CFA Institute CIPM Investment Performance Practice Test

Try 12 original Certificate in Investment Performance Measurement (CIPM) sample questions on performance measurement, attribution, appraisal, manager selection, reporting, and ethics, then use the Notify me form if this is the Finance Prep route you want next.

CFA Institute’s Certificate in Investment Performance Measurement (CIPM) is a specialized route for investment performance measurement, attribution, appraisal, manager selection, reporting, and ethics.

Use these 12 original sample questions for initial self-assessment. They are not official CFA Institute questions and do not reproduce a live exam; they are designed to preview performance-measurement, attribution, reporting, and ethics judgment before you choose whether this Finance Prep route is the one you want next.

What this route should test

  • calculating and interpreting investment performance measures
  • distinguishing attribution, appraisal, reporting, and manager-selection decisions
  • recognizing when performance presentation, benchmark choice, or disclosure creates a misleading result
  • applying professional standards to performance communication

Sample Exam Questions

Use these questions to test whether you can distinguish measurement, attribution, appraisal, reporting, and manager-selection decisions instead of treating all performance questions as return calculations.

Question 1

Topic: time-weighted return

Why is time-weighted return often used to evaluate an investment manager?

  • A. It always equals the client’s personal internal rate of return
  • B. It reduces the effect of external cash flows outside the manager’s control
  • C. It ignores all portfolio valuation changes
  • D. It measures only tax efficiency

Best answer: B

Explanation: Time-weighted return isolates manager performance by removing much of the effect of external cash flows. Money-weighted return is more sensitive to the timing and size of cash flows.


Question 2

Topic: money-weighted return

Which situation makes money-weighted return especially relevant?

  • A. The evaluator wants to ignore all investor cash flows
  • B. The manager has no control over the investment process
  • C. The portfolio has no beginning or ending value
  • D. The investor wants to understand the actual return earned on capital invested over time

Best answer: D

Explanation: Money-weighted return reflects the timing and size of investor cash flows. It can be useful for assessing the investor’s realized experience, especially when cash-flow decisions are part of the evaluation.


Question 3

Topic: attribution

A portfolio outperforms because it held more of a sector that outperformed the benchmark. What is this most likely called in a basic attribution framework?

  • A. Allocation effect
  • B. Currency translation only
  • C. Custody reconciliation
  • D. Fee compression

Best answer: A

Explanation: Allocation effect measures the impact of overweighting or underweighting segments relative to the benchmark. Security selection measures performance within a segment.


Question 4

Topic: selection effect

A manager has the same sector weights as the benchmark but chooses stronger-performing stocks within each sector. What attribution effect is most directly indicated?

  • A. Allocation effect only
  • B. Benchmark timing error
  • C. Selection effect
  • D. Settlement effect

Best answer: C

Explanation: Selection effect captures the manager’s success in choosing securities within benchmark segments. If sector weights match the benchmark, allocation effect may be small while selection effect drives excess return.


Question 5

Topic: benchmark quality

A small-cap manager compares performance against a broad large-cap index. What is the main problem?

  • A. The manager should never use benchmarks
  • B. A broad large-cap index always understates return
  • C. Benchmark choice affects only marketing, not analysis
  • D. The benchmark may not represent the manager’s mandate, risk, or opportunity set

Best answer: D

Explanation: A valid benchmark should be appropriate, investable, measurable, unambiguous, and reflective of the mandate. A mismatched benchmark can make performance evaluation misleading.


Question 6

Topic: appraisal ratio

What does an appraisal ratio most directly relate to?

  • A. Total return divided by total assets
  • B. Active return relative to active risk
  • C. Coupon income divided by par value
  • D. Trading volume divided by shares outstanding

Best answer: B

Explanation: The appraisal ratio evaluates active return per unit of active risk. It is useful when assessing manager skill relative to benchmark-relative risk.


Question 7

Topic: performance presentation

A firm presents only the best-performing account from a strategy and omits similar accounts with weaker results. What is the main concern?

  • A. The presentation may be misleading because it is not representative
  • B. The presentation is automatically acceptable if the chosen account is real
  • C. Account selection has no effect on performance communication
  • D. The weakest account should always be shown alone

Best answer: A

Explanation: Selective presentation can mislead users by overstating the strategy’s performance. Fair performance reporting should be representative and adequately disclosed.


Question 8

Topic: risk-adjusted performance

A portfolio has the highest return among peers but also much higher volatility and drawdown. What should the analyst evaluate?

  • A. Return only, because risk is irrelevant after performance is known
  • B. The number of holdings only
  • C. Risk-adjusted performance and whether the return compensated for the risk taken
  • D. The manager’s marketing budget

Best answer: C

Explanation: CIPM-style performance work should connect return to risk. Higher return can be attractive, but evaluation should consider volatility, drawdown, tracking error, and mandate consistency.


Question 9

Topic: manager selection

During manager due diligence, a strategy shows strong backtested performance but no live track record. What is the best response?

  • A. Treat the backtest as equivalent to live results
  • B. Ignore methodology and focus only on the final number
  • C. Reject every strategy with a backtest automatically
  • D. Review assumptions, survivorship bias, transaction costs, capacity, and whether results are robust

Best answer: D

Explanation: Backtests can be useful but can also overstate results if assumptions are unrealistic. Due diligence should challenge methodology, costs, data quality, capacity, and robustness.


Question 10

Topic: fee impact

Two managers report identical gross returns, but one charges materially higher fees. What should the evaluator compare for client outcomes?

  • A. Gross return only
  • B. Net-of-fee performance and whether the higher cost is justified
  • C. Office size
  • D. Number of employees only

Best answer: B

Explanation: Clients experience net performance after fees. Gross returns can help evaluate investment skill, but net-of-fee results are critical for client outcomes.


Question 11

Topic: composite construction

Why should similar discretionary portfolios be grouped into an appropriate composite?

  • A. To present a more representative record for a strategy
  • B. To hide underperforming accounts
  • C. To avoid documenting the investment process
  • D. To make benchmark selection unnecessary

Best answer: A

Explanation: Composite construction helps present performance for a defined strategy rather than cherry-picking accounts. The composite should be defined and maintained consistently.


Question 12

Topic: ethics and disclosure

A performance report changes benchmark methodology but does not tell clients. Why is that a problem?

  • A. Benchmark changes are always prohibited
  • B. Clients do not need benchmark information
  • C. Undisclosed methodology changes can make performance comparisons misleading
  • D. Benchmark methodology affects only custody fees

Best answer: C

Explanation: Benchmark and methodology changes can affect reported relative performance. Clear disclosure helps users understand comparability and prevents misleading conclusions.

CIPM quick checklist

  • Can you explain when time-weighted return and money-weighted return answer different questions?
  • Can you separate allocation, selection, benchmark, and risk-adjusted performance issues?
  • Can you identify when a performance presentation is technically true but still misleading?
Revised on Monday, May 18, 2026