CII R06 — Financial Planning Practice Companion Study Plan
A practical 7, 14, 30, and 60/90-day study plan for CII R06 candidates preparing for the Financial Planning Practice exam.
Study Plan overview
This Study Plan is for candidates preparing for CII R06 — Financial Planning Practice Companion, exam code CII R06. It is designed for the real exam: applied financial planning, client facts, suitability reasoning, recommendations, advantages and disadvantages, and written answer structure.
CII R06 preparation is different from pure knowledge revision. You need to practise turning a client fact pattern into clear, exam-ready answers. Your plan should include:
- technical refresh across pensions, investments, protection, tax, estate planning, and regulation;
- case-study analysis and client objective mapping;
- short-answer writing practice;
- missed-question review;
- timed mock practice;
- final-week consolidation rather than adding too much new material.
This is an independent study planning resource and is not affiliated with CII.
Which plan should you use?
| Time available | Best plan | Use this if | Main risk to manage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | Final review plan | You are close to the exam and need structure | Trying to relearn everything instead of improving answer quality |
| 14 days | Focused case-study plan | You have the pre-exam period available and need intensive practice | Reading notes passively and not writing enough answers |
| 30 days | Balanced plan | You have about a month and can study most days | Spending too long on technical notes and leaving mocks too late |
| 60/90 days | Full preparation path | You are starting early or retaking | Forgetting early material unless you cycle review |
Core R06 preparation principles
1. Study from client facts outward
For CII R06, do not revise topics in isolation only. Always connect technical knowledge to client circumstances.
Use this pattern:
| Step | Question to ask | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Identify facts | What do we know about income, assets, debts, dependants, objectives, tax position, risk attitude, time horizon, and constraints? | Fact list |
| Identify issues | What planning gaps, risks, inefficiencies, or conflicts are visible? | Issue list |
| Select actions | What recommendations could address each issue? | Recommendation list |
| Justify | Why is this suitable for this client? | Reasoned answer |
| Add cautions | What risks, disadvantages, assumptions, or further information are needed? | Balanced response |
2. Write answers, do not only read answers
R06 rewards applied written responses. Build the habit of writing in concise points.
A strong answer usually includes:
- the client fact it relates to;
- the recommendation or planning point;
- the reason it is relevant;
- the benefit or risk;
- any limitation, assumption, tax issue, or follow-up information needed.
3. Use topic drills to support case-study performance
You still need technical accuracy. Prioritise topics commonly tested through client scenarios:
| Area | What to practise |
|---|---|
| Pensions | Contributions, carry forward logic, retirement income options, death benefits, lifetime planning considerations |
| Investments | Risk profiling, asset allocation, tax wrappers, diversification, income versus growth needs |
| Protection | Life cover, critical illness, income protection, family income benefit, business protection where relevant |
| Tax | Income tax, CGT, IHT, dividend and savings income logic, allowances and planning order |
| Estate planning | Wills, trusts, lasting powers of attorney, gifts, nil-rate band concepts, liquidity for IHT |
| Regulation and advice process | Suitability, disclosure, fact-finding, reviews, client agreement, vulnerable client considerations |
| Cash flow and budgeting | Emergency funds, debt repayment, income shortfalls, affordability of recommendations |
| Ethics and communication | Client priorities, conflicts, risk warnings, explaining trade-offs clearly |
Daily practice rhythm
Use this rhythm for most study days. Adjust the duration to your available time.
| Study block | 45-minute version | 90-minute version | 2-3 hour version |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recall warm-up | 5 min: list key facts or formulas from memory | 10 min: quick topic recall | 15 min: mixed recall and flash review |
| Technical refresh | 10 min: one weak topic | 20 min: one or two weak topics | 35-45 min: targeted topic study |
| Applied drill | 15 min: answer 2-3 short questions | 30 min: answer a mini case set | 45-60 min: write a timed section |
| Review | 10 min: mark and annotate | 20 min: compare to model points | 30-40 min: improve answer and log errors |
| Memory close | 5 min: write 3 takeaways | 10 min: update checklist | 15 min: revise error log and next actions |
Weekly rhythm if you have more than two weeks
| Day type | Purpose | Best activities |
|---|---|---|
| Technical day | Close knowledge gaps | Topic notes, short drills, calculation refresh |
| Case-analysis day | Improve issue spotting | Client fact maps, objective tables, risk lists |
| Written-practice day | Improve answer quality | Timed short-answer sets, recommendation questions |
| Review day | Convert mistakes into marks | Error log, rewritten answers, weak-topic drills |
| Mock day | Build exam timing | Full or partial timed mock, then deep review |
Missed-question review method
Do not only record the correct answer. Record why your answer missed marks.
Use a simple error log:
| Error type | What it means | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge gap | You did not know the rule or planning concept | Re-study the topic and create a one-page summary |
| Fact missed | You ignored a client detail | Highlight client facts before writing |
| Generic answer | Your point was true but not linked to the client | Add “because…” after each recommendation |
| Poor balance | You gave benefits but no risks, limitations, or assumptions | Add disadvantages and further information needed |
| Weak structure | Your answer was hard to mark | Use bullets, one point per line |
| Time loss | You spent too long on one answer | Practise timed sections and move on sooner |
| Calculation error | Your method was right but arithmetic or tax logic failed | Redo the calculation and write the steps clearly |
The 3-pass review cycle
- Immediate review: mark the answer and note missing points.
- Same-day rewrite: rewrite the weakest answer without looking at the solution.
- 48-hour retest: attempt a similar question from memory.
If the same error appears twice, it becomes a priority topic for the next study session.
How to analyse the case material
When case information is available for your sitting, your first task is not to predict exact questions. Your first task is to understand the clients.
Create these working documents.
Client fact map
| Category | What to capture |
|---|---|
| Personal details | Ages, family position, dependants, health, employment, retirement plans |
| Objectives | Stated goals, unstated needs, conflicts between objectives |
| Income and expenditure | Earnings, bonuses, pensions, benefits, regular spending, surplus or shortfall |
| Assets | Cash, investments, property, pensions, business interests, collectives or wrappers |
| Liabilities | Mortgage, loans, credit cards, business debts, guarantees |
| Protection | Existing cover, employer benefits, gaps, affordability |
| Tax position | Income tax band, CGT exposure, IHT exposure, pension allowance considerations |
| Risk and capacity | Attitude to risk, capacity for loss, time horizon, liquidity needs |
| Advice process | Missing information, disclosure needs, review requirements |
Objective-to-recommendation table
| Client objective | Planning issue | Possible recommendation | Why it fits | Risks or further information |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retirement income | Pension adequacy, timing, tax | Increase contributions, review asset allocation, consider income options | Links contribution and risk strategy to retirement goal | Affordability, tax position, allowance limits |
| Family protection | Dependants exposed to income loss or death | Life cover, income protection, critical illness cover | Protects household income and liabilities | Existing cover, health underwriting, cost |
| Tax efficiency | Taxable savings or gains | Use appropriate allowances and wrappers | Improves net return and tax control | Suitability, access needs, risk profile |
| Estate planning | Potential IHT or poor documentation | Review will, gifting strategy, trusts, LPA | Aligns legacy planning with control and family needs | Loss of access, seven-year planning, legal advice |
7-day final review plan
Use this if the exam is in one week. The aim is to sharpen case analysis, answer structure, and timing. Stop trying to cover every topic equally.
| Day | Main objective | Study actions | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days out | Build the case file | Read all case material carefully, highlight facts, list objectives, identify obvious planning gaps | Completed fact map and objective table |
| 6 days out | Technical triage | Review the weakest 4-6 technical areas connected to the case | One-page summaries and formula notes |
| 5 days out | Written answer drills | Complete short-answer sets on recommendations, advantages, disadvantages, risks, and further information | Marked answer set and error log |
| 4 days out | Timed partial mock | Sit a timed section or past-style paper section under exam conditions | Timing notes and missed-mark list |
| 3 days out | Deep review | Rewrite weak answers, practise client-specific wording, refresh tax/pension/protection logic | Improved model answer bank |
| 2 days out | Full or near-full timed mock | Complete a full mock if stamina allows; otherwise complete two timed sections | Final timing plan and red-flag list |
| 1 day out | Light consolidation | Review fact maps, key technical sheets, error log, and answer structures only | Calm final checklist |
7-day rules
- Do not spend the week reading large textbooks from page one.
- Do not write long paragraphs when bullet points would be clearer.
- Do not attempt to memorise model answers word for word.
- Do practise linking each point to the client facts.
- Do review mistakes more than once.
- Do stop adding major new material on the final day.
14-day focused plan
Use this if you have two weeks. This suits the common R06 preparation window where case-focused work becomes the priority.
| Day | Focus | Actions |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Diagnostic | Sit a short mixed diagnostic or attempt a past-style section. Identify weak topics and weak answer types. |
| 13 | Case read-through | Build client fact maps. Mark objectives, risks, tax issues, protection gaps, pension issues, investment concerns, and missing information. |
| 12 | Pensions and retirement | Review pension planning points relevant to the case. Drill recommendations, benefits, limitations, and further information questions. |
| 11 | Investments and risk | Practise risk profile, capacity for loss, asset allocation, diversification, wrappers, and review points. |
| 10 | Protection planning | Drill life, critical illness, income protection, family income benefit, employer benefits, and affordability issues. |
| 9 | Tax and estate planning | Refresh income tax, CGT, IHT, wills, gifts, trusts, LPAs, and tax-efficient planning logic. |
| 8 | Advice process and suitability | Practise suitability wording, disclosure, documentation, reviews, and client communication. |
| 7 | Timed written practice | Complete a timed partial mock. Mark it carefully and classify every missed point. |
| 6 | Weak-topic repair | Re-study only the topics causing lost marks. Create short answer templates. |
| 5 | Case prediction practice | For each client objective, write likely question angles and bullet-point answers. |
| 4 | Full mock or extended mock | Sit a full timed mock if possible. If not, complete the longest timed session you can manage. |
| 3 | Mock review | Rewrite weak answers, improve structure, and review all missed technical points. |
| 2 | Final applied drills | Practise short sets: “recommend and justify,” “advantages/disadvantages,” “risks,” “further information.” |
| 1 | Light final review | Review case maps, error log, answer frameworks, and high-probability weak areas. Sleep and logistics matter. |
Best use of the 14-day plan
Split each day into three blocks:
| Block | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Block 1 | Technical refresh | Review pension death benefits or CGT logic |
| Block 2 | Case application | Apply the topic to the client facts |
| Block 3 | Written practice | Write and mark 3-5 exam-style responses |
30-day balanced plan
Use this if you have about a month. The goal is to build technical confidence first, then move into case-study execution.
Days 1-7: Diagnostic and technical foundation
| Day | Focus | Actions |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Diagnostic | Attempt a mixed practice set. Record weak topics and weak answer formats. |
| 2 | Exam technique | Review answer structure: concise bullets, client links, suitability language, balanced recommendations. |
| 3 | Pensions | Refresh core pension rules and retirement planning scenarios. Drill short answers. |
| 4 | Investments | Review wrappers, risk, asset allocation, income/growth needs, charges, and liquidity. |
| 5 | Protection | Review personal and family protection products, employer benefits, underwriting, and suitability. |
| 6 | Tax | Refresh income tax, CGT, IHT, allowances, reliefs, and tax planning order. |
| 7 | Weekly review | Reattempt missed questions and write one timed mini-section. |
Days 8-14: Applied topic practice
| Day | Focus | Actions |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Retirement planning application | Write recommendations for clients approaching, at, or in retirement. |
| 9 | Investment suitability | Practise client-specific portfolio review and wrapper recommendations. |
| 10 | Protection scenarios | Identify gaps and recommend cover types with reasons and limitations. |
| 11 | Estate planning scenarios | Practise wills, gifting, trusts, IHT liquidity, and LPAs. |
| 12 | Tax planning scenarios | Work through taxable income, capital gains, pension contributions, and wrapper use. |
| 13 | Advice process | Drill further information, documentation, reviews, risk warnings, and suitability reporting. |
| 14 | Timed partial mock | Complete a timed section and perform full missed-question review. |
Days 15-21: Case-study mode
| Day | Focus | Actions |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Case pack setup | Build fact maps and objective tables for the case material available to you. |
| 16 | Client 1 planning issues | Identify all issues, gaps, and possible recommendations. |
| 17 | Client 2 planning issues | Repeat the process for the second client or second scenario. |
| 18 | Cross-topic integration | Link pensions, tax, investment, protection, and estate planning points. |
| 19 | Question-angle practice | Write possible questions and bullet answers for each objective. |
| 20 | Timed written drill | Complete a timed set based on the case issues. |
| 21 | Review and repair | Rewrite answers and update the error log. |
Days 22-30: Mock and final consolidation
| Day | Focus | Actions |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Full mock 1 | Sit a full or near-full timed mock. |
| 23 | Mock 1 review | Analyse every missed point. Sort errors into knowledge, application, structure, and timing. |
| 24 | Weak-topic repair | Re-study the top 3 weak topics and write fresh answers. |
| 25 | Case-specific drills | Practise likely recommendation, risk, disadvantage, and further-information questions. |
| 26 | Full mock 2 or timed sections | Sit another timed paper or two extended timed sections. |
| 27 | Mock 2 review | Focus on recurring missed marks and timing issues. |
| 28 | Final technical refresh | Review one-page sheets only. No broad new study. |
| 29 | Final case review | Re-read fact maps, objectives, recommendations, and assumptions. |
| 30 | Light review | Error log, answer templates, exam logistics, rest. |
60/90-day full preparation path
Use this if you are starting early, building knowledge from scratch, or retaking after a narrow miss. The longer plan should cycle topics repeatedly so early work is not forgotten.
Phase 1: Foundation knowledge
| Timeline | Goal | Actions |
|---|---|---|
| Days 1-14 | Understand the exam style and baseline ability | Complete a diagnostic, review the syllabus areas you are using, set up an error log, and study core advice process concepts |
| Days 15-30 | Build technical coverage | Study pensions, investments, protection, tax, estate planning, and suitability. Use short drills after each topic. |
Phase 2: Applied planning practice
| Timeline | Goal | Actions |
|---|---|---|
| Days 31-45 | Convert knowledge into recommendations | Practise case scenarios. For every topic, write “recommendation, reason, advantage, disadvantage, further information.” |
| Days 46-60 | Improve timing and answer quality | Complete weekly timed sections. Rewrite weak answers. Start building concise answer templates. |
Phase 3: Case-specific and mock preparation
| Timeline | Goal | Actions |
|---|---|---|
| Days 61-75 | Move into case-study mode | Analyse available case material, build fact maps, and identify likely planning issues. |
| Days 76-85 | Mock practice | Sit full or extended mocks under timed conditions. Review deeply. |
| Days 86-90 | Final consolidation | Stop adding major new content. Review case maps, error log, technical summaries, and timing strategy. |
If you only have 60 days
Compress the plan like this:
| Period | Focus |
|---|---|
| Days 1-20 | Technical foundation and diagnostic |
| Days 21-35 | Applied topic drills |
| Days 36-48 | Case-study analysis and written practice |
| Days 49-56 | Timed mocks and review |
| Days 57-60 | Final consolidation |
Topic drill checklist
Use this checklist across any plan.
| Drill type | What to do | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Recommendation drills | Write 5-8 recommendations for a client objective and justify each one | 3-5 times per week |
| Advantages/disadvantages | For each product or strategy, list benefits and limitations | 3 times per week |
| Further-information questions | List what you would need before advising | 2-3 times per week |
| Tax logic drills | Work through tax position, allowances, wrappers, and planning order | 2-4 times per week |
| Protection gap drills | Match risks to suitable cover types | 2-3 times per week |
| Estate planning drills | Identify will, trust, LPA, gifting, and IHT considerations | 2 times per week |
| Timed short answers | Write concise bullet answers under time pressure | 4-6 times per week |
| Error-log review | Reattempt missed or weak questions | Every study day |
Answer frameworks to practise
Recommendation and justification
Use this structure:
- Recommend the action.
- Link it to a client fact.
- Explain the benefit.
- Mention a limitation, cost, risk, tax issue, or assumption where relevant.
Example structure:
- Recommend reviewing existing protection because the client has dependants and mortgage liabilities.
- This could provide funds if death or illness affects household income.
- The level and term should match the liability and family need.
- Affordability, underwriting, employer benefits, and existing cover should be checked.
Further information
Common further-information categories:
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Personal | Health, dependants, family circumstances, retirement age, residence or domicile where relevant |
| Financial | Income, expenditure, tax status, debts, savings, pension values, investment details |
| Objectives | Priority order, timescales, income needs, capital needs, legacy wishes |
| Risk | Attitude to risk, capacity for loss, experience, need for guarantees |
| Existing arrangements | Policy terms, beneficiaries, charges, fund choices, surrender penalties, employer benefits |
| Legal and tax | Wills, trusts, powers of attorney, previous gifts, tax returns, business ownership |
| Practical | Affordability, access needs, review frequency, client understanding |
Advantages and disadvantages
When asked for advantages and disadvantages, avoid generic lists. Tie the point to the client.
| Weak answer | Stronger R06-style answer |
|---|---|
| “It is tax efficient.” | “It may improve tax efficiency for the client because investment income or gains could be managed more effectively within the appropriate wrapper, subject to allowance availability.” |
| “It provides protection.” | “It could provide a lump sum or income for the family if the client dies or becomes ill, helping meet mortgage and living costs.” |
| “It has charges.” | “Charges could reduce returns, so the recommendation should be compared with existing arrangements and the client’s expected holding period.” |
Timed mock exam strategy
Timed mocks are most useful after you have enough technical knowledge to write meaningful answers. Do not leave all timed work until the final week.
| Preparation stage | Mock use |
|---|---|
| Early stage | Short timed sections only. Focus on structure and identifying gaps. |
| Middle stage | Partial mocks. Build stamina and timing discipline. |
| Final third of plan | Full or near-full mocks. Replicate exam conditions where possible. |
| Final 48 hours | Avoid heavy mocks unless you need a confidence check. Review is usually more valuable. |
How to review a mock
Spend at least as long reviewing as you spent sitting the mock.
| Review step | Action |
|---|---|
| 1. Mark missed points | Identify technical points, client links, and answer formats you missed |
| 2. Classify errors | Knowledge, application, structure, timing, or calculation |
| 3. Rewrite weak answers | Produce a better answer from memory |
| 4. Extract templates | Save useful phrases and structures |
| 5. Retest | Attempt a similar question within 48 hours |
When to stop adding new material
Stop adding major new technical content when:
- you are inside the final 48 hours;
- new material is increasing confusion rather than improving marks;
- your error log shows that structure and application are costing more marks than knowledge;
- you still have unreviewed mock answers;
- you have not consolidated the case facts and client objectives.
In the final stage, prioritise:
- case fact maps;
- objective-to-recommendation tables;
- error-log review;
- short timed answer practice;
- high-yield technical summaries;
- sleep, logistics, and exam-day readiness.
Final-week rules
| Rule | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Use bullet points | Easier to structure and easier to mark |
| Link every point to the client | R06 is applied financial planning, not abstract theory |
| Balance recommendations | Include risks, disadvantages, assumptions, and further information |
| Practise timing | Good knowledge can still fail if not delivered quickly |
| Review errors daily | Repeated missed points are the fastest marks to recover |
| Keep answers concise | Long narrative can hide valid points and waste time |
| Avoid brand-new deep topics late | Consolidation usually produces better returns |
Exam-readiness checks
You are likely ready if you can do most of the following without notes:
| Readiness check | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Explain each client’s main objectives and constraints | |
| Identify major pension, investment, protection, tax, and estate planning issues from the facts | |
| Write recommendations with client-specific reasons | |
| List advantages and disadvantages without becoming generic | |
| Identify further information needed before advice | |
| Complete a timed section without running badly over time | |
| Review a mock and explain why marks were lost | |
| Reattempt missed questions successfully after 48 hours | |
| Use concise bullet points under pressure | |
| Stop when a question is no longer worth the extra time |
If several answers are “No,” focus the remaining time on written drills and missed-question review rather than broad reading.
Practical next step
Choose the plan that matches your time remaining, then start with a diagnostic practice set or a timed short-answer drill. Build your fact map, keep an error log, and make every study session produce written answers you can review and improve.