AIC Adjuster Level 2 Licensing Readiness Review Cheat Sheet
Cheat sheet: AIC Adjuster Level 2 reference for licence facts, supervision boundaries, issue classification, file notes, evidence, property, automobile, liability, settlement, recovery, and escalation.
Use the tables for a quick pre-exam check. Expand a topic’s notes for explanations, examples, and additional distinctions.
Official route at a glance
Verify current details with AIC before applying.
| Route fact | Quick reference |
|---|---|
| Official status | Adjuster Level 2 is an AIC licence class, not a separately published Level 2 exam. |
| Alberta resident pathway | Includes the required Level 1 basis, at least 24 consecutive months of claims-adjusting experience, and required Insurance Institute coursework. |
| Application support | Includes licensed Designated Representative recommendation and current application documentation. |
| E&O | The business E&O policy must meet the current AIC requirements and cover applicable certificate holders. |
| Supervision | Ongoing direct supervision by Adjuster Level 3 is required. |
| Reports | Level 2 claim-adjustment reports require Level 3 approval and countersignature under the current AIC description. |
Classify before acting
| Issue | Core question | Evidence often needed |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage | How does the complete policy respond to the established facts? | Declarations, wording, endorsements, cause, date, notice, use, occupancy, conditions |
| Liability | Who may be legally responsible based on investigated facts? | Statements, witnesses, scene facts, contracts, reports, expert evidence |
| Valuation | What is the supportable value of covered property or damage? | Estimate, scope, age, condition, invoices, proof of ownership, depreciation, betterment |
| Bodily injury damages | What loss is documented and causally connected? | Consent, medical records, treatment, income records, prognosis, activity evidence |
| Authority | Who may investigate, recommend, approve, pay, settle, deny, or communicate the position? | Assignment, insurer instructions, authority limits, Level 3 review |
| Recovery | Is another party, policy, salvage asset, or repayment source involved? | Cause evidence, contracts, ownership, notices, preserved property, limitation diary |
| Conduct or service | Is the file fair, accurate, timely, confidential, and properly supervised? | Contact history, complaint details, consent, notes, instructions, correction record |
Keep these pairs separate
| Do not combine… | Because… |
|---|---|
| Coverage and valuation | A loss can be measurable before coverage is determined. |
| Coverage and liability | A policy may respond to allegations before liability is established. |
| Evidence and conclusion | A red flag or allegation starts investigation; it does not finish it. |
| Reserve awareness and payment authority | A changed exposure may justify reserve review without authorizing payment. |
| Negotiation support and settlement approval | Preparing rationale is not the same as approving terms or issuing funds. |
| Process explanation and legal advice | An adjuster can explain claim steps without advising a party on legal rights. |
| Mitigation and permanent repair | Emergency work may proceed while scope, coverage, and final repair remain under review. |
| Salvage and subrogation | Salvage concerns residual property value; subrogation pursues a responsible third party after payment rights arise. |
Review-ready file note
Use this order:
- Source and time: Who supplied the information, how, and when?
- Material fact: What happened, and what is observed rather than assumed?
- Issue: Which coverage, liability, value, privacy, authority, or recovery question remains?
- Evidence: What supports the current view, and what is missing or conflicting?
- Action: What was requested, preserved, communicated, or completed?
- Authority: Who instructed, approved, or must review the action?
- Follow-up: What is the diary date, owner, and next decision?
Never silently overwrite a material mistake. Correct it transparently so the chronology and reason for correction remain reviewable.
Property and commercial loss checks
- Identify building, contents, stock, equipment, tenant improvements, additional living expense, business income, and extra expense separately.
- Establish cause, origin, duration, extent, occupancy, use, ownership, and prior damage.
- Separate emergency mitigation from permanent repair.
- Reconcile photographs, inspection, estimates, invoices, and expert opinions.
- Identify upgrades, unrelated work, depreciation, betterment, deductible, limits, and proof issues.
- Preserve damaged items and cause evidence before repair, disposal, demolition, or salvage action.
- Consider contractor, tenant, manufacturer, neighbour, utility, or other recovery targets.
Automobile and transportation checks
- Confirm vehicle, owner, driver, permission, use, location, policy, endorsement, and other insurance.
- Separate physical damage, liability, accident benefits, bodily injury, uninsured automobile, and recovery issues.
- Compare statements, police information, witness evidence, scene facts, and damage patterns.
- Check repair scope, prior damage, actual cash value, betterment, deductible, lienholder, storage, salvage, and release.
- Avoid admission, final repair commitment, or settlement promise without authority and evidence.
Liability and bodily injury checks
- Identify allegation, duty, breach, causation, damage, occurrence, insured status, and policy issue.
- Preserve scene, witness, contract, product, premises, and expert evidence.
- Obtain medical or employment information only with proper purpose and authority.
- Distinguish treatment evidence, causation, pre-existing conditions, income loss, and future loss.
- Confirm coverage, liability, damages, authority, release, lien, contribution, and recovery before supporting settlement.
Immediate escalation cues
Escalate while continuing permitted urgent work when the file involves:
- serious injury, fatality, major loss, vulnerable parties, or catastrophe volume;
- uncertain or disputed coverage that may lead to reservation or denial;
- litigation, represented parties, limitation concerns, or legal interpretation;
- suspected fraud, payment diversion, invoice manipulation, or duplicate payment;
- privacy breach, conflict, complaint, inaccurate communication, or potential E&O exposure;
- authority beyond Level 2, unclear supervision, or a missing approval/countersignature control;
- expert, engineering, medical, accounting, environmental, or specialist evidence;
- settlement, release, recovery, or disposal steps that could prejudice rights.
One-line answer test
Before choosing an option, complete this sentence:
Because [decisive fact] leaves [issue] unresolved, the Level 2 adjuster should [permitted next action], document [evidence and instruction], and obtain [required review or approval].
If the sentence cannot be completed from the facts, the answer probably assumes too much.
What this review is for
Use this page before mixed AIC Adjuster Level 2 practice when you need to refresh the decisions behind the questions. It is an independent Finance Prep review of licensing readiness and supervised claims work.
AIC presents Adjuster Level 2 as a licence class, not as a separate Level 2 exam. The official route and this practice bank solve different problems: AIC defines qualification and supervision requirements; Finance Prep lets you practise applying claims concepts without implying that you hold authority you do not have.
Official Level 2 facts to keep separate
Verify the current requirements with AIC. The current official Adjuster licence page identifies these elements for the Level 2 route:
| Element | Review point | Common mistake |
|---|---|---|
| Prior status | Alberta residents need the required Level 1 status or qualifying proof described by AIC. | Treating work experience alone as enough. |
| Experience | The route includes at least 24 consecutive months of claims-adjusting experience. | Confusing elapsed employment time with qualifying adjusting experience. |
| Coursework | The route includes six Insurance Institute courses, with an approved claims course among them, or accepted equivalents. | Assuming any six insurance courses automatically qualify. |
| Firm recommendation | The licensed Designated Representative recommends the applicant. | Treating a supervisor’s informal approval as the application decision. |
| Application controls | Current criminal-check and qualifying business E&O requirements apply as described by AIC. | Treating technical competence as a substitute for application documents. |
| Supervision | Level 2 work remains under ongoing direct Level 3 supervision, with reports approved and countersigned by Level 3. | Treating Level 2 as independent final authority. |
Notes and examples
Qualification is not the same as claim authority. A fact pattern can show that a person is ready to apply while still showing that the person cannot independently approve a disputed coverage position, commit the insurer, admit liability, or finalize settlement.
The Level 2 claims model
For most scenarios, work through five questions in order:
- Authority: What is the Level 2 adjuster allowed to investigate, document, recommend, or communicate, and what requires Level 3 or insurer direction?
- Issue: Is the unresolved question about coverage, liability, damages, valuation, evidence, privacy, payment, recovery, or conduct?
- Evidence: What fact or document would make the recommendation supportable?
- Action: What is the best next step that preserves the claim, the insurer’s position, and the claimant’s fair treatment?
- Record: What must the file note show, and who must review or approve the result?
The strongest answer usually advances the file without pretending uncertainty has disappeared.
High-yield practice map
| Practice area | Know how to… | Avoid… |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing, supervision, and conduct | Separate application eligibility, Level 2 work, Level 3 approval, and Designated Representative firm control. | Letting confidence or experience substitute for documented authority. |
| Claim intake, coverage, and evidence | Capture the loss facts, obtain the policy and endorsements, identify uncertainty, plan evidence, diary follow-up, and document the recommendation. | Jumping from a suspicious or incomplete fact to denial, payment, or accusation. |
| Property and commercial losses | Separate cause, covered property, damage scope, valuation, mitigation, business-income evidence, salvage, and subrogation. | Treating a contractor estimate as proof of cause, coverage, and settlement value all at once. |
| Automobile and transportation | Separate vehicle and driver facts, permission and use, physical damage, liability, injury, policy coordination, salvage, and recovery. | Admitting fault or authorizing a final outcome before conflicting evidence is resolved. |
| Liability, injury, settlement, and recovery | Identify duty, breach, causation, damages, privacy, authority, release, lien, contribution, and recovery issues. | Treating an allegation as established liability or a demand as documented quantum. |
| Regulatory and advanced context | Keep roles clear, record supervision, respond to complaints, protect vulnerable parties, and triage catastrophe files without losing controls. | Using urgency as a reason to skip evidence, privacy, payment verification, or escalation. |
Five distinctions that control many answers
Coverage is not valuation
Coverage asks whether and how policy wording responds. Valuation asks how much a covered loss is worth. A repair estimate can help measure damage without deciding whether the damage is covered.
Liability is not coverage
A claimant may allege that the insured is responsible, but liability still requires factual investigation. The policy response is a related but separate question.
A red flag is not proof
Inconsistent timing, unusual invoices, or conflicting statements justify objective investigation and escalation. They do not justify an unsupported accusation or automatic denial.
A recommendation is not approval
A Level 2 adjuster can develop and document a recommendation. Final coverage, payment, settlement, or report authority may remain with Level 3, the insurer, or another authorized decision-maker.
A file note is not a conclusion label
Good notes show source, date, fact, unresolved issue, action, authority, instruction, and follow-up. Labels such as “fraud,” “liable,” or “covered” are weak when the evidence and reasoning are missing.
Last-pass file checklist
Before selecting a final answer, ask:
- Is the policy, claimant, insured, vehicle, property, or business correctly identified?
- Is the decisive fact known, missing, or disputed?
- Does the proposed action preserve evidence and recovery rights?
- Does it protect confidential or medical information?
- Is the communication factual without promising coverage, payment, or liability?
- Is the action within Level 2 authority?
- Does the file need Level 3 approval, countersignature, insurer instruction, legal input, or specialist evidence?
- Is there a clear diary date and next step?
Finance Prep’s 810-question bank is most useful when every miss becomes a corrected decision rule. Drill the weak area, explain the closest distractor, and then test the same judgment in an unseen mixed scenario.