AIC Adjuster Level 2 Licensing Readiness Review Cheat Sheet

Cheat sheet: AIC Adjuster Level 2 reference for licence facts, supervision boundaries, issue classification, file notes, evidence, property, automobile, liability, settlement, recovery, and escalation.

Use the tables for a quick pre-exam check. Expand a topic’s notes for explanations, examples, and additional distinctions.

Official route at a glance

Verify current details with AIC before applying.

Route factQuick reference
Official statusAdjuster Level 2 is an AIC licence class, not a separately published Level 2 exam.
Alberta resident pathwayIncludes the required Level 1 basis, at least 24 consecutive months of claims-adjusting experience, and required Insurance Institute coursework.
Application supportIncludes licensed Designated Representative recommendation and current application documentation.
E&OThe business E&O policy must meet the current AIC requirements and cover applicable certificate holders.
SupervisionOngoing direct supervision by Adjuster Level 3 is required.
ReportsLevel 2 claim-adjustment reports require Level 3 approval and countersignature under the current AIC description.

Classify before acting

IssueCore questionEvidence often needed
CoverageHow does the complete policy respond to the established facts?Declarations, wording, endorsements, cause, date, notice, use, occupancy, conditions
LiabilityWho may be legally responsible based on investigated facts?Statements, witnesses, scene facts, contracts, reports, expert evidence
ValuationWhat is the supportable value of covered property or damage?Estimate, scope, age, condition, invoices, proof of ownership, depreciation, betterment
Bodily injury damagesWhat loss is documented and causally connected?Consent, medical records, treatment, income records, prognosis, activity evidence
AuthorityWho may investigate, recommend, approve, pay, settle, deny, or communicate the position?Assignment, insurer instructions, authority limits, Level 3 review
RecoveryIs another party, policy, salvage asset, or repayment source involved?Cause evidence, contracts, ownership, notices, preserved property, limitation diary
Conduct or serviceIs the file fair, accurate, timely, confidential, and properly supervised?Contact history, complaint details, consent, notes, instructions, correction record

Keep these pairs separate

Do not combine…Because…
Coverage and valuationA loss can be measurable before coverage is determined.
Coverage and liabilityA policy may respond to allegations before liability is established.
Evidence and conclusionA red flag or allegation starts investigation; it does not finish it.
Reserve awareness and payment authorityA changed exposure may justify reserve review without authorizing payment.
Negotiation support and settlement approvalPreparing rationale is not the same as approving terms or issuing funds.
Process explanation and legal adviceAn adjuster can explain claim steps without advising a party on legal rights.
Mitigation and permanent repairEmergency work may proceed while scope, coverage, and final repair remain under review.
Salvage and subrogationSalvage concerns residual property value; subrogation pursues a responsible third party after payment rights arise.

Review-ready file note

Use this order:

  1. Source and time: Who supplied the information, how, and when?
  2. Material fact: What happened, and what is observed rather than assumed?
  3. Issue: Which coverage, liability, value, privacy, authority, or recovery question remains?
  4. Evidence: What supports the current view, and what is missing or conflicting?
  5. Action: What was requested, preserved, communicated, or completed?
  6. Authority: Who instructed, approved, or must review the action?
  7. Follow-up: What is the diary date, owner, and next decision?

Never silently overwrite a material mistake. Correct it transparently so the chronology and reason for correction remain reviewable.

Property and commercial loss checks

  • Identify building, contents, stock, equipment, tenant improvements, additional living expense, business income, and extra expense separately.
  • Establish cause, origin, duration, extent, occupancy, use, ownership, and prior damage.
  • Separate emergency mitigation from permanent repair.
  • Reconcile photographs, inspection, estimates, invoices, and expert opinions.
  • Identify upgrades, unrelated work, depreciation, betterment, deductible, limits, and proof issues.
  • Preserve damaged items and cause evidence before repair, disposal, demolition, or salvage action.
  • Consider contractor, tenant, manufacturer, neighbour, utility, or other recovery targets.

Automobile and transportation checks

  • Confirm vehicle, owner, driver, permission, use, location, policy, endorsement, and other insurance.
  • Separate physical damage, liability, accident benefits, bodily injury, uninsured automobile, and recovery issues.
  • Compare statements, police information, witness evidence, scene facts, and damage patterns.
  • Check repair scope, prior damage, actual cash value, betterment, deductible, lienholder, storage, salvage, and release.
  • Avoid admission, final repair commitment, or settlement promise without authority and evidence.

Liability and bodily injury checks

  • Identify allegation, duty, breach, causation, damage, occurrence, insured status, and policy issue.
  • Preserve scene, witness, contract, product, premises, and expert evidence.
  • Obtain medical or employment information only with proper purpose and authority.
  • Distinguish treatment evidence, causation, pre-existing conditions, income loss, and future loss.
  • Confirm coverage, liability, damages, authority, release, lien, contribution, and recovery before supporting settlement.

Immediate escalation cues

Escalate while continuing permitted urgent work when the file involves:

  • serious injury, fatality, major loss, vulnerable parties, or catastrophe volume;
  • uncertain or disputed coverage that may lead to reservation or denial;
  • litigation, represented parties, limitation concerns, or legal interpretation;
  • suspected fraud, payment diversion, invoice manipulation, or duplicate payment;
  • privacy breach, conflict, complaint, inaccurate communication, or potential E&O exposure;
  • authority beyond Level 2, unclear supervision, or a missing approval/countersignature control;
  • expert, engineering, medical, accounting, environmental, or specialist evidence;
  • settlement, release, recovery, or disposal steps that could prejudice rights.

One-line answer test

Before choosing an option, complete this sentence:

Because [decisive fact] leaves [issue] unresolved, the Level 2 adjuster should [permitted next action], document [evidence and instruction], and obtain [required review or approval].

If the sentence cannot be completed from the facts, the answer probably assumes too much.

What this review is for

Use this page before mixed AIC Adjuster Level 2 practice when you need to refresh the decisions behind the questions. It is an independent Finance Prep review of licensing readiness and supervised claims work.

AIC presents Adjuster Level 2 as a licence class, not as a separate Level 2 exam. The official route and this practice bank solve different problems: AIC defines qualification and supervision requirements; Finance Prep lets you practise applying claims concepts without implying that you hold authority you do not have.

Official Level 2 facts to keep separate

Verify the current requirements with AIC. The current official Adjuster licence page identifies these elements for the Level 2 route:

ElementReview pointCommon mistake
Prior statusAlberta residents need the required Level 1 status or qualifying proof described by AIC.Treating work experience alone as enough.
ExperienceThe route includes at least 24 consecutive months of claims-adjusting experience.Confusing elapsed employment time with qualifying adjusting experience.
CourseworkThe route includes six Insurance Institute courses, with an approved claims course among them, or accepted equivalents.Assuming any six insurance courses automatically qualify.
Firm recommendationThe licensed Designated Representative recommends the applicant.Treating a supervisor’s informal approval as the application decision.
Application controlsCurrent criminal-check and qualifying business E&O requirements apply as described by AIC.Treating technical competence as a substitute for application documents.
SupervisionLevel 2 work remains under ongoing direct Level 3 supervision, with reports approved and countersigned by Level 3.Treating Level 2 as independent final authority.
Notes and examples

Qualification is not the same as claim authority. A fact pattern can show that a person is ready to apply while still showing that the person cannot independently approve a disputed coverage position, commit the insurer, admit liability, or finalize settlement.

The Level 2 claims model

For most scenarios, work through five questions in order:

  1. Authority: What is the Level 2 adjuster allowed to investigate, document, recommend, or communicate, and what requires Level 3 or insurer direction?
  2. Issue: Is the unresolved question about coverage, liability, damages, valuation, evidence, privacy, payment, recovery, or conduct?
  3. Evidence: What fact or document would make the recommendation supportable?
  4. Action: What is the best next step that preserves the claim, the insurer’s position, and the claimant’s fair treatment?
  5. Record: What must the file note show, and who must review or approve the result?

The strongest answer usually advances the file without pretending uncertainty has disappeared.

High-yield practice map

Practice areaKnow how to…Avoid…
Licensing, supervision, and conductSeparate application eligibility, Level 2 work, Level 3 approval, and Designated Representative firm control.Letting confidence or experience substitute for documented authority.
Claim intake, coverage, and evidenceCapture the loss facts, obtain the policy and endorsements, identify uncertainty, plan evidence, diary follow-up, and document the recommendation.Jumping from a suspicious or incomplete fact to denial, payment, or accusation.
Property and commercial lossesSeparate cause, covered property, damage scope, valuation, mitigation, business-income evidence, salvage, and subrogation.Treating a contractor estimate as proof of cause, coverage, and settlement value all at once.
Automobile and transportationSeparate vehicle and driver facts, permission and use, physical damage, liability, injury, policy coordination, salvage, and recovery.Admitting fault or authorizing a final outcome before conflicting evidence is resolved.
Liability, injury, settlement, and recoveryIdentify duty, breach, causation, damages, privacy, authority, release, lien, contribution, and recovery issues.Treating an allegation as established liability or a demand as documented quantum.
Regulatory and advanced contextKeep roles clear, record supervision, respond to complaints, protect vulnerable parties, and triage catastrophe files without losing controls.Using urgency as a reason to skip evidence, privacy, payment verification, or escalation.

Five distinctions that control many answers

Coverage is not valuation

Coverage asks whether and how policy wording responds. Valuation asks how much a covered loss is worth. A repair estimate can help measure damage without deciding whether the damage is covered.

Liability is not coverage

A claimant may allege that the insured is responsible, but liability still requires factual investigation. The policy response is a related but separate question.

A red flag is not proof

Inconsistent timing, unusual invoices, or conflicting statements justify objective investigation and escalation. They do not justify an unsupported accusation or automatic denial.

A recommendation is not approval

A Level 2 adjuster can develop and document a recommendation. Final coverage, payment, settlement, or report authority may remain with Level 3, the insurer, or another authorized decision-maker.

A file note is not a conclusion label

Good notes show source, date, fact, unresolved issue, action, authority, instruction, and follow-up. Labels such as “fraud,” “liable,” or “covered” are weak when the evidence and reasoning are missing.

Last-pass file checklist

Before selecting a final answer, ask:

  • Is the policy, claimant, insured, vehicle, property, or business correctly identified?
  • Is the decisive fact known, missing, or disputed?
  • Does the proposed action preserve evidence and recovery rights?
  • Does it protect confidential or medical information?
  • Is the communication factual without promising coverage, payment, or liability?
  • Is the action within Level 2 authority?
  • Does the file need Level 3 approval, countersignature, insurer instruction, legal input, or specialist evidence?
  • Is there a clear diary date and next step?

Finance Prep’s 810-question bank is most useful when every miss becomes a corrected decision rule. Drill the weak area, explain the closest distractor, and then test the same judgment in an unseen mixed scenario.

Put the review into practice