ASIC Financial Adviser Exam Quick Review
Review the ASIC Financial Adviser Exam format, three competency areas, scenario method, high-value distinctions, and final preparation sequence.
Know the current exam frame
| Item | Current ASIC policy |
|---|---|
| Questions | At least 70 selected-response questions |
| Coverage | Equal split across three competency areas |
| Duration | 3.5 hours, including 15 minutes of reading time |
| Scoring | Credit-level pass or fail; no fixed public pass percentage |
| Wrong answers | No negative marking |
| Delivery | Remote proctoring under the current policy |
| Reference material | Relevant statutory content is supplied as part of applicable questions |
The exam is not a general open-book research exercise. Use supplied statutory extracts with the scenario facts and the task being asked.
Use six checks for every scenario
- Classify the actor. Relevant provider, provisional relevant provider, AFS licensee, authorised representative, supervisor, client, product issuer, or another party?
- Classify the activity. Factual information, general advice, personal advice, dealing, arranging, implementation, marketing, supervision, or review?
- Identify the governing layer. Corporations Act, another statute, ASIC guidance, Code of Ethics, or advice-process judgment?
- Locate the process stage. Scoping, fact finding, strategy, disclosure, consent, implementation, monitoring, complaint handling, or remediation?
- Find the decisive evidence. What fact, document, authority, timing condition, client constraint, or conflict changes the answer?
- Choose the proportionate response. Select the action that resolves the stated issue without inventing facts or jumping to a later step.
High-value distinctions
- Factual information versus general advice versus personal advice
- Retail versus wholesale client status
- Individual adviser duties versus AFS licensee responsibilities
- Legal minimum compliance versus the higher ethical obligation in the facts
- Disclosure of a conflict versus avoidance, control, or client-priority action
- Client preference versus informed consent and suitable advice
- Risk tolerance versus risk capacity, goals, liquidity, and time horizon
- A behavioural bias observed in the client versus an assumption made by the adviser
- Advice scope agreed with the client versus relevant issues that cannot be ignored
- A documented process versus evidence that the required judgment was actually exercised
Final preparation sequence
- Complete one unseen mixed set without notes.
- Classify every miss by actor, obligation, process stage, and decisive evidence.
- Drill the weakest competency area with new questions.
- Recheck volatile rules and dates through the official resources .
- Complete the free practice diagnostic under the 3.5-hour limit.
- Review reasoning, not answer letters, before another unseen timed set.