CISI IAD Derivatives Technical Unit Quick Reference

Compact derivatives formulas, product distinctions, risk concepts, and exam traps for CISI IAD Derivatives Technical Unit candidates.

Exam identity and use

This Quick Reference supports candidates preparing for the Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment CISI IAD Derivatives Technical Unit exam, code CISI IAD Derivatives. It is independent review support and original practice support, not official exam-owner material.

Use it as a compact revision aid for:

  • Product mechanics: forwards, futures, options, swaps, structured products, and contracts for difference.
  • Payoff logic: who gains, who loses, when cash flows occur, and what risk remains.
  • Suitability and risk language: leverage, liquidity, counterparty exposure, margin, volatility, and client understanding.
  • Calculation shortcuts: option payoff, futures hedge sizing, margin, basis, FRA settlement, and swap cash flows.

Core derivatives map

ProductMain ideaTypical marketObligation or right?Main usersPrimary risks
ForwardBespoke agreement to trade later at fixed priceOTCObligation on both partiesHedgers, corporates, institutionsCounterparty, liquidity, settlement
FutureStandardised exchange-traded forward-like contractExchangeObligation on both partiesHedgers, traders, institutionsMargin calls, basis, leverage
Call optionRight to buy underlyingExchange or OTCBuyer has right; seller has obligationHedgers, investors, speculatorsPremium loss for buyer; potentially large loss for seller
Put optionRight to sell underlyingExchange or OTCBuyer has right; seller has obligationHedgers, investors, speculatorsPremium loss for buyer; large downside for seller
SwapExchange of cash flowsOTC, sometimes clearedContractual obligationInstitutions, corporates, fundsCounterparty, valuation, basis
CFDCash-settled exposure to price movementOTC providerContractual exposure, no asset ownershipSpeculators, hedgersLeverage, provider, funding, gap risk
WarrantSecuritised option-like instrumentExchange or issuer marketHolder has rightInvestorsIssuer, gearing, time decay
Structured productInvestment payoff built from bond plus derivativeIssuer productDepends on termsRetail/professional investorsIssuer credit, complexity, liquidity, payoff caps/barriers

Derivatives vocabulary that drives exam answers

TermPractical meaningCommon exam trap
UnderlyingAsset, rate, index, commodity, currency, or credit referenceThe derivative value may move non-linearly relative to the underlying
NotionalReference amount used to calculate cash flowsNotional is not always exchanged
Long positionBenefits from price rising, unless product design differsLong option means bought option, not necessarily bullish if it is a put
Short positionBenefits from price falling, unless product design differsShort option means written option and has obligation
LeverageSmall initial cash controls larger exposureLeverage magnifies both losses and gains
MarginCollateral required to support exposureMargin is not the same as option premium
PremiumPrice paid by option buyer to sellerPremium is paid upfront and is maximum loss for a plain bought option
Mark-to-marketRevalue position using current market pricesFutures settle gains/losses daily, unlike most forwards
SettlementClosing by delivery or cash paymentMany index and rate derivatives settle in cash
BasisDifference between spot and futures/forward priceBasis risk remains even if direction is hedged
Intrinsic valueImmediate exercise value of optionCannot be negative for a plain option
Time valueOption price minus intrinsic valueTime value generally decays as expiry approaches
DeltaSensitivity of option value to underlying priceDelta changes as underlying and time change
VolatilityDegree of price movementHigher expected volatility usually increases option value
Counterparty riskRisk other party fails to performLower in central-cleared exchange-traded contracts, not eliminated in all contexts
Liquidity riskRisk of poor exit price or inability to closeExchange listing does not guarantee deep liquidity

Linear vs non-linear payoff

FeatureLinear derivativesNon-linear derivatives
Typical productsForwards, futures, swaps, CFDsOptions, warrants, some structured products
Payoff shapeOne-for-one or near one-for-one exposureAsymmetric payoff
Buyer/seller symmetryGains and losses are broadly symmetricBuyer and writer have different risk profiles
Upfront paymentUsually none, except margin/collateral or spreadOption premium usually paid upfront
Main exam focusDirection, hedge ratio, basis, marginMoneyness, volatility, Greeks, maximum gain/loss

Forward and futures essentials

Forward vs futures decision table

FeatureForwardFuture
Trading venueOTCExchange
Contract termsBespokeStandardised
CounterpartyDirect counterparty exposureClearing house structure reduces bilateral exposure
LiquidityCan be difficult to closeUsually easier to trade/offset if active contract
Settlement of gains/lossesUsually at maturityMarked to market daily
MarginCollateral may be negotiatedInitial and variation margin expected
FlexibilityHighLower
Main useTailored hedgeStandardised hedge or trading

Long and short futures logic

PositionProfit ifLoss ifTypical hedge use
Long futureFutures price risesFutures price fallsHedge future purchase or protect against price rise
Short futureFutures price fallsFutures price risesHedge existing asset or protect against price fall

Futures payoff

\[ \text{Profit to long futures} = (\text{Closing futures price} - \text{Opening futures price}) \times \text{Contract size} \times \text{Number of contracts} \]\[ \text{Profit to short futures} = (\text{Opening futures price} - \text{Closing futures price}) \times \text{Contract size} \times \text{Number of contracts} \]

Basis and convergence

\[ \text{Basis} = \text{Spot price} - \text{Futures price} \]
ConceptMeaningExam point
Positive basisSpot above futuresDo not assume this is always normal; depends on asset and carry
Negative basisSpot below futuresOften seen where cost of carry exceeds income
ConvergenceFutures and spot move together near deliveryBasis should tend toward zero at expiry for deliverable contracts
Basis riskHedge does not perfectly offset spot exposureA futures hedge can reduce risk without eliminating it

Cost of carry intuition

For investment assets, the futures price is driven by spot price, financing cost, income/yield, storage, convenience yield, and time.

Factor increasesEffect on futures price, all else equal
Spot price risesFutures price rises
Interest/financing cost risesFutures price rises
Storage cost risesFutures price rises
Income/dividend yield risesFutures price falls
Convenience yield risesFutures price falls

Contango and backwardation

TermMarket conditionCommon interpretationTrap
ContangoFutures price above spot priceCarry costs exceed benefits of holdingNot automatically bearish
BackwardationFutures price below spot priceConvenience yield or scarcity may be highNot automatically bullish
Normal contango/backwardationRelationship linked to expected spot and risk premiumUsed differently across textbooks/marketsRead wording carefully

Margin and daily settlement

ItemMeaningCandidate focus
Initial marginCollateral deposited when position openedNot a cost like a premium; it supports obligations
Variation marginDaily settlement of gains/lossesCash flows occur before final close-out
Maintenance marginMinimum margin level before top-up requiredBreach can trigger margin call
Margin callRequest for extra collateralFailure may lead to position closure
Leverage effectExposure exceeds cash depositedPercentage loss on margin can be large

Margin return trap

If a futures position has exposure of 100,000 and initial margin of 5,000, a 2,000 trading loss is:

  • 2% of exposure.
  • 40% of initial margin.

The exam may test whether you calculate gain/loss against the contract value or the cash committed.

Hedging with futures

Number of contracts

\[ \text{Number of futures contracts} = \frac{\text{Value of exposure to hedge}}{\text{Futures price} \times \text{Contract multiplier}} \]

If using beta-adjusted equity index hedging:

\[ \text{Number of index futures} = \frac{\text{Portfolio value} \times \text{Portfolio beta}}{\text{Futures price} \times \text{Contract multiplier}} \]
Hedge objectiveFutures position
Protect existing holding from price fallSell futures
Protect future purchase from price riseBuy futures
Reduce portfolio betaSell index futures
Increase portfolio betaBuy index futures
Hedge currency receiptSell currency forward/future in receivable currency
Hedge currency paymentBuy currency forward/future in payable currency

Hedge quality checklist

  • Is the underlying in the derivative the same as the exposure?
  • Is the expiry aligned with the exposure date?
  • Is the contract size creating over-hedging or under-hedging?
  • Is beta, duration, or currency conversion required?
  • Does basis risk remain?
  • Are margin calls affordable during the hedge?

Options core reference

Call and put payoff

\[ \text{Call payoff at expiry} = \max(\text{Underlying price} - \text{Exercise price}, 0) \]\[ \text{Put payoff at expiry} = \max(\text{Exercise price} - \text{Underlying price}, 0) \]\[ \text{Option profit to buyer} = \text{Payoff} - \text{Premium paid} \]\[ \text{Option profit to writer} = \text{Premium received} - \text{Payoff} \]

Plain option position summary

PositionMarket viewMaximum lossMaximum gainBreakeven at expiry
Long callBullishPremiumUnlimited for ordinary share/index callExercise price + premium
Short callNeutral/bearishPotentially unlimitedPremiumExercise price + premium
Long putBearish or protectivePremiumExercise price less premium, if underlying could fall to zeroExercise price - premium
Short putNeutral/bullishExercise price less premium, if underlying could fall to zeroPremiumExercise price - premium

Moneyness

OptionIn the moneyAt the moneyOut of the money
CallUnderlying price > exercise priceUnderlying price = exercise priceUnderlying price < exercise price
PutUnderlying price < exercise priceUnderlying price = exercise priceUnderlying price > exercise price

Intrinsic and time value

\[ \text{Option premium} = \text{Intrinsic value} + \text{Time value} \]
OptionIntrinsic value
CallHigher of zero or underlying price - exercise price
PutHigher of zero or exercise price - underlying price

High-yield points:

  • Intrinsic value cannot be negative.
  • Out-of-the-money options have zero intrinsic value.
  • Time value is normally positive before expiry but decays toward expiry.
  • Deep in-the-money options have high intrinsic value and may have lower percentage time value.

Option pricing drivers

Driver risesCall valuePut valueReason
Underlying priceUpDownCalls benefit from upside; puts from downside
Exercise priceDownUpLower strike helps calls; higher strike helps puts
Time to expiryUsually upUsually upMore time for favourable movement
VolatilityUpUpBoth calls and puts benefit from optionality
Risk-free rateUsually upUsually downPresent value effect on strike
Dividends/incomeDownUpUnderlying expected to fall when income is detached

Common trap: higher volatility is generally favourable to option buyers and unfavourable to option writers, because the buyer has asymmetric upside and limited downside.

Put-call parity

For European options on a non-dividend-paying underlying:

[ \text{Call price} + \text{Present value of exercise price}

\text{Put price} + \text{Spot price} ]

Rearranged:

[ \text{Call price} - \text{Put price}

\text{Spot price} - \text{Present value of exercise price} ]

Exam use:

  • Identify synthetic positions.
  • Check whether a quoted option seems relatively expensive.
  • Understand arbitrage logic.
  • Avoid mixing American exercise features or dividends into a simplified parity question unless stated.

Greeks quick table

GreekMeasuresLong callLong putHigh-yield exam point
DeltaSensitivity to underlying pricePositiveNegativeApproximate hedge ratio
GammaSensitivity of delta to underlying pricePositivePositiveShows how unstable delta is
ThetaSensitivity to time passingUsually negativeUsually negativeTime decay hurts option buyers
VegaSensitivity to volatilityPositivePositiveHigher implied volatility helps long options
RhoSensitivity to interest ratesUsually positiveUsually negativeOften less important than delta/vega/theta

Delta hedge shortcut

\[ \text{Underlying units to hedge} = \text{Option delta} \times \text{Number of options} \times \text{Contract size} \]

Interpretation:

  • Long call delta is positive, so a delta-neutral hedge often involves selling underlying.
  • Long put delta is negative, so a delta-neutral hedge often involves buying underlying.
  • Delta hedges must be rebalanced as delta changes.

Option strategies

Core protective and income strategies

StrategyConstructionViewBenefitRisk/trap
Protective putLong underlying + long putBullish but wants downside protectionFloor on lossPremium reduces return
Covered callLong underlying + short callMildly bullish/neutralPremium incomeUpside capped; downside remains
Fiduciary callLong call + cash for exerciseSimilar to protective putSynthetic protected equity exposureRequires correct PV/cash logic
Cash-secured putShort put + cash to buy underlyingWilling buyer at lower effective pricePremium incomeLoss if asset falls sharply
CollarLong underlying + long put + short callProtect downside, cap upsideLower or funded protectionUpside is sacrificed

Volatility strategies

StrategyConstructionProfits ifLoses ifKey exam phrase
Long straddleBuy call and put, same strike/expiryBig move either waySmall move/time decayLong volatility
Short straddleSell call and put, same strike/expiryPrice remains near strikeLarge move either wayHigh risk, short volatility
Long strangleBuy OTM call and OTM putVery large move either wayPrice stays between strikesCheaper than straddle, needs bigger move
Short strangleSell OTM call and OTM putPrice stays in rangeLarge move beyond strikesPremium income with tail risk

Spread strategies

StrategyConstructionViewMaximum gain/loss profile
Bull call spreadBuy lower-strike call, sell higher-strike callModerately bullishGain and loss capped
Bear put spreadBuy higher-strike put, sell lower-strike putModerately bearishGain and loss capped
Calendar spreadDifferent expiries, often same strikeTime/volatility viewDepends on term structure and timing
ButterflyCombination around middle strikeLow volatility/range viewLimited gain/loss

Interest rate derivatives

Bond price and interest rate relationship

If market ratesBond priceFixed-rate payer position
RiseFallsGains if paying fixed/receiving floating in swap terms may be favourable
FallRisesGains if receiving fixed/paying floating may be favourable

Always identify whether the position is exposed to price, yield, or cash flow.

Forward rate agreements

An FRA locks in an interest rate for a future borrowing or lending period.

PartyUseGains if actual reference rate
FRA buyerHedge future borrowing rate riseRises above agreed FRA rate
FRA sellerHedge future lending/investment rate fallFalls below agreed FRA rate

Generic FRA settlement logic:

\[ \text{Settlement amount} = \frac{(\text{Reference rate} - \text{FRA rate}) \times \text{Notional} \times \text{Days}/\text{Year basis}} {1 + \text{Reference rate} \times \text{Days}/\text{Year basis}} \]

Interpretation:

  • If reference rate exceeds FRA rate, buyer receives and seller pays.
  • If reference rate is below FRA rate, seller receives and buyer pays.
  • Settlement is normally discounted because payment is made at the start of the notional loan period.

Interest rate futures

ExposureConcernHedge
Future borrowerRates may riseSell interest rate futures if contract price rises when rates fall
Future lender/investorRates may fallBuy interest rate futures if contract price rises when rates fall

High-yield trap: many short-term interest rate futures are quoted as 100 minus implied rate. Therefore:

  • Rates rise -> futures price falls.
  • Rates fall -> futures price rises.

Interest rate swaps

Swap positionCash flowsEconomic view/use
Pay fixed, receive floatingPays fixed rate, receives floating rateHedge floating-rate borrowing; benefits if floating rates rise
Receive fixed, pay floatingReceives fixed rate, pays floating rateHedge fixed-rate assets or falling-rate view
Plain vanilla IRSFixed leg vs floating leg in same currencyNotional usually not exchanged
Currency swapCash flows in different currenciesNotional may be exchanged initially/finally depending on structure

Net swap cash flow for a period:

\[ \text{Net cash flow} = (\text{Received rate} - \text{Paid rate}) \times \text{Notional} \times \text{Day-count fraction} \]

Currency derivatives

NeedPossible derivativePosition logic
Will receive foreign currencyForward/futureSell that foreign currency forward
Will pay foreign currencyForward/futureBuy that foreign currency forward
Want protection but retain upsideCurrency optionBuy option rather than lock rate
Convert debt exposureCurrency swapExchange interest and sometimes principal cash flows

Forward exchange rate intuition

A currency with a higher interest rate tends to trade at a forward discount relative to a lower-interest-rate currency, based on covered interest parity logic.

High-yield traps:

  • Always identify the base and terms currency in the quote.
  • Check whether the question asks for domestic currency value or foreign currency amount.
  • A forward contract removes upside as well as downside.
  • An option preserves upside but costs premium.

Equity derivatives and index products

ProductExposureCommon useKey risk
Equity index futureBroad market indexBeta hedge, tactical allocationBasis and margin
Single-stock futureSpecific share exposureHedge or leverageConcentrated price risk
Equity optionShare or index optionalityProtection, income, speculationPremium/time decay/writing risk
Equity swapReturn on equity/index vs rate or other returnSynthetic exposure or financingCounterparty and valuation
CFDLong/short price exposure without ownershipLeveraged trading or hedgeProvider, leverage, funding, gap risk

Equity index hedge decision

Portfolio issueCandidate action
Portfolio likely to fall with marketSell index futures
Portfolio has beta above 1More contracts needed than market-value-only hedge
Portfolio has beta below 1Fewer contracts needed
Hedge only part of exposureMultiply by target hedge percentage
Portfolio differs from indexExpect tracking/basis risk

Credit derivatives

ProductBasic structureProtection buyerProtection seller
Credit default swapPremium paid for compensation if credit event occursPays spread, receives protectionReceives spread, takes credit risk
Total return swapTotal return of asset exchanged for financing legReceives or pays asset economics depending sideOpposite economics

CDS exam logic:

  • Buying CDS protection is economically similar to reducing or shorting credit exposure.
  • Selling CDS protection is economically similar to taking long credit exposure.
  • Main risks include counterparty risk, documentation risk, basis risk, and jump-to-default risk.

Commodity derivatives

FeatureExam relevance
Storage costCan materially affect forward/futures price
Convenience yieldBenefit of holding physical commodity; can support backwardation
SeasonalitySupply/demand patterns can affect pricing
Delivery riskPhysical settlement may be impractical for financial investors
Roll yieldGain/loss from replacing expiring futures with later contracts

Commodity trap: spot price movement and futures roll return are not the same. A commodity futures strategy can lose money in a rising spot market if roll costs are large.

CFDs, warrants, and structured products

Contracts for difference

FeaturePractical point
OwnershipClient does not own the underlying asset
Profit/lossDifference between opening and closing price, adjusted for size
LeverageSmall deposit controls large exposure
FinancingLong positions often incur funding costs; details depend on provider terms
Short exposureCan be easier than borrowing and short-selling the underlying
Main risksLeverage, provider counterparty, liquidity, gap moves, forced close-out

Warrants and covered warrants

FeatureWarrant / covered warrant
Economic natureOption-like securitised product
IssuerIssuer credit risk matters
ExerciseMay be cash-settled or physically settled depending on terms
GearingPrice may move more sharply than underlying
Time decayValue can erode as expiry approaches
Suitability issueComplexity and loss of premium/capital at risk

Structured products

StructureTypical building blocksExam focus
Capital-protected noteZero-coupon bond + optionProtection depends on issuer and terms
AutocallableNote + embedded options/barriersEarly redemption and barrier risk
Reverse convertibleNote + short put-like exposureEnhanced income but downside equity risk
Participation noteBond + call optionUpside participation may be capped or partial
Barrier productOption with knock-in/knock-out featurePath dependency matters

Structured product traps:

  • “Capital protected” may mean protection only at maturity and subject to issuer credit.
  • Income enhancement usually comes from giving up upside or taking downside/barrier risk.
  • Secondary-market liquidity may be limited.
  • Payoff depends on precise terms, not product name alone.

Exchange-traded vs OTC derivatives

IssueExchange-tradedOTC
StandardisationHighLow to medium
FlexibilityLowerHigher
TransparencyUsually higherOften lower
Counterparty riskMitigated by clearing arrangementsBilateral unless collateralised/cleared
LiquidityOften better, but contract-dependentDepends on counterparties and terms
ValuationMarket prices may be observableModel/pricing assumptions may matter
Close-outOffset trade often possibleMay require negotiation or unwind price

Clearing, collateral, and operational risk

TermMeaningWhy it matters
Central counterpartyInterposes itself between buyer and sellerReduces bilateral counterparty risk
NovationReplacement of original trade with CCP-facing tradesChanges counterparty exposure
CollateralAssets posted to secure obligationsReduces credit exposure but creates liquidity needs
HaircutReduction applied to collateral valueProtects collateral receiver
NettingOffsetting exposures between partiesReduces settlement/credit exposure
Close-outTermination and valuation after default or unwindDocumentation and valuation are critical
Settlement riskRisk one leg settles but the other does notEspecially relevant across currencies/time zones
Model riskValuation model is wrong or misusedImportant for complex OTC products

Suitability and advice-focused decision points

For an advice-oriented derivatives exam, expect scenarios where the technically correct product is not suitable for the client.

Client need or fact patternMore suitable directionLess suitable / caution
Wants to insure portfolio downside and retain upsideProtective put or collarShort futures if upside retention is important
Wants income from existing holding and accepts capped upsideCovered callNaked call writing
Needs certainty over future exchange rateForwardOption if unwilling to pay premium may not fit
Wants protection but still wants favourable FX movementCurrency optionForward locks both upside and downside
Cannot meet margin callsBought option may be safer than futuresFutures/CFDs can force liquidity stress
Low risk tolerance and poor product understandingAvoid complex/leverage productsStructured products with barriers, short options, CFDs
Has concentrated shareholdingProtective put/collar may manage downsideSelling calls may create disposal/opportunity issues
Seeks leveraged short-term speculationCFD/option may provide exposureMust assess loss capacity and leverage risk
Needs bespoke hedgeOTC derivative may fitStandard futures may leave basis/maturity mismatch

Suitability checklist

  • What is the client trying to hedge or achieve?
  • Is the derivative for hedging, income, speculation, or arbitrage?
  • Does the client understand leverage and possible losses?
  • Can the client meet margin calls and liquidity needs?
  • Is maximum loss known or potentially open-ended?
  • Is the product exchange-traded or OTC?
  • Is counterparty/issuer risk acceptable?
  • Is the term aligned with the client’s time horizon?
  • Are costs, spreads, premiums, and funding charges understood?
  • Could a simpler product achieve the same objective?

Risk reference

RiskDefinitionProducts where prominentExam clue
Market riskUnderlying moves adverselyAll derivativesDirectional exposure
Leverage riskLosses magnified relative to initial cashFutures, CFDs, options writingSmall deposit, large exposure
Counterparty riskOther party defaultsOTC swaps/forwards/CFDs/structured productsBilateral contract or issuer note
Liquidity riskCannot trade or unwind at fair priceOTC, complex products, thin contractsWide spread or bespoke terms
Basis riskHedge instrument and exposure differFutures hedges, cross hedgesImperfect offset
Volatility riskImplied/realised volatility changesOptions, warrants, structured productsOption value changes without spot move
Gap riskPrice jumps through stop/margin levelsCFDs, short options, leveraged futuresOvernight/event moves
Funding riskFinancing cost changes or funding unavailableCFDs, swaps, leveraged strategiesCarry/funding leg
Operational riskProcessing, confirmation, settlement failuresOTC and exchange-tradedDocumentation and controls
Legal/documentation riskContract terms do not behave as expectedOTC/structured productsPayoff wording and close-out terms
Model riskValuation relies on flawed assumptionsOTC options, exotics, structured productsNo reliable market price

High-yield calculation sheet

Percentage return

\[ \text{Percentage return} = \frac{\text{Gain or loss}}{\text{Initial cash outlay}} \times 100 \]

Use the correct denominator: premium, margin, full exposure, or invested capital depending on the question.

Futures contract value

\[ \text{Contract value} = \text{Futures price} \times \text{Contract multiplier} \]

Futures total profit or loss

\[ \text{Total P/L} = \text{Price movement} \times \text{Contract multiplier} \times \text{Number of contracts} \]

Option total premium

\[ \text{Total premium} = \text{Option premium per unit} \times \text{Contract size} \times \text{Number of contracts} \]

Long call profit

\[ \text{Long call profit} = \max(\text{Underlying price} - \text{Exercise price}, 0) - \text{Premium} \]

Long put profit

\[ \text{Long put profit} = \max(\text{Exercise price} - \text{Underlying price}, 0) - \text{Premium} \]

Breakeven points

\[ \text{Call breakeven} = \text{Exercise price} + \text{Premium} \]\[ \text{Put breakeven} = \text{Exercise price} - \text{Premium} \]

Swap period cash flow

\[ \text{Cash flow} = \text{Rate} \times \text{Notional} \times \text{Day-count fraction} \]

Day-count fraction

\[ \text{Day-count fraction} = \frac{\text{Number of days in period}}{\text{Day-count denominator}} \]

Use the day-count basis stated in the question.

Worked mini-examples

Long call

Investor buys a call with strike 100 and premium 6.

Underlying at expiryPayoffProfit/loss
900-6
1000-6
10660
1202014

Breakeven is 106.

Protective put

Investor owns a share at 100 and buys a put with strike 95 for premium 3.

Underlying at expiryShare valuePut payoffTotal before original costNet economic result vs 100 share cost plus premium
80801595-8
9595095-8
11011001107

The put creates a floor, but the premium reduces upside.

Futures hedge

Portfolio value is 500,000. Index future is 5,000 with multiplier 10. Portfolio beta is 1.2.

[ \text{Contracts} = \frac{500{,}000 \times 1.2}{5{,}000 \times 10}

12 ]

To reduce market exposure, sell 12 index futures, subject to rounding and hedge objective.

Common exam traps

TrapCorrect approach
Confusing premium and marginPremium is paid for an option; margin supports a futures/CFD/short option obligation
Treating long put as bullishLong put is bearish or protective
Ignoring contract multiplierMultiply quoted price movement by contract size
Ignoring number of contractsTotal P/L must include all contracts
Assuming forwards have daily marginFutures are typically daily marked to market; forwards usually settle at maturity
Thinking hedging removes all riskBasis, liquidity, margin, and counterparty risks can remain
Treating structured product name as payoffRead barriers, caps, participation, maturity, and issuer risk
Assuming option buyer can lose more than premiumPlain bought option maximum loss is premium, excluding transaction costs and special product features
Assuming option writer risk is always limitedNaked calls can have unlimited loss; short puts can have very large loss
Forgetting time decayLong options lose time value as expiry approaches
Reversing interest rate futures price logicMany contracts rise when implied rates fall
Ignoring client capacity for lossTechnically effective hedge may still be unsuitable

Scenario decision guide

Scenario wordingLikely answer path
“Client wants to protect an existing equity portfolio but keep upside”Buy puts or use collar
“Client wants to lock in a price for future purchase”Long forward/future
“Client wants to lock in sale proceeds”Short forward/future
“Client expects little price movement and wants income”Covered call if holding asset; short straddle/strangle is higher risk
“Client expects large move but unsure direction”Long straddle or strangle
“Company will borrow in future and fears rising rates”FRA buyer or appropriate interest rate hedge
“Company will receive foreign currency later”Sell that currency forward
“Investor wants leveraged long exposure without owning shares”CFD, futures, call option, or warrant depending risk and suitability
“Investor cannot tolerate losses beyond initial outlay”Bought option-style exposure, not futures/CFDs/short options
“Need bespoke dates and notional”OTC forward/swap/option, with counterparty risk assessment

Last-week revision checklist

  • Recreate payoff diagrams for long/short calls and puts from memory.
  • Practise breakeven, maximum gain, and maximum loss for each option strategy.
  • Drill futures P/L using contract size and number of contracts.
  • Review hedge direction: buy to hedge future purchase, sell to hedge existing holding.
  • Recheck interest rate futures quote logic.
  • Compare OTC and exchange-traded derivatives without relying on memorised slogans.
  • Practise suitability scenarios: objective, risk tolerance, knowledge, liquidity, loss capacity.
  • Review structured product payoff terms: cap, floor, barrier, participation, issuer risk.
  • Mark any question where you assumed a product feature not stated.

Practical next step

Use this Quick Reference as a checklist, then complete a timed mixed set of CISI IAD Derivatives-style questions covering futures, options, swaps, suitability, and calculations. Review every missed question by identifying the product, position, payoff, risk, and client objective before moving to another practice set.

Browse Certification Practice Tests by Exam Family