Review a compact AACE Planning and Scheduling Professional (PSP) cheat sheet for schedule logic, critical path, float, updates, forecasting, recovery, and memo traps before PM Mastery practice.
Use this AACE PSP cheat sheet to review the scheduling decisions that tend to separate a defensible schedule-control answer from a tool-clicking answer. Keep the focus on logic quality, update evidence, critical-path movement, recovery options, and clear stakeholder communication.
| Item | PSP cue |
|---|---|
| Provider | AACE International |
| Exam | Planning & Scheduling Professional (PSP) |
| Format focus | multiple-choice scheduling scenarios plus a communication memo component |
| Practice behavior | identify the schedule logic, update evidence, forecast impact, recovery option, and communication point |
| PM Mastery status | live practice available |
| Area | What to know | Common trap |
|---|---|---|
| Schedule basis | scope, WBS, activity definition, assumptions, calendars, constraints, and resources | accepting a date forecast before checking the model assumptions |
| Logic quality | dependencies, leads/lags, open ends, constraints, out-of-sequence progress, and path continuity | treating software output as reliable without reviewing logic |
| Critical path and float | current driving path, total float, near-critical work, and key milestones | assuming the original baseline critical path is still the current driver |
| Updates and progress | status date, actual starts/finishes, remaining duration, percent complete, and revised logic | mixing progress reporting with forecasting without checking data quality |
| Forecasting and recovery | delay drivers, mitigation, resequencing, crashing, fast tracking, resource changes, and risk | forcing a finish date without a credible recovery action |
| Communication memo | cause, impact, evidence, assumption, risk, recommendation, and confidence level | writing a status narrative that hides uncertainty or skips the control action |
After each PSP diagnostic or topic set, classify misses by failure type: schedule model quality, critical-path reasoning, update data, float interpretation, recovery choice, or communication. If calculation items improve but memo-style reasoning stays weak, spend more time translating schedule evidence into a concise management recommendation.