CISI IAD Derivatives Technical Unit Cheat Sheet

Cheat sheet: derivatives formulas, product distinctions, risk concepts, and exam traps for CISI IAD Derivatives Technical Unit candidates.

Use the tables for a quick pre-exam check. Expand a topic’s notes for explanations, examples, and additional distinctions.

Scope and study context
  • Product mechanics: forwards, futures, options, swaps, structured products, and contracts for difference.
  • Payoff logic: who gains, who loses, when cash flows occur, and what risk remains.
  • Suitability and risk language: leverage, liquidity, counterparty exposure, margin, volatility, and client understanding.
  • Calculation shortcuts: option payoff, futures hedge sizing, margin, basis, FRA settlement, and swap cash flows.

For efficient practice, do not just take full mocks immediately. Work through the question bank by topic first:

  1. Product identification drills Practise recognising futures, options, swaps, CFDs, warrants, and structured products from wording alone.

  2. Payoff and break-even drills Repeat call/put, long/short, premium, and strike calculations until they are automatic.

  3. Hedging direction drills For each scenario, write: “client risk is ___, so derivative must gain if ___.”

  4. Interest rate and FX drills These are common sources of reversal errors. Practise slowly, then increase speed.

  5. Suitability drills For each client scenario, identify objective, capacity for loss, liquidity need, knowledge, and product risk.

  6. Mixed mock exams Once topic accuracy improves, use timed mocks to practise switching between calculations, concepts, and advice judgement.

After each practice set, review detailed explanations and record the exact reason for each missed question: terminology, direction, formula, suitability, or reading error.

Core derivatives map

ProductMain ideaTypical marketObligation or right?Main usersPrimary risks
ForwardBespoke agreement to trade later at fixed priceOTCObligation on both partiesHedgers, corporates, institutionsCounterparty, liquidity, settlement
FutureStandardised exchange-traded forward-like contractExchangeObligation on both partiesHedgers, traders, institutionsMargin calls, basis, leverage
Call optionRight to buy underlyingExchange or OTCBuyer has right; seller has obligationHedgers, investors, speculatorsPremium loss for buyer; potentially large loss for seller
Put optionRight to sell underlyingExchange or OTCBuyer has right; seller has obligationHedgers, investors, speculatorsPremium loss for buyer; large downside for seller
SwapExchange of cash flowsOTC, sometimes clearedContractual obligationInstitutions, corporates, fundsCounterparty, valuation, basis
CFDCash-settled exposure to price movementOTC providerContractual exposure, no asset ownershipSpeculators, hedgersLeverage, provider, funding, gap risk
WarrantSecuritised option-like instrumentExchange or issuer marketHolder has rightInvestorsIssuer, gearing, time decay
Structured productInvestment payoff built from bond plus derivativeIssuer productDepends on termsRetail/professional investorsIssuer credit, complexity, liquidity, payoff caps/barriers
Notes and examples

Core Derivatives Map

InstrumentCore ideaTypical useMain exam trap
ForwardOTC agreement to buy/sell later at agreed priceCustom hedgingCounterparty risk and no daily margining unless agreed
FutureExchange-traded forward-style contractHedging, speculation, price discoveryDaily marking-to-market changes cash flow
OptionRight, not obligation, to buy/sellDownside protection, leverage, strategy constructionBuyer and seller risk profiles are very different
SwapExchange of cash flowsInterest rate, currency, credit, or return exposure managementNotional is usually reference amount, not exchanged in all swaps
CFDLeveraged contract on price movementShort-term speculation or hedgingLosses can exceed initial margin depending on structure
Warrant / covered warrantSecuritised option-like instrumentLeveraged exposureIssuer risk, liquidity, time decay
Structured productPackage of bond and derivative featuresDefined payoff profileCapital protection may be conditional or issuer-dependent
Credit derivativeTransfers credit riskCredit hedging or exposure takingCredit event definitions and counterparty risk matter

Forward FX Logic

ExposureRiskHedge
Future foreign-currency receiptForeign currency weakensSell foreign currency forward
Future foreign-currency paymentForeign currency strengthensBuy foreign currency forward
Investor holding overseas assetCurrency depreciation reduces domestic returnHedge by selling foreign currency
Borrower with foreign-currency debtForeign currency strengthensHedge by buying foreign currency

Common trap: decide from the client’s future cash flow, not from whether the currency is “good” or “bad.” If the client must receive it, they may need to sell it. If they must pay it, they may need to buy it.

Derivatives vocabulary that drives exam answers

TermPractical meaningCommon exam trap
UnderlyingAsset, rate, index, commodity, currency, or credit referenceThe derivative value may move non-linearly relative to the underlying
NotionalReference amount used to calculate cash flowsNotional is not always exchanged
Long positionBenefits from price rising, unless product design differsLong option means bought option, not necessarily bullish if it is a put
Short positionBenefits from price falling, unless product design differsShort option means written option and has obligation
LeverageSmall initial cash controls larger exposureLeverage magnifies both losses and gains
MarginCollateral required to support exposureMargin is not the same as option premium
PremiumPrice paid by option buyer to sellerPremium is paid upfront and is maximum loss for a plain bought option
Mark-to-marketRevalue position using current market pricesFutures settle gains/losses daily, unlike most forwards
SettlementClosing by delivery or cash paymentMany index and rate derivatives settle in cash
BasisDifference between spot and futures/forward priceBasis risk remains even if direction is hedged
Intrinsic valueImmediate exercise value of optionCannot be negative for a plain option
Time valueOption price minus intrinsic valueTime value generally decays as expiry approaches
DeltaSensitivity of option value to underlying priceDelta changes as underlying and time change
VolatilityDegree of price movementHigher expected volatility usually increases option value
Counterparty riskRisk other party fails to performLower in central-cleared exchange-traded contracts, not eliminated in all contexts
Liquidity riskRisk of poor exit price or inability to closeExchange listing does not guarantee deep liquidity

Linear vs non-linear payoff

FeatureLinear derivativesNon-linear derivatives
Typical productsForwards, futures, swaps, CFDsOptions, warrants, some structured products
Payoff shapeOne-for-one or near one-for-one exposureAsymmetric payoff
Buyer/seller symmetryGains and losses are broadly symmetricBuyer and writer have different risk profiles
Upfront paymentUsually none, except margin/collateral or spreadOption premium usually paid upfront
Main exam focusDirection, hedge ratio, basis, marginMoneyness, volatility, Greeks, maximum gain/loss

Forward and futures essentials

Forward vs futures decision table

FeatureForwardFuture
Trading venueOTCExchange
Contract termsBespokeStandardised
CounterpartyDirect counterparty exposureClearing house structure reduces bilateral exposure
LiquidityCan be difficult to closeUsually easier to trade/offset if active contract
Settlement of gains/lossesUsually at maturityMarked to market daily
MarginCollateral may be negotiatedInitial and variation margin expected
FlexibilityHighLower
Main useTailored hedgeStandardised hedge or trading
Notes and examples

Long and short futures logic

PositionProfit ifLoss ifTypical hedge use
Long futureFutures price risesFutures price fallsHedge future purchase or protect against price rise
Short futureFutures price fallsFutures price risesHedge existing asset or protect against price fall

Futures payoff

\[ \text{Profit to long futures} = (\text{Closing futures price} - \text{Opening futures price}) \times \text{Contract size} \times \text{Number of contracts} \]\[ \text{Profit to short futures} = (\text{Opening futures price} - \text{Closing futures price}) \times \text{Contract size} \times \text{Number of contracts} \]

Basis and convergence

\[ \text{Basis} = \text{Spot price} - \text{Futures price} \]
ConceptMeaningExam point
Positive basisSpot above futuresDo not assume this is always normal; depends on asset and carry
Negative basisSpot below futuresOften seen where cost of carry exceeds income
ConvergenceFutures and spot move together near deliveryBasis should tend toward zero at expiry for deliverable contracts
Basis riskHedge does not perfectly offset spot exposureA futures hedge can reduce risk without eliminating it

Cost of carry intuition

For investment assets, the futures price is driven by spot price, financing cost, income/yield, storage, convenience yield, and time.

Factor increasesEffect on futures price, all else equal
Spot price risesFutures price rises
Interest/financing cost risesFutures price rises
Storage cost risesFutures price rises
Income/dividend yield risesFutures price falls
Convenience yield risesFutures price falls

Contango and backwardation

TermMarket conditionCommon interpretationTrap
ContangoFutures price above spot priceCarry costs exceed benefits of holdingNot automatically bearish
BackwardationFutures price below spot priceConvenience yield or scarcity may be highNot automatically bullish
Normal contango/backwardationRelationship linked to expected spot and risk premiumUsed differently across textbooks/marketsRead wording carefully

Futures Contract Essentials

FeatureReview point
StandardisationExchange-traded futures have standard contract terms
MarginInitial and variation margin manage daily credit exposure
Marking-to-marketGains/losses are settled daily
Clearing houseReduces counterparty risk compared with bilateral OTC contracts
Closing outMany futures positions are closed before delivery
Contract sizeConverts price movement into monetary profit/loss
Tick size/valueSmallest price movement and its cash effect

Core calculation:

\[ \text{Futures P\&L} = \text{price movement} \times \text{contract size} \times \text{number of contracts} \]

Futures Hedging Logic

ExposureHedgeReason
Own asset and fear price fallSell futuresShort futures gains when futures price falls
Need to buy asset later and fear price riseBuy futuresLong futures gains when futures price rises
Equity portfolio and fear market fallSell index futuresOffsets broad market decline
Underinvested cash and fear market riseBuy index futuresGains from market rise before physical investment

For equity index hedging, candidates often see a contract-number calculation. The logic is:

\[ \text{Contracts} = \frac{\text{portfolio value} \times \text{beta adjustment}}{\text{futures price} \times \text{contract multiplier}} \]

If the question gives a target beta, the adjustment is often current beta minus target beta for a hedge that reduces exposure.

Basis, Contango, and Backwardation

TermMeaningTrap
BasisDifference between spot and futures priceBasis risk means hedge may not offset perfectly
ContangoFutures price above spot priceOften linked to carry costs
BackwardationFutures price below spot priceOften linked to convenience yield or scarcity
ConvergenceSpot and futures prices tend to align near expiryHedge effectiveness can change before expiry

Do not assume futures hedges are perfect. Mismatched maturity, asset, contract size, or currency can all create basis risk.

Forward Contracts

Forwards are more customisable than futures but usually have more counterparty risk. They are common for foreign exchange and bespoke hedging.

FeatureForwardFuture
TradingOTCExchange
TermsCustomStandardised
Counterparty riskBilateralReduced by clearing
MarginingAs agreedStandardised margin process
LiquidityDepends on counterparty/marketOften stronger for standard contracts
Closing outBy negotiation or offsetUsually easier via exchange

Margin and daily settlement

ItemMeaningCandidate focus
Initial marginCollateral deposited when position openedNot a cost like a premium; it supports obligations
Variation marginDaily settlement of gains/lossesCash flows occur before final close-out
Maintenance marginMinimum margin level before top-up requiredBreach can trigger margin call
Margin callRequest for extra collateralFailure may lead to position closure
Leverage effectExposure exceeds cash depositedPercentage loss on margin can be large

Margin return trap

If a futures position has exposure of 100,000 and initial margin of 5,000, a 2,000 trading loss is:

  • 2% of exposure.
  • 40% of initial margin.

The exam may test whether you calculate gain/loss against the contract value or the cash committed.

Hedging with futures

Number of contracts

\[ \text{Number of futures contracts} = \frac{\text{Value of exposure to hedge}}{\text{Futures price} \times \text{Contract multiplier}} \]

If using beta-adjusted equity index hedging:

\[ \text{Number of index futures} = \frac{\text{Portfolio value} \times \text{Portfolio beta}}{\text{Futures price} \times \text{Contract multiplier}} \]
Hedge objectiveFutures position
Protect existing holding from price fallSell futures
Protect future purchase from price riseBuy futures
Reduce portfolio betaSell index futures
Increase portfolio betaBuy index futures
Hedge currency receiptSell currency forward/future in receivable currency
Hedge currency paymentBuy currency forward/future in payable currency

Hedge quality checklist

  • Is the underlying in the derivative the same as the exposure?
  • Is the expiry aligned with the exposure date?
  • Is the contract size creating over-hedging or under-hedging?
  • Is beta, duration, or currency conversion required?
  • Does basis risk remain?
  • Are margin calls affordable during the hedge?

Options core reference

Call and put payoff

\[ \text{Call payoff at expiry} = \max(\text{Underlying price} - \text{Exercise price}, 0) \]\[ \text{Put payoff at expiry} = \max(\text{Exercise price} - \text{Underlying price}, 0) \]\[ \text{Option profit to buyer} = \text{Payoff} - \text{Premium paid} \]\[ \text{Option profit to writer} = \text{Premium received} - \text{Payoff} \]

Plain option position summary

PositionMarket viewMaximum lossMaximum gainBreakeven at expiry
Long callBullishPremiumUnlimited for ordinary share/index callExercise price + premium
Short callNeutral/bearishPotentially unlimitedPremiumExercise price + premium
Long putBearish or protectivePremiumExercise price less premium, if underlying could fall to zeroExercise price - premium
Short putNeutral/bullishExercise price less premium, if underlying could fall to zeroPremiumExercise price - premium

Moneyness

OptionIn the moneyAt the moneyOut of the money
CallUnderlying price > exercise priceUnderlying price = exercise priceUnderlying price < exercise price
PutUnderlying price < exercise priceUnderlying price = exercise priceUnderlying price > exercise price

Intrinsic and time value

\[ \text{Option premium} = \text{Intrinsic value} + \text{Time value} \]
OptionIntrinsic value
CallHigher of zero or underlying price - exercise price
PutHigher of zero or exercise price - underlying price

High-yield points:

  • Intrinsic value cannot be negative.
  • Out-of-the-money options have zero intrinsic value.
  • Time value is normally positive before expiry but decays toward expiry.
  • Deep in-the-money options have high intrinsic value and may have lower percentage time value.
Notes and examples

Options Cheat Sheet

Options are highly testable because they combine terminology, payoff logic, risk, and calculations.

Calls and Puts

OptionBuyer has the right toBuyer viewSeller obligationBuyer max lossSeller risk
CallBuy underlying at strikeBullishSell if exercisedPremiumPotentially very large
PutSell underlying at strikeBearish/protectiveBuy if exercisedPremiumLarge, but underlying cannot fall below zero

Moneyness

OptionIn the moneyAt the moneyOut of the money
CallUnderlying price > strikeUnderlying price = strikeUnderlying price < strike
PutUnderlying price < strikeUnderlying price = strikeUnderlying price > strike

Intrinsic Value, Time Value, and Break-Even

ConceptCallPut
Intrinsic valueMax(0, underlying - strike)Max(0, strike - underlying)
Time valueOption premium - intrinsic valueOption premium - intrinsic value
Long option break-evenStrike + premiumStrike - premium
Short option break-evenStrike + premiumStrike - premium

Key trap: an option can be out of the money but still have value because it may have time value.

Option Payoff Formulas

\[ \text{Long call profit} = \max(0, S_T - K) - \text{premium} \]\[ \text{Long put profit} = \max(0, K - S_T) - \text{premium} \]

Where \(S_T\) is the underlying price at expiry and \(K\) is the strike price.

Option Greeks

GreekMeasuresLong option exposureCommon interpretation
DeltaSensitivity to underlying priceCalls positive, puts negativeDirectional exposure
GammaSensitivity of deltaUsually positive for long optionsDelta changes faster near strike
ThetaSensitivity to time passingUsually negative for long optionsTime decay hurts buyers
VegaSensitivity to volatilityUsually positive for long optionsHigher volatility helps option value
RhoSensitivity to interest ratesVaries by option typeOften less central than delta/vega/theta

Common trap: volatility benefits option buyers because it increases the chance of favourable extreme outcomes. It usually hurts option sellers, all else equal.

Option Pricing Drivers

Driver risesCall value usuallyPut value usuallyWhy
Underlying priceIncreasesDecreasesCalls benefit from price rise
Strike priceDecreasesIncreasesHigher strike makes calls less attractive, puts more attractive
Time to expiryIncreasesIncreasesMore time for favourable movement
VolatilityIncreasesIncreasesMore uncertainty benefits optionality
Interest ratesOften increaseOften decreaseCarry and present value effects
DividendsOften decreaseOften increaseUnderlying price may fall when dividend paid

Option pricing drivers

Driver risesCall valuePut valueReason
Underlying priceUpDownCalls benefit from upside; puts from downside
Exercise priceDownUpLower strike helps calls; higher strike helps puts
Time to expiryUsually upUsually upMore time for favourable movement
VolatilityUpUpBoth calls and puts benefit from optionality
Risk-free rateUsually upUsually downPresent value effect on strike
Dividends/incomeDownUpUnderlying expected to fall when income is detached

Common trap: higher volatility is generally favourable to option buyers and unfavourable to option writers, because the buyer has asymmetric upside and limited downside.

Put-call parity

For European options on a non-dividend-paying underlying:

[ \text{Call price} + \text{Present value of exercise price}

\text{Put price} + \text{Spot price} ]

Rearranged:

[ \text{Call price} - \text{Put price}

\text{Spot price} - \text{Present value of exercise price} ]

Exam use:

  • Identify synthetic positions.
  • Check whether a quoted option seems relatively expensive.
  • Understand arbitrage logic.
  • Avoid mixing American exercise features or dividends into a simplified parity question unless stated.

Greeks quick table

GreekMeasuresLong callLong putHigh-yield exam point
DeltaSensitivity to underlying pricePositiveNegativeApproximate hedge ratio
GammaSensitivity of delta to underlying pricePositivePositiveShows how unstable delta is
ThetaSensitivity to time passingUsually negativeUsually negativeTime decay hurts option buyers
VegaSensitivity to volatilityPositivePositiveHigher implied volatility helps long options
RhoSensitivity to interest ratesUsually positiveUsually negativeOften less important than delta/vega/theta

Delta hedge shortcut

\[ \text{Underlying units to hedge} = \text{Option delta} \times \text{Number of options} \times \text{Contract size} \]

Interpretation:

  • Long call delta is positive, so a delta-neutral hedge often involves selling underlying.
  • Long put delta is negative, so a delta-neutral hedge often involves buying underlying.
  • Delta hedges must be rebalanced as delta changes.

Option strategies

Core protective and income strategies

StrategyConstructionViewBenefitRisk/trap
Protective putLong underlying + long putBullish but wants downside protectionFloor on lossPremium reduces return
Covered callLong underlying + short callMildly bullish/neutralPremium incomeUpside capped; downside remains
Fiduciary callLong call + cash for exerciseSimilar to protective putSynthetic protected equity exposureRequires correct PV/cash logic
Cash-secured putShort put + cash to buy underlyingWilling buyer at lower effective pricePremium incomeLoss if asset falls sharply
CollarLong underlying + long put + short callProtect downside, cap upsideLower or funded protectionUpside is sacrificed
Notes and examples

Volatility strategies

StrategyConstructionProfits ifLoses ifKey exam phrase
Long straddleBuy call and put, same strike/expiryBig move either waySmall move/time decayLong volatility
Short straddleSell call and put, same strike/expiryPrice remains near strikeLarge move either wayHigh risk, short volatility
Long strangleBuy OTM call and OTM putVery large move either wayPrice stays between strikesCheaper than straddle, needs bigger move
Short strangleSell OTM call and OTM putPrice stays in rangeLarge move beyond strikesPremium income with tail risk

Spread strategies

StrategyConstructionViewMaximum gain/loss profile
Bull call spreadBuy lower-strike call, sell higher-strike callModerately bullishGain and loss capped
Bear put spreadBuy higher-strike put, sell lower-strike putModerately bearishGain and loss capped
Calendar spreadDifferent expiries, often same strikeTime/volatility viewDepends on term structure and timing
ButterflyCombination around middle strikeLow volatility/range viewLimited gain/loss

Common Option Strategies

StrategyBuilt fromMarket view / purposeMain risk
Covered callLong asset + short callIncome, mildly bullish/neutralUpside capped; downside in asset remains
Protective putLong asset + long putDownside protectionPremium cost reduces return
Long straddleLong call + long put, same strike/expiryLarge move either wayTime decay if market quiet
Short straddleShort call + short putMarket stays stablePotentially very large loss
Bull call spreadBuy lower strike call, sell higher strike callModerately bullishGain capped
Bear put spreadBuy higher strike put, sell lower strike putModerately bearishGain capped
CollarLong asset + long put + short callLimit downside, sacrifice upsideUpside capped

A common question-bank trap is confusing profit direction with risk size. For example, a short call benefits from a flat or falling market, but the key suitability issue is the potentially very large loss if the market rises sharply.

Interest rate derivatives

Bond price and interest rate relationship

If market ratesBond priceFixed-rate payer position
RiseFallsGains if paying fixed/receiving floating in swap terms may be favourable
FallRisesGains if receiving fixed/paying floating may be favourable
Notes and examples

Always identify whether the position is exposed to price, yield, or cash flow.

Forward rate agreements

An FRA locks in an interest rate for a future borrowing or lending period.

PartyUseGains if actual reference rate
FRA buyerHedge future borrowing rate riseRises above agreed FRA rate
FRA sellerHedge future lending/investment rate fallFalls below agreed FRA rate

Generic FRA settlement logic:

\[ \text{Settlement amount} = \frac{(\text{Reference rate} - \text{FRA rate}) \times \text{Notional} \times \text{Days}/\text{Year basis}} {1 + \text{Reference rate} \times \text{Days}/\text{Year basis}} \]
  • If reference rate exceeds FRA rate, buyer receives and seller pays.
  • If reference rate is below FRA rate, seller receives and buyer pays.
  • Settlement is normally discounted because payment is made at the start of the notional loan period.

Interest rate futures

ExposureConcernHedge
Future borrowerRates may riseSell interest rate futures if contract price rises when rates fall
Future lender/investorRates may fallBuy interest rate futures if contract price rises when rates fall

High-yield trap: many short-term interest rate futures are quoted as 100 minus implied rate. Therefore:

  • Rates rise -> futures price falls.
  • Rates fall -> futures price rises.

Interest rate swaps

Swap positionCash flowsEconomic view/use
Pay fixed, receive floatingPays fixed rate, receives floating rateHedge floating-rate borrowing; benefits if floating rates rise
Receive fixed, pay floatingReceives fixed rate, pays floating rateHedge fixed-rate assets or falling-rate view
Plain vanilla IRSFixed leg vs floating leg in same currencyNotional usually not exchanged
Currency swapCash flows in different currenciesNotional may be exchanged initially/finally depending on structure

Net swap cash flow for a period:

\[ \text{Net cash flow} = (\text{Received rate} - \text{Paid rate}) \times \text{Notional} \times \text{Day-count fraction} \]

Interest Rate Direction Rules

Market eventBond priceYieldLong bond futureShort bond future
Rates/yields riseFallsRisesLosesGains
Rates/yields fallRisesFallsGainsLoses

High-yield trap: bond prices and yields move inversely.

Floating and Fixed Rate Exposure

Client exposureConcernPossible derivative solutionLogic
Floating-rate borrowerRates risePay fixed / receive floating swap, cap, or suitable futures hedgeOffsets higher floating payments
Floating-rate investorRates fallReceive fixed / pay floating swap or floorProtects income
Fixed-rate borrowerWants floating costReceive fixed / pay floating swapConverts fixed liability economically
Fixed-rate investorWants floating incomePay fixed / receive floating swapConverts fixed asset economically

Swaps

Swap typeCash flows exchangedCommon useMain risks
Interest rate swapFixed vs floating interestManage rate exposureCounterparty, valuation, early termination
Currency swapInterest and often principal in different currenciesFunding and FX exposureFX, rate, counterparty
Total return swapTotal return of asset vs financing/index returnSynthetic exposureCounterparty, leverage, reference asset
Credit default swapCredit protection vs premiumTransfer credit riskCredit event definition, counterparty

For swaps, focus on who pays fixed, who receives floating, and which side benefits when rates move.

Currency derivatives

NeedPossible derivativePosition logic
Will receive foreign currencyForward/futureSell that foreign currency forward
Will pay foreign currencyForward/futureBuy that foreign currency forward
Want protection but retain upsideCurrency optionBuy option rather than lock rate
Convert debt exposureCurrency swapExchange interest and sometimes principal cash flows

Forward exchange rate intuition

A currency with a higher interest rate tends to trade at a forward discount relative to a lower-interest-rate currency, based on covered interest parity logic.

High-yield traps:

  • Always identify the base and terms currency in the quote.
  • Check whether the question asks for domestic currency value or foreign currency amount.
  • A forward contract removes upside as well as downside.
  • An option preserves upside but costs premium.

Equity derivatives and index products

ProductExposureCommon useKey risk
Equity index futureBroad market indexBeta hedge, tactical allocationBasis and margin
Single-stock futureSpecific share exposureHedge or leverageConcentrated price risk
Equity optionShare or index optionalityProtection, income, speculationPremium/time decay/writing risk
Equity swapReturn on equity/index vs rate or other returnSynthetic exposure or financingCounterparty and valuation
CFDLong/short price exposure without ownershipLeveraged trading or hedgeProvider, leverage, funding, gap risk

Equity index hedge decision

Portfolio issueCandidate action
Portfolio likely to fall with marketSell index futures
Portfolio has beta above 1More contracts needed than market-value-only hedge
Portfolio has beta below 1Fewer contracts needed
Hedge only part of exposureMultiply by target hedge percentage
Portfolio differs from indexExpect tracking/basis risk

Credit derivatives

ProductBasic structureProtection buyerProtection seller
Credit default swapPremium paid for compensation if credit event occursPays spread, receives protectionReceives spread, takes credit risk
Total return swapTotal return of asset exchanged for financing legReceives or pays asset economics depending sideOpposite economics

CDS exam logic:

  • Buying CDS protection is economically similar to reducing or shorting credit exposure.
  • Selling CDS protection is economically similar to taking long credit exposure.
  • Main risks include counterparty risk, documentation risk, basis risk, and jump-to-default risk.

Commodity derivatives

FeatureExam relevance
Storage costCan materially affect forward/futures price
Convenience yieldBenefit of holding physical commodity; can support backwardation
SeasonalitySupply/demand patterns can affect pricing
Delivery riskPhysical settlement may be impractical for financial investors
Roll yieldGain/loss from replacing expiring futures with later contracts

Commodity trap: spot price movement and futures roll return are not the same. A commodity futures strategy can lose money in a rising spot market if roll costs are large.

CFDs, warrants, and structured products

Contracts for difference

FeaturePractical point
OwnershipClient does not own the underlying asset
Profit/lossDifference between opening and closing price, adjusted for size
LeverageSmall deposit controls large exposure
FinancingLong positions often incur funding costs; details depend on provider terms
Short exposureCan be easier than borrowing and short-selling the underlying
Main risksLeverage, provider counterparty, liquidity, gap moves, forced close-out
Notes and examples

Warrants and covered warrants

FeatureWarrant / covered warrant
Economic natureOption-like securitised product
IssuerIssuer credit risk matters
ExerciseMay be cash-settled or physically settled depending on terms
GearingPrice may move more sharply than underlying
Time decayValue can erode as expiry approaches
Suitability issueComplexity and loss of premium/capital at risk

Structured products

StructureTypical building blocksExam focus
Capital-protected noteZero-coupon bond + optionProtection depends on issuer and terms
AutocallableNote + embedded options/barriersEarly redemption and barrier risk
Reverse convertibleNote + short put-like exposureEnhanced income but downside equity risk
Participation noteBond + call optionUpside participation may be capped or partial
Barrier productOption with knock-in/knock-out featurePath dependency matters

Structured product traps:

  • “Capital protected” may mean protection only at maturity and subject to issuer credit.
  • Income enhancement usually comes from giving up upside or taking downside/barrier risk.
  • Secondary-market liquidity may be limited.
  • Payoff depends on precise terms, not product name alone.

Contracts for Difference

CFDs provide leveraged exposure to the price movement of an underlying asset without owning it directly.

FeatureReview point
LeverageSmall margin controls larger exposure
Long CFDGains if underlying rises
Short CFDGains if underlying falls
FinancingHolding costs may apply
Dividends/corporate actionsEconomic adjustments may apply
RiskLosses can be rapid and may exceed initial outlay depending on terms

Suitability questions often focus on leverage, capacity for loss, investment experience, and whether the client understands margin.

Warrants and Covered Warrants

FeatureReview point
Call warrantOption-like exposure to rising underlying
Put warrantOption-like exposure to falling underlying
Time decayValue erodes as expiry approaches, all else equal
GearingPercentage gains/losses can be magnified
Issuer riskHolder is exposed to issuer obligations
LiquiditySecondary-market liquidity may be limited

Structured Products

Structured products may combine a deposit/bond component with derivatives to create a defined return profile.

FeatureReview point
Capital protectionMay be conditional and depends on issuer strength
Participation rateDetermines share in upside
BarrierPayoff may change if barrier breached
AutocallProduct may redeem early if conditions met
Counterparty/issuer riskProtection is not the same as risk-free
ComplexitySuitability and explanation quality are central

Candidate trap: “capital protected” does not automatically mean “suitable,” “liquid,” or “free of credit risk.”

Exchange-traded vs OTC derivatives

IssueExchange-tradedOTC
StandardisationHighLow to medium
FlexibilityLowerHigher
TransparencyUsually higherOften lower
Counterparty riskMitigated by clearing arrangementsBilateral unless collateralised/cleared
LiquidityOften better, but contract-dependentDepends on counterparties and terms
ValuationMarket prices may be observableModel/pricing assumptions may matter
Close-outOffset trade often possibleMay require negotiation or unwind price

Clearing, collateral, and operational risk

TermMeaningWhy it matters
Central counterpartyInterposes itself between buyer and sellerReduces bilateral counterparty risk
NovationReplacement of original trade with CCP-facing tradesChanges counterparty exposure
CollateralAssets posted to secure obligationsReduces credit exposure but creates liquidity needs
HaircutReduction applied to collateral valueProtects collateral receiver
NettingOffsetting exposures between partiesReduces settlement/credit exposure
Close-outTermination and valuation after default or unwindDocumentation and valuation are critical
Settlement riskRisk one leg settles but the other does notEspecially relevant across currencies/time zones
Model riskValuation model is wrong or misusedImportant for complex OTC products

Suitability and advice-focused decision points

For an advice-oriented derivatives exam, expect scenarios where the technically correct product is not suitable for the client.

Client need or fact patternMore suitable directionLess suitable / caution
Wants to insure portfolio downside and retain upsideProtective put or collarShort futures if upside retention is important
Wants income from existing holding and accepts capped upsideCovered callNaked call writing
Needs certainty over future exchange rateForwardOption if unwilling to pay premium may not fit
Wants protection but still wants favourable FX movementCurrency optionForward locks both upside and downside
Cannot meet margin callsBought option may be safer than futuresFutures/CFDs can force liquidity stress
Low risk tolerance and poor product understandingAvoid complex/leverage productsStructured products with barriers, short options, CFDs
Has concentrated shareholdingProtective put/collar may manage downsideSelling calls may create disposal/opportunity issues
Seeks leveraged short-term speculationCFD/option may provide exposureMust assess loss capacity and leverage risk
Needs bespoke hedgeOTC derivative may fitStandard futures may leave basis/maturity mismatch
Notes and examples

Suitability checklist

  • What is the client trying to hedge or achieve?
  • Is the derivative for hedging, income, speculation, or arbitrage?
  • Does the client understand leverage and possible losses?
  • Can the client meet margin calls and liquidity needs?
  • Is maximum loss known or potentially open-ended?
  • Is the product exchange-traded or OTC?
  • Is counterparty/issuer risk acceptable?
  • Is the term aligned with the client’s time horizon?
  • Are costs, spreads, premiums, and funding charges understood?
  • Could a simpler product achieve the same objective?

Final Quick Checklist

Before attempting a mock exam, confirm you can answer these without hesitation:

  • What is the difference between a forward and a future?
  • Who has rights and who has obligations in an option contract?
  • When is a call or put in the money?
  • How do you calculate option break-even?
  • What happens to bond prices when yields rise?
  • Which derivative hedge protects a share portfolio against a fall?
  • Which FX forward hedge is used for a foreign-currency payable?
  • Why can a hedge be imperfect?
  • What risks remain in a structured product with capital protection?
  • Why can option writing be unsuitable for some clients?
  • How do margin and leverage change the client’s risk?
  • What client facts are essential before recommending a derivative?

Risk reference

RiskDefinitionProducts where prominentExam clue
Market riskUnderlying moves adverselyAll derivativesDirectional exposure
Leverage riskLosses magnified relative to initial cashFutures, CFDs, options writingSmall deposit, large exposure
Counterparty riskOther party defaultsOTC swaps/forwards/CFDs/structured productsBilateral contract or issuer note
Liquidity riskCannot trade or unwind at fair priceOTC, complex products, thin contractsWide spread or bespoke terms
Basis riskHedge instrument and exposure differFutures hedges, cross hedgesImperfect offset
Volatility riskImplied/realised volatility changesOptions, warrants, structured productsOption value changes without spot move
Gap riskPrice jumps through stop/margin levelsCFDs, short options, leveraged futuresOvernight/event moves
Funding riskFinancing cost changes or funding unavailableCFDs, swaps, leveraged strategiesCarry/funding leg
Operational riskProcessing, confirmation, settlement failuresOTC and exchange-tradedDocumentation and controls
Legal/documentation riskContract terms do not behave as expectedOTC/structured productsPayoff wording and close-out terms
Model riskValuation relies on flawed assumptionsOTC options, exotics, structured productsNo reliable market price

High-yield calculation sheet

Percentage return

\[ \text{Percentage return} = \frac{\text{Gain or loss}}{\text{Initial cash outlay}} \times 100 \]

Use the correct denominator: premium, margin, full exposure, or invested capital depending on the question.

Futures contract value

\[ \text{Contract value} = \text{Futures price} \times \text{Contract multiplier} \]

Futures total profit or loss

\[ \text{Total P/L} = \text{Price movement} \times \text{Contract multiplier} \times \text{Number of contracts} \]

Option total premium

\[ \text{Total premium} = \text{Option premium per unit} \times \text{Contract size} \times \text{Number of contracts} \]

Long call profit

\[ \text{Long call profit} = \max(\text{Underlying price} - \text{Exercise price}, 0) - \text{Premium} \]

Long put profit

\[ \text{Long put profit} = \max(\text{Exercise price} - \text{Underlying price}, 0) - \text{Premium} \]

Breakeven points

\[ \text{Call breakeven} = \text{Exercise price} + \text{Premium} \]\[ \text{Put breakeven} = \text{Exercise price} - \text{Premium} \]

Swap period cash flow

\[ \text{Cash flow} = \text{Rate} \times \text{Notional} \times \text{Day-count fraction} \]

Day-count fraction

\[ \text{Day-count fraction} = \frac{\text{Number of days in period}}{\text{Day-count denominator}} \]

Use the day-count basis stated in the question.

Notes and examples

Common Calculation Items

Calculation typeWhat to identify firstCommon mistake
Option intrinsic valueOption type, strike, underlying priceUsing call logic for a put
Option profitIntrinsic value minus premium for buyerForgetting the premium
Break-evenStrike plus call premium; strike minus put premiumReversing call and put rules
Futures P&LPrice movement, contract size, number of contractsIgnoring multiplier or tick value
Margin callInitial margin vs marked-to-market lossTreating margin as total loss
Hedge ratioExposure value vs futures contract valueRounding in wrong direction without reading question
Leverage/gearingExposure controlled vs capital committedConfusing percentage return with cash return
Swap cash flowFixed leg, floating leg, notional, periodTreating notional as exchanged when it is not

Break-Even Rules

PositionBreak-even
Long callStrike + premium
Short callStrike + premium
Long putStrike - premium
Short putStrike - premium

The break-even is the same for buyer and seller of the same option, but their profit/loss is opposite.

Worked mini-examples

Long call

Investor buys a call with strike 100 and premium 6.

Underlying at expiryPayoffProfit/loss
900-6
1000-6
10660
1202014
Notes and examples

Breakeven is 106.

Protective put

Investor owns a share at 100 and buys a put with strike 95 for premium 3.

Underlying at expiryShare valuePut payoffTotal before original costNet economic result vs 100 share cost plus premium
80801595-8
9595095-8
11011001107

The put creates a floor, but the premium reduces upside.

Futures hedge

Portfolio value is 500,000. Index future is 5,000 with multiplier 10. Portfolio beta is 1.2.

[ \text{Contracts} = \frac{500{,}000 \times 1.2}{5{,}000 \times 10}

12 ]

To reduce market exposure, sell 12 index futures, subject to rounding and hedge objective.

Common exam traps

TrapCorrect approach
Confusing premium and marginPremium is paid for an option; margin supports a futures/CFD/short option obligation
Treating long put as bullishLong put is bearish or protective
Ignoring contract multiplierMultiply quoted price movement by contract size
Ignoring number of contractsTotal P/L must include all contracts
Assuming forwards have daily marginFutures are typically daily marked to market; forwards usually settle at maturity
Thinking hedging removes all riskBasis, liquidity, margin, and counterparty risks can remain
Treating structured product name as payoffRead barriers, caps, participation, maturity, and issuer risk
Assuming option buyer can lose more than premiumPlain bought option maximum loss is premium, excluding transaction costs and special product features
Assuming option writer risk is always limitedNaked calls can have unlimited loss; short puts can have very large loss
Forgetting time decayLong options lose time value as expiry approaches
Reversing interest rate futures price logicMany contracts rise when implied rates fall
Ignoring client capacity for lossTechnically effective hedge may still be unsuitable

Scenario decision guide

Scenario wordingLikely answer path
“Client wants to protect an existing equity portfolio but keep upside”Buy puts or use collar
“Client wants to lock in a price for future purchase”Long forward/future
“Client wants to lock in sale proceeds”Short forward/future
“Client expects little price movement and wants income”Covered call if holding asset; short straddle/strangle is higher risk
“Client expects large move but unsure direction”Long straddle or strangle
“Company will borrow in future and fears rising rates”FRA buyer or appropriate interest rate hedge
“Company will receive foreign currency later”Sell that currency forward
“Investor wants leveraged long exposure without owning shares”CFD, futures, call option, or warrant depending risk and suitability
“Investor cannot tolerate losses beyond initial outlay”Bought option-style exposure, not futures/CFDs/short options
“Need bespoke dates and notional”OTC forward/swap/option, with counterparty risk assessment

Last-week revision checklist

  • Recreate payoff diagrams for long/short calls and puts from memory.
  • Practise breakeven, maximum gain, and maximum loss for each option strategy.
  • Drill futures P/L using contract size and number of contracts.
  • Review hedge direction: buy to hedge future purchase, sell to hedge existing holding.
  • Recheck interest rate futures quote logic.
  • Compare OTC and exchange-traded derivatives without relying on memorised slogans.
  • Practise suitability scenarios: objective, risk tolerance, knowledge, liquidity, loss capacity.
  • Review structured product payoff terms: cap, floor, barrier, participation, issuer risk.
  • Mark any question where you assumed a product feature not stated.

High-Yield Exam Mindset

Derivatives questions often test whether you can identify:

  1. The position — long or short, buyer or seller, hedger or speculator.
  2. The exposure — equity, interest rate, currency, commodity, credit, volatility, or index.
  3. The payoff — linear, non-linear, capped, floored, leveraged, or asymmetric.
  4. The risk transfer — who gains if the underlying rises, falls, or becomes more volatile.
  5. The practical constraint — margin, liquidity, counterparty risk, suitability, settlement, or tax/regulatory context.
  6. The calculation driver — contract size, tick value, premium, strike, basis, multiplier, or notional amount.

A useful rule: do not answer from the product name alone. First map the product to its payoff and risk.

The Fast Decision Rules

Long and Short Positions

PositionBenefits ifLoses ifTypical purpose
Long underlyingPrice risesPrice fallsInvestment exposure
Short underlyingPrice fallsPrice risesHedge or speculation
Long futureFutures price risesFutures price fallsHedge purchase price or speculate up
Short futureFutures price fallsFutures price risesHedge sale price or speculate down
Long callUnderlying rises enoughUnderlying stagnates/fallsUpside with limited premium loss
Short callUnderlying stays below strikeUnderlying rises sharplyIncome, but potentially large loss
Long putUnderlying falls enoughUnderlying rises/stays flatDownside protection or bearish view
Short putUnderlying stays above strikeUnderlying falls sharplyIncome, but large downside risk
Notes and examples

If the Client Is Hedging

Risk facedCommon hedge logicDirectional clue
Holds shares and fears fallBuy put or sell index/equity futuresNeed gain when market falls
Will buy asset later and fears riseBuy future/forward or buy callNeed gain when price rises
Will sell asset later and fears fallSell future/forward or buy putNeed lock-in or floor
Floating-rate borrower fears rate risePay fixed/receive floating swap, cap, or short rate futures depending productNeed benefit when rates rise
Fixed-rate borrower wants floating exposureReceive fixed/pay floating swapConverts fixed cost to floating
Overseas receivable in foreign currencySell that currency forwardProtect domestic value
Overseas payable in foreign currencyBuy that currency forwardProtect cost of payment

Risk Review for Derivatives Advice

The CISI IAD Derivatives Technical Unit is not only about identifying payoffs; it also tests whether derivative use is appropriate in a client context.

Key Risk Types

RiskMeaningWhere it appears
Market riskUnderlying moves adverselyAll derivatives
Leverage riskSmall price move creates large lossFutures, CFDs, options sold
Margin riskNeed to post additional collateralFutures, CFDs, some OTC trades
Counterparty riskOther party fails to performOTC derivatives, structured products
Liquidity riskCannot trade or close at fair priceOTC, warrants, stressed markets
Basis riskHedge does not match exposure exactlyFutures and proxy hedges
Volatility riskOption values change with volatilityOptions, warrants, structured products
Model riskValuation assumptions are wrongOTC and complex derivatives
Early termination riskExit cost or valuation may be unfavourableSwaps, structured products
Regulatory/tax riskTreatment may affect outcomeProduct-dependent
Notes and examples

Suitability Decision Path

    flowchart TD
	    A[Client objective] --> B{Hedge, income, speculation, or leverage?}
	    B --> C[Identify underlying exposure]
	    C --> D[Choose product type]
	    D --> E{Client understands payoff and downside?}
	    E -- No --> F[Do not recommend until explained and assessed]
	    E -- Yes --> G{Capacity for loss and liquidity need acceptable?}
	    G -- No --> H[Consider simpler or lower-risk alternative]
	    G -- Yes --> I{Costs, margin, tax, and exit terms acceptable?}
	    I -- No --> H
	    I -- Yes --> J[Document rationale and monitor]

Suitability Red Flags

Be cautious where a client:

  • Needs capital certainty but is considering leveraged or barrier-based exposure.
  • Cannot meet margin calls.
  • Does not understand that derivatives may create losses larger than the initial outlay.
  • Wants income from option writing without understanding tail risk.
  • Uses short-dated options for long-term investment objectives.
  • Uses complex products where a simpler hedge would meet the objective.
  • Has a concentrated underlying exposure and adds more correlated derivative risk.
  • Treats “hedging” as risk-free rather than risk-reducing.

Common Candidate Mistakes

  1. Confusing buyer and seller risk Option buyers have rights; option sellers have obligations.

  2. Forgetting the premium An in-the-money option is not necessarily profitable once premium is included.

  3. Assuming hedges eliminate all risk Basis risk, timing mismatch, liquidity, and costs remain.

  4. Misreading interest rate futures Understand whether price rises or falls when yields/rates move.

  5. Ignoring contract size A one-point price movement may represent a much larger cash movement.

  6. Treating notional as cash invested Derivative notional measures exposure, not always money paid.

  7. Assuming exchange-traded means risk-free Clearing reduces counterparty risk but does not remove market or margin risk.

  8. Overlooking suitability A technically correct hedge may still be inappropriate for a client.

  9. Confusing speculation with hedging A hedge reduces an existing risk; speculation creates or increases exposure.

  10. Missing time decay Long options and warrants lose time value as expiry approaches, all else equal.

Product Recognition Drill

Use this table as a quick self-test before starting original practice questions.

Clue in questionProduct likely testedWhat to focus on
“Right but not obligation”Option or warrantPremium, strike, moneyness
“Daily margin”Future or CFDMark-to-market and leverage
“Custom OTC agreement”Forward or swapCounterparty and bespoke terms
“Exchange of fixed and floating”Interest rate swapWho pays fixed, who receives floating
“Protect portfolio from market fall”Put or short index futureDownside hedge
“Income from premium”Option writingTail risk
“Barrier breached”Structured product/optionConditional payoff
“Receivable in foreign currency”FX forwardSell foreign currency
“Payable in foreign currency”FX forwardBuy foreign currency
“Underlying volatility rises”Options/warrantsLong options usually benefit

Put the review into practice

Browse Practice Tests & Interview Prep