analysis
Consider:
- Level of influence
- Level of interest
- Expectations
- Communication preferences
- Decision authority
- Support or resistance
- Impact on project success
| Stakeholder type | Project approach |
|---|---|
| High influence, high interest | Manage closely |
| High influence, low interest | Keep satisfied |
| Low influence, high interest | Keep informed |
| Low influence, low interest | Monitor |
Common stakeholder traps
- Ignoring quiet but powerful stakeholders
- Communicating the same level of detail to every audience
- Failing to document approvals
- Assuming the sponsor and end users have identical expectations
- Not managing resistance to change
- Waiting until closure to validate acceptance criteria
For scenario questions, identify whose approval, input, or awareness matters before choosing the communication action.
Communication management
Communication questions usually test matching the message, audience, timing, and method.
Communication methods
| Method | Best use |
|---|---|
| Formal written report | Executive status, audit trail, approvals |
| Meeting | Discussion, alignment, decision-making |
| Routine updates and documented communication | |
| Dashboard | Quick status visibility |
| Instant message/chat | Informal quick coordination |
| Presentation | Stakeholder briefing or milestone review |
| Project repository | Central document access |
| Escalation path | Issues requiring authority or urgent attention |
Communication plan contents
A communication plan should define:
- Audience
- Information needs
- Format
- Frequency
- Owner/sender
- Distribution method
- Escalation path
- Confidentiality or access considerations
Common trap: More communication is not always better. The right answer is usually targeted, timely, and appropriate communication.
Team and resource management
Resource types
| Resource type | Examples |
|---|---|
| Human resources | Project manager, developers, analysts, testers, trainers |
| Physical resources | Equipment, rooms, devices |
| Technical resources | Software, environments, cloud services |
| Financial resources | Budget and funding |
| External resources | Vendors, contractors, consultants |
Team development stages
| Stage | Meaning | Project manager focus |
|---|---|---|
| Forming | Team is newly assembled | Set direction, clarify goals |
| Storming | Conflict and uncertainty appear | Resolve conflict, clarify roles |
| Norming | Team establishes working norms | Reinforce collaboration |
| Performing | Team works effectively | Remove obstacles, sustain performance |
| Adjourning | Team disbands | Recognize work, release resources |
Conflict resolution approaches
| Approach | When it may fit |
|---|---|
| Collaborating/problem solving | Best for important issues needing durable agreement |
| Compromising | Useful when time is limited and each side can give something |
| Smoothing/accommodating | Emphasizes agreement; may not solve root cause |
| Forcing/directing | Useful in emergencies or when authority must decide |
| Avoiding/withdrawing | Temporarily useful for low-priority issues, but rarely solves the issue |
Common exam trap: Avoiding conflict when the scenario needs active resolution. For important project conflicts, collaboration/problem solving is usually stronger than ignoring the issue.
Procurement and vendor management
Project+ scenarios may include vendors, contracts, statements of work, and service expectations.
Procurement terms
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Procurement | Acquiring goods or services from outside the organization |
| Vendor/supplier | External provider |
| Statement of work | Description of work, deliverables, and expectations |
| RFP | Request for proposal; asks vendors to propose a solution |
| RFQ | Request for quote; asks for pricing for defined goods/services |
| RFI | Request for information; gathers market/vendor information |
| SLA | Service level agreement; defines service performance expectations |
| Contract | Legally binding agreement between parties |
Contract type decision review
| Contract type | Buyer risk | Seller risk | Exam clue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed-price | Lower if scope is clear | Higher if costs exceed estimate | Best when requirements are well-defined |
| Time and materials | Higher cost uncertainty | Lower than fixed-price | Useful when scope is uncertain but labor rates are known |
| Cost-reimbursable | Higher | Lower | Buyer pays allowable costs, often plus fee |
Common trap: Choosing fixed-price when the scope is vague. Fixed-price works best when requirements are stable and well understood.
Agile, predictive, and hybrid concepts
CompTIA Project+ candidates should recognize different delivery approaches.
| Approach | Best fit | Key idea |
|---|---|---|
| Predictive/waterfall | Requirements are stable and known early | Plan thoroughly, execute sequentially |
| Agile/adaptive | Requirements may evolve | Deliver iteratively and incorporate feedback |
| Hybrid | Mix of predictive and adaptive elements | Use the right approach for different parts of the project |
Agile terms to recognize
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Backlog | Prioritized list of work items |
| Sprint/iteration | Timeboxed work cycle |
| Product owner | Represents product value and prioritization |
| Scrum master | Facilitates process and removes impediments |
| Daily standup | Short coordination meeting |
| Retrospective | Team improvement meeting after an iteration |
| Increment | Usable completed work from an iteration |
| User story | Requirement written from user perspective |
Common trap: Agile does not mean “no planning” or “no control.” Agile uses frequent planning, prioritization, review, and adaptation.
Governance, compliance, and organizational context
Governance defines how decisions are made and controlled.
High-yield governance concepts:
- Approval authority
- Escalation paths
- Change control board or decision body
- Compliance requirements
- Auditability
- Document retention
- Security and privacy expectations
- Organizational policies
- Project selection and prioritization
Common trap: Choosing a technically convenient action that violates governance, approval, security, or compliance expectations. In exam scenarios, the project manager should follow organizational processes.
Assumptions, constraints, and dependencies
These three are easy to confuse.
| Concept | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Assumption | Something believed true for planning | The vendor will deliver hardware by a certain date |
| Constraint | Limitation or restriction | Budget cannot exceed approved funding |
| Dependency | Relationship between tasks or external events | Testing cannot start until the environment is ready |
Decision rule:
- If it is believed but not guaranteed, it is an assumption.
- If it limits choices, it is a constraint.
- If one thing relies on another, it is a dependency.
- If uncertainty could affect objectives, track it as a risk.
Status reporting and performance review
Status questions often ask what information should be communicated.
Common status elements
| Status item | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Overall health | Quick view of project condition |
| Schedule status | Ahead, on track, or behind |
| Budget status | Under, on, or over budget |
| Scope status | Approved work and change status |
| Risk status | Major risks and response updates |
| Issue status | Active problems and owners |
| Milestones | Completed and upcoming checkpoints |
| Decisions needed | Items requiring stakeholder action |
| Change requests | Submitted, approved, rejected, pending |
| Next steps | Near-term focus |
Common trap: Reporting only good news. Effective status reporting is transparent and highlights risks, issues, and decisions needed.
Meeting types and when to use them
| Meeting | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Kickoff meeting | Align team and stakeholders at project start |
| Status meeting | Review progress, issues, risks, and next steps |
| Risk review | Reassess risks and response plans |
| Change control meeting | Review and decide on change requests |
| Sprint planning | Select iteration work in Agile settings |
| Daily standup | Brief coordination and impediment review |
| Review/demo | Show completed work and collect feedback |
| Retrospective | Improve team process |
| Lessons learned | Capture knowledge for future projects |
| Closure meeting | Confirm final outcomes and administrative closure |
Common trap: Holding a meeting without a purpose. The best answer often names the meeting that matches the project need.
Security, privacy, and IT project awareness
Because CompTIA Project+ is often used in technology project contexts, expect practical awareness of IT project concerns.
High-yield IT project considerations:
- Access control for project tools and repositories
- Data sensitivity and confidentiality
- Change windows and maintenance windows
- Backup and rollback planning
- Testing environments versus production environments
- User acceptance testing
- Deployment communication
- Incident and problem escalation
- Vendor access management
- Documentation and knowledge transfer
Common trap: Deploying a change without stakeholder communication, approval, testing, or rollback planning.
Common “best next step” patterns
| Scenario | Usually best next step |
|---|---|
| New project idea | Develop or review business case |
| Project approved but not yet authorized | Create/obtain project charter |
| Unknown stakeholder expectations | Identify and analyze stakeholders |
| Unclear work boundaries | Review or create scope statement |
| Large deliverable is hard to manage | Decompose into WBS |
| Uncertain future event | Add to risk register |
| Current problem | Add to issue log and assign owner |
| Requested change | Document change request and analyze impact |
| Team role confusion | Review RACI or resource plan |
| Missed milestone | Assess schedule impact and communicate per plan |
| Deliverable complete | Validate against acceptance criteria |
| Project finished | Obtain formal acceptance and close |
| Repeated process problem | Capture lessons learned or improve process |
Common candidate mistakes
Mistake 1: Confusing risks and issues
- Risk: might happen.
- Issue: has happened.
If the scenario says “may,” “could,” or “potential,” think risk. If it says “is,” “has,” or “did,” think issue.
Mistake 2: Skipping change control
Stakeholder requests are not automatically approved changes. Analyze impact and follow the change process.
Mistake 3: Choosing escalation too quickly
Escalate when authority, impact, or policy requires it. Otherwise, log, analyze, assign, and manage the item first.
Mistake 4: Treating communication as one-size-fits-all
Executives, technical teams, vendors, customers, and end users need different levels of detail.
Mistake 5: Ignoring acceptance criteria
A deliverable is not done just because the team says it is done. It must meet agreed acceptance criteria and receive appropriate approval.
Mistake 6: Selecting tools before understanding the problem
A project management tool does not fix unclear scope, missing requirements, weak governance, or poor stakeholder alignment.
Mistake 7: Confusing quality with extra features
Quality means meeting requirements. Extra features can create scope creep, cost increases, risk, and maintenance burden.
Quick scenario decision checklist
Before answering a scenario question, ask:
- What phase is the project in?
- Is this a risk, issue, change, defect, or communication problem?
- Is the event future uncertainty or a current fact?
- Does it affect scope, schedule, cost, quality, resources, or risk?
- Is there an approved process or plan that should be followed?
- Who has authority to decide?
- Who needs to be informed, consulted, or approving?
- What documentation should be updated?
- Is the question asking for the first step, best step, or final resolution?
- Which answer is most controlled, professional, and process-aligned?
Mini review tables
Risk, issue, change, and defect
| Item | Meaning | Primary artifact |
|---|---|---|
| Risk | Uncertain future event | Risk register |
| Issue | Current problem | Issue log |
| Change | Proposed modification to approved plan or baseline | Change request/change log |
| Defect | Deliverable does not meet requirement | Defect log/quality record |
Charter vs. plan
| Document | Timing | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Project charter | Initiation | Authorizes the project |
| Project management plan | Planning | Defines how the project will be executed, monitored, controlled, and closed |
Sponsor vs. project manager
| Role | Primary focus |
|---|---|
| Sponsor | Provides authority, funding support, and strategic direction |
| Project manager | Plans, coordinates, monitors, controls, and communicates project work |
Lessons learned timing
| Timing | Use |
|---|---|
| During project | Improve current performance |
| At closure | Capture final knowledge for future projects |
Lessons learned are not only for the end. They are most useful when captured throughout the project.
Final review before practice
Before moving into original practice questions, make sure you can explain these without notes:
- The purpose of a business case, charter, WBS, risk register, issue log, change log, communication plan, and RACI chart
- The difference between risk, issue, assumption, constraint, and dependency
- The correct response to a stakeholder change request
- How crashing differs from fast tracking
- Why formal acceptance matters during closure
- How to match communication method to audience and urgency
- When to escalate and when to manage within the project team
- Why quality means meeting requirements, not adding extras
- How predictive, Agile, and hybrid approaches differ
- How vendor contracts and scope clarity affect project risk
How to use this with question-bank practice
Use this Quick Review first, then move into PM Mastery practice:
- Start with topic drills on weak areas such as risk, change control, project documents, schedule concepts, and stakeholder communication.
- Answer original practice questions in timed sets so you learn how CompTIA Project+ (PK0-005) scenarios are phrased.
- Read detailed explanations for every missed or guessed question, including why the wrong answers are tempting.
- Keep a short error log organized by concept: risk vs. issue, change control, closure, communication, schedule, procurement, or quality.
- Re-test with mixed question bank sets until you can identify the project management problem before looking at the answer choices.
Practical next step: choose one weak topic from this Quick Review and complete a focused set of original practice questions with detailed explanations before attempting a full mock exam.
Continue in PM Mastery
Use this Quick Review as a final concept map, then move into PM Mastery for focused topic drills, mixed practice sets, timed mock exams, and detailed explanations. The practice questions are original PM Mastery practice items; they are not official CompTIA questions, copied live-exam content, or exam dumps.